Reports of Cases
published in the electronic Reports of Cases (Court Reports - general)
Subject-matter
Information not available
Systematic classification scheme
1.
|
|
3.10.03.02.03 Repetition of pleas in law and arguments put forward at first instance
|
1.
|
|
3 Legal proceedings
3.10 Appeals
3.10.03 Grounds of appeal
3.10.03.02 Issues relating to the admissibility of the pleas
3.10.03.02.03 Repetition of pleas in law and arguments put forward at first instance
|
|
|
4 Internal policy of the European Union
4.12 Economic and monetary policy
4.12.01 Economic policy
|
|
|
2 Institutional framework of the European Union
2.01 Institutions
2.01.04 European Commission
|
|
|
4 Internal policy of the European Union
4.12 Economic and monetary policy
4.12.01 Economic policy
|
|
|
2 Institutional framework of the European Union
2.01 Institutions
2.01.04 European Commission
|
|
|
4 Internal policy of the European Union
4.12 Economic and monetary policy
4.12.01 Economic policy
|
|
|
1 The legal order of the European Union
1.04 Fundamental rights
1.04.03 The fundamental rights
1.04.03.17 Right to property
|
|
|
4 Internal policy of the European Union
4.12 Economic and monetary policy
4.12.01 Economic policy
|
Citations of case-law or legislation
References in grounds of judgment
-
Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU (2007), Article 17
-P1 : paragraphs 47, 66, 68, 75
-
Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU (2007), Article 52
-P1 : paragraph 70
-
TFEU - Protocol No 3
-A58L1 : paragraphs 34, 35
-
TFEU - Protocol No 3
-A61L1 : paragraph 62
-
TFEU, Article 256
: paragraphs 34, 35
-
TFEU, Article 263
: paragraph 55
-
TFEU, Article 268
: paragraphs 55, 60
-
TFEU, Article 340
-L2 : paragraphs 55, 60, 63, 64
-
TFEU, Article 340
-L3 : paragraphs 55, 60, 63
-
TEU, Article 17
-P1 : paragraphs 57, 59, 67
-
Court of Justice - Rules of Procedure (2012)
-A168P1LD : paragraph 35
-
Court of Justice - Rules of Procedure (2012)
-A169P2 : paragraphs 35, 36, 40
-
Agreement between Member States - 42012A0202(01)
: paragraphs 2, 53, 56, 58, 59
-
Agreement between Member States - 42012A0202(01)
-A01 : paragraph 4
-
Agreement between Member States - 42012A0202(01)
-A02 : paragraph 4
-
Agreement between Member States - 42012A0202(01)
-A04P1 : paragraph 5
-
Agreement between Member States - 42012A0202(01)
-A04P3 : paragraph 5
-
Agreement between Member States - 42012A0202(01)
-A04P4L1 : paragraph 5
-
Agreement between Member States - 42012A0202(01)
-A05P3 : paragraph 6
-
Agreement between Member States - 42012A0202(01)
-A06P2 : paragraph 7
-
Agreement between Member States - 42012A0202(01)
-A12 : paragraph 71
-
Agreement between Member States - 42012A0202(01)
-A12P1 : paragraph 8
-
Agreement between Member States - 42012A0202(01)
-A13 : paragraph 9
-
Agreement between Member States - 42012A0202(01)
-A13P3 : paragraphs 46, 52, 58, 67
-
Agreement between Member States - 42012A0202(01)
-A13P4 : paragraphs 42, 46, 51, 58, 67
-
Agreement between Member States - 42012A0202(01)
-A32P2 : paragraph 4
-
Agreement between Member States - 42012A0202(01)
-C1 : paragraph 3
-
Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU (2007), Article 17
-P1 : paragraphs 47, 66, 68, 75
-
Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU (2007), Article 52
-P1 : paragraph 70
-
TFEU - Protocol No 3
-A58L1 : paragraphs 34, 35
-
TFEU - Protocol No 3
-A61L1 : paragraph 62
-
TFEU, Article 256
: paragraphs 34, 35
-
TFEU, Article 263
: paragraph 55
-
TFEU, Article 268
: paragraphs 55, 60
-
TFEU, Article 340
-L2 : paragraphs 55, 60, 63, 64
-
TFEU, Article 340
-L3 : paragraphs 55, 60, 63
-
TEU, Article 17
-P1 : paragraphs 57, 59, 67
-
Court of Justice - Rules of Procedure (2012)
-A168P1LD : paragraph 35
-
Court of Justice - Rules of Procedure (2012)
-A169P2 : paragraphs 35, 36, 40
-
Agreement between Member States - 42012A0202(01)
: paragraphs 2, 53, 56, 58, 59
-
Agreement between Member States - 42012A0202(01)
-A01 : paragraph 4
-
Agreement between Member States - 42012A0202(01)
-A02 : paragraph 4
-
Agreement between Member States - 42012A0202(01)
-A04P1 : paragraph 5
-
Agreement between Member States - 42012A0202(01)
-A04P3 : paragraph 5
-
Agreement between Member States - 42012A0202(01)
-A04P4L1 : paragraph 5
-
Agreement between Member States - 42012A0202(01)
-A05P3 : paragraph 6
-
Agreement between Member States - 42012A0202(01)
-A06P2 : paragraph 7
-
