Reports of Cases

not yet published (Court Reports - general) - publication in extract form

Subject-matter

Information not available

Systematic classification scheme

Citations of case-law or legislation

References in grounds of judgment

• EC Treaty (Amsterdam), Article 81 : paragraphs 64, 170, 695, 719, 720, 722
• EC Treaty (Amsterdam), Article 82 : paragraphs 64 - 75, 82, 100, 105, 116, 120, 162, 170, 173, 186, 199 - 206, 211, 216, 247 - 249, 269, 284, 456, 518, 584, 685, 692, 695, 721 - 724, 786, 798, 873, 967, 973, 1018, 1042, 1559, 1561, 1599, 1602
• EC Treaty (Amsterdam), Article 82 -L2LB : paragraph 219
• Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU (2007), Article 41 : paragraphs 619, 1639
• Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU (2007), Article 47 : paragraphs 63, 1609, 1611, 1612
• Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU (2007), Article 49 -P1 : paragraph 1598
• Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU (2007), Article 52 -P3 : paragraph 1609
• Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU (2007), Article 52 -P7 : paragraph 1609
• TFEU, Article 261 : paragraph 1612
• TFEU, Article 263 : paragraph 1612
• Regulation 17/62 -A15P2 : paragraphs 1622, 1623
• Regulation 4064/89 : paragraphs 233, 241, 242
• General Court - Rules of Procedure (1991) -A43P5 : paragraphs 53, 55, 57, 60
• General Court - Rules of Procedure (1991) -A48P2 : paragraphs 696, 1644
• Secondary Legislation - Document published in the OJ C series- 31998Y0114(01) -P21 : paragraph 1631
• Secondary Legislation - Document published in the OJ C series- 31998Y0114(01) -P22 : paragraphs 1624, 1625
• Regulation 1/2003 -A02 : paragraph 62
• Regulation 1/2003 -A18 : paragraphs 500, 501
• Regulation 1/2003 -A19 : paragraphs 612, 616 - 618, 626
• Regulation 1/2003 -A19P1 : paragraphs 612 - 615
• Regulation 1/2003 -A23 : paragraph 1598
• Regulation 1/2003 -A23P1LA : paragraph 690
• Regulation 1/2003 -A23P2 : paragraph 1647
• Regulation 1/2003 -A23P3 : paragraphs 1622, 1647
• Regulation 1/2003 -A27P2 : paragraph 623
• Regulation 1/2003 -A31 : paragraph 1612
• Regulation 1/2003 -A33P1LC : paragraph 338
• Regulation 1/2003 -C25 : paragraph 617
• Regulation 773/2004 : paragraph 339
• Regulation 773/2004 -A03 : paragraphs 612 - 618, 626
• Regulation 773/2004 -A03P1 : paragraph 613
• Regulation 773/2004 -A10P2 : paragraphs 323, 326, 334, 338
• Regulation 773/2004 -A12 : paragraphs 324, 326, 327, 333, 334, 337, 338
• Regulation 773/2004 -A15P2 : paragraph 623
• General Court - Practice Directions to Parties (2007) -A57LD : paragraph 58
• Commission - Other Acts - 52006XC0901(01) : paragraphs 1559, 1596, 1598, 1624
• Commission - Other Acts - 52006XC0901(01) -P13 : paragraphs 1569, 1571, 1573, 1575, 1576
• Commission - Other Acts - 52006XC0901(01) -P21 : paragraphs 1570, 1571 - 1582, 1631
• Commission - Other Acts - 52006XC0901(01) -P22 : paragraph 1570
• Commission - Other Acts - 52009XC0224(01) : paragraphs 154, 157 - 159, 1639
• Commission - Other Acts - 52009XC0224(01) -P2 : paragraph 155
• Other Bodies - Preparatory Act - 52009XX0922(03) -PT2.1L2 : paragraph 162
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -48/69 : paragraphs 249, 1586
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -6/73 : paragraphs 248, 274
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -85/76 : paragraphs 71 - 73, 77, 81, 83, 90, 91, 94, 106, 116, 135, 139, 219, 527, 1602, 1604, 1619
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -22/79 : paragraph 269
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -322/81 : paragraphs 74, 78, 82, 83, 88, 96, 144, 220, 1601, 1619
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -9/83 : paragraphs 363, 379
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -29/83 : paragraph 66
• Court of Justice - Opinion C -89/85 : paragraph 238
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -89/85 : paragraphs 66, 232, 235, 237, 241, 301, 302
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -62/86 : paragraph 219
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -234/89 : paragraph 89
• General Court - Judgment T -65/89 : paragraphs 90, 112, 139
• General Court - Judgment T -30/91 : paragraphs 349, 350, 357, 627, 630
• General Court - Judgment T -83/91 : paragraphs 1564, 1601
• Court of Justice - Opinion C -36/92 : paragraph 381
