Reports of Cases

published in the electronic Reports of Cases (Court Reports - general)

Subject-matter

Information not available

Systematic classification scheme

Citations of case-law or legislation

References in grounds of judgment

• Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU (2007) : paragraph 48
• Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU (2007), Article 6 : paragraphs 4, 36, 43, 47, 49, 53
• Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU (2007), Article 52 : paragraph 5
• Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU (2007), Article 52 -P1 : paragraphs 50, 81, 82
• Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU (2007), Article 52 -P3 : paragraphs 44, 45, 47, 82
• Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU (2007), Article 52 -P7 : paragraph 47
• TEU, Article 4 -P3 : paragraph 76
• TEU, Article 6 -P1 : paragraph 47
• TEU, Article 6 -P3 : paragraph 45
• Directive 2008/115 : paragraphs 75, 80
• Directive 2008/115 -A03 : paragraph 7
• Directive 2008/115 -A07 : paragraph 8
• Directive 2008/115 -A08 : paragraph 9
• Directive 2008/115 -A11 : paragraph 10
• Directive 2008/115 -A11P2 : paragraphs 72, 73
• Directive 2008/115 -C4 : paragraph 6
• Directive 2013/32 -A02 : paragraph 11
• Directive 2013/32 -A09 : paragraph 12
• Directive 2013/32 -A09P1 : paragraph 74
• Directive 2013/33 : paragraphs 63, 64
• Directive 2013/33 -A02 : paragraph 14
• Directive 2013/33 -A08 : paragraphs 15, 52, 57, 61
• Directive 2013/33 -A08P1 : paragraph 61
• Directive 2013/33 -A08P2 : paragraph 61
• Directive 2013/33 -A08P3 : paragraph 62
• Directive 2013/33 -A08P3L1 : paragraph 59
• Directive 2013/33 -A08P3L1LA : paragraph 63
• Directive 2013/33 -A08P3L1LB : paragraph 63
• Directive 2013/33 -A08P3L1LC : paragraph 63
• Directive 2013/33 -A08P3L1LE : paragraphs 1, 36, 43, 46, 49, 52, 53, 55, 57, 58, 64, 67, 68, 70, 73, 74, 77, 81, 82, 83
• Directive 2013/33 -A08P3L2 : paragraph 60
• Directive 2013/33 -A08P4 : paragraph 61
• Directive 2013/33 -A09 : paragraphs 16, 52
• Directive 2013/33 -A09P1 : paragraph 62
• Directive 2013/33 -A09P2 : paragraph 62
• Directive 2013/33 -A09P3 : paragraph 62
• Directive 2013/33 -A09P4 : paragraph 62
• Directive 2013/33 -A09P5 : paragraph 62
• Directive 2013/33 -C15 : paragraphs 13, 61
• Directive 2013/33 -C18 : paragraph 13
• Directive 2013/33 -C20 : paragraphs 13, 61
• Directive 2013/33 -C35 : paragraph 13
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -218/82 -N15 : paragraph 83
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -305/05 -N28 : paragraph 83
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -549/07 -N17 : paragraph 85
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -357/09 -N45 : paragraph 102
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -61/11 : paragraph 98
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -61/11 -N59 : paragraph 98
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -277/11 -N93 : paragraph 83
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -356/11 -N78 : paragraph 83
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -534/11 -N49 : paragraph 102
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -534/11 -N52 : paragraph 102
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -534/11 -N55 : paragraph 67
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -534/11 -N56 : paragraph 67
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -534/11 -N60 : paragraphs 63, 103, 122
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -534/11 -N63 : paragraph 103
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -579/12 -N40 : paragraph 83
• Court of Justice - Opinion C -554/13 -N46 : paragraph 81
• Court of Justice - Opinion C -554/13 -N47 : paragraph 81
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -373/13 : paragraph 88
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -373/13 -N77 : paragraph 88
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -373/13 -N78 : paragraph 89
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -373/13 -N79 : paragraph 90
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -373/13 -N80 : paragraph 92
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -554/13 -N42 : paragraph 78
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -554/13 -N48 : paragraphs 80, 81
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -554/13 -N50 : paragraphs 95, 97
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -554/13 -N56 : paragraph 114
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -554/13 -N61 : paragraph 90
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -146/14 -N45 : paragraph 132
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -237/15 -N55 : paragraph 57
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -237/15 -N57 : paragraph 62

