CURIA - Case information

Home > Search form > List of results > Case information

Start printing

Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 4 October 2018

Nigyar Rauf Kaza Ahmedbekova and Rauf Emin Ogla Ahmedbekov v Zamestnik-predsedatel na Darzhavna agentsia za bezhantsite

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Administrativen sad Sofia-grad

Reference for a preliminary ruling — Common policy on asylum and subsidiary protection — Standards for the qualification of third-country nationals or stateless persons as beneficiaries of international protection — Directive 2011/95/EU — Articles 3, 4, 10 and 23 — Applications for international protection lodged separately by family members — Individual assessment — Taking into account threats in respect of a family member in carrying out the individual assessment of the application for international protection of another family member — More favourable standards capable of being retained or introduced by the Member States for the purpose of extending the refugee or subsidiary protection status of a beneficiary of international protection to family members — Assessment of the reasons for persecution — Involvement of an Azerbaijani national in bringing a complaint against her country before the European Court of Human Rights — Common procedural standards — Directive 2013/32/EU — Article 46 — Right to an effective remedy — Full and ex nunc examination — Reasons for persecution or evidence withheld from the determining authority but invoked in the course of an action against the decision taken by that authority

Case C-652/16

Documents in the Case

Document

Date

Name of the parties

Subject-matter

Curia

EUR-Lex

Autres Liens

Judgment (OJ)

16/11/2018

Ahmedbekova

area of freedom, security and justice
- Border checks

Judgment
ECLI:EU:C:2018:801

04/10/2018

Ahmedbekova

area of freedom, security and justice
- Border checks

Judgment (Summary)
ECLI:EU:C:2018:801

04/10/2018

Ahmedbekova

area of freedom, security and justice
- Border checks

Application (OJ)

03/03/2017

Ahmedbekova

area of freedom, security and justice
- Border checks

Opinion
ECLI:EU:C:2018:514

28/06/2018

Ahmedbekova

area of freedom, security and justice
- Border checks

Legal analysis of the decision or of the case

Reports of Cases

published in the electronic Reports of Cases (Court Reports - general)

Subject-matter

Information not available

Systematic classification scheme

4 Internal policy of the European Union
  4.06 Area of freedom, security and justice
    4.06.01 Border checks, asylum and immigration
      4.06.01.03 Asylum policy