Agreement between Member States - 42012A0202(01)
-A12 : paragraph 71
-
Agreement between Member States - 42012A0202(01)
-A12P1 : paragraph 8
-
Agreement between Member States - 42012A0202(01)
-A13 : paragraph 9
-
Agreement between Member States - 42012A0202(01)
-A13P3 : paragraphs 46, 52, 58, 67
-
Agreement between Member States - 42012A0202(01)
-A13P4 : paragraphs 42, 46, 51, 58, 67
-
Agreement between Member States - 42012A0202(01)
-A32P2 : paragraph 4
-
Agreement between Member States - 42012A0202(01)
-C1 : paragraph 3
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -352/98
-N34 : paragraph 35
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -352/98
-N42 : paragraph 65
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -20/00
-N79 : paragraph 74
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -20/00
-N80 : paragraph 74
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -20/00
-N81 : paragraph 74
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -20/00
-N82 : paragraph 74
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -20/00
-N83 : paragraph 74
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -20/00
-N84 : paragraph 74
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -20/00
-N85 : paragraph 74
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -20/00
-N86 : paragraph 74
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -548/09
-N113 : paragraph 69
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -548/09
-N114 : paragraph 70
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -370/12
: paragraphs 46, 51, 53
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -370/12
-N162 : paragraph 56
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -370/12
-N163 : paragraphs 57, 67
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -370/12
-N164 : paragraphs 58, 67
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -370/12
-N178 : paragraph 67
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -370/12
-N179 : paragraph 67
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -370/12
-N180 : paragraph 67
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -370/12
-N181 : paragraph 67
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -611/12
-N35 : paragraph 64
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -192/13
-N42 : paragraph 34
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -192/13
-N43 : paragraph 35
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -192/13
-N44 : paragraph 37
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -192/13
-N45 : paragraph 38
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -220/13
-N53 : paragraph 65
-
General Court - Order T -289/13
: paragraphs 1 - 76
-
General Court - Order T -291/13
: paragraphs 1 - 76
-
General Court - Order T -293/13
: paragraphs 1 - 76
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -526/14
-N50 : paragraph 72
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -358/15
-N55 : paragraph 69
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -358/15
-N56 : paragraph 70
Operative part
Opinion
-
Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU (2007), Article 17
: point 83
-
Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU (2007), Article 51
: point 84
-
Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU (2007), Article 51
-P1 : points 85, 87, 90
-
TFEU, Article 6
: point 54
-
TFEU, Article 216
-P2 : point 53
-
TFEU, Article 234
: point 78
-
TFEU, Article 256
-P1L2 : point 35
-
TFEU, Article 258
: points 77, 78
-
TFEU, Article 259
: points 77, 78
-
TFEU, Article 260
: points 77, 78
-
TFEU, Article 263
: points 126, 129
-
TFEU, Article 268
: points 45, 107
-
TFEU, Article 340
: points 45, 47, 97, 107
-
TFEU - Protocol No 3
: point 39
-
TFEU - Protocol No 3
-A58L1 : point 35
-
TEU, Article 4
-P3 : point 103
-
TEU, Article 17
: point 76
-
TEU, Article 17
-P1 : points 66, 67, 71, 75, 80, 93
-
Court of Justice - Rules of Procedure (2012)
: points 34, 39
-
Court of Justice - Rules of Procedure (2012)
-A168P1LD : point 35
-
Court of Justice - Rules of Procedure (2012)
-A169P2 : point 35
-
Agreement between Member States - 42012A0202(01)
: points 1, 43, 50, 51, 53, 54, 66, 67, 71, 86, 88, 102
-
Agreement between Member States - 42012A0202(01)
-A03 : point 4
-
Agreement between Member States - 42012A0202(01)
-A04P1 : point 5
-
Agreement between Member States - 42012A0202(01)
-A05P3 : point 6
-
Agreement between Member States - 42012A0202(01)