Operative part

• Validates : Directive 2013/33 -A08P3L1LE
• Interprets : Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU (2007), Article 6
• Interprets : Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU (2007), Article 52 -P1
• Interprets : Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU (2007), Article 52 -P3

Opinion

• Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU (2007) : point 64
  
• Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU (2007), Article 6 : points 1, 9, 12, 54, 58 - 60, 66, 116, 117, 137 - 139
  
• Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU (2007), Article 51 -P1 : points 9, 54
  
• Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU (2007), Article 52 : points 10, 65
  
• Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU (2007), Article 52 -P1 : points 57, 127, 129
  
• Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU (2007), Article 52 -P3 : point 58
  
• Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU (2007), Article 52 -P7 : point 58
  
• Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU (2007), Article 53 : point 54
  
• TFEU - Protocol No 3 -A23 : points 43, 48
  
• TFEU - Protocol No 3 -A23BIS : point 42
  
• TFEU - Protocol No 21 -A01 : point 1
  
• TFEU - Protocol No 21 -A02 : point 1
  
• TFEU - Protocol No 21 -A04BISP1 : point 1
  
• TFEU - Protocol No 22 : point 1
  
• TFEU, Article 72 : points 8, 65, 80, 109, 137
  
• TFEU, Article 78 -P1 : point 8
  
• TFEU, Article 267 -L3 : point 47
  
• TFEU, Article 347 : point 65
  
• TEU, Article 4 -P1 : point 65
  
• TEU, Article 4 -P2 : points 6, 80, 109, 137
  
• TEU, Article 6 -P1L3 : point 7
  
• Regulation 221/64 : point 88
  
• Regulation 360/68 : point 88
  
• Regulation 1612/68 : point 88
  
• Regulation 148/73 : point 88
  
• Regulation 34/75 : point 88
  
• Regulation 35/75 : point 88
  
• Regulation 364/90 : point 88
  
• Regulation 365/90 : point 88
  
• Regulation 96/93 : point 88
  
• Directive 2001/55 : point 96
  
• Directive 2003/9 : points 1, 67
  
• Directive 2003/9 -A18 : point 67
  
• Regulation 343/2003 : point 14
  
• Regulation 343/2003 -A07P1 : point 51
  
• Directive 2004/38 -A27 : point 88
  
• Directive 2004/38 -A28 : point 88
  
• Directive 2004/83 : point 13
  
• Directive 2004/83 -A24P1 : point 88
  
• Directive 2005/85 : points 14, 16
  
• Directive 2008/115 : points 14, 67, 104
  
• Directive 2008/115 -A02P1 : point 23
  
• Directive 2008/115 -A03 : point 24
  
• Directive 2008/115 -A07P4 : points 25, 94
  
• Directive 2008/115 -A08P1 : point 26
  
• Directive 2008/115 -A11 : point 110
  
• Directive 2008/115 -A11P1 : point 27
  
• Directive 2008/115 -A11P2 : point 27
  
• Directive 2008/115 -A11P5 : point 112
  
• Directive 2008/115 -A15 : points 67, 73, 98, 101, 103
  
• Directive 2008/115 -A15P1 : points 28, 73
  
• Directive 2008/115 -A16 : point 98
  
• Directive 2008/115 -C9 : point 51
  
• Directive 2011/95 : point 13
  
• Directive 2011/95 -A02LH : point 13
  
• Directive 2011/95 -C37 : point 92
  
• Court of Justice - Rules of Procedure (2012) -A105 : point 48
  
• Court of Justice - Rules of Procedure (2012) -A109 : point 43
  
• Court of Justice - Rules of Procedure (2012) -A111 : point 48
  
• Directive 2013/32 : point 14
  
• Directive 2013/32 -A01 : point 16
  
• Directive 2013/32 -A02LB : point 52
  
• Directive 2013/32 -A02LQ : point 17
  
• Directive 2013/32 -A02P1 : points 52, 108
  
• Directive 2013/32 -A09P1 : points 18, 51, 52, 63
  
• Directive 2013/32 -A09P2 : points 18, 51, 107
  
• Directive 2013/32 -A15 : point 108
  
• Directive 2013/32 -A26 : points 19, 67
  
• Directive 2013/32 -A33P2LD : points 20, 21
  
• Directive 2013/32 -A40P2 : point 20
  
• Directive 2013/32 -A40P3 : point 21
  
• Directive 2013/32 -A40P5 : point 22
  
• Directive 2013/32 -A41 : points 18, 51, 107
  
• Directive 2013/32 -A41P1 : point 22
  
• Directive 2013/32 -A41P1LB : point 100
  
• Directive 2013/33 : points 1, 112, 113, 139
  
• Directive 2013/33 -A02 : point 13
  
