Judgment of the Court of First Instance (Fifth Chamber, extended composition) of 30 January 2007.

France Télécom SA v Commission of the European Communities.

Competition - Abuse of a dominant position - Market for services in high-speed Internet access - Predatory pricing.

Case T-340/03.



Top of the page Documents in the Case
Document Date Name of the parties Subject-matter Curia EUR-Lex Autres Liens
Judgment (OJ)
24/03/2007 France Télécom v Commission
Judgment
ECLI:EU:T:2007:22
30/01/2007 France Télécom v Commission
Judgment (Summary)
ECLI:EU:T:2007:22
30/01/2007 France Télécom v Commission
Application (OJ)
29/11/2003 France Télécom v Commission
Top of the page Legal analysis of the decision or of the case

Reports of Cases

2007 II-00107

Subject-matter

Abuse of a dominant position -- Market for high-output Internet access services

Systematic classification scheme

1.
B European Community (EEC/EC)
  B-07 Competition
    B-07.03 Implementation of the competition rules
      B-07.03.02 Procedure for the application of the competition rules by the Commission
        B-07.03.02.06 Hearing of persons concerned and of third parties / Access to the file
B European Community (EEC/EC)
  B-19 Legal proceedings
    B-19.08 Procedural rules
      B-19.08.01 Admissibility and examination of applications, forms of order sought and pleas in law
B European Community (EEC/EC)
  B-07 Competition
    B-07.03 Implementation of the competition rules
      B-07.03.02 Procedure for the application of the competition rules by the Commission
        B-07.03.02.08 Decision of the Commission
B European Community (EEC/EC)
  B-07 Competition
    B-07.03 Implementation of the competition rules
      B-07.03.02 Procedure for the application of the competition rules by the Commission
        B-07.03.02.09 Fines
          B-07.03.02.09.02 Determining the amount of the fine
B European Community (EEC/EC)
  B-07 Competition
    B-07.02 Dominant position
      B-07.02.02 Determination of the relevant market
        B-07.02.02.01 Product or products constituting a market
B European Community (EEC/EC)
  B-07 Competition
    B-07.02 Dominant position
      B-07.02.03 Criteria for establishing the existence of a dominant position
B European Community (EEC/EC)
  B-07 Competition
    B-07.02 Dominant position
      B-07.02.04 Abuse of a dominant position
        B-07.02.04.02 Examples of abuse
B European Community (EEC/EC)
  B-07 Competition
    B-07.02 Dominant position
      B-07.02.04 Abuse of a dominant position
        B-07.02.04.02 Examples of abuse
B European Community (EEC/EC)
  B-07 Competition
    B-07.02 Dominant position
      B-07.02.04 Abuse of a dominant position
        B-07.02.04.01 Definition of abuse
B European Community (EEC/EC)
  B-07 Competition
    B-07.03 Implementation of the competition rules
      B-07.03.02 Procedure for the application of the competition rules by the Commission
        B-07.03.02.09 Fines
          B-07.03.02.09.02 Determining the amount of the fine
B European Community (EEC/EC)
  B-07 Competition
    B-07.03 Implementation of the competition rules
      B-07.03.02 Procedure for the application of the competition rules by the Commission
        B-07.03.02.09 Fines
          B-07.03.02.09.02 Determining the amount of the fine
B European Community (EEC/EC)
  B-07 Competition
    B-07.03 Implementation of the competition rules
      B-07.03.02 Procedure for the application of the competition rules by the Commission
        B-07.03.02.09 Fines
          B-07.03.02.09.02 Determining the amount of the fine


