Reports of Cases
2007 II-00107
Subject-matter
Abuse of a dominant position -- Market for high-output Internet access services
Systematic classification scheme
|
1.
|
|
B-07.03.02.06 Hearing of persons concerned and of third parties / Access to the file
|
|
1.
|
|
B European Community (EEC/EC)
B-07 Competition
B-07.03 Implementation of the competition rules
B-07.03.02 Procedure for the application of the competition rules by the Commission
B-07.03.02.06 Hearing of persons concerned and of third parties / Access to the file
|
|
|
|
B-19.08.01 Admissibility and examination of applications, forms of order sought and pleas in law
|
|
|
|
B European Community (EEC/EC)
B-19 Legal proceedings
B-19.08 Procedural rules
B-19.08.01 Admissibility and examination of applications, forms of order sought and pleas in law
|
|
|
|
B European Community (EEC/EC)
B-07 Competition
B-07.03 Implementation of the competition rules
B-07.03.02 Procedure for the application of the competition rules by the Commission
B-07.03.02.08 Decision of the Commission
|
|
|
|
B European Community (EEC/EC)
B-07 Competition
B-07.03 Implementation of the competition rules
B-07.03.02 Procedure for the application of the competition rules by the Commission
B-07.03.02.09 Fines
B-07.03.02.09.02 Determining the amount of the fine
|
|
|
|
B European Community (EEC/EC)
B-07 Competition
B-07.02 Dominant position
B-07.02.02 Determination of the relevant market
B-07.02.02.01 Product or products constituting a market
|
|
|
|
B-07.02.03 Criteria for establishing the existence of a dominant position
|
|
|
|
B European Community (EEC/EC)
B-07 Competition
B-07.02 Dominant position
B-07.02.03 Criteria for establishing the existence of a dominant position
|
|
|
|
B European Community (EEC/EC)
B-07 Competition
B-07.02 Dominant position
B-07.02.04 Abuse of a dominant position
B-07.02.04.02 Examples of abuse
|
|
|
|
B European Community (EEC/EC)
B-07 Competition
B-07.02 Dominant position
B-07.02.04 Abuse of a dominant position
B-07.02.04.02 Examples of abuse
|
|
|
|
B European Community (EEC/EC)
B-07 Competition
B-07.02 Dominant position
B-07.02.04 Abuse of a dominant position
B-07.02.04.01 Definition of abuse
|
|
|
|
B European Community (EEC/EC)
B-07 Competition
B-07.03 Implementation of the competition rules
B-07.03.02 Procedure for the application of the competition rules by the Commission
B-07.03.02.09 Fines
B-07.03.02.09.02 Determining the amount of the fine
|
|
|
|
B European Community (EEC/EC)
B-07 Competition
B-07.03 Implementation of the competition rules
B-07.03.02 Procedure for the application of the competition rules by the Commission
B-07.03.02.09 Fines
B-07.03.02.09.02 Determining the amount of the fine
|
|
|
|
B European Community (EEC/EC)
B-07 Competition
B-07.03 Implementation of the competition rules
B-07.03.02 Procedure for the application of the competition rules by the Commission
B-07.03.02.09 Fines
B-07.03.02.09.02 Determining the amount of the fine
|
Citations of case-law or legislation
References in grounds of judgment
-
EC Treaty (Amsterdam), Article 81
: paragraph 281
-
EC Treaty (Amsterdam), Article 82
: paragraphs 25, 107, 139, 152, 154, 186, 195, 196, 217, 241 - 245, 250, 266
-
Treaty of Nice 2001 - Protocol on the Statute of the Court of Justice
-A21 : paragraph 166
-
Regulation 17/62
: paragraphs 278, 280
-
Regulation 17/62
-A11P4 : paragraph 277
-
Regulation 17/62
-A11P5 : paragraph 277
-
Regulation 17/62
-A14 : paragraph 281
-
Regulation 17/62
-A14P2 : paragraphs 280, 281
-
Regulation 17/62
-A14P3 : paragraph 281
-
Decision 85/609
: paragraph 179
-
General Court - Rules of Procedure (1991)
-A44P1LC : paragraph 166
-
Secondary Legislation - Document published in the OJ C series- 31997Y1209(01)
: paragraphs 81, 87
-
Secondary Legislation - Document published in the OJ C series- 31997Y1209(01)
-PT17 : paragraph 87
-
Secondary Legislation - Document published in the OJ C series- 31998Y0114(01)
: paragraphs 259, 281
-
Decision 2001/354
: paragraph 247
-
Decision 2001/354
-A02 : paragraph 250
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -6/72
: paragraphs 242, 266
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -40/73
: paragraph 152
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -73/74
: paragraph 57
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -27/76
: paragraphs 101, 185
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -85/76
: paragraphs 80, 100, 101, 109
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -100/80
: paragraphs 50, 272
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -322/81
: paragraphs 78, 99
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -62/86
: paragraphs 100, 130, 134, 178, 181, 195, 216, 224, 229, 243
-
General Court - Judgment T -12/89
: paragraph 277
-
General Court - Judgment T -65/89
: paragraph 185
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -52/90
: paragraph 167
-
General Court - Judgment T -83/91
: paragraphs 130, 134, 197, 216, 227, 229, 243
-
General Court - Order T -56/92
: paragraphs 166, 204
-
General Court - Order T -85/92
: paragraph 167
-
General Court - Judgment T -24/93