-A06P2 : point 7
-
Agreement between Member States - 42012A0202(01)
-A12P1 : point 8
-
Agreement between Member States - 42012A0202(01)
-A13 : points 9, 45, 117
-
Agreement between Member States - 42012A0202(01)
-A13P3 : point 72
-
Agreement between Member States - 42012A0202(01)
-C1 : point 3
-
Agreement between Member States - 42012A0202(01)
-C10 : point 52
-
Agreement between Member States - 42012A0202(01)
-CH4 : point 57
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -5/66
: point 106
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -22/70
-N21 : point 103
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -22/70
-N22 : point 103
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -22/70
-N42 : point 126
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -132/77
: point 106
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -281/82
: point 106
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -175/84
: point 106
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -247/87
-N10 : point 78
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -247/87
-N11 : point 78
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -247/87
-N12 : point 78
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -247/87
-N13 : point 78
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -247/87
-N14 : point 78
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -87/89
-N6 : point 78
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -87/89
-N7 : point 78
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -6/90
: point 104
-
Court of Justice - Order C -72/90
-N13 : point 78
-
Court of Justice - Order C -72/90
-N14 : point 78
-
Court of Justice - Order C -72/90
-N15 : point 78
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -181/91
: point 128
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -181/91
-N12 : point 127
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -181/91
-N13 : point 126
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -181/91
-N14 : point 128
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -181/91
-N16 : point 52
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -181/91
-N20 : point 52
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -181/91
-N22 : point 52
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -316/91
-N26 : point 52
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -316/91
-N34 : point 52
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -316/91
-N41 : point 52
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -431/92
-N21 : point 78
-
Court of Justice - Opinion 1/92
-N32 : point 52
-
Court of Justice - Opinion 1/92
-N41 : point 52
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -46/93
: point 104
-
General Court - Judgment T -371/94
-N453 : point 76
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -472/98
-N34 : point 77
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -472/98
-N35 : point 77
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -472/98
-N36 : point 77
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -472/98
-N37 : point 77
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -472/98
-N38 : point 77
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -472/98
-N85 : point 103
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -234/02
-N59 : point 47
-
General Court - Order T -202/02
-N43 : point 78
-
General Court - Judgment T -440/03
-N61 : point 101
-
General Court - Judgment T -440/03
-N62 : point 101
-
General Court - Judgment T -440/03
-N63 : point 101
-
General Court - Judgment T -440/03
-N64 : point 101
-
General Court - Judgment T -440/03
-N65 : point 101
-
General Court - Judgment T -440/03
-N66 : point 101
-
General Court - Judgment T -440/03
-N67 : point 101
-
General Court - Judgment T -440/03
-N68 : point 101
-
General Court - Judgment T -440/03
-N69 : point 101
-
General Court - Judgment T -440/03
-N70 : point 101
-
General Court - Judgment T -440/03
-N71 : point 101
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -27/04
-N44 : point 126
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -445/06
-N67 : point 78
-
Court of Justice - Order C -107/07
-N26 : point 35
-
Court of Justice - Order C -107/07
-N27 : point 35
-
Court of Justice - Order C -107/07
-N28 : point 35
-
General Court - Order T -375/07
-N19 : point 76
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -350/08
-N33 : point 77
