Reports of Cases
published in the electronic Reports of Cases (Court Reports - general)
Subject-matter
Request for a preliminary ruling – Landgericht Dortmund – Interpretation of Article 5(1) and (3), and Article 6(1) of Council Regulation (EC) No 44/2001 of 22 December 2000 on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters (OJ 2001 L 12, p. 1) – Special jurisdiction – Action brought against several defendants domiciled in different Member States – Jurisdiction of the court over co-defendants – Situation in which proceedings have been discontinued against a defendant domiciled in the Member State of the court after the action has been served on all defendants but before the expiry of the period for lodging a defence
Systematic classification scheme
1.
|
|
4.06.02.01 Jurisdiction, recognition and enforcement of judgments – Civil and commercial matters
|
1.
|
|
4 Internal policy of the European Union
4.06 Area of freedom, security and justice
4.06.02 Judicial cooperation in civil matters
4.06.02.01 Jurisdiction, recognition and enforcement of judgments – Civil and commercial matters
|
|
|
4.06.02.01 Jurisdiction, recognition and enforcement of judgments – Civil and commercial matters
|
|
|
4 Internal policy of the European Union
4.06 Area of freedom, security and justice
4.06.02 Judicial cooperation in civil matters
4.06.02.01 Jurisdiction, recognition and enforcement of judgments – Civil and commercial matters
|
|
|
4.06.02.01 Jurisdiction, recognition and enforcement of judgments – Civil and commercial matters
|
|
|
4 Internal policy of the European Union
4.06 Area of freedom, security and justice
4.06.02 Judicial cooperation in civil matters
4.06.02.01 Jurisdiction, recognition and enforcement of judgments – Civil and commercial matters
|
|
|
4.06.02.01 Jurisdiction, recognition and enforcement of judgments – Civil and commercial matters
|
|
|
4 Internal policy of the European Union
4.06 Area of freedom, security and justice
4.06.02 Judicial cooperation in civil matters
4.06.02.01 Jurisdiction, recognition and enforcement of judgments – Civil and commercial matters
|
|
|
4.06.02.01 Jurisdiction, recognition and enforcement of judgments – Civil and commercial matters
|
|
|
4 Internal policy of the European Union
4.06 Area of freedom, security and justice
4.06.02 Judicial cooperation in civil matters
4.06.02.01 Jurisdiction, recognition and enforcement of judgments – Civil and commercial matters
|
Citations of case-law or legislation
References in grounds of judgment
-
EC Treaty (Amsterdam), Article 81
: paragraphs 2, 10, 14
-
TFEU, Article 101
: paragraphs 14, 21, 34, 56, 57, 72
-
TFEU, Article 267
: paragraph 63
-
Agreement on the European Economic Area
-A53 : paragraphs 2, 10, 14, 21, 34, 56, 57, 72
-
Regulation 44/2001
: paragraphs 58, 60, 63
-
Regulation 44/2001
-A02 : paragraph 18
-
Regulation 44/2001
-A02P1 : paragraph 5
-
Regulation 44/2001
-A05 : paragraphs 61, 71
-
Regulation 44/2001
-A05PT3 : paragraphs 1, 6, 13, 14, 34, 35, 37 - 39, 48, 50, 56, 57, 72
-
Regulation 44/2001
-A06 : paragraphs 61, 71
-
Regulation 44/2001
-A06PT1 : paragraphs 1, 7, 13 - 17, 20, 23, 25, 26, 28, 29, 31 - 33, 57, 72
-
Regulation 44/2001
-A23 : paragraphs 1, 13, 62, 63
-
Regulation 44/2001
-A23P1 : paragraphs 8, 60, 61, 72
-
Regulation 44/2001
-C11 : paragraph 3
-
Regulation 44/2001
-C12 : paragraphs 3, 19
-
Regulation 44/2001
-C14 : paragraph 3
-
Regulation 44/2001
-C15 : paragraphs 3, 19
-
Regulation 44/2001
-C2 : paragraph 3
-
Decision 2006/903
: paragraphs 10, 21
-
Brussels Convention 1968
-A02 : paragraph 59
-
Brussels Convention 1968
-A05 : paragraph 59
-
Brussels Convention 1968
-A06 : paragraph 59
-
Brussels Convention 1968
-A17 : paragraphs 59, 62
-
Brussels Convention 1968
-A17L1 : paragraph 60
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -24/76
: paragraph 59
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -214/89
-N31 : paragraph 68
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -214/89
-N37 : paragraph 67
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -269/95
-N31 : paragraph 67
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -159/97
-N51 : paragraph 62
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -38/98
-N23 : paragraph 63
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -387/98
-N24 : paragraph 65
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -387/98
-N25 : paragraph 65
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -387/98
-N30 : paragraph 65
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -103/05
-N29 : paragraph 16
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -103/05
-N32 : paragraph 27
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -98/06
-N39 : paragraph 20
