Reports of Cases
published in the electronic Reports of Cases (Court Reports - general)
Subject-matter
Information not available
Systematic classification scheme
|
1.
|
|
4.06.02.01 Jurisdiction, recognition and enforcement of judgments – Civil and commercial matters
|
|
1.
|
|
4 Internal policy of the European Union
4.06 Area of freedom, security and justice
4.06.02 Judicial cooperation in civil matters
4.06.02.01 Jurisdiction, recognition and enforcement of judgments – Civil and commercial matters
|
|
|
|
4.06.02.01 Jurisdiction, recognition and enforcement of judgments – Civil and commercial matters
|
|
|
|
4 Internal policy of the European Union
4.06 Area of freedom, security and justice
4.06.02 Judicial cooperation in civil matters
4.06.02.01 Jurisdiction, recognition and enforcement of judgments – Civil and commercial matters
|
|
|
|
4 Internal policy of the European Union
4.04 Free movement of persons and services
4.04.02 Freedom of establishment
4.04.02.01 The various activities
|
|
|
|
4 Internal policy of the European Union
4.04 Free movement of persons and services
4.04.03 Freedom to provide services
4.04.03.01 The various services
|
|
|
|
4.06.02.01 Jurisdiction, recognition and enforcement of judgments – Civil and commercial matters
|
|
|
|
4 Internal policy of the European Union
4.06 Area of freedom, security and justice
4.06.02 Judicial cooperation in civil matters
4.06.02.01 Jurisdiction, recognition and enforcement of judgments – Civil and commercial matters
|
|
|
|
4 Internal policy of the European Union
4.06 Area of freedom, security and justice
4.06.02 Judicial cooperation in civil matters
4.06.02.05 Conflicts of laws
|
Citations of case-law or legislation
References in grounds of judgment
-
Regulation 44/2001
: paragraph 63
-
Regulation 44/2001
-A15 : paragraph 38
-
Regulation 44/2001
-A16 : paragraph 38
-
Regulation 44/2001
-A17 : paragraph 38
-
Directive 2004/39
-A04 : paragraph 62
-
Directive 2004/39
-A04P1 : paragraph 11
-
Directive 2004/39
-A04P1PT10 : paragraphs 70, 73
-
Directive 2004/39
-A04P1PT11 : paragraph 67
-
Directive 2004/39
-A04P1PT12 : paragraphs 25, 32, 37, 60, 67, 71, 73, 76 - 78
-
Directive 2004/39
-N1SCPT9 : paragraphs 12, 62
-
Directive 2004/39
-N2S1 : paragraphs 13, 68, 69, 72, 75
-
Directive 2004/39
-N2S2 : paragraphs 69, 72
-
Directive 2004/39
-N2S2PT2.1 : paragraph 14
-
Regulation 593/2008
-A01P1L1 : paragraphs 9, 64
-
Regulation 593/2008
-A06 : paragraphs 10, 37, 60, 66, 78
-
Regulation 593/2008
-A06P1 : paragraph 62
-
Regulation 593/2008
-A06P2 : paragraph 62
-
Regulation 593/2008
-A06P4LD : paragraph 62
-
Regulation 593/2008
-C7 : paragraphs 8, 63
-
Regulation 593/2008
-C28 : paragraphs 8, 62
-
Regulation 593/2008
-C30 : paragraphs 8, 62
-
Regulation 1215/2012
: paragraphs 49, 50, 52, 63, 64
-
Regulation 1215/2012
-A17 : paragraphs 38, 41, 44, 51, 65
-
Regulation 1215/2012
-A17P1 : paragraphs 1, 4, 24, 25, 28, 31 - 37, 45, 47, 53 - 55, 57, 58, 60, 62, 66, 71, 73, 76 - 78
-
Regulation 1215/2012
-A17P1LA : paragraph 39
-
Regulation 1215/2012
-A17P1LB : paragraph 39
-
Regulation 1215/2012
-A17P1LC : paragraph 39
-
Regulation 1215/2012
-A17P3 : paragraphs 4, 48
-
Regulation 1215/2012
-A18 : paragraphs 38, 41, 44, 51, 65
-
Regulation 1215/2012
-A18P1 : paragraphs 5, 30
-
Regulation 1215/2012
-A19 : paragraphs 6, 29, 38, 44, 51, 65
-
Regulation 1215/2012
-A19PT1 : paragraph 24
-
Regulation 1215/2012
-A25P4 : paragraphs 7, 24, 29
-
Regulation 1215/2012
-C15 : paragraphs 3, 51
-
Regulation 1215/2012
-C16 : paragraph 3
-
Regulation 1215/2012
-C18 : paragraph 3
-
Regulation 1215/2012
-CH2S4 : paragraphs 33, 48
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -45/13
-N20 : paragraph 63
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -375/13
: paragraph 34
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -110/14
-N21 : paragraph 55
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -297/14
-N24 : paragraph 39
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -498/16
-N28 : paragraph 61
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -498/16
-N29 : paragraph 41
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -498/16
-N30 : paragraph 42
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -498/16
-N31 : paragraph 44
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -498/16
-N39 : paragraph 55
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -308/17
-N31 : paragraph 38
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -337/17
-N34 : paragraph 52
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -630/17
