Reports of Cases

published in the electronic Reports of Cases (Court Reports - general)

Subject-matter

Information not available

Systematic classification scheme

Citations of case-law or legislation

References in grounds of judgment

• Directive 95/46 : paragraphs 38, 42, 43, 46, 50, 56
• Directive 95/46 -A01 : paragraph 3
• Directive 95/46 -A02 : paragraph 4
• Directive 95/46 -A02LH : paragraphs 1, 24, 36, 37, 44, 51, 57, 58, 61, 64 - 66, 71
• Directive 95/46 -A07 : paragraphs 5, 53
• Directive 95/46 -A07LA : paragraph 54
• Directive 95/46 -A10 : paragraphs 6, 76 - 78
• Directive 95/46 -A10LC : paragraph 80
• Directive 95/46 -A94P1 : paragraph 39
• Directive 2002/58 : paragraph 42
• Directive 2002/58 -A01 : paragraph 8
• Directive 2002/58 -A02 : paragraph 9
• Directive 2002/58 -A02LF : paragraphs 1, 36, 37, 44, 50, 57, 63, 65, 66, 71
• Directive 2002/58 -A05P3 : paragraphs 1, 10, 36, 37, 44, 46, 49, 50, 56, 57, 63, 65, 66, 68, 71 - 73, 75, 76, 81
• Directive 2002/58 -C17 : paragraphs 7, 49, 50
• Directive 2002/58 -C24 : paragraphs 7, 70
• Directive 2009/136 : paragraph 56
• Regulation 679/2016 : paragraphs 38, 39, 41 - 43, 60
• Regulation 679/2016 -A04 : paragraph 12
• Regulation 679/2016 -A04PT11 : paragraphs 61, 63 - 66, 71
• Regulation 679/2016 -A06 : paragraph 13
• Regulation 679/2016 -A06P1LA : paragraphs 1, 36, 44, 61, 63, 65, 66, 71
• Regulation 679/2016 -A07P4 : paragraphs 14, 64
• Regulation 679/2016 -A13 : paragraph 76
• Regulation 679/2016 -A13P1 : paragraph 15
• Regulation 679/2016 -A13P1LE : paragraph 80
• Regulation 679/2016 -A13P2 : paragraph 15
• Regulation 679/2016 -A13P2LA : paragraph 79
• Regulation 679/2016 -A94 : paragraph 16
• Regulation 679/2016 -A94P2 : paragraph 42
• Regulation 679/2016 -C32 : paragraphs 11, 62
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -468/10 -N30 : paragraph 53
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -582/14 -N57 : paragraph 53
• Court of Justice - Opinion C -673/17 : paragraphs 52, 61, 69, 74
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -483/17 -N36 : paragraph 47
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -496/17 -N38 : paragraph 41
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -129/18 -N50 : paragraph 47
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -621/18 -N47 : paragraph 48

Operative part

• Interprets : Directive 2002/58 -A02LF
• Interprets : Directive 2002/58 -A05P3
• Interprets : Directive 95/46
• Interprets : Directive 95/46 -A02LH
• Interprets : Regulation 679/2016
• Interprets : Regulation 679/2016 -A04PT11
• Interprets : Regulation 679/2016 -A06P1LA

Opinion

• Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU (2007), Article 7 : point 52
  
• Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU (2007), Article 8 : point 52
  
• Directive 95/46 : points 3, 19, 34, 42, 44, 45, 47, 49, 50, 54, 59, 66, 76
  
• Directive 95/46 -A02 : point 4
  
• Directive 95/46 -A02LA : point 22
  
• Directive 95/46 -A02LH : points 23, 32, 56, 60, 70, 84, 85, 93, 100, 110, 122
  
• Directive 95/46 -A07LA : points 5, 17, 60, 81
  
• Directive 95/46 -A10 : points 6, 112
  
• Directive 95/46 -A11 : point 112
  
• Directive 95/46 -A29 : point 81
  
• Directive 2002/21 : point 8
  
• Directive 2002/58 : points 34, 42, 47, 50, 71, 78
  
• Directive 2002/58 -A02LF : points 8, 32, 56, 84, 93, 100, 110, 122
  
• Directive 2002/58 -A05P3 : points 9, 10, 21, 32, 51 - 53, 55, 56, 76, 77, 84, 93, 100, 101, 105, 107 - 111, 121, 122
  
• Directive 2002/58 -A05P3SNT2 : point 54
  
• Directive 2002/58 -C2 : point 52
  
• Directive 2002/58 -C17SNT2 : point 79
  
• Directive 2002/58 -C23 : point 117
  
• Directive 2002/58 -C24 : points 7, 108
  
• Directive 2002/58 -C25 : points 7, 108
  
• Directive 2002/58 -C26 : point 117
  
• Directive 2006/24 -A11 : point 42
  
• Directive 2009/136 : points 53, 54, 71, 78, 109
  
• Directive 2009/136 -C66 : points 10, 80
  
• Directive 2011/83 -A02 : point 113
  
• Regulation 679/2016 : points 3, 34, 41, 42, 44, 47 - 49, 68, 71, 73
  
• Regulation 679/2016 -A04PT1 : points 104, 107
  
• Regulation 679/2016 -A04PT11 : points 12, 69, 85, 93, 122
  
• Regulation 679/2016 -A06 : point 13
  
• Regulation 679/2016 -A06P1LA : points 32, 56
  
• Regulation 679/2016 -A07P4 : points 14, 91, 97
  
• Regulation 679/2016 -A13 : point 112
  
• Regulation 679/2016 -A14 : point 112
  
• Regulation 679/2016 -A68 : point 81
  
• Regulation 679/2016 -A94P1 : point 45
  
• Regulation 679/2016 -A94P2 : points 50, 81
  
• Regulation 679/2016 -A99P2 : point 45
  
• Regulation 679/2016 -C32 : points 11, 72
  
• Regulation 679/2016 -C43 : points 74, 75
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -210/96 -N31 : point 113
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -162/97 -N54 : point 71
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -136/04 -N32 : point 71
  
