Reports of Cases

published in the electronic Reports of Cases (Court Reports - general)

Subject-matter

Information not available

Systematic classification scheme

Citations of case-law or legislation

References in grounds of judgment

• Directive 95/46 : paragraphs 1, 2, 14, 26, 33, 59, 63
• Directive 95/46 -A01 : paragraph 3
• Directive 95/46 -A02LA : paragraphs 4, 27, 28, 31, 32, 34, 45, 62
• Directive 95/46 -A06 : paragraphs 5, 49
• Directive 95/46 -A06LE : paragraph 56
• Directive 95/46 -A06P1 : paragraphs 55, 56
• Directive 95/46 -A06P1LD : paragraphs 53, 54
• Directive 95/46 -A07 : paragraphs 6, 49
• Directive 95/46 -A12 : paragraphs 7, 49
• Directive 95/46 -A12LA : paragraphs 46, 51, 56 - 58
• Directive 95/46 -A12LB : paragraphs 46, 51 - 53, 55 - 58
• Directive 95/46 -A13 : paragraph 8
• Directive 95/46 -A13P1 : paragraph 61
• Directive 95/46 -A13P1LG : paragraph 60
• Directive 95/46 -A14 : paragraphs 9, 49
• Directive 95/46 -A28 : paragraphs 10, 49
• Directive 95/46 -C25 : paragraph 48
• Directive 95/46 -C26 : paragraph 3
• Directive 95/46 -C41 : paragraphs 3, 57
• Directive 95/46 -C25 : paragraph 3
• Regulation 679/2016 : paragraph 59
• Regulation 679/2016 -A15 : paragraphs 12, 61
• Regulation 679/2016 -A23 : paragraph 13
• Regulation 679/2016 -A23P1LE : paragraph 61
• Regulation 679/2016 -A94P1 : paragraph 11
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -553/07 -N59 : paragraph 33
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -141/12 -N44 : paragraph 57
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -141/12 -N45 : paragraph 56
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -141/12 -N46 : paragraph 56
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -582/14 -N43 : paragraph 31
• Court of Justice - Opinion C -434/16 : paragraphs 41, 50, 55

Operative part

• Interprets : Directive 95/46 -A02LA

Opinion

• Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU (2007), Article 8 -P1 : point 33
  
• Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU (2007), Article 8 -P3 : point 33
  
• TFEU, Article 16 -P2 : point 33
  
• Directive 95/46 : points 1, 3, 14, 34, 45, 54, 58, 66
  
• Directive 95/46 -A02 : point 4
  
• Directive 95/46 -A02LA : points 17, 18, 28, 51, 63, 70
  
• Directive 95/46 -A02LC : point 69
  
• Directive 95/46 -A03 : point 5
  
• Directive 95/46 -A03P1 : point 68
  
• Directive 95/46 -A06P1LA : point 32
  
• Directive 95/46 -A06P1LD : point 35
  
• Directive 95/46 -A12 : point 6
  
• Directive 95/46 -A12LB : points 31, 35, 37, 38
  
• Directive 95/46 -A13 : points 46, 48, 50
  
• Directive 95/46 -A13P1 : point 8
  
• Directive 95/46 -A13P1LG : point 65
  
• Directive 95/46 -A28P4 : point 33
  
• Directive 95/46 -C41 : points 7, 31, 39
  
• Regulation 679/2016 : point 3
  
• Regulation 679/2016 -A15P4 : point 48
  
• Regulation 679/2016 -A23 : point 48
  
• Regulation 679/2016 -A23P1 : point 48
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -212/97 -N24 : point 43
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -101/01 -N88 : point 18
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -553/07 -N59 : point 18
  
• Civil Service Tribunal - Judgment F -127/11 -N101 : point 35
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -141/12 -N40 : point 59
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -141/12 -N46 : point 58
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -362/14 -N40 : point 33
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -362/14 -N58 : point 33
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -362/14 -N59 : point 33
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -438/14 -N57 : point 43
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -582/14 -N40 : point 28
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -582/14 -N41 : point 28
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -582/14 -N42 : point 28
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -582/14 -N43 : point 28
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -582/14 -N44 : point 28
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -423/15 -N38 : point 44
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -423/15 -N39 : point 44
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -423/15 -N40 : point 44
  

