Reports of Cases

published in the electronic Reports of Cases (Court Reports - general)

Subject-matter

Information not available

Systematic classification scheme

Citations of case-law or legislation

References in grounds of judgment

• Directive 2000/31 -A14P1 : paragraphs 6, 49, 50
• Directive 2004/48 -A11SNT1 : paragraphs 7, 49, 50
• Regulation 207/2009 : paragraph 4
• Regulation 207/2009 -A09 : paragraphs 36, 49
• Regulation 207/2009 -A09P1 : paragraphs 3, 31, 32, 35
• Regulation 207/2009 -A09P2 : paragraphs 3, 32, 37
• Regulation 207/2009 -A09P2LB : paragraphs 1, 15, 26, 30, 33, 35, 44, 53
• Regulation 2424/2015 : paragraph 1
• Regulation 1001/2017 -A09 : paragraphs 5, 36, 49
• Regulation 1001/2017 -A09P1 : paragraphs 31, 32, 35
• Regulation 1001/2017 -A09P2 : paragraphs 31, 35
• Regulation 1001/2017 -A09P3 : paragraphs 32, 37
• Regulation 1001/2017 -A09P3LB : paragraphs 1, 15, 26, 30, 33, 35, 44, 53
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -236/08 -N56 : paragraph 39
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -236/08 -N57 : paragraphs 43, 49
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -236/08 -N65 : paragraph 32
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -324/09 : paragraph 20
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -324/09 -N103 : paragraph 40
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -119/10 -N29 : paragraph 43
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -119/10 -N30 : paragraph 41
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -119/10 -N35 : paragraph 49
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -89/14 -N44 : paragraph 51
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -379/14 -N42 : paragraph 42
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -379/14 -N45 : paragraph 42
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -479/14 -N36 : paragraph 22
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -179/15 -N39 : paragraph 37
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -179/15 -N40 : paragraph 37
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -179/15 -N41 : paragraph 38
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -42/17 -N24 : paragraph 21
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -129/17 -N38 : paragraph 37
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -16/18 -N18 : paragraph 23
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -16/18 -N19 : paragraph 24
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -484/18 -N29 : paragraph 21

Operative part

• Interprets : Regulation 207/2009 -A09P2LB
• Interprets : Regulation 207/2009 -A09P3LB

