Reports of Cases

not yet published (Court Reports - general)

Subject-matter

Information not available

Systematic classification scheme

Citations of case-law or legislation

References in grounds of judgment

• EU Treaty (Maastricht), Article K.3 : paragraph 50
• Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU (2007), Article 49 -P1 : paragraphs 1, 44, 71, 73, 103, 106, 109
• Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU (2007), Article 51 -P1 : paragraphs 101, 110
• TFEU, Article 4 -P2 : paragraph 80
• TFEU, Article 82 : paragraph 50
• TFEU, Article 83 : paragraph 50
• TFEU, Article 85 : paragraph 50
• TFEU, Article 267 : paragraphs 61, 76, 134
• TFEU, Article 267 -L2 : paragraph 133
• TFEU, Article 325 -P1 : paragraphs 1, 40, 44, 71, 73, 83, 84, 92, 93, 96 - 98, 116, 118, 121, 123, 125, 129, 136
• TFEU, Article 325 -P2 : paragraph 116
• TFEU - Protocol No 3 -A23BISL1 : paragraph 48
• TEU, Article 2 : paragraphs 1, 40, 44, 71, 114
• TEU, Article 4 -P3 : paragraphs 1, 44, 71
• TEU, Article 19 -P1L2 : paragraphs 1, 40, 44, 71
• Decision 2006/928 : paragraphs 1, 44, 58, 65, 70
• Decision 2006/928 -A01 : paragraph 40
• Decision 2006/928 -A02 : paragraph 90
• Decision 2006/928 -A03 : paragraph 40
• Decision 2006/928 -A04 : paragraph 40
• Directive 2006/112 : paragraphs 1, 40, 44
• Court of Justice - Rules of Procedure (2012) -A107P1 : paragraph 49
• Court of Justice - Rules of Procedure (2012) -A107P3 : paragraph 48
• Court of Justice - Rules of Procedure (2012) -A108P1 : paragraphs 48, 56
• Court of Justice - Rules of Procedure (2012) -A113P2 : paragraph 57
• Directive 2017/1371 : paragraphs 58, 70, 81
• Directive 2017/1371 -A02 : paragraphs 1, 40, 44, 64
• Directive 2017/1371 -A12 : paragraphs 1, 44, 64
• Directive 2017/1371 -A12P1 : paragraph 40
• Directive 2017/1371 -A16 : paragraphs 5, 64
• Agreement between Member States - 41995A1127(03) : paragraph 64
• Agreement between Member States - 41995A1127(03) -A01 : paragraph 3
• Agreement between Member States - 41995A1127(03) -A02 : paragraph 4
• Agreement between Member States - 41995A1127(03) -A02P1 : paragraphs 1, 40, 44, 50, 71, 73, 85, 92, 93, 96 - 98, 118, 121, 123, 125, 136
• Commission - COM Document (Other than Draft Legislation) - 52022DC0664 : paragraphs 41, 90
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -52/76 -N26 : paragraph 132
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -106/77 -N24 : paragraph 95
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -617/10 -N29 : paragraph 110
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -105/14 -N54 : paragraph 108
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -105/14 -N55 : paragraph 108
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -105/14 -N56 : paragraph 108
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -105/14 -N57 : paragraph 108
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -72/15 -N161 : paragraph 114
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -72/15 -N162 : paragraph 114
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -574/15 -N36 : paragraph 85
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -310/16 -N33 : paragraph 101
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -42/17 : paragraphs 116, 118, 120
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -42/17 -N36 : paragraph 86
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -42/17 -N41 : paragraph 93
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -42/17 -N43 : paragraph 80
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -42/17 -N44 : paragraph 81
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -42/17 -N47 : paragraph 110
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -42/17 -N51 : paragraph 113
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -42/17 -N55 : paragraph 104
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -42/17 -N56 : paragraph 105
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -115/17 -N33 : paragraph 107
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -573/17 -N61 : paragraph 95
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -573/17 -N62 : paragraph 95
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -16/18 -N21 : paragraph 66
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -202/18 -N57 : paragraph 82
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -634/18 -N48 : paragraph 104
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -634/18 -N49 : paragraph 105
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -83/19 -N244 : paragraph 128
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -213/19 -N219 : paragraph 84
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -357/19 -N121 : paragraph 123
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -357/19 -N133 : paragraph 127
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -357/19 -N181 : paragraph 83
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -357/19 -N182 : paragraph 79
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -357/19 -N191 : paragraph 84
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -357/19 -N193 : paragraph 93
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -357/19 -N194 : paragraph 97
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -357/19 -N203 : paragraph 92
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -357/19 -N204 : paragraph 101
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -357/19 -N211 : paragraph 110
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -357/19 -N253 : paragraph 96
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -357/19 -N257 : paragraph 134
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -357/19 -N259 : paragraph 135
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -357/19 -N260 : paragraph 136
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -100/21 -N52 : paragraph 61
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -100/21 -N53 : paragraph 62
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -100/21 -N59 : paragraph 76
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -156/21 -N136 : paragraph 114
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -156/21 -N223 : paragraph 114
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -158/21 -N61 : paragraph 76
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -430/21 -N53 : paragraph 95
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -430/21 -N74 : paragraph 132
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -430/21 -N75 : paragraph 133
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -528/21 -N52 : paragraph 66
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -583/22 -N45 : paragraph 52

