Reports of Cases
1996 I-05457
Subject-matter
Information not available
Systematic classification scheme
|
1.
|
|
B European Community (EEC/EC)
B-07 Competition
B-07.00 General
B-07.00.06 Definition of undertaking
|
|
|
|
B European Community (EEC/EC)
B-19 Legal proceedings
B-19.10 Appeals
|
Citations of case-law or legislation
References in grounds of judgment
Operative part
Opinion
-
General Court - Judgment T -102/92
: point 1
-
EC Treaty (Maastricht), Article 85
-P1 : points 32 - 77
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -22/71
-N7 : point 32
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -22/71
: point 32
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -48/69
: points 34, 49
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -48/69
-N132 : point 35
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -6/73
-N37 : point 37
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -15/74
: points 38, 41, 49
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -15/74
-N40 : point 39
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -15/74
-N41 : point 39
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -16/74
-N32 : points 41, 49
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -170/83
: point 42
-
Regulation 67/67
: points 42 - 43
-
Regulation 1983/83
: point 42
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -170/83
-N11 : point 43
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -30/87
: points 44, 49
-
EC Treaty (Maastricht), Article 86
: points 45 - 47, 70
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -66/86
: points 46, 49
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -66/86
-N35 : point 46
-
General Court - Judgment T -11/89
-N311 : point 47
-
General Court - Judgment T -68/89
-N357 : point 47
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -16/74
: point 49
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -30/87
-N44 : point 49
-
EC Treaty (Maastricht), Article 3
-LG : points 62 - 66
-
EC Treaty (Maastricht), Article 2
: points 62 - 66
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -140/94
-N15 : point 66
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -2/91
-N22 : point 66
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -15/74
-N40 : point 71
-
Court of Justice - Rules of Procedure (1991)
-A112P1LC : points 78 - 81
-
Court of Justice - Order C -26/94
-N12 : point 78
-
Court of Justice - Order C -173/95
-N20 : point 78
Dates
Date of the lodging of the application initiating proceedings
Information not available
Date of the Opinion
Date of the hearing
Information not available
Date of delivery
24/10/1996
References
Publication in the Official Journal
Application: OJ C 137 from 03.06.1995, p.10
Judgment: OJ C 9 from 11.01.1997, p.6
Name of the parties
Viho v Commission
Notes on Academic Writings
- Mok, M.R.: Concernverhoudingen en art. 85, TVVS ondernemingsrecht en rechtspersonen 1996 p.359
- Vogel, Louis: Contrats - concurrence - consommation 1996 nº 204 p.16-17
- Beeser, Simone: St. Galler Europarechtsbriefe 1996 p.416-417
- Wezenbeek-Geuke, M.G.: Viho/Commissie; toepasselijkheid kartelverbod op verhoudingen binnen concern, Nederlands tijdschrift voor Europees recht 1997 p.12-13
- Micklitz, Hans-W.: Entscheidungen zum Wirtschaftsrecht 1997 p.219-220
- Fernández Vicién, Concepción: L'applicabilité de la notion d'accord visée à l'article 85.1 du traité aux accords conclus entre sociétés mère et filiales: l'arrêt de la Cour du 24 octobre 1996 dans l'affaire C-73/95P, VIHO/CCE, L'Observateur de Bruxelles 1997 p.25
- Hermitte, Marie-Angèle: Journal du droit international 1997 p.596
- Treacy, Pat ; Feaster, Trudy: When Two Into One Will Go: Intra-group Agreements and Article 85(1), European Law Review 1997 p.573-578
- Scaramozzino, Yannick: Gazette du Palais 1998 I Jur. p.392-393
- Tomasevic, Daniel M.: Commentaire de l'arrêt Viho de la Cour de justice des Communautés européennes, Anuario de la competencia 1996 (Ed. Marcial Pons - Madrid) 1998 p.261-270
Procedural Analysis Information
Source of the question referred for a preliminary ruling
Information not available
Subject-matter
- Competition
- - Agreements, decisions and concerted practices
- Competition
- - Dominant position
- Competition
Provisions of national law referred to
Information not available
Provisions of international law referred to
Information not available
Procedure and result
- Actions for annulment
- Appeals : dismissal on substantive grounds
- Appeals : dismissal on grounds of inadmissibility
Formation of the Court
Sixième chambre (Cour)
Judge-Rapporteur
Ragnemalm
Advocate General
Lenz
Language(s) of the Case
Language(s) of the Opinion