Reports of Cases

published in the electronic Reports of Cases (Court Reports - general)

Subject-matter

Information not available

Systematic classification scheme

Citations of case-law or legislation

References in grounds of judgment

• Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU (2007), Article 47 : paragraph 84
• Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU (2007), Article 51 -P1 : paragraph 84
• TFEU, Article 21 -P1 : paragraph 61
• Directive 2004/38 : paragraphs 19, 21, 63, 70, 79
• Directive 2004/38 -A01 : paragraph 4
• Directive 2004/38 -A02 : paragraph 5
• Directive 2004/38 -A02PT2 : paragraph 54
• Directive 2004/38 -A03P1 : paragraphs 6, 43, 54, 58 - 60, 62, 63, 65, 68, 78
• Directive 2004/38 -A06 : paragraphs 7, 8, 48, 49, 74
• Directive 2004/38 -A06P2 : paragraphs 56, 61, 75
• Directive 2004/38 -A07 : paragraphs 7, 9, 49, 52, 74, 76
• Directive 2004/38 -A07P2 : paragraphs 37, 61, 65, 66, 68
• Directive 2004/38 -A08 : paragraph 7
• Directive 2004/38 -A09 : paragraph 7
• Directive 2004/38 -A10 : paragraph 7
• Directive 2004/38 -A11 : paragraph 7
• Directive 2004/38 -A12 : paragraph 7
• Directive 2004/38 -A12P2 : paragraphs 10, 66, 77
• Directive 2004/38 -A13 : paragraph 7
• Directive 2004/38 -A13P2 : paragraphs 11, 66, 77
• Directive 2004/38 -A14 : paragraphs 1, 7, 12, 49
• Directive 2004/38 -A15 : paragraphs 1, 7, 13, 49, 73, 77, 81, 83 - 85, 89
• Directive 2004/38 -A15P1 : paragraphs 71, 80, 86
• Directive 2004/38 -A15P3 : paragraphs 72, 88
• Directive 2004/38 -A27 : paragraphs 1, 14, 15, 43, 48 - 50, 53, 64, 65, 86, 87
• Directive 2004/38 -A28 : paragraphs 1, 14, 16, 43, 48 - 50, 53, 86, 87
• Directive 2004/38 -A30 : paragraphs 14, 17, 71, 81, 84, 86, 89
• Directive 2004/38 -A30P2 : paragraph 82
• Directive 2004/38 -A31 : paragraphs 14, 18, 43, 71, 81, 86, 89
• Directive 2004/38 -A31P1 : paragraph 84
• Directive 2004/38 -A31P2T3 : paragraph 82
• Directive 2004/38 -A31P3 : paragraph 85
• Directive 2004/38 -A31P4 : paragraph 82
• Directive 2004/38 -A35 : paragraphs 64, 65
• Directive 2004/38 -C5 : paragraph 3
• Directive 2004/38 -C23 : paragraph 3
• Directive 2004/38 -C24 : paragraph 3
• Directive 2004/38 -CH6 : paragraph 46
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -127/08 : paragraphs 44, 67
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -127/08 -N93 : paragraph 58
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -127/08 -N94 : paragraph 63
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -127/08 -N95 : paragraphs 64, 87
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -40/11 -N62 : paragraph 61
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -40/11 -N63 : paragraph 61
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -165/16 -N34 : paragraph 54
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -165/16 -N38 : paragraph 62
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -165/16 -N39 : paragraph 62
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -165/16 -N40 : paragraph 62
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -165/16 -N41 : paragraph 62
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -165/16 -N42 : paragraph 62
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -165/16 -N48 : paragraph 61
• Court of Justice - Opinion C -94/18 : paragraph 78

Operative part

• Interprets : Directive 2004/38 -A15
• Interprets : Directive 2004/38 -A30
• Interprets : Directive 2004/38 -A31

Opinion

• TFEU, Article 21 : point 40
  
• TFEU, Article 21 -P1 : points 46, 49, 58, 64, 79, 85
  
• Directive 2004/38 : points 10, 29, 41, 43, 44, 60, 71, 77, 79, 80, 84, 102
  
• Directive 2004/38 -A03 : points 3, 48
  
• 4932004L0038 -A03P1 : point 3
  
• Directive 2004/38 -A01LA : point 46
  
• Directive 2004/38 -A02P2 : point 47
  
• Directive 2004/38 -A02PT2 : points 48, 54
  
• Directive 2004/38 -A03 : points 48, 49
  
• Directive 2004/38 -A03P1 : points 30, 40, 47, 49, 50, 52, 55, 57, 59, 61 - 66, 68, 73, 75, 78, 95, 97, 100
  