Operative part

• Interprets : TFEU, Article 325 -P1
• Interprets : Agreement between Member States - 41995A1127(03) -A02P1

Opinion

• Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU (2007), Article 47 -L2SNT1 : points 143, 144
  
• Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU (2007), Article 49 : points 37, 49, 96, 103
  
• Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU (2007), Article 49 -P1 : points 3, 40, 56, 89, 91, 99 - 101, 111, 123, 128, 129, 131, 138, 145, 146, 161
  
• Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU (2007), Article 51 -P1 : points 86, 132
  
• Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU (2007), Article 52 -P3 : point 96
  
• Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU (2007), Article 53 : point 133
  
• TFEU, Article 4 -P2 : point 105
  
• TFEU, Article 267 : point 161
  
• TFEU, Article 288 -L4 : point 75
  
• TFEU, Article 325 : points 37, 54 - 56, 59, 129, 151
  
• TFEU, Article 325 -P1 : points 40, 49, 53, 57, 61, 62, 71, 72, 84, 86, 87, 143, 152, 161
  
• TEU, Article 2 : points 40, 53, 78, 90, 116, 161
  
• TEU, Article 4 -P2 : point 161
  
• TEU, Article 4 -P3 : points 40, 52, 53, 78, 161
  
• TEU, Article 19 -P1L2 : points 40, 53, 116, 161
  
• Decision 2006/928 : points 37, 40, 49, 55, 56, 75, 77, 84, 86, 116, 129, 143, 152, 161
  
• Decision 2006/928 -A01 : points 6, 79
  
• Decision 2006/928 -A02 : point 76
  
• Decision 2006/928 -N : points 7, 78, 79, 83
  
• Directive 2006/112 : points 40, 53
  
• Directive 2014/104 -A10 : point 108
  
• Directive 2017/1371 -A02 : point 40
  
• Directive 2017/1371 -A02P2 : points 8, 51
  
• Directive 2017/1371 -A12 : points 40, 51, 63, 106
  
• Directive 2017/1371 -A16 : point 9
  
• Directive 2017/1371 -A17 : point 51
  
• Directive 2017/1371 -A17P1 : point 10
  
• Agreement between Member States - 41995A1127(03) : point 54
  
• Agreement between Member States - 41995A1127(03) -A01 : point 60
  
• Agreement between Member States - 41995A1127(03) -A01P1 : point 4
  
• Agreement between Member States - 41995A1127(03) -A02 : points 5, 49, 143
  
• Agreement between Member States - 41995A1127(03) -A02P1 : points 40, 61
  
• Commission - COM Document (Other than Draft Legislation) - 52022DC0664 : points 55, 81, 82
  
• Court of Justice - Opinion C -387/02 -N159 : point 95
  
• Court of Justice - Opinion C -387/02 -N160 : point 95
  
• Court of Justice - Opinion C -387/02 -N161 : point 95
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -387/02 -N68 : point 92
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -387/02 -N69 : point 92
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -617/10 : point 50
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -399/11 -N60 : point 137
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -650/13 -N56 : point 121
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -105/14 : point 50
  
• Court of Justice - Opinion C -574/15 -N155 : point 95
  
• Court of Justice - Opinion C -574/15 -N156 : point 95
  
• Court of Justice - Opinion C -574/15 -N157 : point 95
  
• Court of Justice - Opinion C -574/15 -N158 : point 95
  
• Court of Justice - Opinion C -574/15 -N159 : point 95
  
• Court of Justice - Opinion C -574/15 -N160 : point 95
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -72/15 -N162 : point 110
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -218/15 -N25 : point 92
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -574/15 -N26 : point 52
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -574/15 -N45 : point 59
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -612/15 -N50 : point 57
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -310/16 -N25 : point 57
  
• Court of Justice - Opinion C -115/17 -N39 : point 95
  
• Court of Justice - Opinion C -115/17 -N40 : point 95
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -42/17 : point 50
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -115/17 -N26 : point 92
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -476/17 -N80 : point 137
  
