Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 24 June 2019

Criminal proceedings against Daniel Adam Popławski

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Rechtbank Amsterdam

Reference for a preliminary ruling — Judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Framework Decisions — No direct effect — Primacy of EU law — Consequences — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — Article 4(6) — Framework Decision 2008/909/JHA — Article 28(2) — Declaration by a Member State allowing it to continue to apply existing legal instruments on the transfer of sentenced persons applicable before 5 December 2011 — Late declaration — Consequences

Case C-573/17


Top of the page Documents in the Case
Document Date Name of the parties Subject-matter Curia EUR-Lex Autres Liens
Judgment (OJ)
02/08/2019 Popławski
area of freedom, security and justice
- Judicial cooperation in civil matters
  • area of freedom, security and justice
  • - Judicial cooperation in civil matters
  • area of freedom, security and justice
  • - judicial cooperation in criminal matters
EUR-Lex text EUR-Lex bilingual text
Judgment
ECLI:EU:C:2019:530		 24/06/2019 Popławski
area of freedom, security and justice
- Judicial cooperation in civil matters
  • area of freedom, security and justice
  • - Judicial cooperation in civil matters
  • area of freedom, security and justice
  • - judicial cooperation in criminal matters
EUR-Lex text EUR-Lex bilingual text
Abstract
ECLI:EU:C:2019:530		 24/06/2019 Popławski
area of freedom, security and justice
- Judicial cooperation in civil matters
  • area of freedom, security and justice
  • - Judicial cooperation in civil matters
  • area of freedom, security and justice
  • - judicial cooperation in criminal matters
EUR-Lex text EUR-Lex bilingual text
Application (OJ)
17/11/2017 Popławski
area of freedom, security and justice
- Judicial cooperation in civil matters
  • area of freedom, security and justice
  • - Judicial cooperation in civil matters
  • area of freedom, security and justice
  • - judicial cooperation in criminal matters
View pdf documents
Order
ECLI:EU:C:2017:827		 24/10/2017 Popławski
area of freedom, security and justice
- Judicial cooperation in civil matters
  • area of freedom, security and justice
  • - Judicial cooperation in civil matters
  • area of freedom, security and justice
  • - judicial cooperation in criminal matters
Available in :
EUR-Lex text EUR-Lex bilingual text
Opinion
ECLI:EU:C:2018:957		 27/11/2018 Popławski
area of freedom, security and justice
- Judicial cooperation in civil matters
  • area of freedom, security and justice
  • - Judicial cooperation in civil matters
  • area of freedom, security and justice
  • - judicial cooperation in criminal matters
EUR-Lex text EUR-Lex bilingual text
Top of the page Legal analysis of the decision or of the case

Reports of Cases

published in the electronic Reports of Cases (Court Reports - general)

Subject-matter

Information not available

Systematic classification scheme

1.
-
4 Internal policy of the European Union
  4.06 Area of freedom, security and justice
    4.06.03 Judicial cooperation in criminal matters
      4.06.03.01 Harmonization of laws
-
4 Internal policy of the European Union
  4.06 Area of freedom, security and justice
    4.06.03 Judicial cooperation in criminal matters
      4.06.03.01 Harmonization of laws
-
4 Internal policy of the European Union
  4.06 Area of freedom, security and justice
    4.06.03 Judicial cooperation in criminal matters
      4.06.03.01 Harmonization of laws


Citations of case-law or legislation

References in grounds of judgment

Operative part

Opinion


Dates

Date of the lodging of the application initiating proceedings

  • 28/09/2017

Date of the Opinion

  • 27/11/2018

Date of the hearing

Information not available

Date of delivery

24/06/2019


References

Publication in the Official Journal

Judgment: OJ C 280 from 19.08.2019, p.2

Application: OJ C 412 from 04.12.2017, p.18

Name of the parties

Popławski

Notes on Academic Writings

  1. Rigaux, Anne ; Simon, Denys: L'arrêt Poplawski 2 : accroc limité ou ébranlement général dans la mise en oeuvre de la primauté, Europe 2019 Mois Comm. nº 10 p.5-12 (FR)
  2. Haket, S.W.: Administratiefrechtelijke beslissingen ; Rechtspraak bestuursrecht 2020 nº 5 p.263-266 (NL)
  3. Verhoeven, M.J.M.: Popławski II: een overzichtsarrest over de doorwerking van Unierecht in de nationale rechtsorde, zaak C-573/17, Daniel Adam Popławski/Openbaar Ministerie, S.E.W. : Tijdschrift voor Europees en economisch recht 2020 p.203-206 (NL)
  4. Dero-Bugny, Delphine: II. Sources écrites et non écrites du droit de l’UE, Effet direct et primauté - Cour de justice, gde ch., 24 juin 2019, Daniel Adam Popławski, aff. C-573/17, ECLI:EU:C:2019:530, Jurisprudence de la CJUE 2019. Décisions et commentaires (Ed. Bruylant - Bruxelles) 2020, p. 77-79 (FR)
  5. Coutron, Laurent: V. Questions préjudicielles - Cour de justice, gde ch., 24 juin 2019, Popławski, aff. C-573/17, ECLI:EU:C:2019:530, Jurisprudence de la CJUE 2019. Décisions et commentaires (Ed. Bruylant - Bruxelles) 2020, p. 251-261 (FR)
  6. Coutron, Laurent: Invocabilité du droit de l'Union européenne : une doctrine enfin assumée par la Cour de justice dans l'arrêt Popławski, Revue trimestrielle de droit européen 2020, n° 2, p. 274-278 (FR)
  7. Miasik, Dawid ; Szwarc, Monika: Primacy and direct effect – still together: Popławski II : Case C-573/17, Common Market Law Review 2021 p. 571-590 (EN)



Procedural Analysis Information

Source of the question referred for a preliminary ruling

Rechtbank Amsterdam - Netherlands

Subject-matter

  • area of freedom, security and justice
  • - Judicial cooperation in civil matters
  • area of freedom, security and justice
  • - judicial cooperation in criminal matters

Provisions of national law referred to

Information not available

Provisions of international law referred to

Information not available

Procedure and result

  • Reference for a preliminary ruling

Formation of the Court

Grande chambre (Cour)

Judge-Rapporteur

Lycourgos

Advocate General

Campos Sánchez-Bordona

Language(s) of the Case

  • Dutch

Language(s) of the Opinion

  • French