Citations of case-law or legislation

References in grounds of judgment

Operative part

Information not available

Opinion

Information not available


Dates

Date of the lodging of the application initiating proceedings

  • 02/10/2003

Date of the Opinion

Information not available

Date of the hearing

Information not available

Date of delivery

30/01/2007


References

Publication in the Official Journal

Application: OJ C 289 from 29.11.2003, p.34

Judgment: OJ C 69 from 24.03.2007, p.17

Name of the parties

France Télécom v Commission

Notes on Academic Writings

  1. Gruber, Johannes Peter: Predatory Pricing (Kampfpreise) im europäischen Kartellrecht, MR-Int : europäische Rundschau zum Medienrecht, IP- & IT-Recht 2006 p.167-171 (DE)
  2. Arhel, Pierre: Activité des juridictions communautaires en droit de la concurrence (janvier 2007), Petites affiches. La Loi / Le Quotidien juridique 2007 nº 56 p.16-18 (FR)
  3. Philippe, Jérome ; Janssens, Thomas: Droit de la concurrence - Jurisprudence communautaire, Gazette du Palais 2007 nº 94-95 I Jur. p.19-21 (FR)
  4. Visser, M.: Zijn erg lage prijzen erg? De uitspraak van het GvEA in de Wanadoo-zaak, Actualiteiten mededingingsrecht 2007 p.51-56 (NL)
  5. Idot, Laurence: Abus de position dominante et prix prédateurs, Europe 2007 Mars Comm. nº 99 p. 21-22 (FR)
  6. Tassis, Spyros: Dikaio Meson Enimerosis & Epikoinonias 2007 p.137-139 (EL)
  7. Borba Lefèvre, C.: Wanadoo: hoe "exclusionary" moet een "abuse" zijn om onder artikel 82 EG-Verdrag te vallen?, Nederlands tijdschrift voor Europees recht 2007 p.55-59 (NL)
  8. Kavanagh, James: The France Telecom decision. Is the CFI's decision a victory for form-based competition law over effects-based tests?, Competition Law Insight 2007 Vol.6 Issue 4 p.10-12 (EN)
  9. Sibony, Anne-Lise: Les prix prédateurs entre la lettre de la jurisprudence et l'esprit du raisonnement économique, Petites affiches. La Loi / Le Quotidien juridique 2007 nº 113 p.15-22 (FR)
  10. Giannaccari, Andrea: Il caso Wanadoo, Mercato concorrenza regole 2007 p.109-117 (IT)
  11. Sélinsky, Véronique: Prédation: la possibilité de récupération des pertes n'est pas un préalable à la constatation d'une pratique de prix prédateurs, Revue Lamy de la Concurrence : droit, économie, régulation 2007 nº 11 p.29-30 (FR)
  12. Destours, Stéphane: Des avantages procurés à Wanadoo Interactive du fait de son adossement à France Télécom, Revue Lamy de la Concurrence : droit, économie, régulation 2007 nº 11 p.53-54 (FR)
  13. Adobati, Enrica: Diritto comunitario e degli scambi internazionali 2007 p.113-115 (IT)
  14. Di Rienzo, Alessandro: Bloccati dal Tribunale i prezzi predatori della France Télécom, Diritto pubblico comparato ed europeo 2007 p.1014-1017 (IT)
  15. Schuhmacher, Florian: Altes und Neues zur Kampfpreisunterbietung. Gleichzeitig eine Besprechung des Urteils des EuG v. 30.1.2007 - T-340/03 - France Télécom SA/Kommission, Zeitschrift für Wettbewerbsrecht 2007 p.352-368 (DE)
  16. Prieto, Catherine: Droit spécial du contrat. Les contrats aux effets prédateurs sur les concurrents, Revue des contrats 2007 p.776-781 (FR)
  17. Negrinotti, Matteo Pierangelo: La jurisprudence de la Cour de justice et du Tribunal de première instance. Chronique des arrêts. Arrêt "Wanadoo", Revue du droit de l'Union européenne 2007 nº 3 p. 735-746 (FR)
  18. Kalaϊtzis, D.: Evropaion Politeia 2007 p.1026-1028 (EL)
  19. Donnat, Francis: Chronique annuelle 2007 de jurisprudence communautaire, Revue juridique de l'Economie publique 2008 nº 655 p.12-13 (FR)



Procedural Analysis Information

Source of the question referred for a preliminary ruling

Information not available

Subject-matter

  • Competition
  • - Dominant position

Provisions of national law referred to

Information not available

Provisions of international law referred to

Information not available

Procedure and result

  • Actions for annulment : dismissal on substantive grounds
  • Actions for annulment : dismissal on grounds of inadmissibility

Formation of the Court

Cinquième chambre élargie (Tribunal)

Judge-Rapporteur

Dehousse

Advocate General

Information not available

Language(s) of the Case

  • French

Language(s) of the Opinion

    Information not available