• Directive 2004/38 -A05 : point 50
  
• Directive 2004/38 -A06 : points 33, 34, 72
  
• Directive 2004/38 -A06P1 : points 42, 65, 107
  
• Directive 2004/38 -A06P2 : point 100
  
• Directive 2004/38 -A07 : points 31, 34, 74
  
• Directive 2004/38 -A07P1 : point 49
  
• Directive 2004/38 -A07P1LB : points 40, 72
  
• Directive 2004/38 -A07P1LC : point 72
  
• Directive 2004/38 -A07P1LD : point 72
  
• Directive 2004/38 -A07P2 : points 25, 40, 49, 72, 100
  
• Directive 2004/38 -A07P4 : point 72
  
• Directive 2004/38 -A11P2 : point 62
  
• Directive 2004/38 -A12 : points 73, 75, 100
  
• Directive 2004/38 -A12P1L2 : point 74
  
• Directive 2004/38 -A12P2 : point 74
  
• Directive 2004/38 -A13 : points 73, 75, 100
  
• Directive 2004/38 -A13P1L2 : point 74
  
• Directive 2004/38 -A13P2 : point 74
  
• Directive 2004/38 -A14 : points 34, 73, 100
  
• Directive 2004/38 -A14P1 : points 5, 72
  
• Directive 2004/38 -A14P2 : points 5, 72, 74
  
• Directive 2004/38 -A14P4 : point 5
  
• Directive 2004/38 -A15 : points 1, 34, 42, 73 - 75, 81, 87 - 90, 97, 100, 101, 103, 105 - 107
  
• Directive 2004/38 -A15P1 : points 2, 6, 98, 99, 104
  
• Directive 2004/38 -A15P3 : points 2, 6, 85, 104
  
• Directive 2004/38 -A16P1 : points 49, 72
  
• Directive 2004/38 -A16P2 : point 49
  
• Directive 2004/38 -A27 : points 7, 30, 34, 41, 92 - 96
  
• Directive 2004/38 -A28 : points 30, 34, 41, 92, 96
  
• Directive 2004/38 -A30 : points 8, 97 - 99, 106, 107
  
• Directive 2004/38 -A31 : points 30, 97 - 99, 106, 107
  
• Directive 2004/38 -A31P1 : points 9, 31
  
• Directive 2004/38 -A31P3 : point 9
  
• Directive 2004/38 -A35 : point 95
  
• Directive 2004/38 -C1 : point 46
  
• Directive 2004/38 -C2 : point 46
  
• Directive 2004/38 -C3 : points 45, 46
  
• Directive 2004/38 -C4 : point 46
  
• Directive 2004/38 -C5 : point 86
  
• Directive 2004/38 -C11 : point 46
  
• Directive 2004/38 -C25 : point 86
  
• Directive 2004/38 -CH2 : point 70
  
• Directive 2004/38 -CH3 : points 70, 72
  
• Directive 2004/38 -CH6 : points 1, 31, 32, 42, 89, 91
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -370/90 -N25 : point 49
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -184/99 -N31 : point 45
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -109/01 : point 54
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -291/05 -N43 : point 87
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -291/05 -N45 : point 49
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -127/08 : points 52, 53, 59, 95
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -127/08 -N18 : point 60
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -127/08 -N19 : point 60
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -127/08 -N20 : point 60
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -127/08 -N21 : point 60
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -127/08 -N22 : point 60
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -127/08 -N23 : point 60
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -127/08 -N24 : point 60
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -127/08 -N25 : point 60
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -127/08 -N26 : point 60
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -127/08 -N27 : point 60
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -127/08 -N28 : point 60
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -127/08 -N29 : point 60
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -127/08 -N30 : point 60
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -127/08 -N31 : point 60
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -127/08 -N32 : point 60
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -127/08 -N33 : point 60
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -127/08 -N34 : point 60
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -127/08 -N35 : point 60
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -127/08 -N36 : point 60
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -127/08 -N37 : point 60
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -127/08 -N56 : point 103
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -127/08 -N59 : point 46
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -127/08 -N63 : points 60, 83
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -127/08 -N73 : points 54, 60
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -127/08 -N80 : point 54
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -127/08 -N82 : point 46
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -127/08 -N83 : point 86
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -127/08 -N84 : point 87
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -127/08 -N99 : point 55
  