-N89 : paragraph 43
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -694/17
-N42 : paragraphs 48, 50, 64
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -208/18
: paragraphs 51, 58, 72
Operative part
Opinion
-
Directive 93/13
-A02LB : point 48
-
Regulation 44/2001
: points 51, 69, 73
-
Regulation 44/2001
-A15 : point 33
-
Regulation 44/2001
-A15P1 : points 43, 47, 59
-
Directive 2002/65
: point 83
-
Directive 2004/39
: points 15, 18, 64, 77, 83
-
Directive 2004/39
-A04P1 : point 6
-
Directive 2004/39
-A04P1PT10 : points 70, 85
-
Directive 2004/39
-A04P1PT11 : points 70, 79
-
Directive 2004/39
-A04P1PT12 : points 23, 70, 76, 79, 82, 84, 86, 88, 89
-
Directive 2004/39
-A04P1PT17 : point 70
-
Directive 2004/39
-A19P10LC : point 78
-
Directive 2004/39
-C31 : point 86
-
Directive 2004/39
-N1SC : point 74
-
Directive 2004/39
-N1SCPT9 : point 70
-
Directive 2004/39
-N2S1 : points 80, 85
-
Directive 2004/39
-N2S2 : points 81, 85
-
Regulation 864/2007
-C7 : point 73
-
Regulation 593/2008
: point 73
-
Regulation 593/2008
: point 69
-
Regulation 593/2008
-A06 : points :, , 64
-
Regulation 593/2008
-A06 : points 5, 23, 66, 69, 89
-
Regulation 593/2008
-A06P1 : points 15, 65, 68, 70, 71, 74
-
Regulation 593/2008
-A06P2 : points 65, 70, 71, 74
-
Regulation 593/2008
-A06P4LD : points 67, 70, 71, 74
-
Regulation 593/2008
-C28 : point 70
-
Regulation 593/2008
-C30 : point 70
-
Regulation 1215/2012
: points 69, 73
-
Regulation 1215/2012
-A04P1 : points 2, 86
-
Regulation 1215/2012
-A07P1 : points 2, 86
-
Regulation 1215/2012
-A17 : points 4, 37, 49, 51, 57, 67, 69
-
Regulation 1215/2012
-A17P1 : points 1 - 3, 15, 18, 19, 22 - 24, 32, 35, 36, 38, 44, 45, 47, 48, 50, 53, 54, 56, 58, 61, 63 - 66, 68, 75 - 77, 82, 84 - 86, 88, 89
-
Regulation 1215/2012
-A17P1LA : point 33
-
Regulation 1215/2012
-A17P1LB : point 33
-
Regulation 1215/2012
-A17P1LC : point 33
-
Regulation 1215/2012
-A17P3 : points 43, 74
-
Regulation 1215/2012
-A18 : points 37, 43, 45, 49, 51, 57, 67, 72
-
Regulation 1215/2012
-A18P1 : points 2, 25, 29
-
Regulation 1215/2012
-A19 : points 2, 26, 31, 32, 43, 45, 49, 51, 57, 67, 72
-
Regulation 1215/2012
-A19PT1 : points 27, 28
-
Regulation 1215/2012
-A19PT2 : points 27, 29
-
Regulation 1215/2012
-A19PT3 : points 27, 30
-
Regulation 1215/2012
-A25P4 : point 31
-
Regulation 1215/2012
-C15 : point 51
-
Directive 2014/65
-A04P1PT9 : point 70
-
Directive 2014/65
-A04P1PT10 : point 70
-
Directive 2014/65
-A04P1PT11 : point 70
-
Directive 2014/65
-A04P1PT15 : point 70
-
Directive 2014/65
-A24P4LB : point 78
-
Directive 2014/65
-A25P8LC : point 78
-
Directive 2014/65
-C3 : point 86
-
Directive 2014/65
-C86 : point 86
-
Directive 2014/65
-N1SCPT9 : point 70
-
Directive 2014/65
-N2S1 : point 80
-
Directive 2014/65
-N2S2 : point 81
-
Regulation 600/2014
-A40 : point 57
-
Decision 2018/796
: point 57
-
Decision 2018/796
-C11 : point 57
-
Decision 2018/796
-C12 : point 57
-
Decision 2018/796
-C20 : point 57
-
Decision 2018/796
-C27 : point 57
-
Decision 2018/796
-C35 : point 57
-
Decision 2019/155
: point 57
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -89/91
-N18 : points 2, 49
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -269/95
-N16 : point 37
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -269/95
-N17 : points 37, 61
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -464/01
-N34 : point 2
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -464/01
-N36 : point 37
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -464/01
-N37 : point 37
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -585/08
-N43 : point 69
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -585/08
-N53 : point 2
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -29/10
-N33 : point 69
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -154/11
-N57 : point 29
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -154/11
-N58 : point 29
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -154/11
-N59 : point 29
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -154/11
-N62 : point 29
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -154/11
-N63 : point 29
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -154/11
-N64 : point 29
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -190/11
-N26 : point 2
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -419/11
-N26 : point 2
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -419/11
-N30 : point 33
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -419/11
-N32 : point 85
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -419/11
