Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber), 16 February 2012

Council of the European Union and Commission of the European Communities v Interpipe Nikopolsky Seamless Tubes Plant Niko Tube ZAT (Interpipe Niko Tube ZAT) and Interpipe Nizhnedneprovsky Tube Rolling Plant VAT (Interpipe NTRP VAT)

Appeals — Anti‑dumping duties — Regulation (EC) No 954/2006 — Imports of certain seamless pipes and tubes, of iron or steel originating in Croatia, Romania, Russia and Ukraine — Regulation (EC) No 384/96 — Article 2(10)(i), Article 3(2), (3) and (5) to (7), Article 18(3) and Article 19(3) — Calculation of the normal value and of the injury — ‘Single economic entity’ — Rights of the defence — No statement of reasons

Joined Cases C‑191/09 P and C‑200/09 P



Top of the page Documents in the Case
Document Date Name of the parties Subject-matter Curia EUR-Lex Autres Liens
Judgment (OJ)
16/03/2012 Council and Commission v Interpipe Niko Tube and Interpipe NTRP
External relations
- Commercial policy
- Dumping
  • External relations
  • - Commercial policy
  • - Dumping
EUR-Lex text EUR-Lex bilingual text
Judgment
ECLI:EU:C:2012:78		 16/02/2012 Council and Commission v Interpipe Niko Tube and Interpipe NTRP
External relations
- Commercial policy
- Dumping
  • External relations
  • - Commercial policy
  • - Dumping
EUR-Lex text EUR-Lex bilingual text
Judgment (Summary)
ECLI:EU:C:2012:78		 16/02/2012 Council and Commission v Interpipe Niko Tube and Interpipe NTRP
External relations
- Commercial policy
- Dumping
  • External relations
  • - Commercial policy
  • - Dumping
EUR-Lex text EUR-Lex bilingual text
Application (OJ)
15/08/2009 Council and Commission v Interpipe Niko Tube and Interpipe NTRP
External relations
- Commercial policy
- Dumping
  • External relations
  • - Commercial policy
  • - Dumping
View pdf documents
Order
ECLI:EU:C:2009:454		 15/07/2009 Council and Commission v Interpipe Niko Tube and Interpipe NTRP
External relations
- Commercial policy
- Dumping
  • External relations
  • - Commercial policy
  • - Dumping
Available in :
EUR-Lex text EUR-Lex bilingual text
Opinion
ECLI:EU:C:2011:245		 14/04/2011 Council and Commission v Interpipe Niko Tube and Interpipe NTRP
External relations
- Commercial policy
- Dumping
  • External relations
  • - Commercial policy
  • - Dumping
EUR-Lex text EUR-Lex bilingual text
Top of the page Legal analysis of the decision or of the case

Reports of Cases

published in the electronic Reports of Cases (Court Reports - general)

Subject-matter

Appeal against the judgment of the Court of First Instance (Second Chamber) of 10 March 2009 in Case T-249/06 Interpipe Nikopolsky Seamless Tubes Plant Niko Tube ZAT (Interpipe Niko Tube ZAT) and Interpipe Nizhnedneprovsky Tube Rolling Plant VAT (Interpipe NTRP VAT) v Council of the European Union, annulling Article 1 of Council Regulation (EC) No 954/2006 of 27 June 2006 imposing definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of certain seamless pipes and tubes, of iron or steel originating in Croatia, Romania, Russia and Ukraine, and repealing Regulations (EC) No 2320/97 and (EC) No 348/2000 (OJ 2006 L 175, p. 4).

Systematic classification scheme

1.
-
6 External policy
  6.02 Commercial policy
    6.02.01 Rules on trade with third countries
      6.02.01.01 Anti-dumping and anti-subsidy measures
-
6 External policy
  6.02 Commercial policy
    6.02.01 Rules on trade with third countries
      6.02.01.01 Anti-dumping and anti-subsidy measures
-
6 External policy
  6.02 Commercial policy
    6.02.01 Rules on trade with third countries
      6.02.01.01 Anti-dumping and anti-subsidy measures
-
1 The legal order of the European Union
  1.01 Sources of EU law
    1.01.02 General principles of law
      1.01.02.05 Rights of the defence and procedural guarantees
-
6 External policy
  6.02 Commercial policy
    6.02.01 Rules on trade with third countries
      6.02.01.01 Anti-dumping and anti-subsidy measures
-
3 Legal proceedings
  3.10 Appeals
    3.10.03 Grounds of appeal
      3.10.03.04 Substance of the pleas in law
        3.10.03.04.03 Infringement of EU law
          3.10.03.04.03.01 Insufficient or contradictory reasoning for the decision under appeal
-
6 External policy
  6.02 Commercial policy
    6.02.01 Rules on trade with third countries
      6.02.01.01 Anti-dumping and anti-subsidy measures
-
6 External policy
  6.02 Commercial policy
    6.02.01 Rules on trade with third countries
      6.02.01.01 Anti-dumping and anti-subsidy measures
-
3 Legal proceedings
  3.10 Appeals
    3.10.02 Jurisdiction over the appeal
      3.10.02.01 Exclusion of questions of fact
        3.10.02.01.01 Incorrect assessment of the facts and evidence
          3.10.02.01.01.00 General
-
6 External policy
  6.02 Commercial policy
    6.02.01 Rules on trade with third countries
      6.02.01.01 Anti-dumping and anti-subsidy measures


Citations of case-law or legislation

References in grounds of judgment

Operative part

Opinion


Dates

Date of the lodging of the application initiating proceedings

  • 29/05/2009

Date of the Opinion

  • 14/04/2011

Date of the hearing

Information not available

Date of delivery

16/02/2012


References

Publication in the Official Journal

Applications: OJ C 193 from 15.08.2009, p.7

Judgment: OJ C 98 from 31.03.2012, p.2

Name of the parties

Council and Commission v Interpipe Niko Tube and Interpipe NTRP

Notes on Academic Writings

  1. Idot, Laurence: Antidumping, Europe 2012 Avril Comm. nº 4 p.32 (FR)



Procedural Analysis Information

Source of the question referred for a preliminary ruling

Information not available

Subject-matter

  • External relations
  • - Commercial policy
  • - Dumping

Provisions of national law referred to

Information not available

Provisions of international law referred to

Information not available

Procedure and result

  • Actions for annulment
  • Appeals : dismissal on substantive grounds

Formation of the Court

troisième chambre (Cour)

Judge-Rapporteur

Arestis

Advocate General

Mengozzi

Language(s) of the Case

  • English

Language(s) of the Opinion

  • French