Reports of Cases
published in the electronic Reports of Cases (Court Reports - general)
Subject-matter
Information not available
Systematic classification scheme
1.
|
|
3.04.02 Jurisdiction of the Court of Justice
|
1.
|
|
3 Legal proceedings
3.04 Reference for a preliminary ruling
3.04.02 Jurisdiction of the Court of Justice
|
|
|
1.04.02.01 Field of application of the Charter (Article 51(1) and (2) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights)
|
|
|
1 The legal order of the European Union
1.04 Fundamental rights
1.04.02 Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union
1.04.02.01 Field of application of the Charter (Article 51(1) and (2) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights)
|
|
|
3.04.02 Jurisdiction of the Court of Justice
|
|
|
3 Legal proceedings
3.04 Reference for a preliminary ruling
3.04.02 Jurisdiction of the Court of Justice
|
|
|
3.04.01.03 Exclusive nature of the role of the national court in making the reference
|
|
|
3 Legal proceedings
3.04 Reference for a preliminary ruling
3.04.01 Reference to the Court of Justice
3.04.01.03 Exclusive nature of the role of the national court in making the reference
|
|
|
1.04.03.47 Right to an effective remedy and to a fair trial
|
|
|
1 The legal order of the European Union
1.04 Fundamental rights
1.04.03 The fundamental rights
1.04.03.47 Right to an effective remedy and to a fair trial
|
|
|
1 The legal order of the European Union
1.03 Respective powers and obligations of the European Union and of the Member States
1.03.03 Obligation of good faith
|
|
|
1.04.03.47 Right to an effective remedy and to a fair trial
|
|
|
1 The legal order of the European Union
1.04 Fundamental rights
1.04.03 The fundamental rights
1.04.03.47 Right to an effective remedy and to a fair trial
|
|
|
1 The legal order of the European Union
1.03 Respective powers and obligations of the European Union and of the Member States
1.03.03 Obligation of good faith
|
|
|
1.04.03.47 Right to an effective remedy and to a fair trial
|
|
|
1 The legal order of the European Union
1.04 Fundamental rights
1.04.03 The fundamental rights
1.04.03.47 Right to an effective remedy and to a fair trial
|
|
|
1.05.01 Direct effect, primacy and uniform application of EU law
|
|
|
1 The legal order of the European Union
1.05 EU law and national law
1.05.01 Direct effect, primacy and uniform application of EU law
|
Citations of case-law or legislation
References in grounds of judgment
-
Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU (2007)
: paragraph 85
-
Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU (2007), Article 47
: paragraphs 1, 5, 37, 39, 51, 52, 66, 72, 76, 79, 81, 86, 100, 114, 115, 117, 126, 131, 139, 146, 154, 162 - 166, 168, 170, 171
-
Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU (2007), Article 47
-L2 : paragraphs 8, 118, 119
-
Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU (2007), Article 51
: paragraph 6
-
Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU (2007), Article 51
-P1 : paragraphs 78, 82
-
Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU (2007), Article 52
-P3 : paragraphs 7, 116
-
Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU (2007), Article 52
-P7 : paragraph 117
-
TFEU - Protocol No 3
-A23 : paragraph 65
-
TFEU, Article 252
-L2 : paragraph 62
-
TFEU, Article 267
: paragraphs 69, 72, 74, 77, 103, 132, 170
-
TFEU, Article 267
-L3 : paragraphs 1, 51, 52
-
TEU, Article 2
: paragraphs 1, 3, 51, 52, 120, 167, 169
-
TEU, Article 4
-P3 : paragraph 166
-
TEU, Article 6
-P1L3 : paragraph 117
-
TEU, Article 19
: paragraph 167
-
TEU, Article 19
-P1 : paragraphs 4, 51
-
TEU, Article 19
-P1L2 : paragraphs 1, 37, 72, 76, 82 - 86, 149, 168, 169
-
Directive 2000/78
: paragraph 79
-
Directive 2000/78
-A01 : paragraph 9
-
Directive 2000/78
-A02P1 : paragraphs 10, 38
-
Directive 2000/78
-A09 : paragraph 80
-
Directive 2000/78
-A09P1 : paragraphs 1, 11, 37, 39, 52, 66, 100, 114, 154, 163 - 165, 170, 171
-
Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU (2007) - Explanations
: paragraph 8
-
Court of Justice - Rules of Procedure (2012)
-A83 : paragraph 63
-
Court of Justice - Rules of Procedure (2012)
-A105P2 : paragraph 54
-
Court of Justice - Rules of Procedure (2012)
-A105P3 : paragraph 54
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -10/97
-N14 : paragraph 115
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -10/97
-N15 : paragraph 100
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -462/99
-N42 : paragraph 166
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -470/99
-N43 : paragraph 100
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -15/04
-N32 : paragraph 166
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -15/04
-N33 : paragraph 166
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -15/04
-N34 : paragraph 166
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -15/04
-N35 : paragraph 166
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -15/04
-N36 : paragraph 166
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -15/04
-N37 : paragraph 166
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -15/04
-N38 : paragraph 166
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -15/04
-N39 : paragraph 166
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -268/06
-N44 : paragraph 115
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -268/06
-N45 : paragraph 115
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -175/11
-N99 : paragraph 133
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -180/12
-N38 : paragraph 70
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -279/12
-N29 : paragraph 69
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -510/13
-N49 : paragraph 115
