Reports of Cases

published in the electronic Reports of Cases (Court Reports - general)

Subject-matter

Information not available

Systematic classification scheme

Citations of case-law or legislation

References in grounds of judgment

• TFEU, Article 107 : paragraphs 28, 29, 86
• TFEU, Article 107 -P1 : paragraphs 1, 21, 35, 37 - 40, 54, 60, 63, 74, 90
• TFEU, Article 108 : paragraph 86
• TFEU, Article 108 -P1 : paragraphs 37, 86
• TFEU, Article 108 -P3 : paragraphs 37, 86, 89
• TFEU, Article 267 : paragraphs 24, 36
• TFEU - Protocol No 3 -A23L2 : paragraph 33
• Regulation 1998/2006 : paragraph 84
• Regulation 1998/2006 -A02 : paragraph 82
• Regulation 1998/2006 -C8 : paragraph 82
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -196/87 -N14 : paragraph 43
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -196/87 -N9 : paragraph 43
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -82/01 -N75 : paragraph 44
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -222/04 -N107 : paragraph 41
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -222/04 -N108 : paragraph 45
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -237/04 -N27 : paragraph 39
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -237/04 -N28 : paragraph 39
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -76/05 -N37 : paragraph 47
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -76/05 -N38 : paragraph 47
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -76/05 -N39 : paragraph 50
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -76/05 -N40 : paragraph 48
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -76/05 -N41 : paragraph 49
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -318/05 -N68 : paragraph 50
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -318/05 -N69 : paragraph 48
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -318/05 -N70 : paragraph 49
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -49/07 -N25 : paragraph 44
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -49/07 -N27 : paragraph 46
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -399/10 -N101 : paragraph 66
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -197/11 -N81 : paragraph 82
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -6/12 -N42 : paragraph 87
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -262/12 -N16 : paragraph 74
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -284/12 -N20 : paragraph 26
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -284/12 -N21 : paragraph 27
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -69/13 -N30 : paragraph 85
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -93/13 -N88 : paragraph 39
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -522/13 : paragraph 20
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -522/13 -N21 : paragraph 65
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -522/13 -N42 : paragraph 71
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -306/14 -N17 : paragraph 36
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -524/14 -N40 : paragraph 38
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -590/14 -N45 : paragraph 86
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -20/15 -N53 : paragraph 38
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -76/15 -N56 : paragraph 24
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -76/15 -N57 : paragraph 25
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -76/15 -N102 : paragraph 78
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -76/15 -N104 : paragraph 79
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -211/15 -N66 : paragraph 80

Operative part

• Interprets : TFEU, Article 107 -P1

Opinion

• Treaty of Amsterdam 1997 - Final Act, Declaration No 10 : point 30
  
• Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU (2007), Article 10 : point 29
  
• Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU (2007), Article 10 -P1 : point 41
  
• Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU (2007), Article 14 -P3 : point 41
  
• TFEU, Article 17 : points 4, 29 - 33
  
• TFEU, Article 17 -P1 : points 7, 29, 34, 35, 45, 74
  
• TFEU, Article 56 : points 42, 43, 49
  
• TFEU, Article 101 : point 58
  
• TFEU, Article 102 : point 58
  
• TFEU, Article 107 : point 24
  
• TFEU, Article 107 -P1 : points 1, 6, 28, 29, 59 - 63, 66, 67, 69, 73, 77, 86 - 88, 94, 97, 99 - 102
  
