Reports of Cases

not yet published (Court Reports - general)

Subject-matter

Information not available

Systematic classification scheme

Citations of case-law or legislation

References in grounds of judgment

• Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU (2007), Article 21 -P1 : paragraphs 1, 17, 18, 30
• Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU (2007), Article 51 -P1 : paragraph 28
• TFEU, Article 157 : paragraph 3
• TFEU, Article 157 -P2L1 : paragraphs 20, 23, 25
• Directive 2000/78 : paragraphs 17, 19, 24, 25, 29
• Directive 2000/78 -A01 : paragraph 4
• Directive 2000/78 -A02 : paragraph 5
• Directive 2000/78 -A02P1 : paragraphs 1, 17
• Directive 2000/78 -A02P2LA : paragraphs 1, 17
• Directive 2000/78 -A02P2LB : paragraph 17
• Directive 2000/78 -A03 : paragraph 6
• Directive 2000/78 -A03P1LC : paragraphs 1, 17, 18, 20, 21, 30
• Directive 2000/78 -A03P3 : paragraph 20
• Directive 2000/78 -A06 : paragraph 7
• Directive 2000/78 -A06P1 : paragraph 17
• Directive 2000/78 -C13 : paragraph 3
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -117/01 -N25 : paragraph 23
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -19/02 -N35 : paragraph 21
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -19/02 -N39 : paragraph 22
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -267/06 -N46 : paragraph 25
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -617/10 : paragraph 14
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -546/11 -N23 : paragraph 19
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -267/12 -N28 : paragraph 21
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -529/13 -N20 : paragraph 20

Operative part

• Interprets : Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU (2007), Article 21 -P1
• Interprets : Directive 2000/78 -A03P1LC

Opinion

• EC Treaty (Amsterdam), Article 137 : point 57
  
• EC Treaty (Amsterdam), Article 93 : point 44
  
• EC Treaty (Amsterdam), Article 94 : points 45 - 49, 52
  
• EC Treaty (Amsterdam), Article 95 : point 51
  
• EC Treaty (Amsterdam), Article 137 -P3T1 : point 44
  
• EC Treaty (Amsterdam), Article 175 -P2T1 : point 43
  
• EU Treaty (Amsterdam), Article 13 : points 6, 38, 47, 48, 49, 52, 54
  
• Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU (2007), Article 21 -P1 : points 4, 20, 60, 67, 68
  
• Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU (2007), Article 51 : point 60
  
• Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU (2007), Article 51 -P1 : points 5, 61, 67
  
• TFEU - Protocol No 7 -A12L1 : point 44
  
• TFEU, Article 19 -P1 : point 48
  
• TFEU, Article 45 : point 65
  
• TFEU, Article 45 -P1 : point 64
  
• TFEU, Article 45 -P2 : point 33
  
• TFEU, Article 114 : point 50
  
• TFEU, Article 115 : point 50
  
• TFEU, Article 153 -P5 : point 50
  
• TFEU, Article 157 : point 25
  
• TFEU, Article 157 -P2L1 : points 26, 28
  
• TFEU, Article 182 -P5 : point 44
  
• TFEU, Article 194 -P3 : point 43
  
• TFEU, Article 223 -P2 : point 44
  
• TFEU, Article 267 : point 18
  
• TEU, Article 6 -P3 : point 22
  
• TEU, Article 19 : point 6
  
• Directive 76/207 -A05P1 : point 34
  
• Directive 90/434 : point 45
  
• Directive 2000/78 : points 7, 18, 21 - 23, 35, 38, 39, 50, 53 - 55, 59, 60, 68
  
• Directive 2000/78 -A01 : point 11
  
• Directive 2000/78 -A02 : point 10
  
• Directive 2000/78 -A02P1 : points 11, 18
  
• Directive 2000/78 -A02P2LA : point 18
  
• Directive 2000/78 -A02P2LB : point 18
  
• Directive 2000/78 -A03 : points 8, 47
  
• Directive 2000/78 -A03P1 : points 44, 53
  
• Directive 2000/78 -A03P1LC : points 18, 24, 29 - 31
  
• Directive 2000/78 -A03P3 : point 25
  
• Directive 2000/78 -A06 : point 12
  
• Directive 2000/78 -A06P1 : point 18
  
• Directive 2000/78 -A06P2 : point 27
  
• Directive 2000/78 -A16 : point 9
  
• Directive 2000/78 -A16LA : point 31
  
• Directive 2000/78 -C11 : point 36
  
• Directive 2000/78 -C5 : point 36
  
• Directive 2000/78 -C9 : point 36
  
• Directive 2003/48 : point 45
  
• Directive 2003/49 : point 45
  
• Directive 2006/54 : point 34
  
• Directive 2009/133 : point 45
  
• Directive 2011/96 : point 45
  
• Regulation 492/2011 : point 33
  
• Regulation 492/2011 -A07P2 : point 33
  
• Commission - COM Document (Draft Legislation) - 51999PC0565 -A03 : point 50
  
• European Parliament - Legislative Resolution - 52000AP0264 : point 58
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -175/88 -N12 : point 33
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -262/88 -N12 : point 26
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -279/93 -N21 : point 40
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -279/93 -N23 : point 33
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -302/98 -N29 : point 65
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -302/98 -N30 : point 65
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -319/02 -N19 : point 40
  
