Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 19 March 2020

PG v Bevándorlási és Menekültügyi Hivatal

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Fővárosi Közigazgatási és Munkaügyi Bíróság

Reference for a preliminary ruling — Common policy on asylum and subsidiary protection — Common procedures for granting international protection — Directive 2013/32/EU — Article 46(3) — Full and ex nunc examination — Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Right to an effective remedy — Powers and obligations of the first-instance court or tribunal — No power to vary the decisions of the authorities competent in the area of international protection — National legislation providing for an obligation to adjudicate within a time limit of 60 days

Case C-406/18


Top of the page Documents in the Case
Document Date Name of the parties Subject-matter Curia EUR-Lex
Judgment (OJ)
19/06/2020 PG
area of freedom, security and justice
- Border checks
  • area of freedom, security and justice
  • - Border checks
  • - asylum policy
Judgment
ECLI:EU:C:2020:216		 19/03/2020 PG
area of freedom, security and justice
- Border checks
  • area of freedom, security and justice
  • - Border checks
  • - asylum policy
EUR-Lex text EUR-Lex bilingual text
Opinion
ECLI:EU:C:2019:1055		 05/12/2019 PG
area of freedom, security and justice
- Border checks
  • area of freedom, security and justice
  • - Border checks
  • - asylum policy
EUR-Lex text EUR-Lex bilingual text
Application (OJ)
17/08/2018 PG
area of freedom, security and justice
- Border checks
  • area of freedom, security and justice
  • - Border checks
  • - asylum policy
Top of the page Legal analysis of the decision or of the case

Reports of Cases

published in the electronic Reports of Cases (Court Reports - general)

Subject-matter

Information not available

Systematic classification scheme

1.
-
1 The legal order of the European Union
  1.04 Fundamental rights
    1.04.03 The fundamental rights
      1.04.03.47 Right to an effective remedy and to a fair trial
-
4 Internal policy of the European Union
  4.06 Area of freedom, security and justice
    4.06.01 Border checks, asylum and immigration
      4.06.01.03 Asylum policy
-
1 The legal order of the European Union
  1.04 Fundamental rights
    1.04.03 The fundamental rights
      1.04.03.47 Right to an effective remedy and to a fair trial
-
4 Internal policy of the European Union
  4.06 Area of freedom, security and justice
    4.06.01 Border checks, asylum and immigration
      4.06.01.03 Asylum policy
-
1 The legal order of the European Union
  1.04 Fundamental rights
    1.04.03 The fundamental rights
      1.04.03.47 Right to an effective remedy and to a fair trial
-
4 Internal policy of the European Union
  4.06 Area of freedom, security and justice
    4.06.01 Border checks, asylum and immigration
      4.06.01.03 Asylum policy


Citations of case-law or legislation

References in grounds of judgment

Operative part

Opinion


Dates

Date of the lodging of the application initiating proceedings

  • 20/06/2018

Date of the Opinion

  • 05/12/2019

Date of the hearing

Information not available

Date of delivery

19/03/2020


References

Publication in the Official Journal

Information not available

Name of the parties

PG

Notes on Academic Writings

  1. Michel, Valérie: Asile - Directive procédure et pouvoirs du juge national, Europe 2020, n° 5 Mai, Comm. 142 (FR)
  2. Geertsema, Karen: Uitspraken tegen Hongarije ook van belang in Nederlandse asielprocedure : HvJ EU 19 maart 2020, PG en LH, Asiel en Migrantenrecht 2020 nº 9 p. 463-47 (NL)



Procedural Analysis Information

Source of the question referred for a preliminary ruling

Fővárosi Közigazgatási és Munkaügyi Bíróság - Hungary

Subject-matter

  • area of freedom, security and justice
  • - Border checks
  • - asylum policy

Provisions of national law referred to

A menedékjogról szóló 2007. évi LXXX törvény, 61. § c) pont, 68.§

Provisions of international law referred to

Information not available

Procedure and result

  • Reference for a preliminary ruling

Formation of the Court

première chambre (Cour)

Judge-Rapporteur

Bonichot

Advocate General

Bobek

Language(s) of the Case

  • Hungarian

Language(s) of the Opinion

  • English