Reports of Cases

published in the electronic Reports of Cases (Court Reports - general)

Subject-matter

Information not available

Systematic classification scheme

Citations of case-law or legislation

References in grounds of judgment

• TFEU, Article 78 -P1 : paragraph 42
• Justice and Home Affairs (JHA) - 32002F0475 : paragraphs 52, 54
• Justice and Home Affairs (JHA) - 32002F0475 -A01 : paragraphs 22, 39, 51
• Justice and Home Affairs (JHA) - 32002F0475 -A01P1 : paragraphs 18, 39, 40, 49, 53, 54, 77
• Justice and Home Affairs (JHA) - 32002F0475 -A02 : paragraphs 19, 22, 40, 51, 63
• Justice and Home Affairs (JHA) - 32002F0475 -A02P2LB : paragraph 63
• Justice and Home Affairs (JHA) - 32002F0475 -A03 : paragraphs 20, 22, 51
• Justice and Home Affairs (JHA) - 32002F0475 -A03P1 : paragraph 21
• Justice and Home Affairs (JHA) - 32002F0475 -A03P2 : paragraph 21
• Justice and Home Affairs (JHA) - 32002F0475 -A04 : paragraphs 20, 22, 51
• Justice and Home Affairs (JHA) - 32002F0475 -C6 : paragraphs 17, 50
• Directive 2004/83 : paragraph 42
• Directive 2004/83 -A12 : paragraph 17
• Directive 2004/83 -A12P2 : paragraph 16
• Directive 2004/83 -A12P2LC : paragraphs 1, 39, 40, 43 - 45, 48, 52 - 54, 58 - 60, 62, 69, 70, 72, 73, 79
• Directive 2004/83 -A12P3 : paragraphs 1, 16, 39, 59, 60, 62, 70, 73, 77, 79
• Directive 2004/83 -C16 : paragraphs 15, 41
• Directive 2004/83 -C17 : paragraphs 15, 41
• Directive 2004/83 -C22 : paragraphs 15, 45
• Directive 2004/83 -C3 : paragraphs 14, 41
• Justice and Home Affairs (JHA) - 32008F0919 : paragraphs 21, 22, 23
• Justice and Home Affairs (JHA) - 32008F0919 -C10 : paragraph 20
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -57/09 -N78 : paragraph 42
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -57/09 -N87 : paragraph 72
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -57/09 -N94 : paragraph 72
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -148/13 -N45 : paragraph 41
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -148/13 -N46 : paragraph 42
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -397/14 -N37 : paragraph 56
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -182/15 -N20 : paragraph 56
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -231/15 -N16 : paragraph 56

Operative part

• Interprets : Justice and Home Affairs (JHA) - 32002F0475 -A01P1
• Interprets : Directive 2004/83 -A12P2LC
• Interprets : Directive 2004/83 -A12P3

Opinion

• EC Treaty (Amsterdam), Article 61 : point 55
  
• TFEU - Protocol No 36 -A10P4 : point 1
  
• TFEU, Article 67 : point 55
  
• TFEU, Article 78 : point 55
  
• TFEU, Article 78 -P1 : points 11, 31
  
• TFEU, Article 82 : point 55
  
• TEU, Article 2 : points 10, 55, 77
  
• TEU, Article 3 -P5 : points 10, 77
  
• TEU, Article 29 : point 55
  
• TEU, Article 31 -P1LE : point 55
  
• TEU, Article 34 -P2LB : point 55
  
• TEU, Article 47 : points 66, 77
  
• Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU (2007), Article 4 : point 34
  
• Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU (2007), Article 18 : points 12, 16, 32
  
• Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU (2007), Article 19 -P2 : points 13, 34
  
• Common Foreign and Security Policy 2001/931 : point 39
  
• Justice and Home Affairs (JHA) - 32002F0475 : points 1, 14, 38, 53, 55, 57
  
• Justice and Home Affairs (JHA) - 32002F0475 -A01 : points 1, 14, 29, 53, 68, 76, 89 - 92, 96
  
• Justice and Home Affairs (JHA) - 32002F0475 -A01P1 : points 29, 45, 51, 54, 56, 58, 59, 96
  
• Justice and Home Affairs (JHA) - 32002F0475 -A02 : points 29, 68, 76, 90, 91
  
• Justice and Home Affairs (JHA) - 32002F0475 -A02P1 : point 37
  
• Justice and Home Affairs (JHA) - 32002F0475 -A02P2 : points 56, 59
  
• Justice and Home Affairs (JHA) - 32002F0475 -A02P2LA : point 15
  
• Justice and Home Affairs (JHA) - 32002F0475 -A02P2LB : points 15, 68
  
• Justice and Home Affairs (JHA) - 32002F0475 -A03 : point 68
  
• Justice and Home Affairs (JHA) - 32002F0475 -A03LC : point 37
  
• Justice and Home Affairs (JHA) - 32002F0475 -A04 : point 68
  
• Directive 2004/83 : points 1, 31, 32, 38, 53, 55
  
• Directive 2004/83 -A02 : point 96
  
• Directive 2004/83 -A02LC : points 18, 33, 80
  
• Directive 2004/83 -A04 : points 77, 80
  
• Directive 2004/83 -A04P3 : points 19, 57
  
• Directive 2004/83 -A09P2LE : points 81, 82
  
• Directive 2004/83 -A12 : point 33
  
• Directive 2004/83 -A12P2 : points 20, 33, 34, 39, 60, 68, 70, 74 - 76, 78, 80, 82, 93 - 96
  
• Directive 2004/83 -A12P2LA : point 82
  
• Directive 2004/83 -A12P2LB : points 40, 68
  
• Directive 2004/83 -A12P2LC : points 29, 38, 40, 45, 46, 48, 50, 51, 53, 54, 56, 58, 60, 64, 67, 68, 71, 72, 75, 77, 81, 83, 85, 89, 91, 96
  
