Reports of Cases

published in the electronic Reports of Cases (Court Reports - general)

Subject-matter

Information not available

Systematic classification scheme

Citations of case-law or legislation

References in grounds of judgment

• Directive 95/46 -A01 : paragraph 3
• Directive 95/46 -A01P1 : paragraph 25
• Directive 95/46 -A02 : paragraph 4
• Directive 95/46 -A02LA : paragraph 24
• Directive 95/46 -A02LD : paragraph 24
• Directive 95/46 -A05 : paragraphs 5, 25
• Directive 95/46 -A07 : paragraph 6
• Directive 95/46 -A07LF : paragraphs 1, 22, 23, 25 - 28, 34
• Directive 95/46 -A08P2LE : paragraphs 7, 29
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -275/06 -N53 : paragraph 29
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -275/06 -N54 : paragraph 26
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -275/06 -N55 : paragraph 26
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -92/09 -N86 : paragraph 30
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -468/10 -N40 : paragraph 31
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -468/10 -N44 : paragraph 32
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -473/12 -N39 : paragraph 30
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -212/13 -N28 : paragraph 30
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -582/14 -N62 : paragraph 31
• Court of Justice - Opinion C -13/16 : paragraphs 26, 29, 33

Operative part

• Interprets : Directive 95/46 -A07LF

Opinion

• Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU (2007), Article 7 : points 3, 67
  
• Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU (2007), Article 8 : points 4, 67
  
• TFEU, Article 16 -P1 : point 5
  
• Directive 95/46 : points 32, 33, 37, 38, 42, 45
  
• Directive 95/46 -A02 : point 6
  
• Directive 95/46 -A05 : point 7
  
• Directive 95/46 -A06P1 : point 8
  
• Directive 95/46 -A06P1LC : point 73
  
• Directive 95/46 -A07 : points 16, 39, 40, 48, 52, 55, 58, 64, 72
  
• Directive 95/46 -A07LA : point 56
  
• Directive 95/46 -A07LB : point 56
  
• Directive 95/46 -A07LC : points 41, 54, 56, 57
  
• Directive 95/46 -A07LD : point 56
  
• Directive 95/46 -A07LE : points 41, 54, 56, 57
  
• Directive 95/46 -A07LF : points 2, 29, 30, 34 - 36, 41, 43, 49 - 51, 53, 54, 56, 57, 59, 60, 62, 63, 66, 68, 76, 79, 80, 86, 90, 100
  
• Directive 95/46 -A08 : point 10
  
• Directive 95/46 -A08P2LE : points 11, 80
  
• Directive 95/46 -A08P5 : point 12
  
• Directive 95/46 -A08P7 : points 13, 88
  
• Directive 95/46 -A09 : point 9
  
• Directive 95/46 -A10 : point 66
  
• Directive 95/46 -A11 : point 66
  
• Directive 95/46 -A12 : point 66
  
• Directive 95/46 -A14 : point 14
  
• Directive 95/46 -A17 : point 66
  
• Directive 95/46 -A29 : point 64
  
• Directive 95/46 -C28 : point 73
  
• Regulation 46/95 -A07 : point 58
  
• Directive 2000/31 : point 46
  
• Directive 2001/29 : point 46
  
• Directive 2002/58 : point 45
  
• Directive 2004/48 : point 46
  
• Regulation 79/2016 -A06P1 : point 58
  
• Regulation 679/2016 : point 15
  
• Commission - COM Document (Draft Legislation) - 51990PC0314(01) : point 66
  
• Commission - COM Document (Draft Legislation) - 51992PC0422 : point 66
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -369/98 -N38 : point 90
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -465/00 -N100 : points 41, 73
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -465/00 -N101 : points 41, 73
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -465/00 -N99 : points 41, 73
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -275/06 -N54 : point 45
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -275/06 -N55 : point 45
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -275/06 -N57 : point 46
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -275/06 -N65 : point 46
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -275/06 -N68 : point 97
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -275/06 -N70 : point 46
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -524/06 -N67 : point 90
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -92/09 -N77 : point 65
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -92/09 -N86 : point 70
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -468/10 -N25 : point 38
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -468/10 -N38 : points 60, 67
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -468/10 -N40 : point 67
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -468/10 -N44 : point 69
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -468/10 -N47 : point 68
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -468/10 -N52 : point 41
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -131/12 : point 94
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -131/12 -N66 : point 38
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -131/12 -N74 : point 67
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -293/12 : point 94
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -212/13 : point 93
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -212/13 -N28 : point 70
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -212/13 -N64 : point 65
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -362/14 : point 94
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -582/14 -N62 : point 68
  
• Court of Justice - Order C -508/16 : point 93
  

Dates

Date of the lodging of the application initiating proceedings

• 08/01/2016

Date of the Opinion

• 26/01/2017

Date of the hearing

Information not available

Date of delivery

04/05/2017

References

Publication in the Official Journal

Judgment: OJ C 213 from 03.07.2017, p.11

Application: OJ C 111 from 29.03.2016, p.10

Name of the parties

Rīgas satiksme

Notes on Academic Writings

1. Dimitrova, Diana: Rigas satiksme: The Scope and Limits of Data Protection U, European Data Protection Law Review 2017 Vol. 3 p. 418 - 422 402 - 405 (EN)
2. Gazin, Fabienne: Protection des données personnelles, Europe 2017 Juillet Comm. nº 251 p.21 (FR)
3. Rostama, Guilda ; Malaty, Elsa: Les limites de l'intérêt légitime pour fonder une demande de communication de données, Dalloz IP / IT 2017 nº 10 p.552-555 (FR)
4. Soós, Andrea Klára: Az irányelv 7. cikkének f) pontját úgy kell-e értelmezni, hogy az kötelezővé teszi, hogy a személyes adatokat közöljék valamely harmadik féllel annak érdekében, hogy e fél polgári bíróság előtt az adatvédelemmel érintett személy által okozott kár megtérítése iránti keresetet indíthasson?, Infokommunikáció és jog 2017 nº 68 p.46-49 (HU)

Procedural Analysis Information

Source of the question referred for a preliminary ruling

Augstākā tiesa - Latvia

Subject-matter

• Approximation of laws
  
• Data protection
  

Provisions of national law referred to

Information not available

Provisions of international law referred to

Information not available

Procedure and result

• Reference for a preliminary ruling
  

Formation of the Court

deuxième chambre (Cour)

Judge-Rapporteur

Rosas

Advocate General

Bobek

Language(s) of the Case

• Latvian
  

Language(s) of the Opinion

• English