Opinion

• TFEU, Article 267 : point 23
  
• Directive 89/104 -A05 : point 38
  
• Regulation 40/94 -A09 : point 38
  
• Directive 2000/31 : points 2, 36, 72
  
• Directive 2000/31 -A14P1 : points 62, 63, 73
  
• Directive 2000/31 -A15 : point 77
  
• Directive 2000/31 -C42 : point 62
  
• Directive 2001/29 -A03P1 : point 76
  
• Directive 2004/48 : points 2, 36
  
• Directive 2004/48 -A01 : point 72
  
• Directive 2004/48 -A03P2 : point 77
  
• Directive 2004/48 -A11 : point 76
  
• Directive 2004/48 -A13P1 : point 75
  
• Directive 2004/48 -A13P2 : point 75
  
• Directive 2004/48 -C15 : point 72
  
• Regulation 207/2009 -A09P2 : point 3
  
• Regulation 207/2009 -A09P2LB : points 4, 19, 84
  
• Regulation 2424/2015 -A01P2 : point 3
  
• Regulation 1001/2017 -A09 : point 5
  
• Regulation 1001/2017 -A09P2 : points 30 - 33, 35, 39
  
• Regulation 1001/2017 -A09P2LA : point 34
  
• Regulation 1001/2017 -A09P2LB : point 44
  
• Regulation 1001/2017 -A09P3 : points 32, 35, 44, 50
  
• Regulation 1001/2017 -A09P3LB : points 4, 17 - 19, 31, 46, 64, 67, 84
  
• Regulation 1001/2017 -A15 : point 29
  
• Regulation 1001/2017 -A17P1 : point 71
  
• Regulation 1001/2017 -A17P2 : point 71
  
• Regulation 1001/2017 -A129P2 : point 71
  
• Court of Justice - Opinion C -184/99 -N65 : point 25
  
• Court of Justice - Opinion C -184/99 -N66 : point 25
  
• Court of Justice - Opinion C -184/99 -N67 : point 25
  
• Court of Justice - Opinion C -184/99 -N68 : point 25
  
• Court of Justice - Opinion C -184/99 -N69 : point 25
  
• Court of Justice - Opinion C -184/99 -N70 : point 25
  
• Court of Justice - Opinion C -184/99 -N71 : point 25
  
• Court of Justice - Opinion C -184/99 -N72 : point 25
  
• Court of Justice - Opinion C -184/99 -N73 : point 25
  
• Court of Justice - Opinion C -184/99 -N74 : point 25
  
• Court of Justice - Opinion C -184/99 -N75 : point 25
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -184/99 -N16 : point 25
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -184/99 -N17 : point 25
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -184/99 -N18 : point 25
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -245/02 -N60 : point 53
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -236/08 : point 40
  
• Court of Justice - Order C -62/08 -N47 : point 40
  
• Court of Justice - Order C -62/08 -N48 : point 61
  
• Court of Justice - Order C -62/08 -N49 : point 53
  
• Court of Justice - Order C -62/08 -N51 : point 60
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -324/09 -N102 : point 37
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -324/09 -N103 : point 37
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -324/09 -N104 : point 37
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -119/10 -N29 : point 39
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -621/10 -N41 : point 23
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -255/13 -N55 : point 25
  
• Court of Justice - Order C -82/13 -N13 : point 23
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -379/14 -N45 : points 36, 38
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -113/15 -N34 : point 24
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -160/15 : point 76
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -179/15 -N39 : point 39
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -39/16 -N38 : point 23
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -230/16 : point 1
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -322/16 -N17 : point 24
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -129/17 -N38 : point 43
  

Dates

Date of the lodging of the application initiating proceedings

Information not available

Date of the Opinion

• 28/11/2019

Date of the hearing

Information not available

Date of delivery

02/04/2020

References

Publication in the Official Journal

Information not available

Name of the parties

Coty Germany

Notes on Academic Writings

1. Abenhaïm, Marc: Propriété intellectuelle - Droit de marque, Europe 2020, n° 6 Juin, Comm. 202 (FR)
2. Linders, Douwe M. ; Vermeij, Jesse J.: De gemiste kans van Coty/Amazon: de merkenrechtelijke positie van online verkoopplatforms ongewijzigd : noot, Berichten industriële eigendom 2020 p. 173-176 (NL)
3. Bronneman, M.: Coty / Amazon, Intellectuele eigendom & Reclamerecht 2020 p. 204-206 (NL)
4. Howard, Michael ; Hyland, Mark: The boundaries of "use" : when do e-commerce platforms become liable for trade mark infringement? : Coty Germany GmbH v Amazon Services Europe Sarl (C-567/18), European Intellectual Property Review 2020 p. 849-855 (EN)
5. Riis, Thomas: Primary liability of intermediaries for trade mark infringement in light of the decision in joined cases Louboutin (C-148/21) and (C-184/21), European Intellectual Property Review 2023, Volume 45, Issue 6, p. 337-343 (EN)

Procedural Analysis Information

Source of the question referred for a preliminary ruling

Bundesgerichtshof - Germany

Subject-matter

• Intellectual, industrial and commercial property
  
• - Trade marks
  

Provisions of national law referred to

Information not available

Provisions of international law referred to

Information not available

Procedure and result

• Reference for a preliminary ruling
  

Formation of the Court

Cinquième chambre (Cour)

Judge-Rapporteur

Ilešič

Advocate General

Campos Sánchez-Bordona

Language(s) of the Case

• German
  

Language(s) of the Opinion

• Spanish