• Court of Justice - Opinion C -134/03 : point 66
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -144/04 -N74 : point 22
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -144/04 -N75 : point 22
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -207/04 -N25 : point 34
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -207/04 -N26 : point 34
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -207/04 -N27 : point 34
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -207/04 -N28 : point 34
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -207/04 -N29 : point 34
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -267/06 -N40 : point 25
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -267/06 -N41 : point 25
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -267/06 -N44 : point 26
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -267/06 -N59 : point 44
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -555/07 -N21 : point 22
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -447/09 -N38 : point 22
  
• Court of Justice - Opinion C -498/10 -N28 : point 66
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -617/10 -N19 : point 61
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -476/11 -N25 : point 25
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -476/11 -N26 : point 26
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -546/11 -N26 : point 26
  
• Court of Justice - Opinion C -385/12 -N83 : point 66
  
• Court of Justice - Opinion C -385/12 -N84 : point 66
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -390/12 -N33 : point 61
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -390/12 -N35 : point 62
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -390/12 -N36 : point 62
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -501/12 -N32 : point 50
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -501/12 -N33 : point 50
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -501/12 -N34 : point 50
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -501/12 -N35 : point 50
  
• Court of Justice - Opinion C -686/13 -N40 : point 66
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -512/13 -N22 : point 33
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -529/13 -N16 : point 22
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -529/13 -N20 : point 25
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -529/13 -N21 : point 26
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -530/13 -N22 : point 22
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -530/13 -N23 : point 22
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -632/13 -N28 : point 40
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -650/13 -N26 : point 61
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -9/14 -N20 : point 33
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -83/14 : point 51
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -83/14 -N44 : point 51
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -98/14 -N40 : point 66
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -98/14 -N41 : point 66
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -317/14 -N23 : point 64
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -432/14 -N21 : point 22
  

Dates

Date of the lodging of the application initiating proceedings

• 10/03/2015

Date of the Opinion

• 28/01/2016

Date of the hearing

Information not available

Date of delivery

02/06/2016

References

Publication in the Official Journal

Judgment: OJ C 287 from 08.08.2016, p.11

Application: OJ C 171 from 26.05.2015, p.22

Name of the parties

C

Notes on Academic Writings

1. Helminen, Marjaana: Finland: C-122/15, C and the prohibition of age discrimination, ECJ - Recent Developments in Direct Taxation 2015 (Ed. Linde - Wien) 2015 p.51-60 (EN)
2. Takis, Athanasios: Armenopoulos 2016 p.1446-1447 (EL)
3. Thomas, Edwin: Supplementary tax on pension income. Not within scope of application of Directive 2000/78. Court of Justice, Highlights & Insights on European Taxation 2016 nº 11 p.163-164 (EN)
4. Schlücke, Katharina: Keien Anwendbarkeit des unionsrechtlichen Diskriminierungsverbots aus Art. 3 Abs. 1 Buchst. c der Richtlinie 2000/78/EG sowie des Art. 21 Abs. 1 der EU-Grundrechtscharta auf die Besteuerung von Alterseinkünften durch die Mitgliedstaaten, Internationale Steuer-Rundschau : ISR 2016 n° 8 p.280-282 (DE)
5. Cuypers, D.: Fiscale leeftijdsdiscriminatie is niet altijd, maar soms toch sociale leeftijdsdiscriminatie, S.E.W. ; Sociaal-economische wetgeving 2017 p.84-85 (NL)
6. Wachter, Gustav: Sozialpolitik : Altersdiskriminierung / Altersrenten / Besteuerung, Zeitschrift für europäisches Sozial- und Arbeitsrecht 2017 p.238-241 (DE)
7. Van Toor, A.W.M.: Eerste uitspraak over de rolverdeling tussen de Europese Centrale Bank en nationale toezichthouders binnen het Single Supervisory Mechanism, Nederlands tijdschrift voor Europees recht 2017 p.190-196 (NL)
8. Simon, Denys: BCE, Europe 2017 Juillet Comm. nº 281 p.45-46 (FR)

Procedural Analysis Information

Source of the question referred for a preliminary ruling

Korkein hallinto-oikeus (Cour administrative suprême) - Finland

Subject-matter

• Principles, objectives and tasks of the Treaties
  
• Social policy
  

Provisions of national law referred to

Information not available

Provisions of international law referred to

Information not available

Procedure and result

• Reference for a preliminary ruling
  
• Reference for a preliminary ruling : case not proceeding to judgment
  

Formation of the Court

première chambre (Cour)

Judge-Rapporteur

Arabadjiev

Advocate General

Kokott

Language(s) of the Case

• Finnish
  

Language(s) of the Opinion

• German