Judgment of the Court of First Instance (Second Chamber) of 15 September 1998.

European Night Services Ltd (ENS), Eurostar (UK) Ltd, formerly European Passenger Services Ltd (EPS), Union internationale des chemins de fer (UIC), NV Nederlandse Spoorwegen (NS) and Société nationale des chemins de fer français (SNCF) v Commission of the European Communities.

Competition - Transport by rail - Agreements on overnight rail services through the Channel Tunnel - Restrictions on competition - Directive 91/440/EEC - Appreciable effect on trade - Supply of necessary services - 'Essential facilities' - Statement of reasons - Admissibility.

Joined cases T-374/94, T-375/94, T-384/94 and T-388/94.


Top of the page Documents in the Case
Document Date Name of the parties Subject-matter Curia EUR-Lex Autres Liens
Judgment
ECLI:EU:T:1998:198
15/09/1998 European Night Services and Others v Commission
Judgment (Summary)
ECLI:EU:T:1998:198
15/09/1998 European Night Services and Others v Commission
Top of the page Legal analysis of the decision or of the case

Reports of Cases

1998 II-03141

Subject-matter

Annulment of Commission Decision 94/663/EC relating to a proceeding pursuant to Article 85 of the EC Treaty and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement (IV/34.600 ─ Night Services) ─ Night train services for transporting travellers by the Channel Tunnel

Systematic classification scheme

1.
B European Community (EEC/EC)
  B-19 Legal proceedings
    B-19.02 Actions for annulment
      B-19.02.00 General
B European Community (EEC/EC)
  B-20 Acts of the institutions
    B-20.03 Decisions
      B-20.03.03 Notification
B European Community (EEC/EC)
  B-07 Competition
    B-07.03 Implementation of the competition rules
      B-07.03.02 Procedure for the application of the competition rules by the Commission
        B-07.03.02.08 Decision of the Commission
B European Community (EEC/EC)
  B-20 Acts of the institutions
    B-20.05 Statement of reasons
B European Community (EEC/EC)
  B-07 Competition
    B-07.01 Agreements, decisions and concerted practices
      B-07.01.01 Prohibition of agreements, decisions and concerted practices
        B-07.01.01.02 Restriction of competition
B European Community (EEC/EC)
  B-06 Transport
    B-06.06 Competition rules
B European Community (EEC/EC)
  B-06 Transport
    B-06.06 Competition rules
B European Community (EEC/EC)
  B-07 Competition
    B-07.01 Agreements, decisions and concerted practices
      B-07.01.03 Exemption from the prohibition
        B-07.01.03.01 Conditions for exemption
B European Community (EEC/EC)
  B-07 Competition
    B-07.01 Agreements, decisions and concerted practices
      B-07.01.03 Exemption from the prohibition
        B-07.01.03.01 Conditions for exemption


Citations of case-law or legislation

References in grounds of judgment

Operative part

Opinion

Information not available


Dates

Date of the lodging of the application initiating proceedings

Information not available

Date of the Opinion

Information not available

Date of the hearing

Information not available

Date of delivery

15/09/1998


References

Publication in the Official Journal

Applications: OJ C 392 from 31.12.1994, p.8 ; OJ C 386 from 31.12.1994, p.23

Judgment: OJ C 340 from 07.11.1998, p.15

Name of the parties

European Night Services and Others v Commission

Notes on Academic Writings

  1. Von Fragstein, Udo: Anforderungen an die Begründung einer Kommissionsentscheidung bei Verfahren nach Art. 85 EGV, European Law Reporter 1998 p.444-445 (DE)
  2. Bernaerts, Inge: Gerecht tikt Commissie stevig op de vingers in zaak liberalisering spoorwegen, Nederlandse staatscourant 1998 nº 216 p.2 (NL)
  3. Idot, Laurence: Europe 1998 Novembre Comm. nº 377 p.17-18 (FR)
  4. Poillot-Peruzzetto, Sylvaine: Contrats - concurrence - consommation 1998 nº 165 p.15-16 (FR)
  5. Loozen, E.M.H. ; Mortelmans, K.J.M.: Mededinging in de Kanaaltunnel? De Europese Commissie is ontspoord!, Ars aequi 1999 p.183-193 (NL)
  6. Hermitte, Marie-Angèle: Chronique de jurisprudence du Tribunal et de la Cour de justice des Communautés européennes, Journal du droit international 1999 p.590-594 (FR)
  7. X: Jurisprudence de la Cour de justice et du Tribunal de première instance des Communautés européennes. Trib. prem. inst. C.E. (2e ch.), 15 septembre 1998: European Night Services Ltd (ENS) et autres (aff. T-374/94, 375/94 et 388/94), Petites affiches. La Loi / Le Quotidien juridique 2000 nº 27 p.15-16 (FR)
  8. Stehmann, Oliver: Applying "Essential Facility" Reasoning to Passenger Rail Services in the EU - the Commission Decision in the Case GVG, European Competition Law Review 2004 p.390-394 (EN)
  9. Korah, Valentine: European Night Services, the First Judgment on a Joint Venture Adopted a Realistic Approach to Effects on Competition, Competition Law Journal (Ed. Jordans - Bristol) 2007 (EN)



Procedural Analysis Information

Source of the question referred for a preliminary ruling

Information not available

Subject-matter

  • Competition
  • - Agreements, decisions and concerted practices
  • Transport

Provisions of national law referred to

Information not available

Provisions of international law referred to

Information not available

Procedure and result

  • Actions for annulment : application granted

Formation of the Court

Deuxième chambre (Tribunal)

Judge-Rapporteur

Kalogeropoulos

Advocate General

Information not available

Language(s) of the Case

  • English, French

Language(s) of the Opinion

    Information not available