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -199/92 : paragraph 63
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -235/92 : paragraph 63
• Court of Justice - Opinion C -310/93 : paragraphs 89, 90
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -310/93 : paragraphs 89, 90, 683, 1602
• General Court - Judgment T -24/93 : paragraph 274
• General Court - Judgment T -141/94 : paragraphs 363 - 366, 379
• General Court - Judgment T -25/95 : paragraphs 354, 719
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -306/96 : paragraph 317
• General Court - Judgment T -102/96 : paragraphs 233, 235, 239, 240 - 243, 261, 274
• General Court - Judgment T -228/97 : paragraphs 199, 206, 211, 215, 216
• General Court - Judgment T -65/98 : paragraphs 121 - 123
• General Court - Judgment T -191/98 : paragraphs 359, 614, 619, 623
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -199/99 : paragraph 350
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -238/99 : paragraph 64
• General Court - Judgment T -61/99 : paragraph 816
• General Court - Judgment T -219/99 : paragraphs 186, 1619
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -204/00 : paragraphs 353, 627
• General Court - Judgment T -44/00 : paragraph 400
• General Court - Judgment T -67/00 : paragraphs 62, 63, 691, 720
• General Court - Judgment T -66/01 : paragraph 139
• General Court - Judgment T -203/01 : paragraphs 75, 88, 186, 1564, 1619
• General Court - Judgment T -273/01 : paragraph 161
• General Court - Judgment T -314/01 : paragraphs 367 - 369
• General Court - Judgment T -15/02 : paragraph 619
• General Court - Judgment T -38/02 : paragraphs 614, 619, 720
• General Court - Judgment T -259/02 : paragraphs 1586, 1601
• General Court - Judgment T -18/03 : paragraph 1644
• General Court - Judgment T -204/03 : paragraph 256
• General Court - Judgment T -271/03 : paragraph 1601
• General Court - Judgment T -340/03 : paragraph 203
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -95/04 : paragraphs 74, 78, 82, 83, 91, 94, 96, 105, 527
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -167/04 : paragraph 1614
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -407/04 : paragraph 718
• General Court - Judgment T -201/04 : paragraph 1613
• General Court - Judgment T -60/05 : paragraph 697
• General Court - Judgment T -321/05 : paragraphs 64, 205, 220, 1562, 1622
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -76/06 : paragraph 164
• General Court - Judgment T -75/06 : paragraph 626
• General Court - Judgment T -155/06 : paragraphs 72, 77, 91, 119, 193, 538
• General Court - Judgment T -192/06 : paragraph 1674
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -534/07 : paragraph 1622
• General Court - Judgment T -112/07 : paragraph 62
• General Court - Judgment T -234/07 : paragraph 695
• General Court - Judgment T -240/07 : paragraphs 352, 353, 627
• Court of Justice - Opinion C -280/08 : paragraph 1601
• Court of Justice - Opinion C -407/08 : paragraphs 388, 398 - 401
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -280/08 : paragraphs 98, 99, 152, 522, 1602
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -476/08 : paragraph 626
• General Court - Judgment T -83/08 : paragraph 1598
• General Court - Judgment T -141/08 : paragraphs 67, 542
• General Court - Judgment T -199/08 : paragraph 352
• General Court - Judgment T -211/08 : paragraph 1569
• General Court - Order T -457/08 : paragraph 332
• Court of Justice - Opinion C -521/09 : paragraph 1611
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -52/09 : paragraphs 88, 98, 99, 103, 152, 522
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -244/09 : paragraph 64
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -279/09 : paragraph 1609
• General Court - Judgment T -360/09 : paragraph 1615
• General Court - Judgment T -458/09 : paragraph 619
• Court of Justice - Opinion C -549/10 : paragraphs 97, 116, 132, 150
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -110/10 : paragraphs 627, 630
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -209/10 : paragraphs 94, 98 - 100, 152
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -386/10 : paragraphs 1609, 1612, 1643
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -549/10 : paragraphs 73, 78, 97, 103, 117, 119, 12, 145, 153, 176, 182, 184

