Reports of Cases

published in the electronic Reports of Cases (Court Reports - general)

Subject-matter

Information not available

Systematic classification scheme

Citations of case-law or legislation

References in grounds of judgment

• TFEU, Article 21 : paragraph 22
• TFEU, Article 21 -P1 : paragraphs 29 - 31, 45, 46, 48, 51, 53, 56, 58, 60, 62
• Directive 2004/38 : paragraphs 1, 10, 19, 22, 29, 30, 33, 42, 45 - 47, 61, 62
• Directive 2004/38 -A01 : paragraph 4
• Directive 2004/38 -A01LA : paragraph 36
• Directive 2004/38 -A02 : paragraphs 5, 13
• Directive 2004/38 -A02PT2 : paragraph 34
• Directive 2004/38 -A03 : paragraph 6
• Directive 2004/38 -A03P1 : paragraphs 25, 27, 28, 34, 38, 41, 43
• Directive 2004/38 -A06 : paragraphs 7, 35
• Directive 2004/38 -A07 : paragraphs 13, 27
• Directive 2004/38 -A07P1 : paragraphs 8, 30, 35, 38, 57, 62
• Directive 2004/38 -A07P2 : paragraphs 8, 35
• Directive 2004/38 -A16 : paragraphs 9, 13, 26, 27
• Directive 2004/38 -A16P1 : paragraphs 30, 35, 38, 57, 62
• Directive 2004/38 -A16P2 : paragraph 35
• Directive 2004/38 -C5 : paragraphs 3, 31
• Directive 2004/38 -C18 : paragraph 3
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -127/08 -N62 : paragraph 52
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -434/09 : paragraph 23
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -434/09 -N24 : paragraph 28
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -434/09 -N29 : paragraph 37
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -434/09 -N33 : paragraph 36
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -434/09 -N34 : paragraph 37
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -434/09 -N42 : paragraph 37
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -40/11 -N66 : paragraph 47
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -40/11 -N67 : paragraph 47
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -40/11 -N68 : paragraph 48
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -456/12 -N36 : paragraph 47
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -456/12 -N37 : paragraph 33
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -456/12 -N38 : paragraph 34
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -456/12 -N40 : paragraph 35
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -456/12 -N41 : paragraph 36
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -456/12 -N42 : paragraph 37
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -456/12 -N43 : paragraph 37
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -456/12 -N44 : paragraph 46
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -456/12 -N45 : paragraphs 46, 48
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -456/12 -N46 : paragraph 46
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -456/12 -N47 : paragraph 46
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -456/12 -N48 : paragraph 46
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -456/12 -N49 : paragraph 46
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -456/12 -N50 : paragraphs 46, 61
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -456/12 -N61 : paragraph 61
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -202/13 -N31 : paragraph 31
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -202/13 -N33 : paragraph 31
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -202/13 -N34 : paragraph 32
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -165/14 -N36 : paragraph 48
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -165/14 -N73 : paragraph 48
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -133/15 -N53 : paragraph 33
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -133/15 -N54 : paragraphs 46, 61
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -133/15 -N55 : paragraph 61
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -541/15 -N34 : paragraph 50
• Court of Justice - Opinion C -165/16 : paragraphs 39, 58

Operative part

• Interprets : TFEU, Article 21 -P1
• Interprets : Directive 2004/38
• Interprets : Directive 2004/38 -A07P1
• Interprets : Directive 2004/38 -A16P1

Opinion

• TFEU : point 46
  
• TFEU, Article 20 : point 92
  
• TFEU, Article 21 : point 27
  
• TFEU, Article 21 -P1 : points 11, 12, 53, 54, 67, 68, 70, 72, 85, 86, 90 - 93
  
• Directive 2004/38 : points 1, 6, 17, 23, 25, 27 - 29, 33, 36, 39, 49, 54, 60, 61, 66, 69, 70, 72, 75, 78, 79, 89
  
• Directive 2004/38 -A01 : point 13
  
• Directive 2004/38 -A01LA : point 60
  
• Directive 2004/38 -A02 : points 14, 20
  
• Directive 2004/38 -A02PT2LA : point 44
  
• Directive 2004/38 -A03P1 : points 3, 10, 15, 30, 31, 43, 46, 47, 50, 51, 58, 62, 64, 93
  
• Directive 2004/38 -A06 : point 58
  
• Directive 2004/38 -A07 : points 20, 30, 85
  
• Directive 2004/38 -A07P1 : points 58, 72
  
• Directive 2004/38 -A07P2 : points 58, 72
  
• Directive 2004/38 -A16 : points 11, 16, 20, 30, 31, 32, 37, 65, 72, 84, 85, 91, 93
  