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -510/13
-N50 : paragraph 115
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -689/13
-N32 : paragraph 103
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -689/13
-N33 : paragraph 103
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -83/14
-N71 : paragraph 132
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -205/15
-N22 : paragraph 77
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -205/15
-N23 : paragraph 78
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -205/15
-N40 : paragraph 117
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -64/16
: paragraphs 59, 83
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -284/16
-N26 : paragraph 61
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -284/16
-N27 : paragraph 62
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -414/16
-N78 : paragraph 162
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -414/16
-N79 : paragraph 164
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -452/16
-N35 : paragraph 124
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -396/17
-N61 : paragraph 80
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -556/17
-N55 : paragraph 163
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -556/17
-N56 : paragraphs 162, 163
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -556/17
-N72 : paragraph 165
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -573/17
-N53 : paragraph 157
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -573/17
-N54 : paragraph 158
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -573/17
-N55 : paragraph 159
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -573/17
-N58 : paragraph 160
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -573/17
-N61 : paragraph 161
-
Court of Justice - Opinion 1/17
-N109 : paragraph 156
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -585/18
: paragraphs 58, 59, 60, 61, 62
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -619/18
: paragraph 59
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -38/18
-N39 : paragraph 118
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -216/18
-N63 : paragraph 121
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -216/18
-N65 : paragraph 122
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -216/18
-N66 : paragraph 123
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -619/18
: paragraph 149
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -619/18
-N47 : paragraph 167
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -619/18
-N49 : paragraph 168
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -619/18
-N50 : paragraph 82
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -619/18
-N51 : paragraph 83
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -619/18
-N52 : paragraph 75
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -619/18
-N53 : paragraph 85
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -619/18
-N54 : paragraph 168
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -619/18
-N58 : paragraph 120
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -619/18
-N72 : paragraph 121
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -619/18
-N73 : paragraph 122
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -619/18
-N74 : paragraph 123
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -619/18
-N111 : paragraph 134
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -619/18
-N112 : paragraph 125
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -619/18
-N115 : paragraph 137
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -619/18
-N116 : paragraph 138
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -621/18
-N26 : paragraph 97
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -621/18
-N27 : paragraph 98
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -621/18
-N28 : paragraph 70
-
Court of Justice - Order C -585/18
: paragraph 54
-
Court of Justice - Order C -619/18
: paragraph 96
-
Court of Justice - Order C -619/18
: paragraph 96
Operative part
Opinion
-
Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU (2007), Article 47
: points 7, 38, 43, 44, 54, 57, 58, 60, 66, 70, 75 - 77, 83 - 85, 88, 106, 107, 111, 113, 115, 117, 118, 130, 137, 143 - 145, 155 - 157
-
Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU (2007), Article 47
-L1 : point 9
-
Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU (2007), Article 47
-L2 : points 9, 33, 108
-
Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU (2007), Article 48
: point 117
-
Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU (2007), Article 51
-P1 : points 54, 77, 84, 87, 107
-
Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU (2007), Article 52
-P3 : points 108, 114
-
Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU (2007), Article 53
: point 69
-
TFEU, Article 267
: points 60, 62, 69, 70, 91, 92, 109 - 112, 114
-
TFEU, Article 267
-L3 : points 43, 44, 66, 100
-
TFEU - Protocol No 3
: point 51
-
TFEU - Protocol No 3
-A23BIS : point 46
-
TFEU - Protocol No 30
: point 88
-
TFEU - Protocol No 30
-A01P1 : point 54
-
TEU, Article 2
: points 43, 44, 66, 69, 77, 115, 145
-
TEU, Article 7
: point 69
-
TEU, Article 7
-P1 : points 1, 61
-
TEU, Article 19
-P1 : points 43, 44, 54, 66, 75
-
TEU, Article 19
-P1L2 : points 2, 7, 8, 33, 57, 60, 70, 77, 79, 85 - 88, 107, 111, 113, 145, 147 - 149, 151, 152, 156, 157
-
TEU, Article 49
: point 69
-
Directive 2000/78
: points 42, 57, 83, 84, 103
-
Directive 2000/78
-A01 : point 35
-
Directive 2000/78
-A02P1 : point 35
-
Directive 2000/78
-A09P1 : points 33, 38, 44, 58, 106, 157
-
Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU (2007) - Explanations
: point 108
-
Court of Justice - Rules of Procedure (2012)