Operative part

Information not available

Opinion

Information not available

Dates

Date of the lodging of the application initiating proceedings

• 22/07/2009

Date of the Opinion

Information not available

Date of the hearing

Information not available

Date of delivery

12/06/2014

References

Publication in the Official Journal

Judgment: OJ C 245 from 28.07.2014, p.8

Application: OJ C 220 from 12.09.2009, p.41

Name of the parties

Intel v Commission

Notes on Academic Writings

1. Maier, Martina: EuG: Harte Haltung gegen Geschäftspraktiken marktbeherrschender Unternehmen bestätigt, Betriebs-Berater 2014 p.2004 (DE)
2. Venit, James S.: Case T-286/09 Intel v Commission—The Judgment of the General Court: All Steps Backward and No Steps Forward, European Competition Journal 2014 p.203-230 (EN)
3. Nihoul, Paul: The Ruling of the General Court in Intel: Towards the End of an Effect-based Approach in European Competition Law?, Journal of European Competition Law & Practice 2014 Vol. 5 nº 8 p.521-530 (EN)
4. Venit, James S.: The Intel Judgment, File Access, and Confidentiality in EU Competition Cases: Has the Time Come for Reform? , Journal of European Competition Law & Practice 2014 Vol. 5 nº 10 p.681-692 (EN)
5. Winckler, Antoine: L'arrêt Intel : l'économie est-elle soluble dans le droit?, L'Observateur de Bruxelles 2014 p.40-44 (FR)
6. Vatovec, Lea: Posledice sodbe v zadevi Intel za presojo izključnih rabatnih sistemov, Pravna praksa 2014 nº 33 p.20-22 (SL)
7. Bastidas Venegas, Vladimir: En effektbaserad kontra en formbaserad bedömning av missbruk enligt artikel 102 FEUF - Tribunalens avgörande i Intel, Ny Juridik 2014 nº 4 p.31-62 (SV)
8. Idot, Laurence: Abus de position dominante et rabais d'exclusivité, Europe 2014 Août-Septembre nº 8-9 p.29 (FR)
9. Pielmuș, Ana-Maria: Evoluții recente ale practicii decizionale a instanțelor europene cu privire la discounturile acordate de întreprinderile dominante - implicații ale hotărârii Tribunalului în cauza Intel împotriva Comisiei Europene, Revista română de drept al afacerilor 2014 nº 8 p.103-122 (RO)
10. Wernicke, Stephan: Das Intel-Urteil des EuG – ein Lehrstück dogmatischer Kontinuität, Europäische Zeitschrift für Wirtschaftsrecht 2015 p.19-23 (DE)
11. Wurmnest, Wolfgang ; Lund, Nils: Die internationale Reichweite der europäischen Wettbewerbsregeln nach dem Intel-Urteil des EuG, Neue Zeitschrift für Kartellrecht 2015 p.73-78 (DE)
12. Petit, Nicolas: Intel, leveraging rebates and the goals of Article 102 TFEU, European Competition Journal 2015 p.26-68 (EN)
13. Özkan, Ahmet Fatih: The Intel judgment: the Commission threw the first stone but the EU courts will throw the last, European Competition Journal 2015 p.69-85 (EN)
14. Sher, Brian: Keep Calm—Yes; Carry on—No! A Response to Whish on Intel, Journal of European Competition Law & Practice 2015 Vol. 6 nº 4 p.219-220 (EN)
15. Goffinet, Pierre: The judgment of the General Court in the Intel case and the opinion of the Advocate General in the Post Danmark case: a reconsideration of the policy of the European Commision?, ÖZK aktuell : Österreichische Zeitschrift für Kartell- und Wettbewerbsrecht 2015 p.127-139 (EN)
16. Behrens, Peter: Der extraterritoriale Schutz des Systems unverfälschten Wettbewerbs nach dem Intel-Urteil des EuG?, Privatrecht, Wirtschaftsrecht, Verfassungsrecht (Ed. 2015 Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft, Baden-Baden) 2015 p.542-548 (DE)