• Court of Justice - Opinion C -547/19 -N98 : point 59
  
• Court of Justice - Opinion C -547/19 -N99 : point 59
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -34/19 -N59 : point 68
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -34/19 -N60 : point 68
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -83/19 -N152 : point 55
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -83/19 -N153 : point 55
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -83/19 -N154 : point 55
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -83/19 -N155 : point 55
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -83/19 -N156 : point 55
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -83/19 -N157 : point 55
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -83/19 -N158 : point 55
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -83/19 -N159 : point 55
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -83/19 -N160 : point 55
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -83/19 -N161 : point 55
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -83/19 -N162 : point 55
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -83/19 -N163 : point 55
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -83/19 -N164 : point 55
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -83/19 -N165 : point 55
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -83/19 -N166 : point 55
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -83/19 -N167 : point 55
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -83/19 -N168 : point 55
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -83/19 -N169 : point 55
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -83/19 -N170 : point 55
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -83/19 -N171 : point 55
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -83/19 -N172 : point 55
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -83/19 -N173 : point 55
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -83/19 -N174 : point 55
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -83/19 -N175 : point 55
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -83/19 -N176 : point 55
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -83/19 -N177 : point 55
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -83/19 -N178 : point 55
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -357/19 : point 50
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -791/19 -N137 : point 159
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -791/19 -N138 : point 159
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -160/20 -N82 : point 48
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -267/20 -N46 : point 108
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -40/21 -N71 : point 68
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -430/21 -N44 : point 116
  
• Court of Justice - Order C -506/22 : point 67
  

Dates

Date of the lodging of the application initiating proceedings

• 22/02/2023

Date of the Opinion

• 29/06/2023

Date of the hearing

Information not available

Date of delivery

24/07/2023

References

Publication in the Official Journal

Information not available

Name of the parties

Lin

Notes on Academic Writings

1. Simon, Denys: Primauté - Règles nationales de prescription pénale, Europe 2023, nº 10 Octobre, Comm. 329 (FR)
2. Abenhaïm, Marc ; Georgieva, Cvetelina: Primauté du droit de l'Union : où en est le « pluralisme constitutionnel » après l'arrêt Lin ?, Europe 2023, nº 11 Novembre, Étude 7 (FR)
3. Benlolo Carabot, Myriam: Chronique Droit pénal de l'Union européenne - Protection des intérêts financiers de l'Union européenne, primauté du droit de l'Union et standard national de protection des droits fondamentaux : nouvel acte à la saga Taricco, Revue trimestrielle de droit européen 2023, n° 3, p. 401-407 (FR)
4. Caiola, Antonio: La continuité d'une évolution jurisprudentielle. A la recherche de l'équilibre entre la protection des intérêts financiers de l'Union européenne et le respect du principe de légalité des délits et des peines, Revue des affaires européennes 2023, n°3, p.783-792 (FR)
5. Van Reempts, Fien: De financiële belangen van de Unie en de bescherming van grondrechten in de weegschaal : zaak C-107/23 PPU, Lin, arrest van 24 juli 2023 (Grote kamer), S.E.W. : Tijdschrift voor Europees en economisch recht 2024, n° 2, p. 84-85 (NL)
6. Alonso García, Ricardo: Límites y contra-límites en la aplicación nacional de la CDFUR, y “preeminencia” del derecho de la UE - Limits and counter-limits in the national application of the EUCFR, and the “pre-eminence” of EU law, Revista española de Derecho Europeo 2024 nº 89, p. 149-167 (ES)

Procedural Analysis Information

Source of the question referred for a preliminary ruling

Curtea de Apel Braşov - Romania

Subject-matter

• area of freedom, security and justice
  
• - judicial cooperation in criminal matters
  
• Accession
  
• Financial provisions
  
• - Own resources
  
• Fundamental rights
  
• - Charter of Fundamental Rights
  
• Freedom of establishment
  
• Freedom to provide services
  
• Principles, objectives and tasks of the Treaties
  
• Approximation of laws
  

Provisions of national law referred to

Constituția României Legea nr. 286/2009 privind Codul Penal Ordonanţa de urgenţă nr. 71/2022 pentru modificarea art. 155 alin. (1) din Legea nr. 286/2009 privind Codul penal (Ordonnance d’urgence n° 71/2022 pour la modification de l’article 155, paragraphe 1, du code pénal) Ordonanţa de Urgenţă a Guvernului nr. 34/2006, privind atribuirea contractelor de achiziţie publică, a contractelor de concesiune de lucrări publice şi a contractelor de concesiune de servicii

Provisions of international law referred to

Information not available

Procedure and result

• Preliminary reference - urgent procedure
  
• Preliminary reference - urgent procedure : dismissal on grounds of inadmissibility
  

Formation of the Court

grande chambre (Cour)

Judge-Rapporteur

Lycourgos

Advocate General

Campos Sánchez-Bordona

Language(s) of the Case

• Romanian
  

Language(s) of the Opinion

Information not available