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -98/06
-N40 : paragraph 20
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -98/06
-N54 : paragraph 28
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -189/08
-N27 : paragraph 52
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -145/10
-N73 : paragraph 17
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -145/10
-N74 : paragraph 18
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -145/10
-N77 : paragraph 19
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -145/10
-N78 : paragraph 27
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -145/10
-N79 : paragraph 20
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -145/10
-N84 : paragraph 23
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -543/10
-N19 : paragraph 60
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -543/10
-N20 : paragraph 60
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -543/10
-N29 : paragraph 64
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -228/11
-N25 : paragraph 38
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -228/11
-N26 : paragraph 39
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -228/11
-N27 : paragraph 40
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -228/11
-N41 : paragraph 48
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -645/11
-N40 : paragraph 17
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -645/11
-N42 : paragraph 20
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -645/11
-N43 : paragraph 20
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -147/12
-N58 : paragraph 35
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -360/12
-N48 : paragraph 41
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -387/12
-N28 : paragraph 39
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -375/13
-N43 : paragraph 37
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -375/13
-N45 : paragraph 38
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -375/13
-N47 : paragraph 41
Operative part
Opinion
-
EC Treaty (Amsterdam), Article 81
: points 2, 24, 30, 51, 65, 133
-
EC Treaty (Amsterdam), Article 82
: point 51
-
EC Treaty (Amsterdam), Article 85
: points 27, 123
-
Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU (2007), Article 47
: point 27
-
TFEU, Article 101
: points 1, 6, 24, 27, 28, 30, 32, 33, 42, 47, 50, 51, 52, 70, 91, 100, 103, 112, 114, 116 - 126, 132, 133
-
TFEU, Article 102
: points 51, 120
-
Agreement on the European Economic Area
-A53 : points 2, 24, 65
-
Regulation 44/2001
: points 10, 26, 32, 34 - 36, 75, 98, 99, 104, 106, 116, 121
-
Regulation 44/2001
-A01P1 : point 33
-
Regulation 44/2001
-A01P2LD : points 12, 98
-
Regulation 44/2001
-A02 : points 44, 58, 61, 84, 105
-
Regulation 44/2001
-A02P1 : points 13, 53
-
Regulation 44/2001
-A05 : points 104 - 117, 125
-
Regulation 44/2001
-A05PT1 : points 52, 131
-
Regulation 44/2001
-A05PT3 : points 1, 5, 6, 14, 24, 32, 35, 38, 39 - 55, 91, 95, 105, 108, 113, 131, 133
-
Regulation 44/2001
-A06 : points 104 - 117, 125
-
Regulation 44/2001
-A06PT1 : points 1, 4, 6, 15, 24, 35, 38, 54 - 91, 95, 105, 107, 113, 133
-
Regulation 44/2001
-A13 : point 106
-
Regulation 44/2001
-A17 : point 106
-
Regulation 44/2001
-A21 : point 106
-
Regulation 44/2001
-A22 : point 106
-
Regulation 44/2001
-A23 : points 6, 24, 92, 97, 100, 103 - 117, 121, 124, 129, 133
-
Regulation 44/2001
-A23P1 : points 16, 35
-
Regulation 44/2001
-A23P5 : points 16, 106
-
Regulation 44/2001
-A28 : points 53, 56
-
Regulation 44/2001
-A30 : point 81
-
Regulation 44/2001
-A36 : point 116
-
Regulation 44/2001
-A45P2 : point 116
-
Regulation 44/2001
-A60P1 : point 56
-
Regulation 44/2001
-C1 : point 26
-
Regulation 44/2001
-C11 : points 11, 56, 58, 67, 82, 99, 106
-
Regulation 44/2001
-C12 : points 11, 45, 57, 82
-
Regulation 44/2001
-C13 : point 106
-
Regulation 44/2001
-C14 : points 11, 106, 106
-
Regulation 44/2001
-C15 : points 11, 48, 57
-
Regulation 44/2001
-C16 : point 116
-
Regulation 44/2001
-C17 : point 116
-
Regulation 44/2001
-C2 : point 26
-
Regulation 44/2001
-C6 : point 26
-
Regulation 44/2001
-CH2 : points 13, 16, 59
-
Regulation 44/2001
-S2 : points 14, 15
-
Regulation 44/2001
-S5 : point 59
-
Regulation 44/2001
-S7 : point 16
-
Regulation 44/2001
-S9 : point 81
-
Regulation 1/2003
-A16P1 : point 51
-
Decision 2006/903
: point 59
-
Regulation 864/2007
: points 10, 31, 75
-
Regulation 864/2007
-A06P3 : points 10, 75
-
Regulation 864/2007
-A06P3LB : point 75
-
Regulation 864/2007
-A06P4 : point 104
-
Regulation 864/2007
-C21 : points 10, 50
-
Regulation 864/2007
-C7 : point 75
-
Regulation 1215/2012
: point 10
-
Regulation 1215/2012
-A25P5L2 : point 115
-
Regulation 1215/2012
-C12 : point 121
-
Regulation 1215/2012
-C15 : point 82
-
