Reports of Cases
published in the electronic Reports of Cases (Court Reports - general)
Subject-matter
Information not available
Systematic classification scheme
1.
|
|
3 Legal proceedings
3.01 Actions for failure to fulfil obligations
3.01.00 General
|
|
|
4 Internal policy of the European Union
4.14 Social policy
4.14.01 Equality and non-discrimination
4.14.01.02 Equality for men and women
|
|
|
4 Internal policy of the European Union
4.14 Social policy
4.14.01 Equality and non-discrimination
4.14.01.02 Equality for men and women
|
|
|
4 Internal policy of the European Union
4.14 Social policy
4.14.01 Equality and non-discrimination
4.14.01.02 Equality for men and women
|
|
|
1 The legal order of the European Union
1.03 Respective powers and obligations of the European Union and of the Member States
1.03.03 Obligation of good faith
|
|
|
1.04.03.47 Right to an effective remedy and to a fair trial
|
|
|
1 The legal order of the European Union
1.04 Fundamental rights
1.04.03 The fundamental rights
1.04.03.47 Right to an effective remedy and to a fair trial
|
|
|
1.04.03.47 Right to an effective remedy and to a fair trial
|
|
|
1 The legal order of the European Union
1.04 Fundamental rights
1.04.03 The fundamental rights
1.04.03.47 Right to an effective remedy and to a fair trial
|
|
|
1 The legal order of the European Union
1.03 Respective powers and obligations of the European Union and of the Member States
1.03.03 Obligation of good faith
|
Citations of case-law or legislation
References in grounds of judgment
-
Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU (2007), Article 47
: paragraphs 1, 5, 31, 43, 85, 93, 100, 114
-
Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU (2007), Article 47
-L2 : paragraphs 87, 105
-
Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU (2007), Article 48
: paragraph 114
-
Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU (2007), Article 51
: paragraph 6
-
Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU (2007), Article 51
-P1 : paragraphs 94, 101
-
Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU (2007), Article 51
-P2 : paragraph 94
-
TFEU, Article 157
: paragraphs 1, 4, 31, 42, 47, 48, 50, 52, 59, 60, 66, 67, 69, 72, 74, 78, 84, 136
-
TFEU, Article 157
-P1 : paragraph 58
-
TFEU, Article 157
-P2L1 : paragraph 58
-
TFEU, Article 157
-P4 : paragraphs 51, 57, 80, 82
-
TFEU, Article 252
-L2 : paragraph 37
-
TFEU, Article 253
: paragraph 133
-
TFEU, Article 255
: paragraph 133
-
TEU, Article 2
: paragraphs 2, 98, 106
-
TEU, Article 6
-P1 : paragraph 94
-
TEU, Article 19
: paragraph 98
-
TEU, Article 19
-P1 : paragraph 3
-
TEU, Article 19
-P1L2 : paragraphs 1, 31, 43, 85 - 87, 93, 94, 99 - 104, 107, 108, 134 - 136
-
Directive 79/7
-A07P1LA : paragraph 52
-
Directive 2006/54
: paragraphs 48, 52, 76
-
Directive 2006/54
-A01 : paragraph 8
-
Directive 2006/54
-A02P1 : paragraph 9
-
Directive 2006/54
-A03 : paragraphs 10, 51, 57, 82
-
Directive 2006/54
-A05 : paragraphs 11, 12, 73
-
Directive 2006/54
-A05LA : paragraphs 1, 31, 42, 47, 50, 70, 75, 78, 84, 136
-
Directive 2006/54
-A07 : paragraphs 11, 13
-
Directive 2006/54
-A07P2 : paragraph 71
-
Directive 2006/54
-A09 : paragraphs 11, 14, 73
-
Directive 2006/54
-A09P1LF : paragraphs 1, 31, 42, 47, 50, 70, 76, 78, 84, 136
-
Directive 2006/54
-C14 : paragraphs 7, 72
-
Directive 2006/54
-C22 : paragraph 7
-
Court of Justice - Rules of Procedure (2012)
: paragraph 36
-
Court of Justice - Rules of Procedure (2012)
-A83 : paragraph 38
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -262/88
-N32 : paragraph 74
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -7/93
: paragraph 7
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -7/93
-N5 : paragraph 67
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -7/93
-N46 : paragraph 67
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -366/99
-N31 : paragraph 61
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -366/99
-N33 : paragraph 67
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -366/99
-N34 : paragraph 67
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -366/99
-N35 : paragraph 67
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -366/99
-N64 : paragraph 80
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -351/00
: paragraph 7
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -351/00
-N45 : paragraph 67
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -351/00
-N53 : paragraph 74
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -351/00
-N55 : paragraph 67
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -46/07
-N55 : paragraph 74
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -46/07
-N57 : paragraph 80
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -46/07
-N58 : paragraph 81
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -559/07
-N42 : paragraph 59
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -559/07
-N52 : paragraph 61
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -286/12
-N41 : paragraph 45
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -318/13
-N48 : paragraph 76
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -64/16
: paragraphs 35, 87
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -64/16
-N29 : paragraph 101
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -64/16
-N34 : paragraph 99
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -64/16
-N35 : paragraph 100
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -64/16
-N40 : paragraph 102
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -64/16
-N44 : paragraph 109
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -284/16
-N26 : paragraph 36
