Reports of Cases

not yet published (Court Reports - general)

Subject-matter

Information not available

Systematic classification scheme

Citations of case-law or legislation

References in grounds of judgment

• Directive 95/46 : paragraphs 16, 28 - 30, 32
• Directive 95/46 -A02LH : paragraphs 1, 4, 27, 33, 35, 36, 38, 40, 47, 52
• Directive 95/46 -A06 : paragraph 5
• Directive 95/46 -A06P1LA : paragraph 42
• Directive 95/46 -A06P2 : paragraph 42
• Directive 95/46 -A07LA : paragraphs 6, 33 - 35, 42, 52
• Directive 95/46 -A10 : paragraphs 7, 40, 48
• Directive 95/46 -A10LCT2 : paragraph 41
• Directive 95/46 -C38 : paragraphs 3, 40
• Regulation 679/2016 : paragraphs 28, 31, 32
• Regulation 679/2016 -A04PT11 : paragraphs 1, 9, 33, 36, 38, 40, 47, 52
• Regulation 679/2016 -A05 : paragraph 10
• Regulation 679/2016 -A05P1LA : paragraph 42
• Regulation 679/2016 -A05P2 : paragraph 42
• Regulation 679/2016 -A06P1LA : paragraphs 11, 33, 34, 36, 52
• Regulation 679/2016 -A07P1 : paragraphs 12, 42
• Regulation 679/2016 -A07P2 : paragraph 12
• Regulation 679/2016 -A07P2SNT1 : paragraph 39
• Regulation 679/2016 -A07P4 : paragraph 12
• Regulation 679/2016 -A13 : paragraphs 40, 48
• Regulation 679/2016 -A13P1 : paragraph 13
• Regulation 679/2016 -A13P2 : paragraph 13
• Regulation 679/2016 -A13P2LB : paragraph 41
• Regulation 679/2016 -A13P2LC : paragraph 41
• Regulation 679/2016 -A94P1 : paragraphs 14, 29
• Regulation 679/2016 -A99P2 : paragraphs 15, 29
• Regulation 679/2016 -C32 : paragraphs 8, 37
• Regulation 679/2016 -C42 : paragraphs 8, 39 - 41
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -582/14 -N57 : paragraph 34
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -673/17 -N41 : paragraph 31
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -673/17 -N43 : paragraph 32
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -673/17 -N52 : paragraph 35
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -673/17 -N53 : paragraph 34
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -673/17 -N54 : paragraph 35
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -673/17 -N55 : paragraph 37
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -673/17 -N57 : paragraph 37
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -673/17 -N58 : paragraph 38
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -673/17 -N61 : paragraph 36
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -673/17 -N62 : paragraph 36
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -673/17 -N63 : paragraph 36
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -673/17 -N74 : paragraph 40
• Court of Justice - Opinion C -61/19 : paragraphs 42, 46, 50

Operative part

• Interprets : Directive 95/45 -A02LH
• Interprets : Directive 95/45 -A07LA
• Interprets : Regulation 679/2016 -A04PT11
• Interprets : Regulation 679/2016 -A06P1LA

Opinion

• Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU (2007), Article 8 : point 36
  