Regulation 1215/2012
-C16 : point 82
-
Directive 2014/104
: point 113
-
Directive 2014/104
-A11P1 : point 70
-
Directive 2014/104
-A18 : point 113
-
Directive 2014/104
-A19 : point 113
-
Directive 2014/104
-C37 : point 70
-
Directive 2014/104
-C48 : point 113
-
Brussels Convention 1968
: points 34, 36, 98, 100, 116
-
Brussels Convention 1968
-A05PT3 : point 35
-
Brussels Convention 1968
-A06PT1 : point 35
-
Brussels Convention 1968
-A17 : points 105, 110
-
Brussels Convention 1968
-A17L1 : point 35
-
Brussels Convention 1968
-A22 : point 56
-
Brussels Convention 1968
-A29 : point 116
-
Brussels Convention 1968
-A34 : point 116
-
Lugano Convention 1988
: point 100
-
Commission - COM Document (Other than Draft Legislation) - 52009DC0175
-PT8.2 : point 10
-
Council - Other Acts - 52009XG1223(04)
: point 100
-
Commission - COM Document (Draft Legislation) - 52013PC0404
: point 113
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -24/76
-N7 : point 105
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -23/78
-N5 : point 105
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -38/81
-N7 : point 115
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -189/87
-N10 : point 55
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -189/87
-N11 : point 81
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -189/87
-N12 : point 56
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -189/87
-N9 : points 68, 84
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -32/88
-N13 : point 50
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -32/88
-N14 : point 50
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -220/88
-N19 : point 50
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -220/88
-N20 : point 50
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -190/89
: point 98
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -190/89
-N18 : point 98
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -214/89
-N31 : point 110
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -214/89
-N31 : point 129
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -214/89
-N33 : point 127
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -214/89
-N36 : point 127
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -406/92
-N53 : point 56
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -68/93
-N27 : point 41
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -68/93
-N33 : point 50
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -135/93
-N37 : point 32
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -269/95
-N24 : point 115
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -269/95
-N26 : point 36
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -269/95
-N27 : point 36
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -391/95
-N31 : point 98
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -391/95
-N32 : point 98
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -440/97
: point 89
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -51/97
-N15 : point 44
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -126/97
-N31 : point 123
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -126/97
-N36 : point 123
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -126/97
-N37 : point 123
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -126/97
-N39 : point 123
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -126/97
-N40 : point 123
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -126/97
-N36 : point 27
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -38/98
-N29 : point 116
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -387/98
-N19 : point 108
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -453/99
: points 30, 91
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -256/00
-N49 : point 49
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -256/00
-N55 : point 52
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -27/02
-N29 : point 131
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -168/02
-N14 : point 44
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -168/02
-N20 : point 44
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -295/04
: point 30
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -295/04
-N60 : point 91
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -295/04
-N30 : point 95
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -103/05
-N27 : points 55, 79
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -103/05
-N28 : points 55, 79
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -103/05
-N29 : points 55, 79
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -103/05
-N30 : points 55, 79
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -103/05
-N31 : point 79