• TFEU, Article 108 : points 5, 88, 89, 93
  
• TFEU, Article 108 -P1 : points 89, 90
  
• TFEU, Article 108 -P3 : points 89, 92
  
• TFEU, Article 288 -L2 : point 56
  
• TFEU, Article 351 : points 5, 8, 94, 96
  
• TFEU, Article 351 -P1 : points 88, 95, 99
  
• TFEU, Article 351 -P2 : point 100
  
• TEU, Article 4 -P2 : point 31
  
• Decision 2000/186 -A01 : point 58
  
• Court of Justice - Rules of Procedure (2012) -A94 : point 21
  
• Regulation 1407/2013 -A03P1 : point 86
  
• Regulation 1407/2013 -A03P2 : point 86
  
• Regulation 1407/2013 -A07P1 : point 86
  
• Regulation 651/2014 : point 55
  
• Regulation 651/2014 -C49 : point 56
  
• Commission - Other Acts - 52004XC0427(06) : point 58
  
• Commission - Other Acts - 52014XC0627(01) : point 55
  
• Commission - Other Acts - 52014XC0627(01) -PT20 : point 56
  
• Commission - Other Acts - 52016XC0719(05) -PT28 : point 43
  
• Commission - Other Acts - 52016XC0719(05) -PT29 : point 43
  
• Commission - Other Acts - 52016XC0719(05) -PT30 : point 43
  
• Court of Justice - Order C -30/59 -N43 : point 66
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -173/73 -N26 : point 34
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -36/74 : point 32
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -13/77 -N31 : point 36
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -812/79 -N6 : point 96
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -170/83 -N11 : point 37
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -248/84 -N17 : point 67
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -118/85 -N7 : point 38
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -263/86 : point 3
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -263/86 -N17 : point 43
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -263/86 -N18 : point 43
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -142/87 -N43 : point 82
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -196/87 -N14 : point 32
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -196/87 -N9 : point 32
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -301/87 -N17 : point 89
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -234/89 -N19 : point 84
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -234/89 -N20 : point 84
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -234/89 -N21 : point 84
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -234/89 -N22 : point 84
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -234/89 -N23 : point 84
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -234/89 -N24 : point 84
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -234/89 -N25 : point 84
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -234/89 -N26 : point 84
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -234/89 -N27 : point 84
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -241/89 -N8 : points 35, 88
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -41/90 -N21 : point 37
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -158/91 -N11 : point 96
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -158/91 -N21 : point 98
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -109/92 : point 3
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -109/92 -N15 : point 43
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -109/92 -N16 : point 43
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -109/92 -N17 : point 42
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -387/92 -N13 : point 66
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -387/92 -N14 : point 67
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -387/92 -N20 : point 89
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -393/92 -N37 : point 84
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -324/93 -N27 : point 97
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -324/93 -N29 : point 98
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -324/93 -N32 : point 97
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -415/93 : point 32
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -39/94 -N58 : points 34, 66
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -124/95 -N56 : point 97
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -124/95 -N58 : point 98
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -124/95 -N61 : point 97
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -343/95 -N16 : point 38
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -343/95 -N18 : point 38
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -35/96 -N36 : point 39
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -355/97 -N22 : point 24
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -62/98 -N49 : point 100
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -84/98 -N58 : point 100
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -170/98 -N42 : point 100
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -180/98 -N75 : point 39
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -54/99 : point 32
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -143/99 -N35 : point 71
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -143/99 -N41 : points 69, 70
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -143/99 -N42 : points 70, 72
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -309/99 -N112 : point 37
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -280/00 -N74 : point 63
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -280/00 -N75 : point 64
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -280/00 -N81 : point 82
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -280/00 -N83 : point 73
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -280/00 -N84 : point 73
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -280/00 -N85 : point 73
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -280/00 -N86 : point 73
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -280/00 -N87 : point 73
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -280/00 -N88 : point 73
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -280/00 -N89 : points 73, 74
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -280/00 -N90 : points 73, 75
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -280/00 -N91 : points 73, 75
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -280/00 -N92 : point 73
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -280/00 -N93 : point 73
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -280/00 -N94 : point 73
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -82/01 -N75 : point 38
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -159/01 -N42 : point 72
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -159/01 -N43 : point 72
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -264/01 -N46 : point 37
  
• Court of Justice - Order C -190/02 -N21 : point 21
  
• Court of Justice - Order C -190/02 -N22 : point 21
  
• Court of Justice - Opinion C -134/03 -N72 : point 38
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -88/03 -N54 : point 70
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -88/03 -N55 : point 67
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -88/03 -N56 : point 70
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -172/03 -N40 : point 69
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -172/03 -N46 : point 65
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -182/03 : point 67
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -157/04 -N33 : point 88
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -157/04 -N34 : point 88
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -222/04 -N108 : point 39
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -222/04 -N122 : point 39
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -222/04 -N123 : point 39
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -222/04 -N124 : point 39
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -222/04 -N140 : point 77
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -222/04 -N141 : point 78
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -222/04 -N142 : point 78
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -222/04 -N143 : point 78
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -393/04 -N27 : point 34
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -393/04 -N30 : point 71
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -519/04 : point 32
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -76/05 : points 3, 32
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -76/05 -N39 : point 43
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -76/05 -N40 : point 42
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -318/05 : points 3, 32
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -318/05 -N68 : point 43
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -318/05 -N69 : point 42
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -380/05 -N58 : point 21
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -402/05 -N301 : point 97
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -199/06 -N36 : point 89
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -199/06 -N37 : point 89
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -280/06 -N38 : point 36
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -281/06 -N33 : point 39
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -494/06 -N54 : point 79
  