-A105P1 : point 46
-
Commission - COM Document (Draft Legislation) - 52017PC0835
: point 1
-
Commission - COM Document (Other than Draft Legislation) - 52019DC0198
-TAB54 : point 144
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -106/77
: points 38, 42, 59, 74, 75, 105
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -213/89
: points 38, 59, 74
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -54/96
: point 66
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -103/97
-N24 : point 111
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -110/98
: point 66
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -462/99
: point 42
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -225/02
-N35 : point 92
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -225/02
-N36 : point 92
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -225/02
-N37 : point 92
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -225/02
-N38 : point 92
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -225/02
-N39 : point 92
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -15/04
: point 42
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -432/05
: point 38
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -432/05
-N40 : points 105, 156
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -432/05
-N41 : points 105, 156
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -555/07
: point 75
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -128/09
-N28 : point 98
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -241/09
: point 52
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -241/09
-N32 : point 99
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -241/09
-N33 : point 99
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -241/09
-N34 : point 99
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -279/09
: point 84
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -489/10
-N21 : point 88
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -489/10
-N22 : point 88
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -489/10
-N23 : point 88
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -493/10
-N167 : point 88
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -493/10
-N168 : point 88
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -493/10
-N169 : point 88
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -493/10
-N170 : point 88
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -493/10
-N171 : point 88
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -411/10
-N119 : point 88
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -411/10
-N120 : point 88
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -175/11
: point 66
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -465/11
: point 66
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -492/11
: point 52
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -492/11
-N27 : point 99
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -492/11
-N28 : point 99
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -492/11
-N29 : point 99
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -492/11
-N30 : point 99
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -492/11
-N31 : point 99
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -492/11
-N32 : point 99
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -583/11
-N103 : points 105, 156
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -583/11
-N104 : points 105, 156
-
Court of Justice - Order C -155/11
: point 92
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -497/12
-N16 : point 81
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -497/12
-N17 : point 81
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -497/12
-N18 : point 81
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -497/12
-N19 : point 81
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -497/12
-N20 : point 81
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -497/12
-N21 : point 81
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -497/12
-N22 : point 81
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -497/12
-N23 : point 81
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -497/12
-N24 : point 81
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -497/12
-N25 : point 81
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -180/12
-N37 : point 91
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -180/12
-N38 : point 91
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -286/12
: point 83
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -470/12
-N30 : point 98
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -58/13
-N45 : point 111
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -58/13
-N46 : point 111
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -58/13
-N47 : point 111
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -58/13
-N48 : point 111
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -58/13
-N49 : point 111
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -58/13
-N50 : point 111
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -58/13
-N51 : point 111
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -58/13
-N52 : point 111
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -58/13
-N53 : point 111
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -58/13
-N54 : point 111
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -689/13
-N32 : point 100
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -689/13
-N33 : point 100
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -689/13
-N34 : point 100
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -165/14
-N48 : point 81
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -543/14