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -284/16
-N27 : paragraph 37
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -284/16
-N28 : paragraph 38
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -258/17
-N45 : paragraph 59
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -258/17
-N46 : paragraph 60¨
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -192/18
: paragraphs 34, 35, 36, 37
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -619/18
: paragraph 35
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -216/18
: paragraph 35
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -216/18
-N48 : paragraph 106
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -216/18
-N50 : paragraph 98
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -216/18
-N53 : paragraph 105
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -216/18
-N63 : paragraph 106
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -216/18
-N64 : paragraph 112
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -216/18
-N65 : paragraph 110
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -216/18
-N66 : paragraph 111
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -216/18
-N67 : paragraph 114
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -619/18
-N47 : paragraph 98
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -619/18
-N48 : paragraph 99
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -619/18
-N49 : paragraph 100
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -619/18
-N50 : paragraph 101
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -619/18
-N52 : paragraph 102
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -619/18
-N55 : paragraph 103
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -619/18
-N57 : paragraph 105
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -619/18
-N58 : paragraph 106
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -619/18
-N71 : paragraph 108
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -619/18
-N72 : paragraph 109
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -619/18
-N73 : paragraph 110
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -619/18
-N74 : paragraph 111
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -619/18
-N75 : paragraph 112
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -619/18
-N76 : paragraph 113
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -619/18
-N77 : paragraph 114
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -619/18
-N79 : paragraph 115
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -619/18
-N85 : paragraph 127
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -619/18
-N96 : paragraph 125
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -619/18
-N109 : paragraph 117
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -619/18
-N110 : paragraph 118
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -619/18
-N111 : paragraph 119
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -619/18
-N112 : paragraph 120
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -619/18
-N114 : paragraph 122
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -619/18
-N118 : paragraph 124
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -619/18
-N121 : paragraph 133
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -619/18
-N122 : paragraph 134
Operative part
Opinion
-
EC Treaty (Amsterdam), Article 141
-P2 : point 79
-
Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU (2007), Article 47
: points 2, 4 - 6, 33, 36, 39, 56, 67 - 71, 94, 97, 99 - 101, 116
-
Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU (2007), Article 51
: points 60, 116
-
Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU (2007), Article 51
-P1 : points 4, 60, 68, 69, 72, 99, 100
-
Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU (2007), Article 51
-P2 : points 72, 98, 100, 101
-
TFEU, Article 6
-LB : point 98
-
TFEU, Article 157
: points 33, 35, 39, 45, 46, 49, 74, 76, 77, 79, 120
-
TFEU, Article 157
-P1 : point 8
-
TFEU, Article 157
-P2 : point 8
-
TFEU, Article 157
-P4 : points 8, 50, 51, 90
-
TFEU, Article 258
: points 1, 4, 35, 39, 64, 73
-
TFEU, Article 267
: points 56, 95
-
TEU, Article 2
: points 5, 71, 72, 95, 96, 99
-
TEU, Article 6
: point 101
-
TEU, Article 6
-P1 : point 60
-
TEU, Article 6
-P1L2 : points 69, 72, 100
-
TEU, Article 6
-P3 : point 96
-
TEU, Article 7
-P1 : points 3, 73
-
TEU, Article 17
-P1 : point 69
-
TEU, Article 19
: point 70
-
TEU, Article 19
-P1 : points 33, 56, 60, 95, 101
-
TEU, Article 19
-P1L2 : points 2, 4 - 7, 36, 39, 71, 93 - 97, 99, 102, 103, 114, 115, 120
-
Directive 79/7
: points 66, 74 - 77, 80, 83
-
Directive 79/7
-A07P1LA : points 9, 46, 51, 81, 82
-
Directive 2006/54
: points 33, 46, 51, 66, 74, 76
-
Directive 2006/54
-A01 : points 45, 49
-
Directive 2006/54
-A02 : point 45
-
Directive 2006/54
-A03 : points 10, 50, 51, 90
-
Directive 2006/54
-A05 : point 11
-
Directive 2006/54
-A05LA : points 1, 35, 39, 45, 120
-
Directive 2006/54
-A07P2 : points 45, 49
-
Directive 2006/54
-A09P1LF : points 1, 12, 35, 39, 45, 120
-
Commission - COM Document (Draft Legislation) - 52017PC0835
: point 73
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -12/81
: point 79
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -262/88
-N12 : point 79
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -9/91
: point 82
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -200/91
-N26 : point 80
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -7/93
-N22 : point 81
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -7/93
-N38 : point 78
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -7/93
-N42 : point 78
