Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 3 July 2014

Electrabel SA v European Commission

Appeal — Concentration of undertakings — Commission decision — Order for payment of a fine — Infringement of Article 7 of Regulation (EEC) No 4064/89 — Control of concentrations between undertakings — Article 14(3) — Criteria to be taken into account in determining the amount of the fine — Taking into account the duration of the infringement — Principle of non-retroactivity of the law — Application of Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 — Obligation to state reasons

Case C‑84/13 P



Top of the page Documents in the Case
Document Date Name of the parties Subject-matter Curia EUR-Lex Autres Liens
Judgment (OJ)
08/08/2014 Electrabel v Commission
Judgment
ECLI:EU:C:2014:2040
03/07/2014 Electrabel v Commission
Judgment (Information)
ECLI:EU:C:2014:2040
03/07/2014 Electrabel v Commission
Application (OJ)
19/04/2013 Electrabel v Commission
Top of the page Legal analysis of the decision or of the case

Reports of Cases

published in the electronic Reports of Cases (Court Reports - general - 'Information on unpublished decisions' section)

Subject-matter

Appeal brought against the judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 12 December 2012 in Case T-332/09 Electrabel v Commission by which the General Court confirmed the Commission’s decision of 10 June 2009 ordering the applicant to pay a fine of EUR 20 million for infringement of Article 7 of Regulation (EEC) No 4064/89 on the control of concentrations between undertakings (OJ 1989 L 395, p. 1) – Errors of law – Infringement of Article 14(3) of Regulation No 4064/89 – Criteria to be taken into account in setting the amount of the fine – Account taken of the duration of the infringement – Breach of the principle that the law should not be retroactive – Breach of the obligation to state reasons

Systematic classification scheme

1.
3 Legal proceedings
  3.10 Appeals
    3.10.03 Grounds of appeal
      3.10.03.02 Issues relating to the admissibility of the pleas
        3.10.03.02.04 New pleas in law
3 Legal proceedings
  3.10 Appeals
    3.10.03 Grounds of appeal
      3.10.03.04 Substance of the pleas in law
        3.10.03.04.02 Breaches of procedure before the court of first instance
          3.10.03.04.02.00 General
3 Legal proceedings
  3.10 Appeals
    3.10.03 Grounds of appeal
      3.10.03.03 Ineffective pleas in law


Citations of case-law or legislation

References in grounds of judgment

Operative part

Opinion

Information not available


Dates

Date of the lodging of the application initiating proceedings

  • 21/02/2013

Date of the Opinion

Information not available

Date of the hearing

Information not available

Date of delivery

03/07/2014


References

Publication in the Official Journal

Judgment: OJ C 292 from 01.09.2014, p.6

Application: OJ C 129 from 04.05.2013, p.6

Name of the parties

Electrabel v Commission

Notes on Academic Writings

  1. Carloni, Francesco: Electrabel v Commission & COMP M.7184 Marine Harvest/Morpol: Gun-jumping and Violation of the Merger Standstill Obligation in Europe , Journal of European Competition Law & Practice 2014 Vol. 5 nº 10 p.693-696 (EN)



Procedural Analysis Information

Source of the question referred for a preliminary ruling

Information not available

Subject-matter

  • Competition
  • - Concentrations between undertakings

Provisions of national law referred to

Information not available

Provisions of international law referred to

Information not available

Procedure and result

  • Actions for annulment
  • Appeal brought against a sanction
  • Appeals : dismissal on substantive grounds
  • Appeals : dismissal on grounds of inadmissibility

Formation of the Court

dixième chambre (Cour)

Judge-Rapporteur

Juhász

Advocate General

Sharpston

Language(s) of the Case

  • French

Language(s) of the Opinion

    Information not available