Reports of Cases

1991 I-04529

Swedish XI/I-00405 Finnish XI/I-00423

Subject-matter

Information not available

Systematic classification scheme

Citations of case-law or legislation

References in grounds of judgment

• Regulation 3954/87 : paragraphs 1, 2, 6 - 18
• Euratom Treaty (Rome), Article 31 : paragraphs 2, 6 - 19
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -70/88 : paragraphs 3, 7
• EEC Treaty (Rome), Article 100A : paragraphs 6, 7, 15 - 18
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -300/89 : paragraph 9
• Euratom Treaty (Rome), Article 2 -LB : paragraph 10
• Regulation 3954/87 -C1 : paragraph 10
• Regulation 3954/87 -C5 : paragraph 10
• Regulation 3954/87 -N : paragraph 11
• Regulation 3954/87 -A02 : paragraph 11
• Regulation 3954/87 -A03 : paragraph 11
• Regulation 3954/87 -A05 : paragraph 11
• Euratom Treaty (Rome), Article 30 : paragraphs 13, 14
• EEC Treaty (Rome), Article 8A : paragraph 15
• Regulation 3954/87 -A06P1 : paragraphs 16, 17
• Regulation 3954/87 -C11 : paragraph 16

Operative part

• Confirms : Regulation 3954/87

Opinion

• Euratom Treaty (Rome), Article 31 : points 1, 3, 5 - 10, 16 - 30
  
• EEC Treaty (Rome), Article 100A : points 1, 3, 6 - 10, 17-30
  
• Regulation 3954/87 : points 2, 11 - 19, 26 - 28
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -70/88 : points 2, 3, 30
  
• Euratom Treaty (Rome), Article 31 -L2 : point 3
  
• Decision 87/373 : point 3
  
• Court of Justice - Rules of Procedure (1959) -A93P5 : point 4
  
• Secondary Legislation - Internal Act of the Institutions - 31979Q0921 : point 4
  
• Court of Justice - Opinion C -60/90 : point 5
  
• Court of Justice - Rules of Procedure (1959) -A42P2L1 : point 5
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -62/88 : points 5, 6, 20, 26 - 29
  
• Court of Justice - Opinion C -62/88 : points 5, 27
  
• EEC Treaty (Rome), Article 173 : point 5
  
• EEC Treaty (Rome), Article 113 : points 5, 26, 29
  
• Euratom Treaty (Rome), Article 146 : point 5
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -165/87 : point 6
  
• Euratom Treaty (Rome), preamble : point 7
  
• Euratom Treaty (Rome), Article 2 -LB : points 7, 11
  
• EEC Treaty (Rome), Article 8A : point 7
  
• Euratom Treaty (Rome), Article 30 : points 7 - 10, 14, 16 - 31
  
• EEC Treaty (Rome), Article 232 -P2 : points 9, 25, 29
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -165/87 : point 9
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -242/87 : point 9
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -300/89 : point 9
  
• Court of Justice - Opinion C -300/89 : points 9, 14
  
• Regulation 3954/87 -C : point 11
  
• Regulation 3954/87 -N : point 12
  
• EEC Treaty (Rome), Article 128 : point 23
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -242/87 : point 23
  
• Commission - COM Document (Other than Draft Legislation) - 51987DC0393 : point 24
  
• Directive 80/836 -A05 : point 25
  
• Directive 89/618 : point 25
  
• Directive 89/618 -N2 : point 25
  
• Regulation 3955/87 : points 26 - 28
  
• Regulation 1388/86 : point 27
  
• Regulation 1707/86 : point 27
  
• Regulation 1707/86 -A07 : point 27
  
• Regulation 3020/86 : point 27
  
• Regulation 624/87 : point 27
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -45/89 : point 27
  
• EEC Treaty (Rome), Article 190 : point 27
  
• Regulation 3954/89 -C4 : point 28
  
• Regulation 3954/89 -C3 : point 28
  
• Court of Justice - Rules of Procedure (1959) -A69P3 : point 30
  

Dates

Date of the lodging of the application initiating proceedings

• 04/03/1988

Date of the Opinion

• 26/06/1991

Date of the hearing

Information not available

Date of delivery

04/10/1991

References

Publication in the Official Journal

Application: OJ C 90 from 07.04.1988, p.6

Interlocutory judgment: OJ C 146 from 15.06.1990, p.6

Judgment: OJ C 294 from 13.11.1991, p.7

Name of the parties

Parliament v Council

Notes on Academic Writings

1. Schröer, Thomas: Abgrenzung der Gemeinschaftskompetenzen zum Schutz der Gesundheit vor radioaktiver Strahlung, Europäische Zeitschrift für Wirtschaftsrecht 1992 p.207-210
2. Gastaldy, Arlette: European Food Law Review 1992 p.235-237
3. Jans, J.H.: M en R Kort 1994 p.185-186

Procedural Analysis Information

Source of the question referred for a preliminary ruling

Information not available

Subject-matter

• Provisions governing the institutions
  
• - Acts of the institutions
  
• Approximation of laws
  
• Euratom matters
  
• - Health and safety
  

Provisions of national law referred to

Information not available

Provisions of international law referred to

Information not available

Procedure and result

• Actions for annulment : dismissal on substantive grounds
  
• Actions for annulment : dismissal on grounds of inadmissibility
  

Formation of the Court

Cour plénière (Cour)

Judge-Rapporteur

Zuleeg

Advocate General

Van Gerven

Language(s) of the Case

• French
  

Language(s) of the Opinion

• Dutch