Reports of Cases

published in the electronic Reports of Cases (Court Reports - general)

Subject-matter

Information not available

Systematic classification scheme

Citations of case-law or legislation

References in grounds of judgment

• Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU (2007) : paragraph 53
• Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU (2007), Article 47 : paragraph 53
• TFEU - Protocol No 3 -A20L4 : paragraph 21
• TFEU - Protocol No 3 -A23 : paragraphs 17, 20, 25
• TFEU, Article 101 : paragraphs 1, 2, 10, 34, 38, 43, 46, 49, 54, 59, 60, 63, 66, 74
• TFEU, Article 101 -P1 : paragraphs 31 - 33, 39, 41, 42, 48, 50 - 52, 55, 67 - 69, 73, 75
• TFEU, Article 102 : paragraph 74
• TFEU, Article 252 : paragraph 21
• Regulation 1/2003 -A16 : paragraph 3
• Regulation 1/2003 -A16P1 : paragraph 55
• Regulation 1/2003 -A23P2 : paragraphs 38, 39
• Regulation 1/2003 -A23P2LA : paragraph 62
• Regulation 1/2003 -A27P1 : paragraphs 5, 56
• Court of Justice - Rules of Procedure (2012) -A82P2 : paragraph 21
• Court of Justice - Rules of Procedure (2012) -A83 : paragraphs 16, 20
• Court of Justice - Rules of Procedure (2012) -A94 : paragraph 24
• Regulation 1215/2012 -A01P1 : paragraph 65
• Regulation 1215/2012 -A07 : paragraph 6
• Regulation 1215/2012 -A07PT2 : paragraphs 65, 66
• Directive 2014/104 : paragraph 40
• Directive 2014/104 -A02PT2 : paragraph 40
• Commission - Other Acts - 52017XC0406(01) : paragraph 9
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -48/69 -N140 : paragraph 41
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -127/73 : paragraph 32
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -100/80 -N105 : paragraph 36
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -170/83 -N11 : paragraph 46
• Court of Justice - Order C -17/98 -N13 : paragraph 21
• Court of Justice - Order C -17/98 -N14 : paragraph 21
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -453/99 : paragraphs 33, 35
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -212/04 : paragraph 72
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -295/04 -N61 : paragraph 34
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -217/05 -N41 : paragraph 41
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -97/08 : paragraphs 41, 43
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -407/08 -N84 : paragraph 41
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -407/08 -N86 : paragraph 41
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -231/11 -N45 : paragraph 48
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -247/11 -N123 : paragraph 39
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -247/11 -N124 : paragraph 39
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -179/12 -N57 : paragraph 46
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -93/13 -N91 : paragraph 49
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -93/13 -N94 : paragraph 53
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -625/13 -N145 : paragraph 48
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -625/13 -N150 : paragraph 44
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -516/15 : paragraphs 41, 43, 62
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -516/15 -N49 : paragraph 42
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -516/15 -N60 : paragraph 42
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -588/15 -N44 : paragraph 56
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -588/15 -N45 : paragraph 56
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -588/15 -N46 : paragraph 56
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -573/17 : paragraphs 70, 71
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -724/17 : paragraphs 32 - 35, 37, 38
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -183/18 : paragraphs 70 - 72
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -451/18 : paragraphs 65, 66
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -673/18 -N26 : paragraph 27
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -673/18 -N27 : paragraph 28
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -823/18 -N61 : paragraph 44
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -823/18 -N62 : paragraph 39
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -823/18 -N63 : paragraph 39
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -824/18 -N63 : paragraph 21
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -824/18 -N64 : paragraph 21
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -504/19 -N57 : paragraph 53