-N40 : point 142
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -543/14
-N41 : point 142
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -567/14
-N22 : point 100
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -551/15
-N81 : point 111
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -551/15
-N82 : point 111
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -551/15
-N83 : point 111
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -551/15
-N84 : point 111
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -551/15
-N85 : point 111
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -551/15
-N86 : point 111
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -551/15
-N87 : point 111
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -551/15
-N88 : point 111
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -551/15
-N89 : point 111
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -551/15
-N90 : point 111
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -551/15
-N91 : point 111
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -551/15
-N92 : point 111
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -551/15
-N93 : point 111
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -551/15
-N94 : point 111
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -551/15
-N95 : point 111
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -551/15
-N96 : point 111
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -551/15
-N97 : point 111
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -551/15
-N98 : point 111
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -551/15
-N99 : point 111
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -551/15
-N100 : point 111
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -551/15
-N101 : point 111
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -551/15
-N102 : point 111
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -551/15
-N103 : point 111
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -551/15
-N104 : point 111
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -551/15
-N105 : point 111
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -551/15
-N106 : point 111
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -551/15
-N107 : point 111
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -205/15
-N42 : point 106
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -612/15
-N46 : point 91
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -682/15
-N96 : point 142
-
Court of Justice - Order C -537/15
: point 52
-
Court of Justice - Order C -537/15
-N27 : point 99
-
Court of Justice - Order C -537/15
-N28 : point 99
-
Court of Justice - Order C -537/15
-N29 : point 99
-
Court of Justice - Order C -537/15
-N30 : point 99
-
Court of Justice - Order C -537/15
-N34 : point 99
-
Court of Justice - Order C -537/15
-N36 : point 99
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -64/16
: points 39, 54, 70, 85
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -64/16
-N32 : points 77, 145
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -64/16
-N43 : point 110
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -414/16
: point 42
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -414/16
-N79 : point 155
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -638/16
-N45 : point 84
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -556/17
-N55 : point 87
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -42/17
-N22 : point 112
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -42/17
-N23 : point 112
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -152/17
-N34 : point 84
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -235/17
-N63 : point 84
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -235/17
-N72 : points 108, 114
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -378/17
-N35 : point 155
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -396/17
-N61 : point 106
-
Court of Justice - Order C -177/17
-N19 : point 84
-
Court of Justice - Order C -177/17
-N20 : point 84
-
Court of Justice - Order C -177/17
-N21 : point 84
-
Court of Justice - Opinion 1/17
-N204 : point 116
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -192/18
: points 1, 85, 146
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -192/18
-N11 : point 120
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -192/18
-N115 : point 145
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -192/18
-N116 : point 78
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -216/18
: point 145
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -619/18
: points 1, 146
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -619/18
-N63 : point 145
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -619/18
-N71 : point 120
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -619/18
-N72 : point 107
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -216/18
: points 39, 70, 85
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -216/18
-N48 : point 115
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -216/18
-N54 : point 110
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -216/18
-N60 : point 147
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -216/18
-N66 : point 116
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -216/18
-N67 : point 117
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -216/18
-N73 : point 147
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -216/18
-N74 : point 147
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -619/18
: points 1, 2, 32, 35, 108, 147, 149
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -619/18
-N43 : point 85
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -619/18
-N45 : point 112
