Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 26 March 2019

Clestra Hauserman v European Parliament

Public works contracts — Tendering procedure — Works relating to the ‘Removable partitioning — doors’ of the project to extend and modernise the Parliament’s Konrad Adenauer Building in Luxembourg — Rejection of a tenderer’s bid — Award of the contract to another tenderer — Obligation to state reasons — Abnormally low tender — Manifest error of assessment — Non-contractual liability

Case T-725/17


Top of the page Documents in the Case
Document Date Name of the parties Subject-matter Curia EUR-Lex Autres Liens
Judgment (OJ)
26/04/2019 Clestra Hauserman v Parliament
European Union public contracts
  • European Union public contracts
EUR-Lex text EUR-Lex bilingual text
Judgment
ECLI:EU:T:2019:190		 26/03/2019 Clestra Hauserman v Parliament
European Union public contracts
  • European Union public contracts
Available in :
EUR-Lex text EUR-Lex bilingual text
Judgment (Information)
ECLI:EU:T:2019:190		 26/03/2019 Clestra Hauserman v Parliament
European Union public contracts
  • European Union public contracts
EUR-Lex text EUR-Lex bilingual text
Application (OJ)
15/12/2017 Clestra Hauserman v Parliament
European Union public contracts
  • European Union public contracts
View pdf documents
Top of the page Legal analysis of the decision or of the case

Reports of Cases

published in the electronic Reports of Cases (Court Reports - general - 'Information on unpublished decisions' section)

Subject-matter

Information not available

Systematic classification scheme

1.
-
3 Legal proceedings
  3.02 Actions for annulment
    3.02.00 General
-
2 Institutional framework of the European Union
  2.08 Public procurement by the EU institutions
    2.08.01 Principles governing public procurement
      2.08.01.04 Obligation to state reasons
        2.08.01.04.01 Scope
-
2 Institutional framework of the European Union
  2.08 Public procurement by the EU institutions
    2.08.03 Conduct of procurement procedures
      2.08.03.07 Award of contract
        2.08.03.07.03 Abnormally low tenders
-
2 Institutional framework of the European Union
  2.08 Public procurement by the EU institutions
    2.08.05 Judicial review
      2.08.05.01 Extent of judicial review
-
2 Institutional framework of the European Union
  2.08 Public procurement by the EU institutions
    2.08.05 Judicial review
      2.08.05.04 Liability regime
        2.08.05.04.00 General


Citations of case-law or legislation

References in grounds of judgment

Operative part

Information not available

Opinion

Information not available


Dates

Date of the lodging of the application initiating proceedings

  • 24/10/2017

Date of the Opinion

Information not available

Date of the hearing

Information not available

Date of delivery

26/03/2019


References

Publication in the Official Journal

Judgment: OJ C 164 from 13.05.2019, p.44

Application: OJ C 13 from 15.01.2018, p.22

Name of the parties

Clestra Hauserman v Parliament

Notes on Academic Writings

Information not available



Procedural Analysis Information

Source of the question referred for a preliminary ruling

Information not available

Subject-matter

  • European Union public contracts

Provisions of national law referred to

Information not available

Provisions of international law referred to

Information not available

Procedure and result

  • Actions for annulment : dismissal on grounds of inadmissibility
  • Actions for annulment : dismissal on substantive grounds
  • Action for damages : dismissal on substantive grounds

Formation of the Court

Deuxième chambre (Tribunal)

Judge-Rapporteur

Costeira

Advocate General

Information not available

Language(s) of the Case

  • French

Language(s) of the Opinion

    Information not available