Operative part

• Interprets : TFEU, Article 101 -P1

Opinion

• TFEU - Protocol No 3 -A23 : points 10, 13
  
• TFEU, Article 2 : point 28
  
• TFEU, Article 101 : points 3, 5, 21, 24, 27, 62, 64, 69, 71, 76, 77
  
• TFEU, Article 101 -P1 : point 61
  
• TFEU, Article 102 : points 24, 25, 69
  
• Agreement on the European Economic Area -A53 : point 5
  
• Decision 69/195 : point 27
  
• Regulation 1/2003 -A16P1 : points 21, 69, 74
  
• Regulation 1/2003 -A23P2 : point 76
  
• Regulation 1/2003 -A23P2LA : point 72
  
• Court of Justice - Rules of Procedure (2012) -A61P1 : point 10
  
• Court of Justice - Rules of Procedure (2012) -A94 : points 12, 15
  
• Regulation 1215/2012 -A07PT2 : point 68
  
• Directive 2014/104 -A22P1 : point 14
  
• Commission - Other Acts - 52017XC0406(01) : points 5, 6, 12, 16, 18, 20, 70, 75
  
• Commission - Other Acts - 52017XC0406(01) -C54 : point 75
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -48/69 : point 28
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -52/69 -N42 : point 28
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -52/69 -N43 : point 28
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -52/69 -N44 : point 28
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -53/69 -N45 : point 28
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -22/71 -N7 : point 27
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -22/71 -N8 : point 27
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -22/71 -N9 : point 27
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -6/73 -N36 : point 28
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -6/73 -N37 : point 28
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -6/73 -N38 : point 28
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -6/73 -N39 : point 28
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -6/73 -N40 : point 28
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -6/73 -N41 : points 25, 28
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -40/73 -N480 : point 27
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -15/74 -N41 : point 27
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -107/82 -N49 : point 28
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -107/82 -N50 : point 31
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -170/83 -N11 : points 25, 27
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -66/86 -N35 : point 27
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -30/87 -N19 : point 27
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -41/90 -N21 : point 24
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -159/91 -N17 : point 24
  
• General Court - Judgment T -145/94 -N601 : point 53
  
• General Court - Judgment T -145/94 -N602 : point 53
  
• General Court - Judgment T -145/94 -N603 : point 53
  
• General Court - Judgment T -145/94 -N604 : point 53
  
• General Court - Judgment T -145/94 -N605 : point 53
  
• General Court - Judgment T -145/94 -N606 : point 53
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -73/95 -N15 : point 27
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -73/95 -N16 : point 27
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -73/95 -N17 : point 27
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -294/98 -N27 : point 29
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -294/98 -N36 : point 29
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -196/99 -N96 : point 29
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -218/00 -N22 : point 24
  
• Court of Justice - Opinion C -264/01 -N25 : point 24
  
• General Court - Judgment T -203/01 -N290 : point 53
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -189/02 -N113 : point 35
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -189/02 -N117 : point 29
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -217/05 -N41 : point 35
  
• General Court - Judgment T -24/05 : point 43
  
• General Court - Judgment T -112/05 -N59 : point 46
  
• General Court - Judgment T -168/05 -N77 : point 44
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -280/06 -N42 : point 65
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -280/06 -N49 : point 29
  
• General Court - Judgment T -185/06 : point 43
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -49/07 -N21 : point 24
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -49/07 -N25 : point 25
  
• General Court - Judgment T -39/07 -N97 : point 59
  
• Court of Justice - Opinion C -97/08 -N87 : point 43
  
• Court of Justice - Opinion C -97/08 -N91 : point 43
  
• Court of Justice - Opinion C -97/08 -N93 : point 44
  
• Court of Justice - Opinion C -97/08 -N94 : point 44
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -97/08 -N60 : point 31
  
