Reports of Cases
published in the electronic Reports of Cases (Court Reports - general)
Subject-matter
Information not available
Systematic classification scheme
|
1.
|
|
4 Internal policy of the European Union
4.11 Approximation of laws
4.11.03 European Union trade mark
4.11.03.01 Absolute grounds for refusal
4.11.03.01.00 General
|
|
|
|
4 Internal policy of the European Union
4.11 Approximation of laws
4.11.09 Harmonised intellectual property rights
4.11.09.01 Trade marks
4.11.09.01.01 Absolute grounds for refusal
|
|
|
|
4 Internal policy of the European Union
4.11 Approximation of laws
4.11.03 European Union trade mark
4.11.03.00 General
|
|
|
|
4 Internal policy of the European Union
4.11 Approximation of laws
4.11.09 Harmonised intellectual property rights
4.11.09.01 Trade marks
4.11.09.01.00 General
|
|
|
|
4 Internal policy of the European Union
4.11 Approximation of laws
4.11.03 European Union trade mark
4.11.03.00 General
|
|
|
|
4 Internal policy of the European Union
4.11 Approximation of laws
4.11.09 Harmonised intellectual property rights
4.11.09.01 Trade marks
4.11.09.01.00 General
|
|
|
|
4.11.03.01.06 Marks contrary to public policy or to accepted principles of morality
|
|
|
|
4 Internal policy of the European Union
4.11 Approximation of laws
4.11.03 European Union trade mark
4.11.03.01 Absolute grounds for refusal
4.11.03.01.06 Marks contrary to public policy or to accepted principles of morality
|
|
|
|
4 Internal policy of the European Union
4.11 Approximation of laws
4.11.09 Harmonised intellectual property rights
4.11.09.01 Trade marks
4.11.09.01.01 Absolute grounds for refusal
|
|
|
|
4 Internal policy of the European Union
4.11 Approximation of laws
4.11.03 European Union trade mark
4.11.03.01 Absolute grounds for refusal
4.11.03.01.11 Applicant acting in bad faith
|
|
|
|
4 Internal policy of the European Union
4.11 Approximation of laws
4.11.09 Harmonised intellectual property rights
4.11.09.01 Trade marks
4.11.09.01.01 Absolute grounds for refusal
|
|
|
|
4 Internal policy of the European Union
4.11 Approximation of laws
4.11.09 Harmonised intellectual property rights
4.11.09.01 Trade marks
4.11.09.01.00 General
|
Citations of case-law or legislation
References in grounds of judgment
-
Directive 89/104
: paragraphs 20, 21, 28, 52, 53, 61, 77, 82, 84 - 87
-
Directive 89/104
-A02 : paragraphs 23, 63
-
Directive 89/104
-A03 : paragraphs 54, 56, 58 - 60, 62, 71
-
Directive 89/104
-A03P1 : paragraphs 24, 57
-
Directive 89/104
-A03P1LA : paragraph 63
-
Directive 89/104
-A03P1LF : paragraphs 65, 66
-
Directive 89/104
-A03P2 : paragraph 24
-
Directive 89/104
-A03P2LD : paragraphs 57, 72, 73, 75, 81
-
Directive 89/104
-A07P1 : paragraph 57
-
Directive 89/104
-A12 : paragraph 68
-
Directive 89/104
-A12P1 : paragraph 25
-
Directive 89/104
-A13 : paragraphs 26, 69, 72, 79
-
Directive 89/104
-C5 : paragraph 22
-
Directive 89/104
-C7 : paragraph 22
-
Directive 89/104
-C8 : paragraph 22
-
Regulation 40/94
: paragraphs 10, 11, 52, 53, 59, 77
-
Regulation 40/94
-A04 : paragraphs 12, 63
-
Regulation 40/94
-A07 : paragraphs 54, 57, 60, 62, 71
-
Regulation 40/94
-A07P1 : paragraphs 13, 58, 61
-
Regulation 40/94
-A07P1LA : paragraph 63
-
Regulation 40/94
-A07P1LF : paragraphs 65, 66
-
Regulation 40/94
-A15P1 : paragraph 14
-
Regulation 40/94
-A38P1 : paragraph 15
-
Regulation 40/94
-A50P1 : paragraph 68
-
Regulation 40/94
-A50P1LA : paragraph 16
-
Regulation 40/94
-A50P2 : paragraph 69
-
Regulation 40/94
-A51 : paragraphs 17, 54, 60 - 62, 71
-
Regulation 40/94
-A51P1 : paragraph 58
-
Regulation 40/94
-A51P1LA : paragraph 57
-
Regulation 40/94
-A51P1LB : paragraphs 57, 72, 73, 75, 81
-
Regulation 40/94
-A51P3 : paragraphs 72, 79
-
Regulation 40/94
-A96 : paragraph 57
-
Regulation 40/94
-A96P1 : paragraph 18
-
Directive 2008/95
: paragraphs 20, 52
-
Directive 2008/95
-A18 : paragraphs 27, 51
-
Regulation 207/2009
: paragraphs 10, 52
-
Regulation 207/2009
-A167 : paragraph 51
-
Regulation 207/2009
-A167P1 : paragraph 19
-
Directive 2015/2436
: paragraph 47
-
Directive 2015/2436
-A55 : paragraph 20
-
Regulation 1001/2017
: paragraph 10
-
Regulation 1001/2017
-A04 : paragraph 35
-
Regulation 1001/2017
-A07P1LA : paragraph 35
-
Regulation 1001/2017
-A59P1LA : paragraph 35
-
Regulation 1001/2017
-A128P1 : paragraph 35
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -299/99
-N74 : paragraph 56
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -363/99
-N78 : paragraph 56
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -273/00
-N51 : paragraph 64
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -421/04
-N19 : paragraph 56
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -307/10
: paragraphs 32, 61
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -320/12
-N34 : paragraph 73
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -320/12
-N35 : paragraph 73