• Directive 2013/33 -A02LB : point 72
  
• Directive 2013/33 -A03P3 : point 96
  
• Directive 2013/33 -A08 : points 14, 70
  
• Directive 2013/33 -A08P1 : points 75, 105
  
• Directive 2013/33 -A08P2 : points 94, 113, 129, 133
  
• Directive 2013/33 -A08P3 : points 49, 68
  
• Directive 2013/33 -A08P3L1 : points 70, 72, 74, 75, 82, 85, 112, 114, 115
  
• Directive 2013/33 -A08P3L1LB : points 53, 114
  
• Directive 2013/33 -A08P3L1LD : points 101, 104, 105
  
• Directive 2013/33 -A08P3L1LE : points 1, 139
  
• Directive 2013/33 -A08P4 : point 113
  
• Directive 2013/33 -A09 : point 15
  
• Directive 2013/33 -A09P1 : point 129
  
• Directive 2013/33 -A09P2 : point 133
  
• Directive 2013/33 -A09P3 : points 134, 135
  
• Directive 2013/33 -A09P3L1 : point 87
  
• Directive 2013/33 -A09P4 : point 133
  
• Directive 2013/33 -A09P5 : point 135
  
• Directive 2013/33 -A09P6 : point 135
  
• Directive 2013/33 -A10P1 : point 13
  
• Directive 2013/33 -C15 : points 12, 113
  
• Directive 2013/33 -C16 : point 12
  
• Directive 2013/33 -C17 : points 12, 70, 85, 86
  
• Directive 2013/33 -C2 : point 12
  
• Directive 2013/33 -C35 : point 12
  
• Directive 2013/33 -PR : point 12
  
• Regulation 604/2013 : point 14
  
• Commission - COM Document (Draft Legislation) - 52008PC0815 : point 68
  
• Commission - COM Document (Draft Legislation) - 52011PC0320 : point 70
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -218/82 -N15 : point 83
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -305/05 -N28 : point 83
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -549/07 -N17 : point 85
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -357/09 -N45 : point 102
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -61/11 : point 98
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -61/11 -N59 : point 98
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -277/11 -N93 : point 83
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -356/11 -N78 : point 83
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -534/11 -N49 : point 102
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -534/11 -N52 : point 102
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -534/11 -N55 : point 67
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -534/11 -N56 : point 67
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -534/11 -N60 : points 63, 103, 122
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -534/11 -N63 : point 103
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -579/12 -N40 : point 83
  
• Court of Justice - Opinion C -554/13 -N46 : point 81
  
• Court of Justice - Opinion C -554/13 -N47 : point 81
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -373/13 : point 88
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -373/13 -N77 : point 88
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -373/13 -N78 : point 89
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -373/13 -N79 : point 90
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -373/13 -N80 : point 92
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -554/13 -N42 : point 78
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -554/13 -N48 : points 80, 81
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -554/13 -N50 : points 95, 97
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -554/13 -N56 : point 114
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -554/13 -N61 : point 90
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -146/14 -N45 : point 132
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -237/15 -N55 : point 57
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -237/15 -N57 : point 62
  

Dates

Date of the lodging of the application initiating proceedings

• 17/11/2015

Date of the Opinion

• 26/01/2016

Date of the hearing

Information not available

Date of delivery

15/02/2016

References

Publication in the Official Journal

Judgment: OJ C 145 from 25.04.2016, p.13

Application: OJ C 38 from 01.02.2016, p.34

Name of the parties

N.

