Reports of Cases

published in the electronic Reports of Cases (Court Reports - general)

Subject-matter

Information not available

Systematic classification scheme

Citations of case-law or legislation

References in grounds of judgment

• TFEU, Article 101 : paragraphs 26, 64
• TFEU, Article 102 : paragraphs 25 - 71
• TFEU, Article 102 -L2LA : paragraphs 1, 11, 18, 24, 31, 51, 62, 69, 71
• Regulation 1/2003 -A03P1 : paragraph 3
• Regulation 1/2003 -A05 : paragraph 63
• Regulation 1/2003 -A05L1 : paragraph 4
• Regulation 1/2003 -A23 : paragraph 64
• Regulation 1/2003 -A23P2 : paragraphs 5, 64
• Regulation 1/2003 -A23P3 : paragraph 5
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -27/76 -N252 : paragraph 36
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -27/76 -N253 : paragraph 37
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -395/87 : paragraphs 28, 49, 54, 55
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -395/87 -N38 : paragraphs 38, 44, 53, 57
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -395/87 -N42 : paragraph 58
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -110/88 : paragraphs 20, 22, 28, 49, 54, 55
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -110/88 -N25 : paragraphs 38, 44, 53, 57
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -110/88 -N29 : paragraph 58
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -186/98 -N10 : paragraph 68
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -407/04 -N89 : paragraph 26
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -407/04 -N90 : paragraph 27
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -49/07 -N20 : paragraph 32
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -49/07 -N21 : paragraph 32
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -49/07 -N22 : paragraph 33
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -52/07 -N28 : paragraph 35
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -351/12 : paragraph 28
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -351/12 -N86 : paragraph 34
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -101/15 -N16 : paragraph 65
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -101/15 -N17 : paragraph 65
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -101/15 -N18 : paragraph 65

Operative part

• Interprets : TFEU, Article 102
• Interprets : TFEU, Article 102 -L2LA

Opinion

• TFEU, Article 101 : points 26, 98
  
• TFEU, Article 102 : points 16, 23, 25, 26, 31, 48, 58, 60, 75 - 77, 98, 99, 106, 108, 109, 111 - 113, 116, 122, 131, 134, 145
  
• TFEU, Article 102 -L2LA : points 2, 6, 13, 15, 22, 100, 115, 132
  
• Directive 92/100 : points 75, 77
  
• Directive 92/100 -A08P2 : point 74
  
• Regulation 1/2003 -A23P2 : point 143
  
• Directive 2014/26 : points 75, 77
  
• Directive 2014/26 -A16P2L2 : point 75
  
• Commission - Other Acts - 52006XC0901(01) : point 143
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -24/67 : point 19
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -78/70 : point 19
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -26/75 : points 19, 123
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -26/75 -N16 : point 108
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -26/75 -N17 : point 108
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -26/75 -N18 : point 108
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -26/75 -N19 : point 108
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -26/75 -N20 : point 108
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -27/76 : points 16, 17, 119
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -27/76 -N184 : point 134
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -27/76 -N249 : point 20
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -27/76 -N250 : point 20
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -27/76 -N251 : points 18, 20
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -27/76 -N252 : point 20
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -27/76 -N253 : points 18, 20
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -27/76 -N264 : point 52
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -22/79 -N11 : point 29
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -22/79 -N12 : point 29
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -22/79 -N13 : point 29
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -7/82 -N37 : point 29
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -7/82 -N38 : point 29
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -7/82 -N39 : point 29
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -226/84 : points 19, 123
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -311/84 -N27 : point 134
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -66/86 : point 18
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -66/86 -N43 : point 127
  
• Court of Justice - Opinion C -53/87 -N62 : point 127
  
• Court of Justice - Opinion C -395/87 -N53 : point 72
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -30/87 : point 19
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -53/87 : point 19
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -395/87 : points 29, 107
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -395/87 -N38 : points 23, 84
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -110/88 : points 29, 107
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -110/88 -N25 : points 23, 84
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -110/88 -N28 : point 127
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -110/88 -N29 : point 127
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -179/90 -N19 : point 122
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -323/93 -N19 : point 16
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -323/93 -N21 : point 16
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -242/95 -N39 : point 16
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -245/00 -N36 : point 74
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -245/00 -N37 : point 74
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -95/04 -N69 : point 134
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -95/04 -N86 : point 134
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -407/04 -N89 : point 26
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -407/04 -N90 : point 26
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -49/07 -N42 : point 27
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -52/07 : point 76
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -385/07 -N141 : point 122
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -385/07 -N142 : point 122
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -385/07 -N143 : point 122
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -385/07 -N144 : point 122
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -385/07 -N145 : point 122
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -385/07 -N146 : point 122
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -385/07 -N147 : point 122
  
• Court of Justice - Order C -159/08 -N47 : points 20, 120
  
• General Court - Judgment T -414/08 : point 30
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -351/12 -N80 : point 143
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -74/14 -N38 : point 52
  

Dates

Date of the lodging of the application initiating proceedings

Information not available

Date of the Opinion

• 06/04/2017

Date of the hearing

Information not available

Date of delivery

14/09/2017

References

Publication in the Official Journal

Judgment: OJ C 382 from 13.11.2017, p.18

Application: OJ C 200 from 06.06.2016, p.12

Name of the parties

Biedrība "Autortiesību un komunicēšanās konsultāciju aģentūra - Latvijas Autoru apvienība" Konkurences padome

Notes on Academic Writings

1. Balthasar-Wach, Agnes: EuGH: Zum Preismissbrauch bei Verwertungsgesellschaften, Ecolex 2017 p.1185-1186 (DE)
2. Idot, Laurence: Abus de position dominante et prix excessifs, Europe 2017 novembre nº 11 p.38-39 (FR)
3. Simon, Stella: Mikor tisztességtelen az ár?, Versenytükör 2017 2. szám p.88-94 (HU)
4. Van Loon, S.C.: Prejudiciële vragen over de toepassing van art. 102 VWEU (misbruik van machtspositie) op het prijsbeleid van een collectieve beheersorganisatie, AMI: Tijdschrift voor auteurs-, media & informatierecht 2018 p.68-70 (NL)
5. Kreijger, P.J.: Excessieve prijzen in het mededingingsrecht, Nederlands tijdschrift voor Europees recht 2018 p.160-164 (NL)
6. Van Damme, Eric ; Sauter, Wolf: Bestaat er zoiets als een onbillijke prijs? Zaak C-177/16 (AKKA/LAA), Markt & Mededinging 2018 n° 5 p.200-211 (NL)
7. Temnikov, Oleg: Standard of proof of "Excessive Pricing" under European Union Competition Law - Additional Guidelines Stemming from the Recent Case-law of the Court of Justice of the European Union, Европейски правен преглед 2018 nº XX p.54-62 (BG)

Procedural Analysis Information

Source of the question referred for a preliminary ruling

Augstākā tiesa - Latvia

Subject-matter

• Competition
  

Provisions of national law referred to

Information not available

Provisions of international law referred to

Information not available

Procedure and result

• Reference for a preliminary ruling
  

Formation of the Court

Deuxième chambre (Cour)

Judge-Rapporteur

Prechal

Advocate General

Wahl

Language(s) of the Case

• Latvian
  

Language(s) of the Opinion

• English