Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 21 November 2013

Recaro Holding GmbH, formerly Recaro Beteiligungs-GmbH v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Community trade mark — Revocation proceedings — Community word mark RECARO — Genuine use of the mark — Article 15(1), second subparagraph, (a) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 — Nature of the use of the mark — Admissibility of new evidence — Article 76(2) of Regulation No 207/2009 — Obligation to state reasons — Article 75 of Regulation No 207/2009

Case T‑524/12



Top of the page Documents in the Case
Document Date Name of the parties Subject-matter Curia EUR-Lex Autres Liens
Judgment (OJ)
13/12/2013 Recaro v OHMI - Certino Mode (RECARO)
Intellectual, industrial and commercial property
- Trade marks
  • Intellectual, industrial and commercial property
  • - Trade marks
View pdf documents
Judgment
ECLI:EU:T:2013:604		 21/11/2013 Recaro v OHMI - Certino Mode (RECARO)
Intellectual, industrial and commercial property
- Trade marks
  • Intellectual, industrial and commercial property
  • - Trade marks
Available in :
EUR-Lex text EUR-Lex bilingual text
Judgment (Information)
ECLI:EU:T:2013:604		 21/11/2013 Recaro v OHMI - Certino Mode (RECARO)
Intellectual, industrial and commercial property
- Trade marks
  • Intellectual, industrial and commercial property
  • - Trade marks
EUR-Lex text EUR-Lex bilingual text
Application (OJ)
18/01/2013 Recaro v OHMI - Certino Mode (RECARO)
Intellectual, industrial and commercial property
- Trade marks
  • Intellectual, industrial and commercial property
  • - Trade marks
View pdf documents
Top of the page Legal analysis of the decision or of the case

Reports of Cases

published in the electronic Reports of Cases (Court Reports - general - 'Information on unpublished decisions' section)

Subject-matter

Information not available

Systematic classification scheme

1.
-
4 Internal policy of the European Union
  4.11 Approximation of laws
    4.11.03 European Union trade mark
      4.11.03.03 Other questions of substantive law
        4.11.03.03.02 Genuine use of a mark
          4.11.03.03.02.01 Concept and criteria for assessment
-
4 Internal policy of the European Union
  4.11 Approximation of laws
    4.11.03 European Union trade mark
      4.11.03.03 Other questions of substantive law
        4.11.03.03.02 Genuine use of a mark
          4.11.03.03.02.05 Signs examined
-
4 Internal policy of the European Union
  4.11 Approximation of laws
    4.11.03 European Union trade mark
      4.11.03.04 Procedure and legal proceedings
        4.11.03.04.03 Appeals
          4.11.03.04.03.01 Appeals before the Boards of Appeal
-
4 Internal policy of the European Union
  4.11 Approximation of laws
    4.11.03 European Union trade mark
      4.11.03.04 Procedure and legal proceedings
        4.11.03.04.04 Procedure
          4.11.03.04.04.07 Statement of reasons


Citations of case-law or legislation

References in grounds of judgment

Operative part

Information not available

Opinion

Information not available


Dates

Date of the lodging of the application initiating proceedings

  • 03/12/2012

Date of the Opinion

Information not available

Date of the hearing

Information not available

Date of delivery

21/11/2013


References

Publication in the Official Journal

Application: OJ C 32 from 02.02.2013, p.23

Judgment: OJ C 9 from 11.01.2014, p.23

Name of the parties

Recaro v OHMI - Certino Mode (RECARO)

Notes on Academic Writings

Information not available



Procedural Analysis Information

Source of the question referred for a preliminary ruling

Information not available

Subject-matter

  • Intellectual, industrial and commercial property
  • - Trade marks

Provisions of national law referred to

Information not available

Provisions of international law referred to

Information not available

Procedure and result

  • Actions for annulment : dismissal on substantive grounds

Formation of the Court

Septième chambre (Tribunal)

Judge-Rapporteur

van der Woude

Advocate General

Information not available

Language(s) of the Case

  • English

Language(s) of the Opinion

    Information not available