• Directive 2004/38 -A16P1 : point 58
  
• Directive 2004/38 -A16P2 : point 58
  
• Directive 2004/38 -C18 : point 85
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -369/90 -N10 : point 40
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -370/90 : points 55, 73
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -370/90 -N19 : point 75
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -370/90 -N21 : point 75
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -179/98 -N29 : point 40
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -192/99 -N19 : point 40
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -200/02 -N37 : point 40
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -291/05 : points 55, 73
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -291/05 -N31 : point 60
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -291/05 -N35 : point 77
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -291/05 -N36 : point 77
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -135/08 -N39 : point 40
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -135/08 -N48 : point 40
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -434/09 : point 49
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -434/09 -N29 : point 60
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -434/09 -N34 : point 60
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -434/09 -N43 : point 28
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -87/12 : point 49
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -456/12 : point 9
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -165/14 -N36 : point 45
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -133/15 : point 9
  

Dates

Date of the lodging of the application initiating proceedings

• 21/03/2016

Date of the Opinion

• 30/05/2017

Date of the hearing

Information not available

Date of delivery

14/11/2017

References

Publication in the Official Journal

Judgment: OJ C 22 from 22.01.2018, p.7

Application: OJ C 191 from 30.05.2016, p.17

Name of the parties

Lounes

Notes on Academic Writings

1. Caiola, Antonio: Citoyenneté de l'Union européenne, double nationalité et fondement du droit de séjour, Revue des affaires européennes 2017 p.717-725 (FR)
2. Weber, Ferdinand: Analogiebildung und "Lückenfüllung" im Aufenthaltsrichterrecht, Neue Zeitschrift für Verwaltungsrecht 2018 p.130-133 (DE)
3. Slot, P.J.: Toufik Lounes/Secretary of State for the Home Department, Ars aequi 2018 p.150 (NL)
4. Kämper, Christopher ; Rünzel, Nadja Josefin: Juristenzeitung 2018 p.206-210 (DE)
5. Carlier, Jean-Yves ; Renaudière, Géraldine: Libre circulation des personnes dans l'Union européenne, Journal de droit européen 2018 p.141-151 (FR)
6. Pfersich, Andreas: Unionsbürgerschaft, Art. 21 AEUV, Richtline 2004/38/ EG, doppelte Staatsangehörigkeit, Unionsbürger, der unter Beibehaltung seiner ursprünglichen Staatsangehörigkeit die Staatsangehörigkeit des Aufnahmemitgliedstaats erworben hat, Aufenthaltsrecht eines drittstaatsangehörigen Familienangehörigen, Zeitschrift für Ausländerrecht und Ausländerpolitik 2018 p.78-79 (DE)
7. Kroeze, H.: De relatie tussen (dubbele) nationaliteit en EU burgerschapsrechten, S.E.W. : Tijdschrift voor Europees en economisch recht 2018 p.226-229 (NL)
8. Pataut, Étienne: Les conflits de nationalités face au droit de l'Union, Revue critique de droit international privé 2018 nº 2 p.241-256 (FR)
9. Oosterom-Staples, H.: Na naturalisatie is er niet zonder meer sprake van een zuiver interne situatie voor het personenverkeer, Nederlands tijdschrift voor Europees recht 2018 p.128-133 (NL)
10. Heymann, Jeremy: Citoyenneté de l'Union et conflit positif de nationalités, Revue trimestrielle de droit européen 2018 N°3 p.587-596 (FR)
11. Réveillère, Vincent: Family rights for naturalized EU citizens: Lounes, Common Market Law Review 2018, Volume 55, Issue 6, p. 1855-1878 (EN)
12. Benlolo Carabot, Myriam: VI. Citoyenneté - Cour de justice, gde ch., 14 novembre 2017, Toufik Lounes c/ Secretary of State for the Home Department, aff. C-165/16, ECLI:EU:C:2017:862, Jurisprudence de la CJUE 2017. Décisions et commentaires (Ed. Bruylant - Bruxelles) 2018, p. 262-266 (FR)
13. Rigaux, Anne: Citoyenneté européenne - Droit de séjour dérivé des ressortissants d'États tiers, Europe 2018, Janvier nº 1, Comm. 3 (FR)
14. Polak, Polly Ruth: A Commentary on the Lounes Case and the Protection of EU Citizens’ Rights Post-Brexit, Revista General de Derecho Europeo 2018, nº 44, p. 190-203 (EN)
15. Carlier, Jean-Yves ; Renaudière, Géraldine: Libre circulation des personnes dans l'Union européenne, Journal de droit européen 2019 p.166-175 (FR)
16. Hyltén-Cavallius, Katarina: The Importance of Family Time: Returnees’ Residence Rights in EU Citizenship Law, European Public Law 2025, Volume 31, Issue 3, p. 353 - 370. (EN)

Procedural Analysis Information

Source of the question referred for a preliminary ruling

High Court of Justice (England & Wales), Queen’s Bench Division (Administrative Court) - United Kingdom

Subject-matter

• Non-discrimination and citizenship of the Union
  
• - Citizenship of the Union
  
• area of freedom, security and justice
  
• - Borders, asylum and immigration
  
• - Border checks
  

Provisions of national law referred to

Information not available

Provisions of international law referred to

Information not available

Procedure and result

• Reference for a preliminary ruling
  

Formation of the Court

Grande chambre (Cour)

Judge-Rapporteur

Tizzano

Advocate General

Bot

Language(s) of the Case

• English
  

Language(s) of the Opinion

• French