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -103/05
-N32 : point 84
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -98/06
: point 89
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -98/06
-N39 : point 35
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -98/06
-N53 : point 56
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -98/06
-N54 : points 79, 85
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -462/06
-N20 : point 59
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -462/06
-N28 : point 58
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -185/07
-N26 : point 98
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -185/07
-N27 : point 98
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -185/07
-N31 : point 121
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -185/07
-N32 : point 121
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -185/07
-N33 : point 121
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -585/08
-N43 : point 75
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -585/08
-N74 : point 75
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -585/08
-N84 : point 75
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -360/09
-N28 : point 124
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -509/09
-N51 : point 41
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -145/10
-N74 : point 58
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -145/10
-N77 : point 57
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -145/10
-N78 : point 84
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -145/10
-N83 : point 74
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -145/10
-N84 : point 66
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -412/10
: point 10
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -543/10
-N18 : point 35
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -543/10
-N19 : point 35
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -543/10
-N27 : point 109
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -616/10
-N28 : point 71
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -616/10
-N29 : point 74
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -133/11
: point 51
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -133/11
-N31 : point 35
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -133/11
-N32 : point 35
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -173/11
-N29 : point 75
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -173/11
-N31 : point 75
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -199/11
-N46 : point 27
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -199/11
-N51 : point 51
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -228/11
-N22 : point 44
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -228/11
-N27 : point 45
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -228/11
-N34 : point 44
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -228/11
-N35 : point 36
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -228/11
-N40 : point 49
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -536/11
-N29 : point 124
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -645/11
-N31 : point 35
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -645/11
-N42 : point 35
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -645/11
-N43 : point 62
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -645/11
-N44 : point 66
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -645/11
-N47 : point 71
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -645/11
-N48 : point 71
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -147/12
-N28 : point 35
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -147/12
-N29 : point 35
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -360/12
-N43 : point 44
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -360/12
-N44 : point 44
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -360/12
-N45 : point 44
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -360/12
-N46 : point 41
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -360/12
-N47 : point 45
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -360/12
-N48 : point 45
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -387/12
-N27 : point 41
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -438/12
-N40 : point 44
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -470/12
-N27 : point 43
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -519/12
-N21 : point 34
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -548/12
-N19 : point 34
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -548/12
-N20 : point 131
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -557/12
-N20 : point 120