Notes on Academic Writings

1. Thelosen, Sjoerd: Advocatenblad 2016 p.36-38 (NL)
2. Langer, Jurian: Hoe autonoom is het EU-Handvest?, Asiel en Migrantenrecht 2016 p.203 (NL)
3. Motulsky, François ; De Haes, Konstantin: La procédure de retour des ressortissants de pays tiers en séjour irrégulier, Journal des tribunaux 2016 p.278-280 (FR)
4. Guarnier, Tatiana: Il caso J. N. : la pregiudiziale di validità può comporre i diversi livelli di tutela dei diritti ?, Quaderni costituzionali 2016 p.380-383 (IT)
5. Picod, Fabrice: Le dispositif de rétention est bien conforme à la Charte des droits fondamentaux, La Semaine Juridique - édition générale 2016 nº 8 p.411 (FR)
6. Cornelisse, G.: Detentie van asielzoekers, de spoedige terugkeer van illegale vreemdelingen, en de openbare orde: het arrest J.N., Nederlands tijdschrift voor Europees recht 2016 p.187-195 (NL)
7. Zisopoulou, Alexandra-Christina: Kratisi allodapou aitoundos asylo, Elliniki Epitheorisi Evropaïkou Dikaiou 2016 p.82-90 (EL)
8. Takis, Athanasios: Armenopoulos 2016 p.937-939 (EL)
9. Millet, François-Xavier: L'arrêt J.N.: entre lecture autonome et lecture systémique des motifs de rétention des demandeurs d’asile, Revue des affaires européennes 2016 p.113-120 (FR)
10. Gazin, Fabienne: Rétention des demandeurs d'asile, Europe 2016 Avril Comm. nº 4 p.20-21 (FR)
11. Mariotti, Caterina: Trattenimento del richiedente asilo e Carta dei diritti fondamentali dell’UE, Giurisprudenza italiana 2016 p.531-533 (IT)
12. Pacini, Marco: Il trattenimento dei richiedenti asilo tra Carta UE dei diritti fondamentali e Cedu, Giornale di diritto amministrativo 2016 p.658-664 (IT)
13. Pfersich, Andreas: Eilvorabentscheidungsverfahren, Richtlinie 2013/33/EU, Haft, Gründe der nationalen Sicherheit oder der öffentlichen Ordnung, Charta der Grundrechte, Zeitschrift für Ausländerrecht und Ausländerpolitik 2016 p.192 (DE)
14. Berger, Maria ; Pelzl, Alexander: Inhaftierung von Asylwerbern aus Gründen der nationalen Sicherheit oder öffentlichen Ordnung möglich, Österreichische Juristenzeitung 2016 p.284 (DE)
15. Le Divelec, Florent ; Robberecht, E. ; Stanescu, R.: La jurisprudence de la cour de justice et du tribunal de l'Union européenne, Revue du droit de l'Union européenne 2016 nº 1-2016 p.111-115 (FR)
16. Margaritis, Konstantinos: Dikaioma paramonis aitountos asylou kai periptoseis kratisis: i apofasi (c-601/15 PPU), Efarmoges dimosiou dikaiou 2016 p.198-202 (EL)
17. De Coninck, Joyce: Rétention de demandeurs d'asile dans l'Union européenne et instruments parallèles de protection des droits fondamentaux, Cahiers de droit européen 2017 p.83-116 (FR)
18. Michel, Valérie: Rétention des demandeurs d'asile, Europe 2017 novembre nº 11 p.30 (FR)
19. Vial, Claire: III. Droits fondamentaux - Cour de justice, gde ch., 15 février 2016, J. N., aff. C-601/15 PPU, ECLI:EU:C:2016:84, Jurisprudence de la CJUE 2016. Décisions et commentaires (Ed. Bruylant - Bruxelles) 2017, p. 55-65 (FR)
20. Labayle, Henri: XIV. Espace de liberté, de sécurité et de justice - Cour de justice, gde ch., 15 février 2016, J. N. c/ Staatssecretaris van Veiligheid en Justitie, aff. C-601/15 PPU, ECLI:EU:C:2016:84, Jurisprudence de la CJUE 2016. Décisions et commentaires (Ed. Bruylant - Bruxelles) 2017, p. 553-560 (FR)
21. Carlier, Jean-Yves ; Leboeuf, Luc: Droit européen des migrations, Journal de droit européen 2018 p.95-110 (FR)

Procedural Analysis Information

Source of the question referred for a preliminary ruling

Raad van State - Netherlands

Subject-matter

• area of freedom, security and justice
  
• - Border checks
  
• - asylum policy
  

Provisions of national law referred to

Vreemdelingenwet 2000, artikelen 8, aanhef en onder f, 30a en 59b, eerste lid, aanhef en onder d Vreemdelingenbesluit, artikel 3.1

Provisions of international law referred to

Information not available

Procedure and result

• Preliminary reference - urgent procedure
  

Formation of the Court

grande chambre (Cour)

Judge-Rapporteur

von Danwitz

Advocate General

Sharpston

Language(s) of the Case

• Dutch
  

Language(s) of the Opinion

• French