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -414/08
-N138 : point 120
-
Court of Justice - Opinion 1/09
-N75 : point 52
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -366/10
-N50 : point 53
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -366/10
-N52 : point 53
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -366/10
-N60 : point 53
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -366/10
-N61 : point 53
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -366/10
-N62 : point 53
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -366/10
-N63 : points 54, 55
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -617/10
-N19 : point 87
-
Court of Justice - Order C -434/11
: point 91
-
Court of Justice - Order C -462/11
: point 91
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -28/12
-N51 : point 56
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -114/12
-N38 : point 127
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -114/12
-N39 : point 127
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -114/12
-N40 : point 127
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -114/12
-N41 : point 127
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -295/12
-N29 : point 35
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -295/12
-N30 : point 35
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -370/12
: points 1, 42, 50, 61, 65 - 67, 72, 80, 93
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -370/12
-N68 : point 127
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -370/12
-N112 : point 69
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -370/12
-N120 : point 54
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -370/12
-N161 : point 53
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -370/12
-N178 : point 88
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -370/12
-N179 : point 88
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -370/12
-N180 : point 88
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -370/12
-N181 : point 88
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -382/12
-N41 : point 36
-
Court of Justice - Order C -128/12
: point 91
-
Court of Justice - Order C -264/12
: point 91
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -206/13
-N24 : point 87
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -265/13
-N33 : point 87
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -393/13
-N16 : point 15
-
Court of Justice - Order C -665/13
: point 91
-
General Court - Order T -289/13
: point 27
-
General Court - Order T -291/13
: point 27
-
General Court - Order T -293/13
: point 27
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -280/14
-N42 : point 35
Dates
Date of the lodging of the application initiating proceedings
Date of the Opinion
Date of the hearing
Information not available
Date of delivery
20/09/2016
References
Publication in the Official Journal
Judgment: OJ C 419 from 14.11.2016, p.10
Application: OJ C 171 from 26.05.2015, p.7
Name of the parties
Ledra Advertising v Commission and ECB
Notes on Academic Writings
- Berlin, Dominique: Hétérogénéité institutionnelle, orthodoxie juridique, La Semaine Juridique - édition générale 2016 nº 39 p.1755 (FR)
- Gundel, Jörg: Kein Schadenersatz wegen der Rolle der Kommission bei der Stabilitätshilfe für Zypern, Neue juristische Wochenschrift 2016 p.3294-3295 (DE)
- Wieser, Nikolaus: Austeritätsmaßnahmen auf dem grundrechtlichen Prüfstand, Juridikum : Zeitschrift im Rechtsstaat 2016 p.417-419 (DE)
- Simon, Denys: Contrôle juridictionnel des mesures prises dans le cadre de l'Eurogroupe et le MES à l'occasion de la restructuration du système bancaire de la République chypriote, Europe 2016 Novembre Comm. nº 11 p.45-46 (FR)
- Takis, Athanasios: Armenopoulos 2016 p.1989-1993 (EL)
- Nettesheim, Martin: Unionaler Grundrechtsschutz vor Austeritätspolitik?, Europäische Zeitschrift für Wirtschaftsrecht 2016 p.801-802 (DE)
- Nettesheim, Martin: Unionaler Grundrechtsschutz vor Austeritätspolitik?, Europäische Zeitschrift für Wirtschaftsrecht 2016 p.801-802 (DE)
- Spagnolo, Andrea: The Loan of Organs between International Organizations as a "Normative Bridge": Insights from Recent EU Practice, The Italian Yearbook of International Law 2016 p.171-190 (EN)
- Ehlers, Dirk: Europarecht - Zur Rechtsbindung der Unionsorgane bei Handlungen im Rahmen des ESM und zur Möglichkeit von Schadensersatzansprüchen bei Verletzung von Unionsgrundrechten, Juristenzeitung 2017 p.43-45 (DE)