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -557/12
-N21 : point 120
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -557/12
-N21 : point 119
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -557/12
-N24 : point 119
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -557/12
-N30 : point 50
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -579/12
-N40 : point 32
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -302/13
-N48 : point 33
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -400/13
-N58 : point 61
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -441/13
-N42 : point 49
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -302/13
-N28 : points 40, 47
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -302/13
-N29 : point 33
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -302/13
-N46 : point 116
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -302/13
-N47 : point 116
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -302/13
-N48 : point 116
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -302/13
-N49 : point 116
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -302/13
-N50 : point 116
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -302/13
-N51 : point 116
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -302/13
-N52 : point 116
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -302/13
-N53 : point 116
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -302/13
-N54 : point 116
Dates
Date of the lodging of the application initiating proceedings
Date of the Opinion
Date of the hearing
Information not available
Date of delivery
21/05/2015
References
Publication in the Official Journal
Judgment: OJ C 236 from 20.07.2015, p.3
Application: OJ C 298 from 12.10.2013, p.2
Name of the parties
CDC Hydrogen Peroxide
Notes on Academic Writings
- Pike, Richard ; Tosheva, Yulia: CDC v Evonik Degussa (C-352/13) and its potential implications for private enforcement of European competition law, Global Competition Litigation Review 2015 Vol. 8 Nº 2 p.82-85 (EN)
- Harms, Rüdiger ; Sanner, Julian Alexander ; Schmidt, Johannes: EuGVVO: Gerichtsstand bei Kartellschadensersatzklagen, Europäische Zeitschrift für Wirtschaftsrecht 2015 p.584-592 (DE)
- Woodgate, Tony ; Owen, Chris: Jurisdiction revisited. Forum shopping in cross-border damages claims, Competition Law Insight 2015 Vol. 14 Issue 7 p.16-17 (EN)
- Berlin, Dominique: Compétence du juge national, pluralité de codéfendeurs… et désistement du codéfendeur fondant la compétence du juge saisi, La Semaine Juridique - édition générale 2015 nº 23 p.665 (FR)
- Berlin, Dominique: Compétence du juge national, pluralité de codéfendeurs… et désistement du codéfendeur fondant la compétence du juge saisi, La Semaine Juridique - édition générale 2015 nº 23 p.1109 (FR)
- Gartagani, Stella ; Boyle, Nicole ; Hannah, Lesley: Jurisdiction in follow-on damages claims - AG Jaaskinen's opinion in the Hydrogen Peroxide case, Global Competition Litigation Review 2015 Vol. 8 Nº 3 p.R53-R57 (EN)
- Boyle, Nicole ; Chhokar, Gurpreet ; Gartagani, Stella: Jurisdiction in follow-on damages claims: update on the judgment of the European Court of Justice in the hydrogen peroxide cartel claim, Global Competition Litigation Review 2015 Vol. 8 Nº 3 p.R58-R62 (EN)
- Negri, Marcella: Una pronuncia a tutto campo sui criteri di allocazione della competenza giurisdizionale nel private antitrust enforcement transfrontaliero : il caso esemplare delle azioni risarcitorie c.d. follow-on rispetto a decisioni sanzionatorie di cartelli pan-europei, Int'l Lis 2015 p.78-84 (IT)
- Idot, Laurence: Actions en matière délictuelle en droit de la concurrence, Europe 2015 Juillet Comm. nº 7 p.34-36 (FR)
- Geiss, Oliver ; Daniel, Horst: Cartel Damage Claims (CDC) Hydrogen Peroxide SA v Akzo Nobel NV and Others: A summary and critique of the judgment of the European Court of Justice of May, 21 2015, European Competition Law Review 2015 p.430-435 (EN)
- Mehrbrey, Kim Lars ; Jaeger, Sophia: EuGH-Entscheidung klärt internationale Zuständigkeit von nationalen Zivilgerichten in Kartellschadensersatzfällen, European Law Reporter 2015 p.146-154 (DE)
- Panitsas, Georgios: Ritres diaitisias/Ritres parektasis diethnous dikaiodosias kai adikopraktikes axioseis apozimiosis logo paraviasis ton kanonon antagonismou, Dikaio Epicheiriseon & Etairion 2015 p.1117-1119 (EL)
- Skubic, Zoran: Forum uveljavljanja odškodninske odgovornosti nezakonitih kartelov po Uredbi Bruselj I, Pravna praksa 2015 nº 22 p.24-25 (SL)
- Torbjörn, Andersson: Zuständigkeit und Zuständigkeitskonzentration bei Verstößen gegen europäisches Kartellrecht, Ecolex 2015 p.968-969 (DE)