• Directive 95/46 : points 10, 25, 37, 40, 52, 55
  
• Directive 95/46 -A02LH : points 3, 20, 29, 34, 39, 41, 63
  
• Directive 95/46 -A06 : point 5
  
• Directive 95/46 -A06P1LA : point 32
  
• Directive 95/46 -A07 : points 6, 32, 33
  
• Directive 95/46 -A07LA : points 39, 56
  
• Directive 95/46 -A07LB : point 58
  
• Directive 95/46 -A10 : point 47
  
• Directive 95/46 -A11 : point 47
  
• Directive 95/46 -A13 : point 32
  
• Directive 95/46 -CH2 : point 4
  
• Regulation 679/2016 : points 24, 25, 37, 39
  
• Regulation 679/2016 -04PT11 : point 41
  
• Regulation 679/2016 -A04PT11 : points 7, 29, 35, 40, 63
  
• Regulation 679/2016 -A05 : point 32
  
• Regulation 679/2016 -A05P1LA : point 46
  
• Regulation 679/2016 -A05P2 : point 49
  
• Regulation 679/2016 -A06 : point 32
  
• Regulation 679/2016 -A06P1LA : points 8, 39
  
• Regulation 679/2016 -A06P1LB : point 58
  
• Regulation 679/2016 -A07 : point 56
  
• Regulation 679/2016 -A07P1 : points 9, 49, 50, 54
  
• Regulation 679/2016 -A23 : point 32
  
• Regulation 679/2016 -A94P1 : point 23
  
• Regulation 679/2016 -A99P2 : point 23
  
• Commission - COM Document (Draft Legislation) - 52012PC0011 -A07P1 : point 52
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -468/10 -N30 : point 33
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -131/12 -N71 : point 32
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -582/14 -N57 : point 33
  
• Court of Justice - Opinion C -673/17 -N44 : point 25
  
• Court of Justice - Opinion C -673/17 -N45 : point 25
  
• Court of Justice - Opinion C -673/17 -N46 : point 25
  
• Court of Justice - Opinion C -673/17 -N47 : point 25
  
• Court of Justice - Opinion C -673/17 -N48 : point 25
  
• Court of Justice - Opinion C -673/17 -N49 : point 25
  
• Court of Justice - Opinion C -673/17 -N57 : point 36
  
• Court of Justice - Opinion C -673/17 -N62 : point 45
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -136/17 -N33 : point 25
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -493/17 -N39 : point 25
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -496/17 -N57 : point 32
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -673/17 -N38 : point 25
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -673/17 -N39 : point 25
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -673/17 -N40 : point 25
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -673/17 -N41 : point 25
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -673/17 -N42 : point 25
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -673/17 -N43 : point 25
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -673/17 -N52 : point 44
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -673/17 -N53 : point 33
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -673/17 -N54 : point 60
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -673/17 -N55 : point 45
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -708/18 -N36 : point 32
  

Dates

Date of the lodging of the application initiating proceedings

• 29/01/2019

Date of the Opinion

• 04/03/2020

Date of the hearing

Information not available

Date of delivery

11/11/2020

References

Publication in the Official Journal

Information not available

Name of the parties

Orange Romania

Notes on Academic Writings

1. Sellars, Clare: A "crystal-clear" opportunity for the ECJ to clarify the concept of "consent" under the GDPR?, Computer and Telecommunications Law Review 2020 p. 136-138 (EN)
2. Kaiser, Elena: The concept of "freely given, specific and informed" consent under the scrutiny of the European Court of Justice : Case C-61/19 Orange România SA c. Autoritatea Naţională de Supraveghere a Prelucrării Datelor cu Caracter Personal (ANSPDCP), Court of Justice of the European Union, European Data Protection Law Review 2020 Vol. 6 nº 4 p. 607-610 (EN)
3. Simon, Denys: Droits fondamentaux - Protection des données, Europe 2021, nº 1 Janvier, comm. 1 (FR)
4. Savirimuthu, Joseph: Lawfulness of Pre-Formulated Declarations of Consent Case Note on Orange Romania (C-61/19), Journal of European Consumer and Market Law 2021 n° 4 p. 169-172 (EN)
5. Bertrand, Brunessen: Perfectibilité de la protection des données personnelles, Revue trimestrielle de droit européen 2021, n° 1, p. 143-144 (FR)

Procedural Analysis Information

Source of the question referred for a preliminary ruling

Tribunalul Bucureşti - Romania

Subject-matter

• Approximation of laws
  
• Data protection
  

Provisions of national law referred to

Information not available

Provisions of international law referred to

Information not available

Procedure and result

• Reference for a preliminary ruling
  

Formation of the Court

deuxième chambre (Cour)

Judge-Rapporteur

von Danwitz

Advocate General

Szpunar

Language(s) of the Case

• Romanian
  

Language(s) of the Opinion

• English