Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 11 January 2017

Criminal proceedings against Jozef Grundza

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Krajský súd v Prešove

References for a preliminary ruling — Judicial cooperation in criminal matters — Framework Decision 2008/909/JHA — Article 7 — Condition of double criminality — Article 9 — Ground for non-recognition and non-enforcement based on the lack of double criminality — National of the executing State convicted in the issuing State for failure to comply with a decision issued by a public authority

Case C-289/15


Top of the page Documents in the Case
Document Date Name of the parties Subject-matter Curia EUR-Lex Autres Liens
Judgment (OJ)
10/02/2017 Grundza
area of freedom, security and justice
- judicial cooperation in criminal matters
  • area of freedom, security and justice
  • - judicial cooperation in criminal matters
View pdf documents
Judgment
ECLI:EU:C:2017:4		 11/01/2017 Grundza
area of freedom, security and justice
- judicial cooperation in criminal matters
  • area of freedom, security and justice
  • - judicial cooperation in criminal matters
EUR-Lex text EUR-Lex bilingual text
Judgment (Summary)
ECLI:EU:C:2017:4		 11/01/2017 Grundza
area of freedom, security and justice
- judicial cooperation in criminal matters
  • area of freedom, security and justice
  • - judicial cooperation in criminal matters
EUR-Lex text EUR-Lex bilingual text
Application (OJ)
21/08/2015 Grundza
area of freedom, security and justice
- judicial cooperation in criminal matters
  • area of freedom, security and justice
  • - judicial cooperation in criminal matters
View pdf documents
Opinion
ECLI:EU:C:2016:622		 28/07/2016 Grundza
area of freedom, security and justice
- judicial cooperation in criminal matters
  • area of freedom, security and justice
  • - judicial cooperation in criminal matters
EUR-Lex text EUR-Lex bilingual text
Top of the page Legal analysis of the decision or of the case

Reports of Cases

published in the electronic Reports of Cases (Court Reports - general)

Subject-matter

Information not available

Systematic classification scheme

1.
-
4 Internal policy of the European Union
  4.06 Area of freedom, security and justice
    4.06.03 Judicial cooperation in criminal matters
      4.06.03.01 Harmonization of laws


Citations of case-law or legislation

References in grounds of judgment

Operative part

Opinion


Dates

Date of the lodging of the application initiating proceedings

  • 15/06/2015

Date of the Opinion

  • 28/07/2016

Date of the hearing

Information not available

Date of delivery

11/01/2017


References

Publication in the Official Journal

Application: OJ C 294 from 07.09.2015, p.32

Judgment: OJ C 63 from 27.02.2017, p.2

Name of the parties

Grundza

Notes on Academic Writings

  1. Gazin, Fabienne: Reconnaissance mutuelle des jugements en matière pénale, Europe 2017 Mars nº 03 p.20 (FR)
  2. Jánošíková, Martina: Zásada vzájomného uznávania rozsudkov v trestných veciach a podmienka obojstrannej trestnosti, Bulletin slovenskej advokácie 2017 n° 3 p.37-39 (SK)
  3. Glerum, V.H.: Beoordeling van de voorwaarde van dubbele strafbaarheid bij wederzijdse erkenning: oude wijn in nieuwe zakken, S.E.W. : Tijdschrift voor Europees en economisch recht 2017 p.478-481 (NL)
  4. Falkiewicz, Ariel: The Double Criminality Requirement in the Area of Freedom, Security and Justice – Reflections in Light of the European Court of Justice Judgment of 11 January 2017, C-289/15, Criminal Proceedings against Jozef Grundza, European Criminal Law Review 2017 p.258–274 (EN)



Procedural Analysis Information

Source of the question referred for a preliminary ruling

Krajský súd v Prešove - Slovakia

Subject-matter

  • area of freedom, security and justice
  • - judicial cooperation in criminal matters

Provisions of national law referred to

Information not available

Provisions of international law referred to

Information not available

Procedure and result

  • Reference for a preliminary ruling

Formation of the Court

Cinquième chambre (Cour)

Judge-Rapporteur

Berger

Advocate General

Bobek

Language(s) of the Case

  • Slovak

Language(s) of the Opinion

  • English