- Timmermans, Jolien: “Het Hof van Justitie licht de rechtsbescherming in het kader van het ESM toe”, Tijdschrift voor bestuurswetenschappen en publiekrecht 2017 p.32-34 (NL)
- Vezzani, Simone: Sulla responsabilità extracontrattuale dell'Unione Europea per violazione della Carta dei diritti fondamentali : riflessioni in margine alla sentenza della Corte di giustizia nel caso Ledra Advertising, Rivista di diritto internazionale 2017 p.154-161 (IT)
- Hojnik, Janja: Odgovornost Evropske komisije in ECB za posledice varčevalnih ukrepov, Davčno-finančna praksa : davki, finance, zavarovalnistvo 2017 n° 2 p.23-27 (SL)
- Germain, Jérôme: La protection par l'Union européenne des droits fondamentaux contre les programmes d'ajustement macroéconomiques, Revue de l'Union européenne 2017 n° 606 p.166-170 (FR)
- Frenz, Walter: Nichtigkeitsklage unzulässig, Schadensersatzklage zulässig?! Zur Bedeutung der Grundrechte bei internem Unionshandeln - Anmerkung zu den Urteilen des EuGH v. 20. September 2016 - C-105-109/15 P (Mallis/Kommission und EZB) und C-8-10/15 P (Ledra/Kommission und EZB), Europarecht 2017 p.332-340 (DE)
- Bronzini, Giuseppe: Corte di giustizia : verso la sindacabilità delle misure di austerity ?, Rivista italiana di diritto del lavoro 2017 1 p.220-226 (IT)
- Dermine, Paul: The end of impunity? The legal duties of "borrowed" EU institutions under the European stability mechanism framework, European Constitutional Law Review 2017 Vol. 13 p.369-382 (EN)
- Repasi, René: Judicial protection against austerity measures in the euro area: Ledra and Mallis, Common Market Law Review 2017, Volume 54, Issue 4, p. 1123-1155 (EN)
- Lindenbergh, S.D.: Hogere voorziening. Programma ter ondersteuning van de stabiliteit van de Republiek Cyprus. Memorandum van overeenstemming inzake specifieke economische beleidsvoorwaarden dat op 26 april 2013 tussen de Republiek Cyprus en het Europese Stabiliteitsmechanisme (ESM) is gesloten. Functies van de Europese Commissie en de Europese Centrale Bank. Niet-contractuele aansprakelijkheid van de Europese Unie. Art. 340 tweede alinea VWEU. Voorwaarden. Verplichting om erop toe te zien dat dit memorandum van overeenstemming verenigbaar is met het Unie-recht, Nederlandse jurisprudentie ; Uitspraken in burgerlijke en strafzaken 2017 nº 41 p.5445-5447 (NL)
- Poulou, Anastasia: The Liability of the EU in the ESM framework, Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law 2017 p.127-139 (EN)
- Donati, Iacopo: L'incerto bilanciamento dei diritti degli azionisti e dei creditori nella capitalizzazione forzosa dei crediti, Rivista di diritto societario 2017 p.1104-1126 (IT)
- Vial, Claire: III. Droits fondamentaux - Cour de justice, gde ch., 20 septembre 2016, Ledra avdertising c/ Commission et BCE, aff. jtes C-8/15 P à C-10/15 P, ECLI:EU:C:2016:701, Jurisprudence de la CJUE 2016. Décisions et commentaires (Ed. Bruylant - Bruxelles) 2017, p. 104-112 (FR)
- Martucci, Francesco: XXIV. Union économique et monétaire - Cour de justice, gde ch., 20 septembre 2016, Ledra Advertising Ltd e.a. c/ Commission européenne et Banque centrale européenne (BCE), aff. jtes C-8/15 P à C-10/15 P, ECLI:EU:C:2016:701, Jurisprudence de la CJUE 2016. Décisions et commentaires (Ed. Bruylant - Bruxelles) 2017, p. 856-867 (FR)
- Laulhé Shaelou, Stéphanie ; Karatzia, Anastasia: Some Preliminary Thoughts on the Cyprus Bail-in Litigation: A Commentary on Mallis and Ledra, European Law Review 2018 p.249-268 (EN)
- Pavlopoulos, Prokopios: La faille normative du droit de l'Union européenne quant à la conclusion et la mise en oeuvre des protocoles d'accord : commentaires des arrêts de la Cour de justice de l'Union européenne, Pringle (C-370/12), Ledra Advertising (C-8/15 P), Mallis (C-105-15), Mélanges en l'honneur de Bernard Pacteau. Cinquante ans de contentieux publics 2018 (FR)
Procedural Analysis Information
Source of the question referred for a preliminary ruling
Information not available
Subject-matter
- Economic and monetary policy
Provisions of national law referred to
Information not available
Provisions of international law referred to
Information not available
Procedure and result
- Actions for annulment
- Action for damages
- Appeals : application granted
Formation of the Court
grande chambre (Cour)
Judge-Rapporteur
Arabadjiev
Advocate General
Wahl
Language(s) of the Case
Language(s) of the Opinion