• Court of Justice - Opinion C -192/08 -N87 : point 71
  
• Court of Justice - Opinion C -192/08 -N88 : point 71
  
• Court of Justice - Opinion C -192/08 -N89 : point 71
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -293/12 -N71 : point 42
  
• Court of Justice - Opinion C -31/16 -N132 : point 71
  
• Court of Justice - Opinion C -210/16 -N5 : point 36
  
• Court of Justice - Opinion C -496/17 -N32 : point 49
  
• Court of Justice - Opinion C -681/17 -N55 : point 113
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -44/17 -N47 : point 113
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -485/17 -N44 : point 113
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -496/17 -N39 : point 49
  

Dates

Date of the lodging of the application initiating proceedings

• 30/11/2017

Date of the Opinion

• 21/03/2019

Date of the hearing

Information not available

Date of delivery

01/10/2019

References

Publication in the Official Journal

Judgment: OJ C 413 from 09.12.2019, p.4

Application: OJ C 112 from 26.03.2018, p.9

Name of the parties

Planet49

Notes on Academic Writings

1. Spittka, Jan: Erfordert der Einsatz von Cookies immer eine Einwilligung ?, Der Betrieb 2019 p.2850-2854 (DE)
2. Péraldi Leneuf, Fabienne: Communications électroniques. Protection des données à caractère personnel, Europe 2019 Décembre Comm. nº 12 p.29-30 (FR)
3. Duţu, Andrei: Regulamentul nr. 679 al Parlamentului European şi al Consiliului din 27 aprilie 2016 (GDRP) şi modulele cookie: bifarea unui căsuţe nu echivalează cu exprimarea valabilă a consimţământului (Curtea de Justiţie a Uniunii Europene, hotărârea preliminară din 1 octombrie 2019 pronunţată în cauza nr. C-673/17 Bundesverband der Verbraucherzentralen und Verbraucherverbande - Verbraucherzentrale Bundesverband eV c. Planet49 GmbH, ECLI:EU:C:2019:801), Pandectele Romane: repertoriu trimestrial de jurisprudenta, doctrina si legislatie 2019 Vol. 5 p. 235-239 (RO)
4. Le Maigat, Patrice: Cookies et consentement : une difficile digestion, Gazette du Palais 2019 nº 36 Jur. p. 21-23 (FR)
5. Heyvaert, Brieuc: Entre consentement présumé et présomption de consentement forcé, commentaire de l’arrêt et des conclusions de l’avocat général Szpunar dans l’affaire Planet49, Revue européenne de droit de la consommation 2020 p.397-413 (FR)
6. Roerdink, Herwin: Verbraucherzentrale Bundesverband/Planet49 : zaak C‑673/17 : noot, Mediaforum: Tijdschrift voor Media- en Communicatierecht 2020 nº 2 p. 61-62 (NL)
7. Jansen, M.: HvJ EU 01-10-2019, C-673/17, Bundesverband der Verbraucherzentralen und Verbraucherverbande - Verbraucherzentrale Bundesverband e.V. tegen Planet49 GmbH : noot, Tijdschrift voor consumentenrecht en handelspraktijken 2020 p. 96-100 (NL)
8. Peyrou, Sylvie: Société de l’information, vie privée et protection des données à caractère personnel: des précisions attendues, Revue du droit de l'Union européenne 2020 nº 1 p. 210-219 (FR)
9. Dommering, Egbert J.: Bundesverband der Verbraucherzentralen und Verbraucherverbände - Verbraucherzentrale Bundesverband eV tegen Planet49 GmbH : noot, Nederlandse jurisprudentie ; Uitspraken in burgerlijke en strafzaken 2020 nº 13/14 p. 1671-1673 (NL)
10. Wiedemann, Klaus: The ECJ's decision in Planet 49 (Case C-673/17): a cookie monster or much ado about nothing?, International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law 2020 p. 543-553 (EN)
11. Jabłonowska, Agnieszka ; Michałowicz, Adrianna: Planet49: Pre-Ticked Checkboxes Are Not Sufficient to Convey User’s Consent to the Storage of Cookies, European Data Protection Law Review 2020, nº 1, p. 137-142 (EN)
12. Nebel, Jens: Einwilligungsverwaltungsdienste nach dem TTDSG : lösen Personal-Information-Management-Systeme das Cookie-Dilemma? : C-673/17, Planet49, Computer und Recht 2022 p. 18-24 (DE)

Procedural Analysis Information

Source of the question referred for a preliminary ruling

Bundesgerichtshof - Germany

Subject-matter

• Data protection
  
• Approximation of laws
  
• Telecommunications
  
• Principles, objectives and tasks of the Treaties
  

Provisions of national law referred to

Information not available

Provisions of international law referred to

Information not available

Procedure and result

• Reference for a preliminary ruling
  

Formation of the Court

grande chambre (Cour)

Judge-Rapporteur

Rosas

Advocate General

Szpunar

Language(s) of the Case

• German
  

Language(s) of the Opinion

• English