17. Peeperkorn, Luc: Conditional pricing : Why the General Court is wrong in Intel and what the Court of Justice can do to rebalance the assessment of rebates, Concurrences : revue des droits de la concurrence 2015 nº 1 p.43-63 (EN)
18. Kjølbye, Lars ; Padilla, Jorge ; Snelders, Robbert: The Intel controversy: an introduction, Competition Law & Policy Debate 2015 Vol. 1 p.28-31 (EN)
19. Bodenstein, Ines: Intel und Post Danmark II – Die Weichen für die zukünftige Bewertung von Rabatten nach Art. 102 AEUV sind so gut wie gestellt!, Zeitschrift für Wettbewerbsrecht 2015 p.403-420 (DE)
20. Jones, Alison ; Sufrin, Brenda: The European way - reflections on the Intel judgment, Competition Law & Policy Debate 2015 Vol. 1 p.32-42 (EN)
21. Allan, Bill: Loyalty and fidelity rebates: a sense of déjà vu again, Competition Law & Policy Debate 2015 Vol. 1 p.50-59 (EN)
22. Ahlborn, Christian ; Piccinin, Daniel: The Intel judgment and consumer welfare - a response to Wouter Wils, Competition Law & Policy Debate 2015 Vol. 1 p.60-75 (EN)
23. Dolmans, Maurits ; Graf, Thomas: Dealing with Intel intelligently delineating the scope and limits of the Court’s ruling, Competition Law & Policy Debate 2015 Vol. 1 p.76-85 (EN)
24. Neven, Damien: A structured assessment of rebates contingent on exclusivity, Competition Law & Policy Debate 2015 Vol. 1 p.86-96 (EN)
25. Goffinet, Pierre: The judgment of the General Court in the Intel case and the opinion of the Advocate General in the Post Danmark case: a reconsideration of the policy of the European Commission?, ÖZK aktuell : Österreichische Zeitschrift für Kartell- und Wettbewerbsrecht 2016 p.123-137 (EN)
26. Marty, Frédéric: Éviction abusive - Remise de fidélité - Dénigrement - Opérateur historique : L'Autorité de la concurrence sanctionne l'opérateur historique en matière de télédiffusion par voie hertzienne à hauteur de 20.6 millions d'euros pour des pratiques d'éviction anticoncurrentielles durant le déploiement de la TNT passant par des stratégies de dénigrement et la mise en oeuvre de rabais de fidélité, Concurrences : revue des droits de la concurrence 2016 nº 3 p.79-82 (FR)
27. Carli, Cecilia: La Commissione aveva ragione, o forse si sbagliava (davvero) ?, Mercato concorrenza regole 2017 p.149-167 (IT)
28. Goffinet, Pierre ; Siniscalco, Léa: The judgments of the Court of Justice in the Intel case: is the “as-efficient competitor test” for exclusivity rebates back?, ÖZK aktuell : Österreichische Zeitschrift für Kartell- und Wettbewerbsrecht 2018 p.159-173 (EN)
29. FIŠER ŠOBOT, Sandra: A New Approach to Rebates After Intel Case, LeXonomica : revija za pravo in ekonomijo 2018 nº 02 p.103-118 (EN)
30. Cole, Matthew: No data, no abuse: the lesson from Intel's "more economic approach", European Competition Law Review 2023, Volume 44, Issue 10, p. 419-428 (EN)

Procedural Analysis Information

Source of the question referred for a preliminary ruling

Information not available

Subject-matter

• Competition
  
• - Dominant position
  

Provisions of national law referred to

Information not available

Provisions of international law referred to

Information not available

Procedure and result

• Actions for annulment : dismissal on substantive grounds
  
• Appeal brought against a sanction : dismissal on substantive grounds
  

Formation of the Court

septième chambre élargie (Tribunal)

Judge-Rapporteur

Dittrich

Advocate General

Information not available

Language(s) of the Case

• English
  

Language(s) of the Opinion

Information not available