Citations of case-law or legislation

References in grounds of judgment

Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU (2007), Article 7 : paragraphs 43, 52, 64
Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU (2007), Article 18 : paragraphs 43, 52, 64
Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU (2007), Article 47 : paragraphs 43, 52, 64
TFEU, Article 78 -P1 : paragraph 43
TFEU, Article 78 -P2LA : paragraphs 5, 43
TFEU, Article 78 -P2LB : paragraph 5
TFEU, Article 78 -P2LD : paragraphs 16, 43
TFEU, Article 78 -P2LF : paragraph 43
Directive 2011/95 : paragraphs 1, 5, 19, 32, 48, 52, 56, 64, 65, 72
Directive 2011/95 -A02 : paragraph 7
Directive 2011/95 -A02LD : paragraphs 43, 47, 95
Directive 2011/95 -A02LF : paragraphs 47, 95
Directive 2011/95 -A02LJ : paragraphs 43, 68
Directive 2011/95 -A03 : paragraphs 8, 43, 66, 69 - 71, 74
Directive 2011/95 -A04 : paragraphs 46, 49, 51
Directive 2011/95 -A04P1 : paragraph 9
Directive 2011/95 -A04P2 : paragraph 9
Directive 2011/95 -A04P3 : paragraphs 9, 57
Directive 2011/95 -A04P4 : paragraphs 9, 43
Directive 2011/95 -A10 : paragraphs 10, 95
Directive 2011/95 -A10P1 : paragraph 85
Directive 2011/95 -A10P1LD : paragraphs 43, 84, 88, 90
Directive 2011/95 -A10P1LE : paragraphs 43, 84, 87, 90
Directive 2011/95 -A10P2 : paragraph 85
Directive 2011/95 -A12 : paragraphs 11, 74
Directive 2011/95 -A13 : paragraphs 12, 43, 47
Directive 2011/95 -A15 : paragraphs 13, 47, 95
Directive 2011/95 -A18 : paragraphs 14, 47
Directive 2011/95 -A23 : paragraphs 15, 43, 68
Directive 2011/95 -A23P1 : paragraph 43
Directive 2011/95 -A23P2 : paragraph 43
Directive 2011/95 -C14 : paragraphs 6, 70
Directive 2011/95 -C16 : paragraphs 6, 43
Directive 2011/95 -C18 : paragraphs 6, 43
Directive 2011/95 -C24 : paragraphs 6, 43
Directive 2011/95 -C36 : paragraphs 6, 43, 50
Directive 2013/32 : paragraphs 1, 16, 43, 52, 64, 65, 100
Directive 2013/32 -A01 : paragraph 18
Directive 2013/32 -A02 : paragraph 19
Directive 2013/32 -A02LA : paragraph 43
Directive 2013/32 -A02LC : paragraph 43
Directive 2013/32 -A02LG : paragraph 43
Directive 2013/32 -A02LL : paragraph 53
Directive 2013/32 -A07 : paragraph 20
Directive 2013/32 -A07P1 : paragraphs 43, 53, 76
Directive 2013/32 -A07P2 : paragraph 77
Directive 2013/32 -A07P3 : paragraphs 43, 54, 76
Directive 2013/32 -A09 : paragraph 43
Directive 2013/32 -A09P1 : paragraph 21
Directive 2013/32 -A10P2 : paragraphs 22, 43
Directive 2013/32 -A13P1 : paragraph 23
Directive 2013/32 -A31 : paragraph 24
Directive 2013/32 -A31P1 : paragraph 43
Directive 2013/32 -A31P2 : paragraphs 57, 60
Directive 2013/32 -A33P2 : paragraph 25
Directive 2013/32 -A33P2LE : paragraphs 43, 75, 77, 79 - 81, 83
Directive 2013/32 -A40P1 : paragraphs 26, 98, 103
Directive 2013/32 -A46 : paragraph 27
Directive 2013/32 -A46P3 : paragraphs 43, 91, 92, 94, 96, 103
Directive 2013/32 -C12 : paragraphs 17, 43
Directive 2013/32 -C60 : paragraphs 17, 43
Directive 2013/33 -A06 : paragraph 43
Directive 2013/33 -A06P1 : paragraph 29
Directive 2013/33 -A12 : paragraphs 30, 43
Directive 2013/33 -C9 : paragraphs 28, 43
Directive 2013/33 -C11 : paragraphs 28, 43
Directive 2013/33 -C35 : paragraphs 28, 43
Court of Justice - Judgment C -57/09 -N115 : paragraph 71
Court of Justice - Judgment C -71/11 -N68 : paragraph 48
Court of Justice - Judgment C -199/12 -N45 : paragraph 89
Court of Justice - Judgment C -542/13 -N42 : paragraph 71
Court of Justice - Judgment C -542/13 -N44 : paragraph 71
Court of Justice - Opinion C -652/16 : paragraphs 50, 72, 101
Court of Justice - Judgment C -473/16 -N41 : paragraph 48
Court of Justice - Judgment C -585/16 -N105 : paragraph 92
Court of Justice - Judgment C -585/16 -N109 : paragraphs 60, 100
Court of Justice - Judgment C -585/16 -N110 : paragraph 94
Court of Justice - Judgment C -585/16 -N111 : paragraph 93
Court of Justice - Judgment C -585/16 -N113 : paragraph 93
Court of Justice - Judgment C -585/16 -N116 : paragraph 96