Dates

Date of the lodging of the application initiating proceedings

• 04/08/2016

Date of the Opinion

• 20/07/2017

Date of the hearing

Information not available

Date of delivery

20/12/2017

References

Publication in the Official Journal

Judgment: OJ C 72 from 26.02.2018, p.20

Application: OJ C 364 from 03.10.2016, p.11

Name of the parties

Nowak

Notes on Academic Writings

1. Kamara, Irene: Exam Scripts Are Personal Data According to AG Kokott, European Data Protection Law Review 2017 Vol. 3 p. 402-405 (EN)
2. Gardette, Jean-Marie: Précisions sur la protection des données à caractère personnel dans le cadre des examens, Revue des affaires européennes 2017 p.739-745 (FR)
3. Adobati, Enrica: Interpretazione della direttiva n. 95/46/Ce nell'ambito di un reclamo presentato da un candidato in un concorso tendente a contestare il risultato dell' esame sostenuto, Diritto comunitario e degli scambi internazionali 2017 p.618-619 (IT)
4. El Berhoumi, Mathias: Arrêt " Nowak " : les copies d'examen, nouveau terrain de la protection des données personnelles, Journal de droit européen 2018 nº 247 p.90-91 (FR)
5. Podstawa, Karolina: Peter Nowak v Data Protection Commissioner: You Can Access Your Exam Script, Because It Is Personal Data, European Data Protection Law Review 2018 Vol. 4 p.252 - 259 (EN)
6. Sauron, Jean-Luc ; Grasso, Anna: Copies d'examen, données personnelles et vigilance de la Cour de justice, Gazette du Palais 2018 nº 8 Jur. p.25-27 (FR)
7. Degrave, Elise: Protection des personnes physiques à l'égard du traitement des données à caractère personnel, Journal des tribunaux 2018 N°6734 p.480-484 (FR)
8. Dommering, E.J.: Nederlandse jurisprudentie ; Uitspraken in burgerlijke en strafzaken 2018 Afl.35/36 p.4793-4795 (NL)
9. Skubic, Zoran: Komentarji ocenjevalca na izpitni poli so (lahko) osebni podatki kandidata, Pravna praksa 2018 nº 6 p.30-32 (SL)
10. Kulk, S.: Examenantwoorden zijn ook persoonsgegevens, Nederlands tijdschrift voor Europees recht 2018 p.205-210 (NL)
11. Tlamycha, Jan: Monitoring judikatury Soudního dvora EU a Tribunálu Období: 20. prosince 2017 – 31. ledna 2018, Jurisprudence : specialista na komentování judikatury 2018 nº 1 p.52-56 (CS)
12. Jove, Daniel: Peter Nowak v Data Protection Commissioner : Potential Aftermaths Regarding Subjective Annotations in Clinical Records, European Data Protection Law Review 2019 Vol.5 N°2 p.175-183 (EN)
13. Dudás, Gábor János ; Tátrai, Tünde: A Nowak-ügy a magyar bírói gyakorlat tükrében : a személyes adat fogalmának abszolút és relatív értelmezése, Jogesetek Magyarázata 2020 nº 1-2 p. 57-65 (HU)
14. Dudás, Gábor János ; Tátrai, Tünde: A Nowak-ügy a magyar bírói gyakorlat tükrében : a személyes adat fogalmának abszolút és relatív értelmezése, Jogesetek Magyarázata 2020 nº 1-2 p. 57-65 (HU)

Procedural Analysis Information

Source of the question referred for a preliminary ruling

Supreme Court - Ireland

Subject-matter

• Approximation of laws
  
• Data protection
  

Provisions of national law referred to

Information not available

Provisions of international law referred to

Information not available

Procedure and result

• Reference for a preliminary ruling
  

Formation of the Court

deuxième chambre (Cour)

Judge-Rapporteur

Ilešič

Advocate General

Kokott

Language(s) of the Case

• English
  

Language(s) of the Opinion

• German