• Court of Justice - View C-127/08 : point 53
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -434/09 -N33 : point 46
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -424/10 -N38 : point 72
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -40/11 -N63 : points 60, 83
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -40/11 -N68 : points 60, 83
  
• Court of Justice - Opinion C -456/12 -N68 : point 48
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -378/12 -N30 : point 72
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -456/12 -N35 : point 46
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -456/12 -N41 : point 46
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -456/12 -N45 : points 60, 83
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -456/12 -N61 : point 49
  
• Court of Justice - Opinion C -202/13 : point 50
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -202/13 -N31 : point 46
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -202/13 -N32 : point 87
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -202/13 -N33 : point 86
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -202/13 -N42 : point 50
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -165/14 -N73 : points 60, 83
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -218/14 -N74 : point 40
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -218/14 -N75 : point 40
  
• Court of Justice - Opinion C -165/16 -N48 : point 57
  
• Court of Justice - Opinion C -165/16 -N63 : point 57
  
• Court of Justice - Opinion C -165/16 -N86 : points 58, 64
  
• Court of Justice - Opinion C -165/16 -N87 : point 64
  
• Court of Justice - Opinion C -165/16 -N88 : point 64
  
• Court of Justice - Opinion C -165/16 -N89 : point 64
  
• Court of Justice - Opinion C -442/16 -N51 : point 72
  
• Court of Justice - Opinion C -442/16 -N52 : point 72
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -165/16 : points 52, 56, 59, 76
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -165/16 -N32 : point 48
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -165/16 -N37 : point 57
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -165/16 -N39 : point 57
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -165/16 -N41 : point 57
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -165/16 -N44 : point 57
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -165/16 -N48 : points 58, 60, 83
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -165/16 -N55 : point 64
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -165/16 -N56 : point 58
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -165/16 -N60 : point 58
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -165/16 -N62 : point 58
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -316/16 -N51 : point 72
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -673/16 : point 49
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -89/17 : point 49
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -621/18 -N64 : point 45
  

Dates

Date of the lodging of the application initiating proceedings

• 12/02/2018

Date of the Opinion

• 21/05/2019

Date of the hearing

Information not available

Date of delivery

10/09/2019

References

Publication in the Official Journal

Judgment: OJ C 383 from 11.11.2019, p.18

Application: OJ C 152 from 30.04.2018, p.15

Name of the parties

Chenchooliah

Notes on Academic Writings

1. Ritleng, Dominique: Scope and meaning of Article 15 of Directive 2004/38: Yes but no: Chenchooliah, Common Market Law Review 2020, n° 4, p. 1183-1200 (EN)
2. Eijken, Hanneke ; Kroeze, Hester H.C.: Beperkingen van het verblijfsrecht van EU-burgers en hun familieleden in de lidstaten van de EU : uit het oog, maar niet uit het hart?, Nederlands tijdschrift voor Europees recht 2020 p. 106-113 (NL)
3. Pfersich, Andreas: Unionsbürgerschaft, Recht der Unionsbürger und ihrer Familienangehörigen, sich im Hoheitsgebiet eines Mitgliedstaats frei zu bewegen und aufzuhalten, Begriff des Berechtigten, mit einem Unionsbürger verheirateter Drittstaatsangehöriger, Rückkehr des Unionsbürgers in den Staat seiner Staatsbürgerschaft, Freiheitsstrafe, Ausweisung des Drittstaatsangehörigen EZAR NF 14 Nr. 59 : Anmerkung, Zeitschrift für Ausländerrecht und Ausländerpolitik 2020 p. 198-199 (DE)
4. Réveillère, Vincent: Séjourner sur le territoire de l'Union (dans un autre État membre), Revue trimestrielle de droit européen 2020, n° 3, p. 734-739 (FR)

Procedural Analysis Information

Source of the question referred for a preliminary ruling

High Court (Irlande) - Ireland

Subject-matter

• Non-discrimination and citizenship of the Union
  
• - Citizenship of the Union
  
• - Right of entry and residence
  

Provisions of national law referred to

Information not available

Provisions of international law referred to

Information not available

Procedure and result

• Reference for a preliminary ruling
  

Formation of the Court

Grande chambre (Cour)

Judge-Rapporteur

Prechal

Advocate General

Szpunar

Language(s) of the Case

• English
  

Language(s) of the Opinion

• French