Operative part

Information not available

Opinion

Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU (2007), Article 7 : points 8, 58
Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU (2007), Article 18 : point 8
Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU (2007), Article 47 : point 8
TFEU, Article 78 -P1 : point 8
TFEU, Article 78 -P2LD : point 8
TFEU, Article 78 -P2LF : point 8
Directive 2003/9 : point 42
Directive 2004/83 : point 11
Directive 2004/83 -A03 : points 56, 57
Directive 2004/83 -A12P2 : point 57
Directive 2004/83 -C8 : point 54
Directive 2005/85 : points 10, 19, 36, 43, 44
Directive 2005/85 -A02LC : point 42
Directive 2005/85 -A06P2 : points 24, 42, 46, 81
Directive 2005/85 -A06P3 : points 24, 28, 37, 39, 41, 46, 81
Directive 2005/85 -A08P2LA : point 45
Directive 2005/85 -A09P3 : points 38, 41, 46, 81
Directive 2005/85 -A25P1 : points 17, 18
Directive 2005/85 -A25P2 : points 18, 19, 81
Directive 2005/85 -A25P2LG : points 16, 20 - 23, 27, 28
Directive 2005/85 -A39 : point 70
Directive 2005/85 -C22 : points 17, 20, 42
Directive 2008/115 : point 7
Directive 2008/115 -A05 : point 42
Directive 2011/95 : points 2, 11, 13, 30, 44, 46 - 48, 50, 52, 77, 78
Directive 2011/95 -A02LD : points 8, 31, 32, 34, 64, 74, 81
Directive 2011/95 -A02LJ : points 1, 8
Directive 2011/95 -A03 : points 8, 54, 55, 59, 60, 81
Directive 2011/95 -A04 : points 8, 35
Directive 2011/95 -A04P3 : points 31, 34, 67, 81
Directive 2011/95 -A04P4 : points 8, 29, 31
Directive 2011/95 -A06 : point 32
Directive 2011/95 -A09P1 : points 31, 32, 34, 81
Directive 2011/95 -A09P2 : point 31
Directive 2011/95 -A09P3 : points 31, 32
Directive 2011/95 -A10 : point 74
Directive 2011/95 -A10P1 : points 31, 64
Directive 2011/95 -A10P1LD : points 8, 61, 62, 68, 81
Directive 2011/95 -A10P1LE : points 8, 62, 66, 68, 81
Directive 2011/95 -A12 : points 32, 60, 81
Directive 2011/95 -A13 : point 8
Directive 2011/95 -A21 : point 53
Directive 2011/95 -A23 : point 8
Directive 2011/95 -A23P1 : points 8, 53, 58
Directive 2011/95 -A23P2 : points 8, 53, 58
Directive 2011/95 -A24P1L2 : point 53
Directive 2011/95 -C14 : point 54
Directive 2011/95 -C16 : points 8, 58
Directive 2011/95 -C18 : point 8
Directive 2011/95 -C22 : point 58
Directive 2011/95 -C24 : point 8
Directive 2011/95 -C36 : points 8, 33, 34, 81
Court of Justice - Rules of Procedure (2012) -A101 : point 49
Directive 2013/32 : points 1, 2, 16, 36
Directive 2013/32 -A01 : point 8
Directive 2013/32 -A02LA : point 8
Directive 2013/32 -A02LC : point 8
Directive 2013/32 -A02LQ : point 77
Directive 2013/32 -A07 : point 25
Directive 2013/32 -A07P1 : points 8, 24
Directive 2013/32 -A07P3 : points 8, 24, 28
Directive 2013/32 -A09 : point 8
Directive 2013/32 -A10P2 : point 8
Directive 2013/32 -A11P3 : point 38
Directive 2013/32 -A31P1 : points 8, 25, 35
Directive 2013/32 -A31P2 : point 25
Directive 2013/32 -A33P1 : points 13, 17
Directive 2013/32 -A33P2 : point 8
Directive 2013/32 -A33P2LE : points 8, 12, 14 - 16, 23, 79
Directive 2013/32 -A37 : point 10
Directive 2013/32 -A40 : point 77
Directive 2013/32 -A40P1 : point 74
Directive 2013/32 -A46P1LAPT1 : point 71
Directive 2013/32 -A46P3 : points 8, 69, 71, 75, 76, 78, 79
Directive 2013/32 -A52L1 : point 10
Directive 2013/32 -C12 : point 8
Directive 2013/32 -C60 : point 8
Directive 2013/33 : point 42
Directive 2013/33 -A06 : point 8
Directive 2013/33 -A12 : point 8
Directive 2013/33 -C9 : point 8
Directive 2013/33 -C11 : point 8
Directive 2013/33 -C35 : point 8
Commission - COM Document (Draft Legislation) - 52016PC0467 -A36P1LD : point 17
Court of Justice - Judgment C -57/09 -N114 : point 57
Court of Justice - Judgment C -57/09 -N115 : point 57
Court of Justice - Judgment C -199/12 -N45 : point 65
Court of Justice - Judgment C -542/13 -N42 : point 57
Court of Justice - Judgment C -542/13 -N43 : point 57
Court of Justice - Judgment C -542/13 -N44 : point 57
Court of Justice - Order C -556/15 -N20 : point 22
Court of Justice - Order C -556/15 -N21 : point 22
Court of Justice - Opinion C -585/16 : points 1, 10, 11, 17, 70, 75, 76

Dates

Date of the lodging of the application initiating proceedings

19/12/2016

Date of the Opinion

28/06/2018

Date of the hearing

Information not available

Date of delivery

04/10/2018

References

Publication in the Official Journal

Judgment: OJ C 436 from 03.12.2018, p.4

Application: OJ C 86 from 20.03.2017, p.11

Name of the parties

Ahmedbekova

Notes on Academic Writings

Reneman, A.M.: In het beroep tegen de afwijzing van het asielverzoek dient de rechter in eerste instantie nieuwe asielmotieven mee te nemen, tenzij deze te laat of op onvoldoende concrete wijze zijn ingediend, Administratiefrechtelijke beslissingen ; Rechtspraak bestuursrecht 222019 nº 71-82 p.487-490 (NL)
Pfersich, Andreas: Zeitschrift für Ausländerrecht und Ausländerpolitik 2019 N°1 p.31 (DE)
Carlier, Jean-Yves ; Leboeuf, Luc: Droit européen des migrations, Journal de droit européen 2019 nº 3 p.114-130 (FR)

Procedural Analysis Information

Source of the question referred for a preliminary ruling

Administrativen sad Sofia-grad - Bulgaria

Subject-matter

area of freedom, security and justice
- Border checks
- asylum policy

Provisions of national law referred to

Information not available

Provisions of international law referred to

Convention de Genève relative au statut des réfugiés (28/07/1951), articles 1A, 5, 31 et 33

Procedure and result

Reference for a preliminary ruling

Formation of the Court

deuxième chambre (Cour)

Judge-Rapporteur

Ilešič

Advocate General

Mengozzi

Language(s) of the Case

Bulgarian

Language(s) of the Opinion

Italian