Reports of Cases

1994 I-00833

Swedish XV/I-00059 Finnish XV/I-00067

Subject-matter

Information not available

Systematic classification scheme

Citations of case-law or legislation

References in grounds of judgment

• Decision 86/509 : paragraphs 1, 3, 8
• EEC Treaty (Rome), Article 173 -L3 : paragraphs 1, 9, 14, 15, 17
• EEC Treaty (Rome), Article 93 -P2L1 : paragraphs 3, 8, 15, 16, 26
• EEC Treaty (Rome), Article 93 -P3 : paragraph 3
• EEC Treaty (Rome), Article 92 : paragraph 3
• EEC Treaty (Rome), Article 173 -L2 : paragraphs 8, 13, 14, 19, 23, 24, 26
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -20/65 : paragraph 13
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -730/79 : paragraph 14
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -156/77 : paragraph 15
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -183/91 : paragraph 15
• EEC Treaty (Rome), Article 93 -P2L2 : paragraph 16
• EEC Treaty (Rome), Article 93 : paragraphs 14, 17
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -133/85 : paragraph 19
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -216/82 : paragraphs 21, 22, 23
• EEC Treaty (Rome), Article 184 : paragraph 23
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -92/78 : paragraph 23

Operative part

• Interprets : EEC Treaty (Rome), Article 93 -P2
• Interprets : EEC Treaty (Rome), Article 173 -L2

Opinion

• EEC Treaty (Rome), Article 177 : points 1, 4, 13 - 27
  
• EEC Treaty (Rome), Article 173 -L2 : points 1, 3, 4, 13 - 27
  
• EEC Treaty (Rome), Article 93 -P2L1 : points 2, 4
  
• Decision 86/509 : points 2, 3, 4
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -216/82 : points 7, 14, 26
  
• EEC Treaty (Rome), Article 184 : points 7, 14
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -156/77 : points 9, 26
  
• EEC Treaty (Rome), Article 173 -L3 : points 13, 17, 18
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -92/78 -N39 : point 14
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -92/78 -N40 : point 14
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -294/83 -N23 : point 14
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -730/79 -N5 : point 15
  
• Court of Justice - Opinion C -310/85 : point 15
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -20/65 : point 17
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -156/77 -N21 : point 18
  
• Court of Justice - Opinion C -358/89 : point 20
  
• EEC Treaty (Rome) - Protocol on the Statute of the Court of Justice, Article 20 : point 21
  
• EEC Treaty (Rome) - Protocol on the Statute of the Court of Justice, Article 37 : point 21
  
• Decision 93/350 : point 23
  

Dates

Date of the lodging of the application initiating proceedings

• 12/05/1992

Date of the Opinion

• 15/09/1993

Date of the hearing

Information not available

Date of delivery

09/03/1994

References

Publication in the Official Journal

Application: OJ C 167 from 04.07.1992, p.7

Judgment: OJ C 103 from 11.04.1994, p.3

Name of the parties

TWD v Bundesrepublik Deutschland

Notes on Academic Writings

1. Nihoul, Paul: Journal des tribunaux / droit européen 1994 p.90 (FR)
2. X: Revue de jurisprudence fiscale 1994 p.442 (FR)
3. X: Europe 1994 Mai Comm. nº 180 p.9 (FR)
4. Pache, Eckhard: Keine Vorlage ohne Anfechtung? Zum Verhältnis des Vorabentscheidungsverfahrens nach Art.177 I lit.b EGV zur Nichtigkeitsklage nach Art.173 IV EGV, Europäische Zeitschrift für Wirtschaftsrecht 1994 p.615-620 (DE)
5. Ross, Malcolm: Limits on Using Article 177 EC, European Law Review 1994 p.640-644 (EN)
6. Hoskins, Mark: Common Market Law Review 1994 p.1399-1408 (EN)
7. Baratta, Roberto: Un "nuovo" limite al controllo giurisdizionale degli atti comunitari incidenti sulla sfera giuridica dei singoli, Giustizia civile 1995 I p.632-635 (IT)
8. Trautwein, Thomas: Zeitschrift für Rechtsvergleichung, internationales Privatrecht und Europarecht 1995 p.70-71 (DE)
9. Daniele, Luigi: Il Foro italiano 1995 IV Col.113-115 (IT)
10. Joris, T.: S.E.W. ; Sociaal-economische wetgeving 1995 p.362-368 (NL)
11. Simon, Denys: Chronique de jurisprudence du Tribunal et de la Cour de justice des Communautés européennes. Institutions et ordre juridique communautaire, Journal du droit international 1995 p.438-440 (FR)
12. Gratani, Adabella: Effetti della scadenza dei termini per impugnare provvedimenti nazionali di esecuzione di atti comunitari, Diritto comunitario e degli scambi internazionali 1995 p.164-165 (IT)
13. Turner, Sharon: Challenging EC Law before a National Court: a Further Restriction of the Rights of Natural and Legal Persons?, Irish Journal of European Law 1995 Vol.4 p.68-87 (EN)
14. Fines, Francette: 69. Articulation des voies de droit. CJCE, 28 avr. 1971, n° 4/69, Alfons Lütticke GmbH c/ Commission et CJCE, 9 mars 1994, n° C-188/92, TWD Textilwerke Deggendorf GmbH c/ Bundesrepublik Deutschland, Les grands arrêts de la Cour de justice de l'Union européenne. Droit constitutionnel et institutionnel de l'Union européenne (Dalloz, 2e édition) 2023, p. 1087-1096 (FR)

Procedural Analysis Information

Source of the question referred for a preliminary ruling

Oberverwaltungsgericht für das Land Nordrhein-Westfalen - Germany

Subject-matter

• Competition
  
• - State aid
  

Provisions of national law referred to

Investitionszulagengesetz (InvZulG), Paragraph 2

Provisions of international law referred to

Information not available

Procedure and result

• Reference for a preliminary ruling
  

Formation of the Court

Cour plénière (Cour)

Judge-Rapporteur

Rodríguez Iglesias

Advocate General

Jacobs

Language(s) of the Case

• German
  

Language(s) of the Opinion

• English