• General Court - Judgment T -76/08 -N62 : point 44
  
• General Court - Judgment T -204/08 -N156 : point 73
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -90/09 -N88 : point 30
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -201/09 -N95 : point 46
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -521/09 -N59 : point 31
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -521/09 -N63 : point 31
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -521/09 -N88 : point 44
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -521/09 -N144 : point 43
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -521/09 -N145 : point 43
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -521/09 -N146 : point 43
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -521/09 -N147 : point 43
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -521/09 -N148 : point 43
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -521/09 -N149 : point 43
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -521/09 -N150 : point 43
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -521/09 -N151 : point 43
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -521/09 -N152 : point 43
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -521/09 -N153 : point 43
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -521/09 -N155 : point 43
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -521/09 -N156 : point 43
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -521/09 -N157 : point 43
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -521/09 -N158 : point 43
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -521/09 -N159 : point 43
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -521/09 -N160 : point 43
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -521/09 -N161 : point 43
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -521/09 -N162 : point 43
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -521/09 -N163 : point 43
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -521/09 -N164 : point 43
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -521/09 -N165 : point 43
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -521/09 -N166 : point 43
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -521/09 -N167 : point 43
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -521/09 -N168 : point 43
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -521/09 -N169 : point 43
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -521/09 -N170 : point 43
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -521/09 -N171 : point 43
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -628/10 -N43 : point 34
  
• General Court - Judgment T -436/10 : point 43
  
• Court of Justice - Opinion C -231/11 -N74 : point 39
  
• Court of Justice - Opinion C -231/11 -N75 : point 39
  
• Court of Justice - Opinion C -231/11 -N76 : point 39
  
• Court of Justice - Opinion C -231/11 -N77 : point 39
  
• Court of Justice - Opinion C -231/11 -N78 : points 39, 46
  
• Court of Justice - Opinion C -231/11 -N79 : point 39
  
• Court of Justice - Opinion C -231/11 -N80 : point 39
  
• Court of Justice - Opinion C -231/11 -N81 : point 39
  
• Court of Justice - Opinion C -231/11 -N82 : point 39
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -231/11 -N56 : point 46
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -440/11 -N38 : point 34
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -444/11 : point 73
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -448/11 -N22 : point 65
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -508/11 -N64 : point 43
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -508/11 -N81 : point 47
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -508/11 -N82 : point 47
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -172/12 : point 42
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -179/12 : point 42
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -243/12 : point 31
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -557/12 -N21 : point 61
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -557/12 -N22 : point 61
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -557/12 -N23 : point 61
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -93/13 -N40 : point 34
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -93/13 -N89 : point 46
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -93/13 -N92 : point 53
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -352/13 -N56 : point 68
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -434/13 -N40 : point 65
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -625/13 : point 31
  
• General Court - Judgment T -92/13 : point 29
  
• General Court - Judgment T -104/13 : point 42
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -155/14 : point 31
  
• General Court - Judgment T -419/14 : point 31
  
• General Court - Judgment T -419/14 -N82 : point 29
  
• General Court - Judgment T -419/14 -N83 : point 43
  
• General Court - Judgment T -419/14 -N152 : point 43
  
• General Court - Judgment T -451/14 -N48 : point 44
  
• General Court - Judgment T -677/14 : point 53
  
• General Court - Judgment T -677/14 -N209 : point 53
  
• General Court - Judgment T -677/14 -N217 : point 53
  
• General Court - Judgment T -677/14 -N218 : point 53
  
• General Court - Judgment T -677/14 -N220 : point 53
  
• General Court - Judgment T -677/14 -N222 : point 53
  
• General Court - Judgment T -677/14 -N225 : point 53
  
• General Court - Judgment T -677/14 -N227 : point 53
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -490/15 : points 29, 43
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -490/15 -N60 : point 44
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -516/15 : points 44, 63
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -516/15 -N49 : points 35, 46
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -516/15 -N51 : point 72
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -516/15 -N56 : points 34, 46
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -516/15 -N57 : points 46, 72
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -516/15 -N59 : point 37
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -516/15 -N77 : point 46
  