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -619/18
-N46 : point 85
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -619/18
-N47 : points 77, 85, 145
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -619/18
-N49 : point 115
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -619/18
-N50 : point 87
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -619/18
-N51 : point 87
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -619/18
-N53 : point 88
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -619/18
-N55 : points 85, 87
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -619/18
-N56 : point 87
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -619/18
-N57 : points 85, 87
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -619/18
-N58 : points 87, 115
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -619/18
-N59 : point 87
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -619/18
-N71 : point 116
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -619/18
-N72 : point 116
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -619/18
-N73 : point 116
-
Court of Justice - Order C -169/18
: point 92
-
Court of Justice - Order C -169/18
-N23 : point 91
-
Court of Justice - Order C -585/18
: point 46
-
Court of Justice - Order C -8/19
-N47 : point 117
Dates
Date of the lodging of the application initiating proceedings
Date of the Opinion
Date of the hearing
Information not available
Date of delivery
19/11/2019
References
Publication in the Official Journal
Judgment: OJ C 27 from 27.01.2020, p.6
Application: OJ C 44 from 04.02.2019, p.9
Name of the parties
A.K. (Independence of the Disciplinary Chamber of the Supreme Court)
Notes on Academic Writings
- Simon, Denys: Droits fondamentaux - Indépendance des juges nationaux, Europe 2020 Janvier Comm. nº 1 p.2 (FR)
- Karpenstein, Ulrich ; Sangi, Roya: Polexit vom Rechtsstaat?, Europäische Zeitschrift für Wirtschaftsrecht 2020 p.140-143 (DE)
- Leloup, Mathieu: Het arrest A.K., CP en DO en de eerste uitspraak van het Hof over een nationale raad voor de rechtspraak: een weinig overtuigende eerste indruk : gevoegde zaken C-585/18, C-624/18 en C-625/18, A.K., CP en DO, S.E.W. : Tijdschrift voor Europees en economisch recht 2020 p.153-157 (NL)
- Krajewski, Michal ; Ziólkowski, Michal: EU judicial independence decentralized: A.K., Common Market Law Review 2020 p. 1107-1138 (EN)
- Leloup, Mathieu: An uncertain first step in the field of judicial self-government. ECJ 19 November 2019, joined cases C-585/15, C-624/18 and C-625/18, A.K., CP and DO, European Constitutional Law Review 2020 Vol. 16 Issue I p. 145-169 (EN)
- Krzywoń, Adam: La defensa y el desarrollo del principio de independencia judicial en la Unión Europea, Revista española de Derecho Constitucional 2020 nº 119 p. 85-117 (ES)
Procedural Analysis Information
Source of the question referred for a preliminary ruling
Sąd Najwyższy - Poland
Subject-matter
- Fundamental rights
- - Charter of Fundamental Rights
- Principles, objectives and tasks of the Treaties
- Social policy
Provisions of national law referred to
Konstytucja Rzeczypospolitej Polskiej, article 10, article 187 Ustawa z dnia 8 grudnia 2017 r. o zmianie ustawy o Krajowej Radzie Sądownictwa oraz niektórych innych ustaw, article 1, article 6 Ustawa z dnia 8 grudnia 2017 r. o Sądzie Najwyższym, article 27, paragraphe 1 Ustawa z dnia 17 listopada 1964 r. - Kodeks postępowania cywilnego, article 461, §1 (1)
Konstytucja Rzeczypospolitej Polskiej, art. 187 ust. 1 pkt 2 i ust. 4 w związku z art. 2, art. 10 ust. 1; art. 173; art. 186 ust. 1; art. 2; art. 10; art. 144 ust. 3 pkt 17; art. 178; art. 179; art. 186 ust. 1; art. 7; art. 184 Ustawa z dnia 17 listopada 1964 r. - Kodeks postępowania cywilnego, art. 388 § 1 oraz przepisy o skardze kasacyjnej
1) art. 9a, art. 11a, art. 11b, art. 11c, art. 11d i art. 11e ustawy z dnia 12 maja 2011 r. o Krajowej Radzie Sądownictwa (Dz. U. z 2018 r. poz. 389, ze zm.) z art. 187 ust. 1 pkt 2 i ust. 4 w związku z art. 2, art. 10 ust. 1 i art. 173 Konstytucji oraz z art. 186 ust. 1 Konstytucji,
2) art. 44 ust. 1 ustawy o Krajowej Radzie Sądownictwa w zakresie, w jakim dopuszcza odwołanie od uchwał Krajowej Rady Sądownictwa w sprawach, o których mowa w art. 3 ust. 1 pkt 1 i 2 tej ustawy, z art. 2, art. 10, art. 144 ust. 3 pkt 17, art. 173, art. 178, art. 179 i art. 186 ust. 1 Konstytucji,
3) art. 44 ust. 1a ustawy o Krajowej Radzie Sądownictwa z art. 2, art. 10, art. 60, art. 144 ust. 3 pkt 17, art. 173, art. 178, art. 179 i art. 184 Konstytucji,
4) art. 44 ust. 3 ustawy o Krajowej Radzie Sądownictwa w zakresie, w jakim do postępowania przed Naczelnym Sądem Administracyjnym nakazuje stosowanie przepisów ustawy z dnia 17 listopada 1964 r. – Kodeks postępowania cywilnego (Dz. U. z 2018 r. poz. 155, ze zm.) o skardze kasacyjnej, z art. 2, art. 7, art. 10, art. 144 ust. 3 pkt 17, art. 173, art. 178, art. 179 i art. 184 Konstytucji,
5) art. 388 § 1 ustawy z dnia 17 listopada 1964 r. – Kodeks postępowania cywilnego (Dz. U. z 2018 r. poz. 1360, ze zm.) w związku z art. 44 ust. 3 ustawy o Krajowej Radzie Sądownictwa w zakresie, w jakim umożliwia wstrzymanie uprawnień Prezydenta Rzeczypospolitej Polskiej do powołania sędziego, z art. 2, art. 7, art. 10, art. 144 ust. 3 pkt 17, art. 173, art. 178, art. 179 i art. 184 Konstytucji,
6) art. 44 ust. 4 ustawy o Krajowej Radzie Sądownictwa z art. 2, art. 7, art. 10, art. 60, art. 173, art. 178, art. 179 i art. 186 ust. 1 Konstytucji,
Provisions of international law referred to
Information not available
Procedure and result
- Reference for a preliminary ruling
Formation of the Court
grande chambre (Cour)
Judge-Rapporteur
Prechal
Advocate General
Tanchev
Language(s) of the Case
Language(s) of the Opinion