Reports of Cases

published in the electronic Reports of Cases (Court Reports - general)

Subject-matter

Information not available

Systematic classification scheme

Citations of case-law or legislation

References in grounds of judgment

• TFEU, Article 288 : paragraph 29
• Directive 95/46 -A28 : paragraphs 8, 26
• Directive 95/46 -A28P1 : paragraph 8
• Directive 2002/21 : paragraph 1
• Directive 2002/21 -A02LG : paragraphs 4, 28, 30
• Directive 2002/21 -A02LL : paragraph 4
• Directive 2002/21 -A03 : paragraphs 6, 45
• Directive 2002/21 -A03P1 : paragraph 32
• Directive 2002/21 -A03P2 : paragraphs 26, 32
• Directive 2002/21 -A03P3 : paragraph 32
• Directive 2002/21 -A03P3BIS : paragraphs 26, 33, 39, 47, 51, 52
• Directive 2002/21 -A03P3BISL2 : paragraphs 40, 43
• Directive 2002/21 -A03P4 : paragraph 34
• Directive 2002/21 -A03P6 : paragraph 34
• Directive 2002/21 -A04 : paragraphs 7, 35
• Directive 2002/21 -C11 : paragraphs 3, 45
• Directive 2009/140 : paragraphs 1, 45
• Directive 2009/140 -C13 : paragraphs 5, 45, 46
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -82/07 : paragraph 23
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -82/07 -N24 : paragraph 30
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -424/07 -N55 : paragraph 48
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -424/07 -N56 : paragraph 48
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -424/07 -N57 : paragraph 48
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -424/07 -N58 : paragraph 48
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -424/07 -N59 : paragraph 48
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -424/07 -N60 : paragraph 48
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -424/07 -N61 : paragraph 48
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -389/08 : paragraph 23
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -389/08 -N23 : paragraph 28
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -389/08 -N24 : paragraph 29
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -389/08 -N25 : paragraph 29
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -389/08 -N26 : paragraph 30
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -389/08 -N27 : paragraph 31
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -389/08 -N30 : paragraph 36
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -288/12 : paragraphs 23, 25
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -85/14 -N53 : paragraph 30
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -85/14 -N57 : paragraph 36
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -240/15 -N32 : paragraph 45
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -240/15 -N34 : paragraph 45

Operative part

• Interprets : Directive 2002/21
• Interprets : Directive 2002/21 -A03P3BIS

Opinion

• Directive 95/46 : point 9
  
• Directive 95/46 -A28 : point 25
  
• Directive 95/46 -A28P1 : point 10
  
• Directive 95/46 -A28P1L2 : point 38
  
• Directive 2002/19 -A13 : point 45
  
• Directive 2002/20 : point 45
  
• Directive 2002/21 : points 3, 6, 26, 30, 31, 34, 36
  
• Directive 2002/21 -A02LG : points 7, 29
  
• Directive 2002/21 -A03 : point 8
  
• Directive 2002/21 -A03P2 : points 25, 32, 44
  
• Directive 2002/21 -A03P3 : point 33
  
• Directive 2002/21 -A03P3BIS : points 4, 25, 27, 44, 55, 56
  
• Directive 2002/21 -A03P3BISL1 : point 54
  
• Directive 2002/21 -A03P3BISL2 : points 23, 47
  
• Directive 2002/21 -A09 : point 45
  
• Directive 2002/21 -A10 : point 45
  
• Directive 2002/21 -A11 : point 45
  
• Directive 2002/21 -A20 : point 45
  
• Directive 2002/21 -C1 : point 5
  
• Directive 2002/22 : point 30
  
• Directive 2002/22 -A17 : point 45
  
• Directive 2009/140 -C13 : point 44
  
• Regulation 1211/2009 : point 8
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -82/07 -N25 : point 30
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -82/07 -N26 : point 30
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -82/07 -N27 : point 30
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -424/07 -N61 : point 45
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -518/07 -N42 : point 46
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -389/08 -N30 : point 30
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -288/12 : points 25, 42
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -288/12 -N50 : point 38
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -288/12 -N51 : point 39
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -288/12 -N53 : point 39
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -288/12 -N54 : points 40, 50
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -85/14 -N53 : point 29
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -85/14 -N57 : point 30
  

Dates

Date of the lodging of the application initiating proceedings

• 31/07/2015

Date of the Opinion

• 30/06/2016

Date of the hearing

Information not available

Date of delivery

19/10/2016

References

Publication in the Official Journal

Judgment: OJ C 475 from 19.12.2016, p.6

Application: OJ C 363 from 03.11.2015, p.21

Name of the parties

Ormaetxea Garai and Lorenzo Almendros

Notes on Academic Writings

1. Bruck, Véronique: Alors qu'une fusion d'autorités de régulation nationales n'est en principe pas contraire au droit de l'Union, le congédiement de membres du collège dirigeant l'autorité fusionnée viole le droit de l'Union, à moins que des règles de congédiement soient préalablement établies afin de protéger l'indépendance et l'impartialité des autorités de régulation, Europe 2016 Décembre Comm. nº 12 p.33-34 (FR)
2. Bruck, Véronique: Impartialité et indépendance des autorités réglementaires nationales, Europe 2016 Décembre nº 12 p.33-34 (FR)

Procedural Analysis Information

Source of the question referred for a preliminary ruling

Tribunal Supremo - Spain

Subject-matter

• Approximation of laws
  
• Telecommunications
  
• Data protection
  

Provisions of national law referred to

Information not available

Provisions of international law referred to

Information not available

Procedure and result

• Reference for a preliminary ruling
  

Formation of the Court

deuxième chambre (Cour)

Judge-Rapporteur

Jarašiūnas

Advocate General

Bot

Language(s) of the Case

• Spanish
  

Language(s) of the Opinion

• French