• Court of Justice - Opinion C -637/17 -N60 : point 14
  
• Court of Justice - Opinion C -637/17 -N61 : point 14
  
• Court of Justice - Opinion C -637/17 -N62 : point 14
  
• Court of Justice - Opinion C -637/17 -N63 : point 14
  
• Court of Justice - Opinion C -637/17 -N64 : point 14
  
• Court of Justice - Opinion C -724/17 -N46 : point 67
  
• Court of Justice - Opinion C -724/17 -N47 : point 67
  
• Court of Justice - Opinion C -724/17 -N48 : point 67
  
• Court of Justice - Opinion C -724/17 -N49 : point 67
  
• Court of Justice - Opinion C -724/17 -N50 : point 67
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -349/17 -N49 : point 13
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -617/17 -N25 : point 71
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -637/17 -N24 : point 14
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -637/17 -N25 : point 14
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -637/17 -N26 : point 14
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -637/17 -N27 : point 14
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -637/17 -N28 : point 14
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -637/17 -N29 : point 14
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -637/17 -N30 : point 14
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -637/17 -N31 : point 14
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -637/17 -N32 : point 14
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -637/17 -N33 : point 14
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -637/17 -N34 : point 14
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -724/17 : point 63
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -724/17 -N25 : point 61
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -724/17 -N26 : point 61
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -724/17 -N27 : point 62
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -724/17 -N28 : point 62
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -724/17 -N29 : point 63
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -724/17 -N30 : point 63
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -724/17 -N31 : point 64
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -724/17 -N32 : point 64
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -724/17 -N36 : point 63
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -724/17 -N37 : point 63
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -724/17 -N38 : point 65
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -724/17 -N39 : point 65
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -724/17 -N40 : point 65
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -724/17 -N43 : point 61
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -724/17 -N44 : point 61
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -724/17 -N45 : point 60
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -724/17 -N47 : points 63, 76
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -451/18 -N37 : point 68
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -719/18 -N32 : point 17
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -719/18 -N33 : point 17
  