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -320/12
-N42 : paragraph 56
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -591/12
-N12 : paragraph 49
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -577/14
-N29 : paragraph 61
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -577/14
-N30 : paragraph 61
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -501/15
-N38 : paragraph 61
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -104/18
-N45 : paragraph 74
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -104/18
-N46 : paragraph 75
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -541/18
-N22 : paragraph 76
Operative part
Opinion
-
Directive 89/104
: points 33, 35, 36, 42, 51, 94, 142
-
Directive 89/104
-A02 : points 40, 54
-
Directive 89/104
-A03 : points 41, 43
-
Directive 89/104
-A03P1LA : points 40, 50, 54
-
Directive 89/104
-A03P1LF : points 59, 143
-
Directive 89/104
-A03P2LD : points 93, 139
-
Directive 89/104
-A13 : points 125, 127, 143
-
Directive 89/104
-C5 : point 135
-
Directive 89/104
-C7 : point 136
-
Regulation 40/94
: points 33, 35, 36, 51, 94
-
Regulation 40/94
-A04 : points 40, 54
-
Regulation 40/94
-A07 : point 44
-
Regulation 40/94
-A07P1LA : points 40, 50, 54
-
Regulation 40/94
-A07P1LF : points 59, 143
-
Regulation 40/94
-A51 : points 44, 47
-
Regulation 40/94
-A51P1LB : points 85, 93, 100, 115
-
Regulation 40/94
-A51P3 : points 125, 127, 143
-
Regulation 40/94
-A96 : point 45
-
Regulation 1891/2006
: point 33
-
Directive 2008/95
: points 22, 34 - 36, 42
-
Directive 2008/95
-A03P1LA : point 40
-
Directive 2008/95
-C6 : point 135
-
Directive 2008/95
-C8 : point 136
-
Directive 2008/95
-C9 : point 69
-
Regulation 207/2009
: points 22, 33, 34, 36, 103
-
Regulation 207/2009
-A52P1LB : point 99
-
Regulation 207/2009
-C10 : point 69
-
Directive 2015/2436
: points 19, 33, 129, 134
-
Directive 2015/2436
-A03 : point 23
-
Directive 2015/2436
-A04 : point 23
-
Directive 2015/2436
-A05 : point 23
-
Directive 2015/2436
-C31 : point 71
-
Directive 2015/2436
-C32 : point 71
-
Regulation 1001/2017
-A04 : point 23
-
Regulation 1001/2017
-A07P1LA : point 23
-
Regulation 1001/2017
-A08 : point 23
-
Regulation 1001/2017
-A33P2 : point 11
-
Regulation 1001/2017
-A59P1LA : point 119
-
Regulation 1001/2017
-A59P1LB : point 115
-
Regulation 1001/2017
-C28 : point 63
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -39/97
-N28 : point 63
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -363/99
-N34 : point 28
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -273/00
: point 23
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -273/00
-N48 : point 58
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -273/00
-N50 : point 70
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -273/00
-N51 : point 55
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -273/00
-N52 : point 55
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -418/02
-N47 : point 4
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -418/02
-N30 : point 136
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -353/03
-N25 : point 28
-
General Court - Judgment T -126/03
: point 83
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -421/04
-N19 : point 42
-
General Court - Judgment T -256/04
-N21 : point 83
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -529/07
-N48 : point 85
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -529/07
: points 92, 94, 109, 111
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -529/07
-N31 : point 85
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -529/07
-N32 : point 85
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -529/07
-N37 : point 100
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -529/07
-N42 : point 100
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -529/07
-N43 : point 72
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -529/07
-N44 : point 72
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -569/08
: point 111
-
General Court - Judgment T -507/08
-N88 : point 102
-
General Court - Judgment T -507/08
-N89 : point 102
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -307/10
-N68 : point 58
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -307/10
: points 11, 21, 22, 24, 37, 54, 57, 58, 63
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -307/10
-N43 : point 23
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -307/10
-N44 : point 23
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -307/10
-N45 : point 23
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -307/10
-N46 : point 61
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -307/10
-N47 : point 61
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -307/10
-N48 : point 61
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -307/10
-N54 : point 75
-
General Court - Judgment T -321/10
: point 119
-
General Court - Judgment T -321/10
