Reports of Cases

published in the electronic Reports of Cases (Court Reports - general)

Subject-matter

Information not available

Systematic classification scheme

Citations of case-law or legislation

References in grounds of judgment

• Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU (2007), Article 47 : paragraphs 48, 49, 64, 72
• TFEU - Protocol No 3 -A23 : paragraphs 30, 31, 35, 39
• TFEU - Protocol No 3 -A23L2 : paragraph 37
• TFEU, Article 267 : paragraph 35
• Directive 89/665 : paragraphs 28, 47, 50, 54, 69, 75, 79
• Directive 89/665 -A01 : paragraphs 1, 4, 42, 49, 72
• Directive 89/665 -A01P1 : paragraphs 43, 52
• Directive 89/665 -A01P3 : paragraph 43
• Directive 89/665 -A02P1LB : paragraph 45
• Directive 89/665 -A07 : paragraph 5
• Directive 89/665 -C3 : paragraph 3
• Directive 2004/18 : paragraphs 52, 54
• Directive 2004/18 -A07 : paragraph 53
• Directive 2004/18 -A10 : paragraph 52
• Directive 2004/18 -A18 : paragraph 52
• Regulation 1177/2009 : paragraph 6
• Court of Justice - Rules of Procedure (2012) -A96P1 : paragraphs 31, 35
• Court of Justice - Rules of Procedure (2012) -A97P1 : paragraph 32
• Court of Justice - Rules of Procedure (2012) -A97P2 : paragraph 38
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -470/99 -N72 : paragraph 47
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -309/02 -N26 : paragraph 33
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -213/04 -N32 : paragraph 33
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -145/08 -N74 : paragraph 46
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -403/08 -N9 : paragraph 35
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -568/08 -N57 : paragraph 44
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -212/13 -N29 : paragraph 49
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -417/13 -N74 : paragraph 67
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -538/13 -N39 : paragraph 46
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -538/13 -N40 : paragraph 47
• Court of Justice - Opinion C -61/14 -N40 : paragraph 61
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -169/14 -N35 : paragraph 48

Operative part

• Interprets : Directive 89/665 -A01

Opinion

• Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU (2007), Article 47 : points 24, 33, 36, 37, 42, 45, 51, 55, 56
  
• Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU (2007), Article 52 -P1 : points 36, 55, 56
  
• TEU, Article 19 -P1 : point 36
  
• Directive 89/665 : points 3, 13, 20 - 22, 34, 45, 56
  
• Directive 89/665 -A01 : point 5
  
• Directive 89/665 -A01P1L3 : point 20
  
• Directive 89/665 -A02 : point 6
  
• Directive 89/665 -A02P1 : point 19
  
• Directive 89/665 -A02P1LB : points 52, 56
  
• Directive 89/665 -C3 : point 4
  
• Directive 92/50 : point 13
  
• Directive 2004/18 : points 26, 27, 30, 45
  
• Directive 2004/18 -A07 : point 29
  
• Regulation 1251/2011 -A02 : point 30
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -199/82 : point 35
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -222/84 -N18 : point 33
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -430/93 : point 45
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -430/93 -N19 : point 35
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -470/99 -N71 : point 20
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -470/99 -N72 : point 20
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -225/02 -N28 : point 17
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -317/08 : point 55
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -279/09 : points 23, 36, 37, 55
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -279/09 -N61 : point 55
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -571/10 -N41 : point 17
  
• Court of Justice - Opinion C -536/11 : point 36
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -260/11 : point 23
  
• Court of Justice - Opinion C -93/12 : point 24
  
• Court of Justice - Opinion C -562/12 : point 24
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -93/12 : point 28
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -470/12 -N29 : point 17
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -56/13 -N64 : point 27
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -538/13 : point 24
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -567/13 -N47 : point 28
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -662/13 -N30 : point 25
  
• Court of Justice - Opinion C -69/14 : point 31
  

Dates

Date of the lodging of the application initiating proceedings

• 07/02/2014

Date of the Opinion

• 07/05/2015

Date of the hearing

Information not available

Date of delivery

06/10/2015

References

Publication in the Official Journal

Judgment: OJ C 389 from 23.11.2015, p.5

Application: OJ C 135 from 05.05.2014, p.21

Name of the parties

Orizzonte Salute

Notes on Academic Writings

1. D'Ancona, Stefano: Corte di giustizia dell'Unione europea, Sez. V, sentenza 6 ottobre 2015, in causa C-61/14, Orizzonte Salute-Studio infermieristico associato c. Azienda Pubblica di servizi alla persona S. Valentino-Città di Levico Terme e altri, Rivista italiana di diritto pubblico comunitario 2015 p.1795-1797 (IT)
2. Gazin, Fabienne: Droit à un recours juridictionnel effectif, Europe 2015 Décembre Comm. nº 12 p.10 (FR)
3. Drijber, B.J.: Nederlandse jurisprudentie ; Uitspraken in burgerlijke en strafzaken 2016 Afl.22 p.2972-2973 (NL)
4. Krommendijk, Jasper: Is there light on the horizon? The distinction between “Rewe effectiveness” and the principle of effective judicial protection in Article 47 of the Charter after Orizzonte, Common Market Law Review 2016, Volume 53, Issue 5, p. 1395-1418 (EN)
5. Dero-Bugny, Delphine ; Perrin, Alix: XVII. Marchés publics - Cour de justice, 5e ch., 6 octobre 2015, Orizzonte Salute – Studio Infermieristico Associato c/ Azienda Pubblica di Servizi alla persona San Valentino – Città di Levico Terme et al., aff. C-61/14, ECLI:EU:C:2015:655, Jurisprudence de la CJUE 2015. Décisions et commentaires (Ed. Bruylant - Bruxelles) 2016, p. 663-665 (FR)

Procedural Analysis Information

Source of the question referred for a preliminary ruling

Tribunale regionale di giustizia amministrativa di Trento - Italy

Subject-matter

• Freedom of movement for persons
  
• - Freedom of establishment
  
• Freedom to provide services
  

Provisions of national law referred to

decreto legislativo, art. 15 decreto legislativo decreto legislativo 02/07/2010 n° 104 - Codice del processo amministrativo, artt. 1, 7, 43 Costituzione, artt. 3, 24, 103, comma 1º, 113

Provisions of international law referred to

Convention européenne de sauvegarde des Droits de l'Homme et des Libertés fondamentales (04/11/1950), articles 6 et 13

Procedure and result

• Reference for a preliminary ruling
  

Formation of the Court

Cinquième chambre (Cour)

Judge-Rapporteur

Juhász

Advocate General

Jääskinen

Language(s) of the Case

• Italian
  

Language(s) of the Opinion

• English