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -7/93
: point 82
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -7/93
-N46 : point 46
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -450/93
: point 50
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -147/95
-N19 : point 77
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -409/95
: point 50
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -158/97
: point 50
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -167/97
-N23 : point 79
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -366/99
-N50 : point 81
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -50/99
: point 82
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -366/99
: point 82
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -366/99
-N28 : points 46, 77
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -366/99
-N78 : point 48
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -476/99
: point 50
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -476/99
-N41 : point 90
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -351/00
: points 50, 82
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -19/02
-N45 : point 79
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -4/02
: point 82
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -4/02
-N20 : point 48
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -53/03
-N31 : point 59
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -319/03
: point 50
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -508/03
-N73 : point 64
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -506/04
-N51 : points 93, 96
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -506/04
-N52 : point 96
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -506/04
-N53 : point 111
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -244/06
-N39 : point 104
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -46/07
-N40 : point 46
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -46/07
-N41 : point 46
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -559/07
: point 82
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -559/07
-N47 : point 77
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -559/07
-N57 : point 83
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -104/09
-N47 : point 90
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -104/09
: point 50
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -104/09
-N33 : point 90
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -124/11
-N38 : point 79
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -497/12
-N55 : point 69
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -286/12
: point 3
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -198/13
-N32 : point 98
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -198/13
-N33 : point 98
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -198/13
-N34 : point 98
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -198/13
-N35 : point 98
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -198/13
-N36 : point 98
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -198/13
-N37 : point 98
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -258/14
-N47 : point 69
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -258/14
-N48 : point 69
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -64/16
-N40 : points 56, 95
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -64/16
-N41 : point 56
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -64/16
-N42 : points 56, 94
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -64/16
-N43 : point 56
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -64/16
-N44 : point 94
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -64/16
-N45 : point 93
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -336/16
-N47 : point 64
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -638/16
-N45 : point 69
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -235/17
-N68 : point 114
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -235/17
-N101 : point 114
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -235/17
-N111 : point 70
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -380/17
-N44 : point 104
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -609/17
-N72 : point 69
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -609/17
-N73 : point 69
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -609/17
-N74 : point 69
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -609/17
-N75 : point 69
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -609/17
-N76 : point 69
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -609/17
-N77 : point 69
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -609/17
-N78 : point 69
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -609/17
-N79 : point 69
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -609/17
-N80 : point 69
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -609/17
-N81 : point 69
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -609/17
-N82 : point 69
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -609/17
-N83 : point 69
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -609/17
-N84 : point 69
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -609/17
-N85 : point 69
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -609/17
-N86 : point 69
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -609/17
-N87 : point 69
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -609/17
-N88 : point 69
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -609/17
-N89 : point 69
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -609/17
