Reports of Cases
published in the electronic Reports of Cases (Court Reports - general - 'Information on unpublished decisions' section)
Subject-matter
Appeal brought against the judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 12 October 2011 in Case T-41/05 Alliance One International v Commission reducing the part of the fine imposed on Agroexpansión, for the payment of which Alliance One International, Inc. is held jointly and severally liable with Agroexpansión, and dismissing as to the remainder an application for partial annulment of Commission Decision C(2004) 4030 final of 20 October 2004 relating to a proceeding under Article 81(1) of the EC Treaty (Case COMP/C.38.238/B.2 − Raw tobacco sector in Spain) concerning a cartel aimed at fixing the prices paid to producers and the quantities purchased from them in the Spanish raw tobacco market
Systematic classification scheme
1.
|
|
4 Internal policy of the European Union
4.08 Competition
4.08.01 Agreements, decisions and concerted practices
4.08.01.07 null
4.08.01.07.02 null
4.08.01.07.02.03
|
|
|
3 Legal proceedings
3.10 Appeals
3.10.02 Jurisdiction over the appeal
3.10.02.01 Exclusion of questions of fact
3.10.02.01.01 Incorrect assessment of the facts and evidence
3.10.02.01.01.00 General
|
|
|
3 Legal proceedings
3.10 Appeals
3.10.03 Grounds of appeal
3.10.03.02 Issues relating to the admissibility of the pleas
3.10.03.02.02 Requirement of precision
|
|
|
3 Legal proceedings
3.10 Appeals
3.10.03 Grounds of appeal
3.10.03.02 Issues relating to the admissibility of the pleas
3.10.03.02.04 New pleas in law
|
|
|
4 Internal policy of the European Union
4.08 Competition
4.08.03 Implementation of the competition rules
4.08.03.03 Fines imposed by the Commission
4.08.03.03.04 Fines for infringement of Articles 101 TFEU and 102 TFEU (Articles 81 EC and 82 EC)
4.08.03.03.04.02 Basic amount
4.08.03.03.04.02.02 Basic amount according to the 1998 Guidelines
4.08.03.03.04.02.02.03 Increase for deterrence
|
|
|
4 Internal policy of the European Union
4.08 Competition
4.08.03 Implementation of the competition rules
4.08.03.03 Fines imposed by the Commission
4.08.03.03.04 Fines for infringement of Articles 101 TFEU and 102 TFEU (Articles 81 EC and 82 EC)
4.08.03.03.04.03 Adjustment to the basic amount
4.08.03.03.04.03.01 Attenuating/mitigating circumstances according to the 1998 and 2006 Guidelines
4.08.03.03.04.03.01.06 Cessation of the infringement upon the Commission's first intervention
|
|
|
3 Legal proceedings
3.10 Appeals
3.10.03 Grounds of appeal
3.10.03.03 Ineffective pleas in law
|
|
|
3.10.03.04.03.01 Insufficient or contradictory reasoning for the decision under appeal
|
|
|
3 Legal proceedings
3.10 Appeals
3.10.03 Grounds of appeal
3.10.03.04 Substance of the pleas in law
3.10.03.04.03 Infringement of EU law
3.10.03.04.03.01 Insufficient or contradictory reasoning for the decision under appeal
|
|
|
4 Internal policy of the European Union
4.08 Competition
4.08.03 Implementation of the competition rules
4.08.03.03 Fines imposed by the Commission
4.08.03.03.08 Judicial review
4.08.03.03.08.03 Review in the exercise of unlimited jurisdiction
4.08.03.03.08.03.02 Power to vary the amount of the fine
4.08.03.03.08.03.02.02 Reduction
|
Citations of case-law or legislation
References in grounds of judgment
-
EC Treaty (Amsterdam), Article 81
: paragraphs 37, 73
-
Treaty of Nice 2001 - Protocol on the Statute of the Court of Justice
-A36 : paragraph 98
-
Treaty of Nice 2001 - Protocol on the Statute of the Court of Justice
-A53L1 : paragraph 98
-
Treaty of Nice 2001 - Protocol on the Statute of the Court of Justice
-A58L1 : paragraph 52
-
TFEU, Article 256
-P1L2 : paragraph 52
-
TFEU, Article 261
: paragraph 104
-
TFEU, Article 266
-L1 : paragraph 107
-
Regulation 17/62
-A17 : paragraph 104
-
General Court - Rules of Procedure (1991)
-A81 : paragraph 98
-
Secondary Legislation - Document published in the OJ C series- 31998Y0114(01)
: paragraph 68
-
Secondary Legislation - Document published in the OJ C series- 31998Y0114(01)
-PT1BL1 : paragraphs 67, 69
-
Secondary Legislation - Document published in the OJ C series- 31998Y0114(01)
-PT3T3 : paragraphs 80, 83
-
Regulation 1/2003
-A23P2 : paragraph 73
-
Regulation 1/2003
-A31 : paragraph 104
-
Decision 2007/236
: paragraphs 1, 41 - 49, 53, 69, 71, 100, 101, 111
-
Court of Justice - Rules of Procedure (2012)
-A168P1LD : paragraph 52
-
Court of Justice - Rules of Procedure (2012)
-A169P2 : paragraph 52
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -397/03
: paragraph 50
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -289/04
: paragraph 73
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -407/04
: paragraph 80
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -229/05
: paragraph 35
-
General Court - Judgment T -38/05
: paragraphs 2, 107
-
General Court - Judgment T -41/05
: paragraphs 1 - 113
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -3/06
: paragraphs 104 - 105, 111
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -374/07
: paragraph 85
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -534/07
: paragraph 104
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -97/08
: paragraphs 36 - 37, 39
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -413/08
: paragraphs 73 - 74
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -96/09
: paragraph 85
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -352/09
: paragraph 50
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -473/09
: paragraph 35
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -628/10
: paragraphs 37 - 41, 43 - 44, 47, 60
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -199/11
: paragraph 104
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -240/11
: paragraph 53
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -286/11
: paragraph 110
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -421/11
: paragraph 75
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -625/11
: paragraphs 52, 98
Operative part
Opinion
Information not available
Dates
Date of the lodging of the application initiating proceedings
Date of the Opinion
Information not available
Date of the hearing
Information not available
Date of delivery
26/09/2013
References
Publication in the Official Journal
Application: OJ C 73 from 10.03.2012, p.20
Judgment: OJ C 344 from 23.11.2013, p.18
Name of the parties
Alliance One International v Commission
Notes on Academic Writings
- Idot, Laurence: Cartels et responsabilité des sociétés mères. La Cour confirme sa jurisprudence sur l'imputabilité des comportements des filiales aux sociétés mères , Europe 2013 Novembre Comm. nº 11 p.36 (FR)
- Robin, Catherine: Confirmation de la méthode « de la double base », Revue Lamy de la Concurrence : droit, économie, régulation 2014 nº 38 p.34 (FR)
Procedural Analysis Information
Source of the question referred for a preliminary ruling
Information not available
Subject-matter
- Competition
- - Agreements, decisions and concerted practices
Provisions of national law referred to
Information not available
Provisions of international law referred to
Information not available
Procedure and result
- Actions for annulment
- Appeal brought against a sanction
- Appeals : dismissal on grounds of inadmissibility
- Appeals : dismissal on substantive grounds
Formation of the Court
neuvième chambre (Cour)
Judge-Rapporteur
Lõhmus
Advocate General
Mengozzi
Language(s) of the Case
Language(s) of the Opinion
Information not available