: paragraphs 104, 185, 196
-
General Court - Judgment T -317/94
: paragraph 277
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -333/94
: paragraphs 130, 134, 216, 224 - 226, 229, 243
-
General Court - Judgment T -25/95
: paragraphs 51, 272
-
General Court - Judgment T -86/95
: paragraphs 18, 36
-
General Court - Judgment T -213/95
: paragraph 251
-
General Court - Judgment T -221/95
: paragraph 100
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -7/95
: paragraphs 129, 163
-
General Court - Judgment T -65/96
: paragraph 78
-
General Court - Judgment T -84/96
: paragraph 167
-
General Court - Judgment T -111/96
: paragraph 186
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -395/96
: paragraph 242
-
General Court - Judgment T -228/97
: paragraph 196
-
General Court - Judgment T -45/98
: paragraphs 66, 234
-
General Court - Judgment T -65/98
: paragraph 99
-
General Court - Judgment T -31/99
: paragraph 30
-
General Court - Judgment T -219/99
: paragraph 78
-
General Court - Judgment T -203/01
: paragraphs 195, 282
-
General Court - Judgment T -310/01
: paragraphs 18, 36
Operative part
Information not available
Opinion
Information not available
Dates
Date of the lodging of the application initiating proceedings
Date of the Opinion
Information not available
Date of the hearing
Information not available
Date of delivery
30/01/2007
References
Publication in the Official Journal
Application: OJ C 289 from 29.11.2003, p.34
Judgment: OJ C 69 from 24.03.2007, p.17
Name of the parties
France Télécom v Commission
Notes on Academic Writings
- Gruber, Johannes Peter: Predatory Pricing (Kampfpreise) im europäischen Kartellrecht, MR-Int : europäische Rundschau zum Medienrecht, IP- & IT-Recht 2006 p.167-171 (DE)
- Arhel, Pierre: Activité des juridictions communautaires en droit de la concurrence (janvier 2007), Petites affiches. La Loi / Le Quotidien juridique 2007 nº 56 p.16-18 (FR)
- Philippe, Jérome ; Janssens, Thomas: Droit de la concurrence - Jurisprudence communautaire, Gazette du Palais 2007 nº 94-95 I Jur. p.19-21 (FR)
- Visser, M.: Zijn erg lage prijzen erg? De uitspraak van het GvEA in de Wanadoo-zaak, Actualiteiten mededingingsrecht 2007 p.51-56 (NL)
- Idot, Laurence: Abus de position dominante et prix prédateurs, Europe 2007 Mars Comm. nº 99 p. 21-22 (FR)
- Tassis, Spyros: Dikaio Meson Enimerosis & Epikoinonias 2007 p.137-139 (EL)
- Borba Lefèvre, C.: Wanadoo: hoe "exclusionary" moet een "abuse" zijn om onder artikel 82 EG-Verdrag te vallen?, Nederlands tijdschrift voor Europees recht 2007 p.55-59 (NL)
- Kavanagh, James: The France Telecom decision. Is the CFI's decision a victory for form-based competition law over effects-based tests?, Competition Law Insight 2007 Vol.6 Issue 4 p.10-12 (EN)
- Sibony, Anne-Lise: Les prix prédateurs entre la lettre de la jurisprudence et l'esprit du raisonnement économique, Petites affiches. La Loi / Le Quotidien juridique 2007 nº 113 p.15-22 (FR)
- Giannaccari, Andrea: Il caso Wanadoo, Mercato concorrenza regole 2007 p.109-117 (IT)
- Sélinsky, Véronique: Prédation: la possibilité de récupération des pertes n'est pas un préalable à la constatation d'une pratique de prix prédateurs, Revue Lamy de la Concurrence : droit, économie, régulation 2007 nº 11 p.29-30 (FR)
- Destours, Stéphane: Des avantages procurés à Wanadoo Interactive du fait de son adossement à France Télécom, Revue Lamy de la Concurrence : droit, économie, régulation 2007 nº 11 p.53-54 (FR)
- Adobati, Enrica: Diritto comunitario e degli scambi internazionali 2007 p.113-115 (IT)
- Di Rienzo, Alessandro: Bloccati dal Tribunale i prezzi predatori della France Télécom, Diritto pubblico comparato ed europeo 2007 p.1014-1017 (IT)
- Schuhmacher, Florian: Altes und Neues zur Kampfpreisunterbietung. Gleichzeitig eine Besprechung des Urteils des EuG v. 30.1.2007 - T-340/03 - France Télécom SA/Kommission, Zeitschrift für Wettbewerbsrecht 2007 p.352-368 (DE)
- Prieto, Catherine: Droit spécial du contrat. Les contrats aux effets prédateurs sur les concurrents, Revue des contrats 2007 p.776-781 (FR)
- Negrinotti, Matteo Pierangelo: La jurisprudence de la Cour de justice et du Tribunal de première instance. Chronique des arrêts. Arrêt "Wanadoo", Revue du droit de l'Union européenne 2007 nº 3 p. 735-746 (FR)
- Kalaϊtzis, D.: Evropaion Politeia 2007 p.1026-1028 (EL)
- Donnat, Francis: Chronique annuelle 2007 de jurisprudence communautaire, Revue juridique de l'Economie publique 2008 nº 655 p.12-13 (FR)
Procedural Analysis Information
Source of the question referred for a preliminary ruling
Information not available
Subject-matter
- Competition
- - Dominant position
Provisions of national law referred to
Information not available
Provisions of international law referred to
Information not available
Procedure and result
- Actions for annulment : dismissal on substantive grounds
- Actions for annulment : dismissal on grounds of inadmissibility
Formation of the Court
Cinquième chambre élargie (Tribunal)
Judge-Rapporteur
Dehousse
Advocate General
Information not available
Language(s) of the Case
Language(s) of the Opinion
Information not available