-N90 : point 69
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -609/17
-N91 : point 69
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -609/17
-N92 : point 69
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -609/17
-N93 : point 69
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -609/17
-N94 : point 69
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -609/17
-N95 : point 69
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -609/17
-N96 : point 69
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -609/17
-N97 : point 69
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -609/17
-N98 : point 69
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -609/17
-N99 : point 69
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -609/17
-N100 : point 69
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -609/17
-N101 : point 69
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -609/17
-N102 : point 69
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -609/17
-N103 : point 69
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -609/17
-N104 : point 69
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -609/17
-N105 : point 69
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -609/17
-N106 : point 69
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -609/17
-N107 : point 69
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -609/17
-N108 : point 69
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -609/17
-N109 : point 69
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -609/17
-N110 : point 69
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -609/17
-N111 : point 69
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -609/17
-N112 : point 69
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -609/17
-N113 : point 69
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -609/17
-N114 : point 69
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -609/17
-N115 : point 69
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -609/17
-N116 : point 69
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -609/17
-N117 : point 69
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -609/17
-N118 : point 69
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -258/17
-N46 : point 83
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -260/17
-N38 : point 98
-
Court of Justice - Opinion 1/17
-N202 : point 94
-
Court of Justice - Opinion 1/17
-N203 : point 94
-
Court of Justice - Opinion 1/17
-N204 : point 94
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -171/18
-N62 : point 80
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -619/18
: points 3 - 5, 24, 68, 95, 111
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -619/18
-N48 : point 73
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -619/18
-N49 : point 73
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -619/18
-N50 : point 73
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -619/18
-N51 : point 73
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -49/18
-N63 : point 95
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -49/18
-N66 : point 94
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -216/18
: points 5, 97
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -216/18
-N52 : point 95
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -216/18
-N60 : point 115
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -216/18
-N63 : point 94
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -216/18
-N64 : point 94
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -216/18
-N65 : point 94
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -216/18
-N66 : points 106, 111
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -216/18
-N77 : point 111
-
Court of Justice - Order C -619/18
: point 3
Dates
Date of the lodging of the application initiating proceedings
Date of the Opinion
Date of the hearing
Information not available
Date of delivery
05/11/2019
References
Publication in the Official Journal
Judgment: OJ C 432 from 23.12.2019, p.6
Application: OJ C 182 from 28.05.2018, p.14
Name of the parties
Commission v Poland (Independence of ordinary courts)
Notes on Academic Writings
- Giannopoulos, Christos: L’inamovibilité des juges et l’État de droit – la Cour de justice retoque la réforme polonaise de la retraite des magistrats. CJUE, gde ch., 5 novembre 2019, Commission/Pologne, aff. C-192/18, Revue des affaires européennes 2019, n. 4, p. 815-822 (FR)
- Simon, Denys: Droits fondamentaux - Indépendance des juges nationaux, Europe 2020 Janvier Comm. nº 1 p.1 (FR)
- Leloup, Mathieu: Het arrest Europese Commissie/Polen (C-192/18): een nieuwe overwinning voor de Europese Unie in de strijd om de rechtsstaat, S.E.W. : Tijdschrift voor Europees en economisch recht 2020 p.149-153 (NL)
- Krzywoń, Adam: La defensa y el desarrollo del principio de independencia judicial en la Unión Europea, Revista española de Derecho Constitucional 2020 nº 119 p. 85-117 (ES)
Procedural Analysis Information
Source of the question referred for a preliminary ruling
Information not available
Subject-matter
- Principles, objectives and tasks of the Treaties
- Provisions governing the institutions
- Social policy
- Fundamental rights
- - Charter of Fundamental Rights
Provisions of national law referred to
Information not available
Provisions of international law referred to
Information not available
Procedure and result
- Action for a declaration of failure to fulfil obligations : application granted
Formation of the Court
grande chambre (Cour)
Judge-Rapporteur
Prechal
Advocate General
Tanchev
Language(s) of the Case
Language(s) of the Opinion