-N47 : point 126
-
General Court - Judgment T -321/10
-N48 : point 126
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -149/11
-N32 : point 70
-
General Court - Judgment T -33/11
-N24 : point 102
-
General Court - Judgment T -33/11
-N25 : point 102
-
General Court - Judgment T -33/11
-N26 : point 102
-
General Court - Judgment T -33/11
-N32 : point 126
-
General Court - Judgment T -136/11
: point 92
-
General Court - Judgment T -136/11
-N54 : point 102
-
General Court - Judgment T -136/11
-N55 : point 102
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -320/12
: point 136
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -320/12
-N42 : point 42
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -597/12
-N24 : point 118
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -597/12
-N25 : point 118
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -597/12
-N26 : point 118
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -597/12
-N27 : point 118
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -597/12
-N28 : point 118
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -597/12
-N29 : point 118
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -597/12
-N30 : point 118
-
General Court - Judgment T -47/12
-N20 : point 83
-
General Court - Judgment T -327/12
-N38 : point 102
-
General Court - Judgment T -327/12
-N39 : point 102
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -217/13
-N31 : point 36
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -577/14
-N29 : point 21
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -577/14
-N30 : point 21
-
General Court - Judgment T -82/14
: points 92, 96, 112
-
General Court - Judgment T -82/14
-N28 : point 103
-
General Court - Judgment T -82/14
-N29 : point 103
-
General Court - Judgment T -82/14
-N30 : point 103
-
General Court - Judgment T -82/14
-N31 : point 103
-
General Court - Judgment T -82/14
-N32 : point 103
-
General Court - Judgment T -82/14
-N33 : point 103
-
General Court - Judgment T -82/14
-N48 : point 103
-
General Court - Judgment T -82/14
-N49 : point 103
-
General Court - Judgment T -82/14
-N50 : point 103
-
General Court - Judgment T -82/14
-N51 : point 103
-
General Court - Judgment T -82/14
-N52 : point 103
-
General Court - Judgment T -343/14
-N46 : point 103
-
General Court - Judgment T -343/14
-N47 : point 103
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -501/15
-N38 : point 21
-
General Court - Judgment T -132/16
-N63 : point 107
-
General Court - Judgment T -132/16
-N64 : point 107
-
General Court - Judgment T -132/16
-N65 : point 107
-
Court of Justice - Order C -101/17
: points 92, 103, 112
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -104/18
-N32 : point 97
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -104/18
-N45 : point 98
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -104/18
-N62 : point 101
Dates
Date of the lodging of the application initiating proceedings
Information not available
Date of the Opinion
Date of the hearing
Information not available
Date of delivery
29/01/2020
References
Publication in the Official Journal
Information not available
Name of the parties
Sky and Others
Notes on Academic Writings
- Jehoram, Tobias Cohen ; Lokhorst, Geert: Depots van merken voor een breed scala aan waren en diensten: blijft 'the Sky the limit'? : noot, Berichten industriële eigendom 2020 p. 182-184 (NL)
- Verschuur, Anne-Marie E.: Sky / Skykick, Intellectuele eigendom & Reclamerecht 2020 p. 197-199 (DE)
- Smith, Joel ; Silver, Joanna: CJEU Decision in SkyKick Offers Relief to Trade Mark Owners, European Intellectual Property Review 2020, Vol 42, n° 5, p. 323-324 (EN)
- Wilding, Charlotte ; Reeve-Young, Richard: "Computer software": are overbroad trademark specifications bad faith and what does that mean for validity?, Computer and Telecommunications Law Review 2020 p. 121-125 (EN)
- Smith, Joel ; Silver, Joanna: CJEU decision in SkyKick offers relief to trade mark owners : Sky Plc v SkyKick UK Ltd (C-371/18), European Intellectual Property Review 2020 p. 323-324 (EN)
- Arnold, Richard: Broad specifications and intent to use : is the EU trade mark system credible? : case C-371/18 Sky v SkyKick, Gewerblicher Rechtsschutz und Urheberrecht INT 2021 p. 656-661 (EN)
Procedural Analysis Information
Source of the question referred for a preliminary ruling
High Court of Justice (Chancery Division) - United Kingdom
Subject-matter
- Intellectual, industrial and commercial property
- - Trade marks
- Approximation of laws
Provisions of national law referred to
Information not available
Provisions of international law referred to
Information not available
Procedure and result
- Reference for a preliminary ruling
Formation of the Court
Quatrième chambre (Cour)
Judge-Rapporteur
Jürimäe
Advocate General
Tanchev
Language(s) of the Case
Language(s) of the Opinion