• Directive 2004/83 -A12P3 : points 20, 29, 60, 68, 70 - 73, 81, 85, 89 - 91, 96
  
• Directive 2004/83 -A21 : point 34
  
• Directive 2004/83 -A21P2 : point 21
  
• Directive 2004/83 -A24P1 : point 85
  
• Directive 2004/83 -C10 : point 16
  
• Directive 2004/83 -C15 : points 16, 31
  
• Directive 2004/83 -C16 : points 16, 57
  
• Directive 2004/83 -C17 : points 16, 57
  
• Directive 2004/83 -C22 : points 17, 31, 41, 71
  
• Directive 2004/83 -C3 : points 16, 54
  
• Directive 2004/83 -C6 : point 16
  
• Directive 2011/95 : point 1
  
• Directive 2011/95 -A12P3 : point 60
  
• Directive 2013/32 : point 19
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -402/05 -N283 : point 32
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -175/08 -N54 : point 32
  
• Court of Justice - Opinion C -57/09 : points 31, 33
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -57/09 : points 39, 42, 50, 68 - 70
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -57/09 -N57 : point 39
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -57/09 -N58 : point 39
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -57/09 -N59 : point 39
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -57/09 -N60 : point 39
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -57/09 -N77 : point 16
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -57/09 -N81 : point 41
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -57/09 -N82 : point 41
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -57/09 -N83 : points 41, 49
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -57/09 -N84 : point 50
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -57/09 -N89 : points 55, 69
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -57/09 -N90 : point 69
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -57/09 -N93 : points 55, 68
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -57/09 -N94 : point 74
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -57/09 -N97 : point 74
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -648/11 -N37 : point 63
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -373/13 -N85 : point 49
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -373/13 -N89 : point 70
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -373/13 -N90 : point 85
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -373/13 -N91 : points 73, 85
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -373/13 -N92 : point 85
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -373/13 -N93 : point 85
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -472/13 : points 81, 82
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -472/13 -N38 : point 82
  

Dates

Date of the lodging of the application initiating proceedings

• 11/12/2014

Date of the Opinion

• 31/05/2016

Date of the hearing

Information not available

Date of delivery

31/01/2017

References

Publication in the Official Journal

Judgment: OJ C 104 from 03.04.2017, p.12

Application: OJ C 46 from 09.02.2015, p.36

Name of the parties

Lounani

Notes on Academic Writings

1. Berlin, Dominique: Terrorisme et demande du statut de réfugié : quand le droit rejoint le bon sens, La Semaine Juridique - édition générale 2017 nº 7-8 p.312-313 (FR)
2. Lehofer, Hans Peter: Asylantrag kann abgelehnt werden, wenn Antragsteller an Aktivitäten einer terroristischen Vereinigung beteiligt war, Österreichische Juristenzeitung 2017 p.282-283 (DE)
3. Mariotti, C.: Status di rifugiato e partecipazione alle attività di un gruppo terroristico, Giurisprudenza italiana 2017 p.579 (IT)
4. Gazin, Fabienne: Terrorisme et statut de réfugié, Europe 2017 Mars nº 03 p.18-19 (FR)
5. Rodrigues, P.R.: Uitsluiting vanwege handelingen in strijd met doelstellingen en beginselen van Verenigde Naties mag plaatsvinden bij een strafrechtelijke veroordeling voor het, als leidinggevende, deelnemen aan een terroristische organisatie., Administratiefrechtelijke beslissingen ; Rechtspraak bestuursrecht 2017 nº 203 (NL)
6. Nigro, Raffaella: La sentenza della Corte di giustizia dell'Unione Europea nel caso Lounani e le controverse motivazioni giuridiche al fine di escludere lo status di rifugiato per presunti terroristi, Rivista di diritto internazionale 2017 p.565-575 (IT)
7. Chatelet, Pauline: Statut de réfugié et lutte contre le terrorisme, Revue des affaires européennes 2017 p.107-118 (FR)
8. Kosińska, Anna Magdalena: The Problem of Exclusion from Refugee Status on the Grounds of Being Guilty of Terrorist Acts in the CJEU Case-law, European Journal of Migration and Law 2017 Vol. 19 p.425–446 (EN)
9. Takis, Athanasios: Armenopoulos 2017 p.483-484 (EL)
10. Tzortzi, Virginia: Elliniki Epitheorisi Evropaïkou Dikaiou 2017 p.139-146 (EL)
11. Carlier, Jean-Yves ; Leboeuf, Luc: Droit européen des migrations, Journal de droit européen 2018 p.95-110 (FR)
12. Labayle, Henri: XIV. Espace de liberté, de sécurité et de justice - Cour de justice, gde ch., 31 janvier 2017, Commissariat général aux réfugiés c/ Lounani, aff. C-573/14, ECLI:EU:C:2017:71, Jurisprudence de la CJUE 2017. Décisions et commentaires (Ed. Bruylant - Bruxelles) 2018, p. 600-602 (FR)

Procedural Analysis Information

Source of the question referred for a preliminary ruling

Conseil d'État - Belgium

Subject-matter

• area of freedom, security and justice
  
• - asylum policy
  

Provisions of national law referred to

Information not available

Provisions of international law referred to

Charte des Nations unies (26/06/1945), articles 1 et 2

Procedure and result

• Reference for a preliminary ruling
  
• Reference for a preliminary ruling : case not proceeding to judgment
  

Formation of the Court

grande chambre (Cour)

Judge-Rapporteur

Rosas

Advocate General

Sharpston

Language(s) of the Case

• French
  

Language(s) of the Opinion

• English