• Court of Justice - Opinion C -49/07 -N49 : point 38
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -49/07 : point 32
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -49/07 -N20 : point 36
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -49/07 -N22 : point 39
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -49/07 -N25 : point 38
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -49/07 -N27 : point 39
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -188/07 -N31 : point 24
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -325/08 : point 32
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -358/08 -N50 : points 35, 88
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -71/09 -N94 : point 65
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -106/09 -N101 : point 70
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -106/09 -N72 : point 67
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -106/09 -N73 : point 70
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -106/09 -N75 : point 70
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -128/09 -N27 : point 26
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -366/10 -N61 : point 97
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -571/10 -N42 : point 21
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -41/11 -N36 : point 24
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -197/11 -N74 : points 63, 64
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -6/12 -N18 : point 71
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -6/12 -N22 : point 72
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -6/12 -N36 : point 89
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -162/12 -N38 : point 21
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -284/12 -N20 : point 21
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -284/12 -N25 : point 89
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -284/12 -N26 : point 89
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -67/13 -N79 : point 84
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -93/13 -N88 : point 36
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -173/13 -N56 : point 35
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -173/13 -N64 : point 35
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -518/13 -N33 : point 66
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -518/13 -N54 : point 69
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -518/13 -N55 : point 69
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -518/13 -N65 : point 77
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -518/13 -N66 : point 78
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -518/13 -N67 : point 78
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -518/13 -N68 : point 82
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -522/13 -N23 : points 67, 71
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -522/13 -N42 : point 72
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -522/13 -N43 : point 72
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -562/13 -N37 : point 88
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -597/13 -N33 : point 37
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -62/14 -N25 : point 24
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -105/14 -N61 : point 71
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -179/14 -N149 : point 39
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -345/14 -N26 : point 84
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -505/14 -N18 : point 89
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -505/14 -N19 : point 89
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -524/14 -N40 : points 63, 64
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -524/14 -N41 : points 69, 72
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -524/14 -N48 : point 65
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -524/14 -N54 : point 69
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -590/14 -N45 : point 89
  
• Court of Justice - Opinion C -76/15 -N115 : point 92
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -20/15 -N53 : points 63, 64
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -20/15 -N54 : points 69, 70
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -20/15 -N56 : points 67, 71
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -20/15 -N58 : point 72
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -20/15 -N59 : point 71
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -20/15 -N60 : point 70
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -76/15 -N102 : point 77
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -76/15 -N104 : point 78
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -76/15 -N107 : point 82
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -76/15 -N56 : point 21
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -76/15 -N57 : points 21, 24
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -182/15 -N20 : point 24
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -187/15 -N35 : point 35
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -211/15 -N38 : point 65
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -211/15 -N42 : point 73
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -211/15 -N44 : point 73
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -211/15 -N64 : point 77
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -211/15 -N66 : point 79
  