- Stadler, Astrid: Schadensersatzklagen im Kartellrecht – Forum shopping welcome! - Zugleich Besprechung von EuGH, Urteil v. 21.5.2015 – C-352/13, Juristenzeitung 2015 p.1138-1149 (DE)
- Okretič, Neli: Arbitražni sporazumi in odškodninski zahtevki zaradi kršitve konkurenčnega prava, Slovenska arbitražna praksa 2015 nº 3 p.105-106 (SL)
- Pato, Alexia: Sentencia del Tribunal de Justicia (Sala 4a) de 21 de mayo de 2015, asunto C-352/13, Cartel Damage Claims (CDC) Hydrogen Peroxide SA c. Akzo Nobel NV y otros, Revista española de Derecho Internacional 2015 n°67 p. 195-198 (ES)
- Musger, Gottfried: Internationale Zuständigkeit fur Kartellschadenersatz, Österreichische Blätter für gewerblichen Rechtsschutz und Urheberrecht 2015 p.235-237 (DE)
- Geelhand, Laurent ; Gartagani, Stella: CDC v Akzo Nobel and Others: Clarifications on the Jurisdiction Rules in Cartel Damages Claims, Journal of European Competition Law & Practice 2015 Vol. 6 nº 10 p.713-715 (EN)
- Dumitraşcu, Augustina: Curtea de Justiție a Uniunii Europene, Curierul Judiciar 2015 p.450-452 (RO)
- Harler, Christoph ; Weinzierl, Josef: The ECJ's CDC-Judgment on Jurisdiction in Cartel Damages Cases: Repercussions for International Arbitration, Europäisches Wirtschafts- & Steuerrecht - EWS 2015 Heft 3 p.121-123 (EN)
- Wiegandt, Dirk: Europäisches Wirtschafts- & Steuerrecht - EWS 2015 Heft 3 p.157-159 (DE)
- Weller, Matthias: EuGVVO - Zuständigkeitskonzentration bei Schadensersatzklage gegen mehrere Kartellanten und Reichweite einer abweichenden Gerichtsstandsvereinbarung, Recht der internationalen Wirtschaft 2015 Heft 9 p.603-605 (DE)
- Темников, Олег: Кой съд е компетентен да разгледа иск за вреди, причинени от нарушение на правилата на конкуренцията, Европейски правен преглед 2015 nº XIII p.66-90 (BG)
- Едрева, Габриела: Международна компетентност при искове за обезщетение за вреди от трансгранични антиконкурентни практики, Европейски правен преглед 2015 nº XIII p.91-102 (BG)
- Nourissat, Cyril: Action indemnitaire en droit de la concurrence : quand la Cour de justice instaure un nouveau forum actoris au bénéfice des victimes..., Procédures 2015 nº 7 p.19-20 (FR)
- Strikwerda, L.: Nederlandse jurisprudentie ; Uitspraken in burgerlijke en strafzaken 2016 Afl.10 p.1205-1208 (NL)
- Wurmnest, Wolfgang: International jurisdiction in competition damages cases under the Brussels I Regulation: CDC Hydrogen Peroxide, Common Market Law Review 2016, Volume 53, Issue 1, p. 225-247 (EN)
- Delikostopoulos, Ioannis: Dikaiodosia se axiosi apo adikopraxia kata pleionon enagomenon epi apagorevmenis sympraxis stin EE, Elliniki Dikaiosyni 2016 p.300-307 (EL)
- Kroes, Chr.F.: Luciburgum locuta, causa finita of Delphi "revisited"?, Nederlands internationaal privaatrecht 2016 Afl.3 p.470-477 (NL)
- Reydellet, Colin: Leçon 2 : De la matière délictuelle et de sa qualification....., Revue Lamy droit des affaires 2016 nº 111 p.33-36 (FR)
- Reydellet, Colin: Leçon 3 : De la clause attributive de juridiction et de son sort....., Revue Lamy droit des affaires 2016 nº 111 p.37-39 (FR)
- Mäsch, Gerald: Blondes Have More Fun (Or Have They?), Wirtschaft und Wettbewerb 2016 p.285-291 (DE)
- Laazouzi, Malik: XXI. Compétence des juridictions et lois applicables - Cour de justice, 4e ch., 21 mai 2015, Cartel Damage Claims, aff. C-352/13, ECLI:EU:C:2015:335, Jurisprudence de la CJUE 2015. Décisions et commentaires (Ed. Bruylant - Bruxelles) 2016, p. 853-857 (FR)
- Pato, Alexia: Collective Redress for Cartel Damage Claims in The European Union after CDC v Akzo Nobel NV and Others, Yearbook of private international law 2017 p.491-506 (EN)
- Thole, Christoph: Erfassen Schiedsvereinbarungen auch Kartellschadensersatzansprüche?, Zeitschrift für Wettbewerbsrecht 2017 p.133-145 (DE)
- Kruger, Thalia: Arbitrage en Brussel I(bis), Revue de droit commercial belge 2017 p.308-315 (NL)
- Thiede, Thomas ; Klumpe, Gerhard: A Christmas Carol - strongly inspired by Charles Dickens and CDC Hydrogen Peroxide, Neue Zeitschrift für Kartellrecht 2017 p.643 (EN)
- Van Bochove, L.M.: Internationaalprivaatrechtelijke aspecten van kartelschade, Kartelschade 2019 p.207-236 (NL)
- Bochove, L.M.: Internaationaalprivaatrechtelijke aspecten van kartelschade, Kartelschade (Wolters Kluwer) 2019 p.207-236 (NL)
Procedural Analysis Information
Source of the question referred for a preliminary ruling
Landgericht Dortmund - Germany
Subject-matter
- area of freedom, security and justice
- - Judicial cooperation in civil matters
Provisions of national law referred to
Information not available
Provisions of international law referred to
Information not available
Procedure and result
- Reference for a preliminary ruling
Formation of the Court
quatrième chambre (Cour)
Judge-Rapporteur
Safjan
Advocate General
Jääskinen
Language(s) of the Case
Language(s) of the Opinion