Dates

Date of the lodging of the application initiating proceedings

Information not available

Date of the Opinion

• 15/04/2021

Date of the hearing

Information not available

Date of delivery

06/10/2021

References

Publication in the Official Journal

Information not available

Name of the parties

Sumal

Notes on Academic Writings

1. Kadri, Aqeel ; Campbell, Scott: Subsidiary liability - the Provimi point answered? Sumal SL v Mercedes Benz Trucks España SL (C-882/19), European Competition Law Review 2021, n° 12, p. 686-690 (EN)
2. Bauermeister, Tabea: Zugehörigkeit zur wirtschaftlichen Einheit und wesentlicher Beitrag zur Umsetzung des Rechtsverstoßes : Sumal/Mercedes Benz Trucks España : C-882/19, Wirtschaft und Wettbewerb 2021 p. 559-562 (DE)
3. Idot, Laurence: Concurrence - Notion d'entreprise et action en réparation, Europe Europe 2021, nº 12 Décembre, comm. 450 (FR)
4. Kersting, Christian ; Otto, Jannik: Die Haftung der wirtschaftlichen Einheit. Teil 1, zugleich Anmerkung zum Urteil des EuGH in Sachen Sumal : C-882/19, Neue Zeitschrift für Kartellrecht 2021 p. 651-659 (DE)
5. Meier-Beck, Peter: Grundlinien der neueren Rechtsprechung des Kartellsenats des Bundesgerichtshofs : C-882/19, Wirtschaft und Wettbewerb 2021 p. 686-695 (DE)
6. Billard, Olivier ; Colombier, Quentin: Entente – Quand la fille pourrait être responsable du comportement anticoncurrentiel de sa mère, Revue Lamy de la Concurrence 2021, nº 108, p. 40-44 (FR)
7. Kersting, Christian ; Otto, Jannik: Die Haftung der wirtschaftlichen Einheit, Teil 2, zugleich Anmerkung zum Urteil des EuGH in Sachen Sumal : C-882/19, Neue Zeitschrift für Kartellrecht 2022 p. 14-19 (DE)
8. Gehann, Franziska: Ein Stern, der Deinen Namen trägt- : das Lkw-Kartell und die Unternehmenshaftung im europäischen Kartellrecht : zugleich Anmerkung zu EuGH, Urt. v. 6.10.2021, C-882/19 : Sumal, Zeitschrift für das Privatrecht der Europäischen Union - GPR 2022 p. 46-50 (DE)
9. Palzer, Christoph: Kartellzivile Haftung als “familiäre” Belastungsprobe : zugleich Anmerkung zu EuGH, 6. 10. 2021 : Rs. C-882/19, Sumal, Europäisches Wirtschafts- & Steuerrecht - EWS 2022 p. 23-30 (DE)
10. Kersting, Christian ; Otto, Jannik: Die Haftung der wirtschaftlichen Einheit. Teil 2 : zugleich Anmerkung zum Urteil des EuGH in Sachen Sumal : C-882/19, Neue Zeitschrift für Kartellrecht 2022 p. 14-19 (DE)
11. Robertson, Aidan: Sumal SL v Mercedes Benz Trucks Espana : another landmark Court of Justice judgment for cartel damages litigation : (C-882/19), European Competition Law Review 2022 p. 186-191 (EN)
12. Lepièce, Annabelle ; Vandenneucker, Marie: Arrêt « Sumal » : responsabilité civile d’une filiale en raison des pratiques anticoncurrentielles de sa société mère, Journal de droit européen 2022, nº 2, p. 60-63 (FR)
13. Rasking, Lauren ; Maes, Esther: The burden of family relations : how the subsidiary is held liable for competition law infringements of its parent company : C-882/19, Sumal, Revue de droit commercial belge 2022 p. 275-287 (EN)
14. Diop, Falilou: Unité économique et actions privées: l'extension aux filiales de la responsabilité consécutive au comportement anticoncurrentiel d'une société mère, Revue Lamy de la Concurrence : droit, économie, régulation 2022 nº 112 p. 17-22 (FR)
15. Korneeva, Olga V. ; VerLoren van Themaat, Weyer: Het Sumal-arrest : doorbraak in aansprakelijkheid van de onderneming voor mededingingsinbreuken : C-882/19, Nederlands tijdschrift voor Europees recht 2022 p. 68-73 (NL)
16. Tuinenga, Stefan: The road ahead for liability in damages actions : case C-882/19 Sumal, Journal of European Competition Law & Practice 2022 Vol. 13 nº 6 p. 416-418 (EN)
17. Cauffman, Caroline: Case C-882/19 Sumal SL v. Mercedes Benz Trucks España SL, Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law 2022, n° 4, p. 499-519 (EN)
18. Bosco, David: XII. Ententes, abus de position dominante et concentrations - Cour de justice, gde ch., 6 octobre 2021, SumalSL c/ Mercedes Benz Trucks EspañaSL, aff. C-882/19, ECLI:EU:C:2021:800, Jurisprudence de la CJUE 2021. Décisions et commentaires (Ed. Bruylant - Bruxelles) 2022, p. 571-574 (FR)
19. Idot, Laurence: Nouvel essor des actions en réparation, Revue trimestrielle de droit européen 2022, n° 4, p. 788-793 (FR)
20. Hornkohl, Lena: Die internationalzivilprozessualen Folgen der unionskartellrechtlichen Konzernhaftung : zu EuGH, 6.10.2021, Rs. C-882/19 : Sumal SL ./. Mercedes Benz Trucks España SL, Praxis des internationalen Privat- und Verfahrensrechts 2023 p. 254-263 (DE)
21. Ackermann, Thomas ; Rohr, Shazana: Die Bestimmung der unionsrechtlichen Bußgeldobergrenze in Konzernsachverhalten : Neuinterpretation nach Sumal? : [EuGH, Urt. v. 6.10.2021, C-882/19], Neue Zeitschrift für Kartellrecht 2023 p. 452-457 (DE)

Procedural Analysis Information

Source of the question referred for a preliminary ruling

Audiencia Provincial de Barcelona - Spain

Subject-matter

• Competition
  
• - Agreements, decisions and concerted practices
  

Provisions of national law referred to

Ley 15/2007, de 3 de julio, de Defensa de la Competencia, art. 71, 15/07/2007

Provisions of international law referred to

Information not available

Procedure and result

• Reference for a preliminary ruling
  

Formation of the Court

Grande chambre (Cour)

Judge-Rapporteur

Šváby

Advocate General

Pitruzzella

Language(s) of the Case

• Spanish
  

Language(s) of the Opinion

• Italian