-N33 : point 2
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -419/11
-N34 : point 37
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -508/12
-N25 : point 69
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -375/13
-N28 : point 43
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -45/13
-N20 : point 73
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -140/13
-N26 : point 86
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -375/13
-N23 : point 33
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -375/13
-N24 : point 43
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -110/14
-N21 : point 48
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -110/14
-N27 : point 48
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -297/14
-N24 : point 33
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -359/14
-N43 : point 69
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -191/15
-N36 : point 69
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -196/15
-N16 : point 51
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -678/15
-N41 : point 86
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -498/16
-N41 : point 61
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -249/16
-N32 : point 69
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -498/16
-N29 : point 37
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -498/16
-N30 : point 37
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -498/16
-N37 : point 61
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -498/16
-N38 : point 61
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -498/16
-N39 : points 47, 48
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -694/17
-N49 : point 73
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -694/17
-N50 : point 73
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -308/17
-N31 : point 33
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -630/17
-N86 : point 36
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -630/17
-N87 : point 37
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -630/17
-N88 : point 37
Dates
Date of the lodging of the application initiating proceedings
Date of the Opinion
Date of the hearing
Information not available
Date of delivery
03/10/2019
References
Publication in the Official Journal
Judgment: OJ C 413 from 09.12.2019, p.10
Application: OJ C 200 from 11.06.2018, p.23
Name of the parties
Petruchová
Notes on Academic Writings
- Mankowski, Peter: RIW-Kommentar, Recht der internationalen Wirtschaft 2019 p.0810-818 (DE)
- Nourissat, Cyril: Note à l'arrêt de la Cour du 3 octobre 2019, affaire C-208/18, Procédures 2019 nº 12 p.21-22 (FR)
- Idot, Laurence: Règlement "Bruxelles I bis". Notion de consommateur, Europe 2019 Décembre Comm. nº 12 p.49-50 (FR)
- Chacornac, Jérôme: La double autonomie de la notion de consommateur dans le règlement Bruxelles I bis en matière financière, Revue critique de droit international privé 2020 nº 2 p. 300-316 (FR)
- Tenenbaum, Aline: Les consommateurs et les opérations bancaires et financières : notion de consommateur, protection relative aux moyens de paiement et sanctions attachées aux clauses abusives, Revue des contrats 2020, n° 1, p. 83-87 (FR)
- Wendelstein, Christoph: Haftung von CFD-Brokern im europäischen Zuständigkeitsrecht : Anmerkung zu EuGH, Urt. v. 2.4.2020 : C-500/18, Reliantco und EuGH, Urt. v. 3.10.2019 : C-208/18 , Petruchová, Zeitschrift für das Privatrecht der Europäischen Union - GPR 2021 p. 7-14 (DE)
- Ho-Dac, Marion: Du dialogue interprétatif entre droit (matériel) de la consommation et droit international privé de l'Union - L'exemple du « for du consommateur », Revue critique de droit international privé 2022, nº 1, p. 47-62 (FR)
- Callens, Evariest ; Steennot, Reinhard: Complexe contracts for differences maken geen verschil voor de kwalificatie als consument : Hof van Justitie, 03/10/2019, C-208/18, Revue de droit commercial belge 2022 p. 62-68 (NL)
Procedural Analysis Information
Source of the question referred for a preliminary ruling
Nejvyšší soud České republiky - Czech Republic
Subject-matter
- area of freedom, security and justice
- - Judicial cooperation in civil matters
Provisions of national law referred to
Information not available
Provisions of international law referred to
Information not available
Procedure and result
- Reference for a preliminary ruling
Formation of the Court
Première chambre (Cour)
Judge-Rapporteur
Safjan
Advocate General
Tanchev
Language(s) of the Case
Language(s) of the Opinion