• Court of Justice - Order C -692/15 -N18 : point 21
  

Dates

Date of the lodging of the application initiating proceedings

Information not available

Date of the Opinion

• 16/02/2017

Date of the hearing

Information not available

Date of delivery

27/06/2017

References

Publication in the Official Journal

Judgment: OJ C 283 from 28.08.2017, p.5

Application: OJ C 145 from 25.04.2016, p.21

Name of the parties

Congregación de Escuelas Pías Provincia Betania

Notes on Academic Writings

1. Jaspers, R.M.T.M.: "Do Not Make my Father's House, a House of Trade": Catholic Church, Economic Activities and State Aid, European Law Reporter 2016 p.303-306 (DE, EN)
2. Hojnik, Janja: Davčne olajšave za Rimo-katoliško cerkev prepovedana državna pomoč, Davčno-finančna praksa : davki, finance, zavarovalnistvo 2017 n° 7-8 p.33-40 (SL)
3. Fierstra, M.A.: Staatssteun en economische activiteiten van de kerk, Nederlands tijdschrift voor Europees recht 2017 p.181-189 (NL)
4. Buckler, Julius: Staatliche Beihilfen: Befreiung von der Steuer auf Baumaßnahmen an Schulgebäude der katholischen Kirche, soweit darin Tätigkeiten wirtschaftlicher Art ausgeübt werden, Europäisches Wirtschafts- & Steuerrecht - EWS 2017 p.286-288 (DE)
5. Berlin, Dominique: Le recours à Dieu peut être une aide…illégale, La Semaine Juridique - édition générale 2017 nº 29 p.1417 (FR)
6. Pezet, Fabrice: Droit des aides d'État et congrégations religieuses : rendez au marché ce qui est au marché et à Dieu ce qui est à Dieu, Revue de droit fiscal 2017 Comm. 500 p.61-62 (FR)
7. Idot, Laurence: Notion d'entreprise, Europe 2017 Août Comm. nº 313 p.27-28 (FR)
8. Mohammad, A.H.A. ; Al Khatib, A.A.: Wanneer zijn onderwijsactiviteiten economische activiteiten in de zin van Europese staatsteunrecht? Het Hof formuleert voor het eerst een staatssteunrechtelijk beoordelingskader voor onderwijsactiviteiten, Administratiefrechtelijke beslissingen ; Rechtspraak bestuursrecht 2017 nº 45 p.2616-2621 (NL)
9. Nicolaides, Phedon: Not Even the Church Is Absolved from State Aid Rules: The Essence of Economic Activity, European State Aid Law Quarterly 2017 p.527 - 536 (EN)
10. Adobati, Enrica: Esenzioni fiscali a favore della Chiesa cattolica, Diritto comunitario e degli scambi internazionali 2017 p.363-364 (IT)
11. Soņeca, Viktorija ; Petrocka-Petrovska, Elīza: Eiropas Savienības tiesa : aktualitātes judikatūrā, Jurista vārds 2017 50 p.28-32 (LV)
12. Takis, Athanasios: Ta forologika pleonektimata ton Ekklision ypo to prisma tou enosiakou dikaiou, Armenopoulos 2017 p.1457-1458 (EL)
13. Stefopoulou, Frosyna: Pote i foroapallagi tis Katholikis Ekklisias apotelei kratiki enisxysi?, Efimerida Dioikitikou Dikaiou 2017 p.409-418 (EL)
14. Gatti, Mauro: Régime d'aides d'Etat et exonération fiscale d'une école religieuse, Revue des affaires européennes 2017 p.535-542 (FR)
15. Swennen, Henri: Escuolas Pias: ook vrome ondernemers? Onderwijsinstellingen in het mededingingsrecht en in het consumentenrecht, Rechtskundig weekblad 2017-18 p.1173-1176 (NL)
16. Dehaeck, V.: Reddite ergo, quae sunt Caesaris, Caesari, S.E.W. : Tijdschrift voor Europees en economisch recht 2018 p.64-70 (NL)
17. Dorigo, Stefano: European Union - Tax Relief Granted to “Private-Social” Organizations and State Aid Rules: A Difficult Balance Following Betania (Case C-74/16), European Taxation 2018 nº 2/3 p.109-115 (EN)
18. Kotsiras, Georgios A.: Dikaio Epicheiriseon & Etairion 2018 p.51-53 (EL)
19. Saanen, N.: NJ 2018/138 - HvJ EU 27 juni 2017, C-74/16, Congregación de Escuelas Pías Provincia Betania / Ayuntamiento de Getafe - Noot, Nederlandse jurisprudentie ; Uitspraken in burgerlijke en strafzaken 2018 nº 15 p.2031-2034 (NL)
20. Neri, Marcello: Religione e spazio pubblico europeo: il potere sovrano dell'economia, Pluralismo religioso e integrazione europea (G. Giappichelli Editore) 2018 p.87-98 (IT)
21. Maitrot de la Motte, Alexandre: XI. Fiscalité - Cour de justice, gde ch., 27 juin 2017, Congregación de Escuelas Pías Provincia Betania c/ Ayuntamiento de Getafe, aff. C‑74/16, ECLI:EU:C:2017:496, Jurisprudence de la CJUE 2017. Décisions et commentaires (Ed. Bruylant - Bruxelles) 2018, p. 482-485 (FR)
22. Polo Sabau, José Ramón: Estado y confesiones religiosas en el Derecho de la Unión Europea: la repercusión del artículo 17 del Tratado de Funcionamiento de la Unión Europea en la jurisprudencia del TJUE, Revista General de Derecho Europeo 2018, nº 46, p. 270-315 (ES)

Procedural Analysis Information

Source of the question referred for a preliminary ruling

Juzgado de lo Contencioso-Administrativo nº 4 de Madrid - Spain

Subject-matter

• Competition
  
• - State aid
  

Provisions of national law referred to

Ley Orgánica 13/1982, de 10 de agosto, de reintegración y amejoramiento del Régimen Foral de Navarra, de 5 de marzo, por el que se aprueba el texto refundido de la Ley Reguladora de las Haciendas Locales (Vigente hasta el 30 de Junio de 2017)

Provisions of international law referred to

Information not available

Procedure and result

• Reference for a preliminary ruling
  

Formation of the Court

Grande chambre (Cour)

Judge-Rapporteur

Arabadjiev

Advocate General

Kokott

Language(s) of the Case

• Spanish
  

Language(s) of the Opinion

• German