Reports of Cases

published in the electronic Reports of Cases (Court Reports - general)

Subject-matter

Information not available

Systematic classification scheme

Citations of case-law or legislation

References in grounds of judgment

• Directive 95/46 -A01 : paragraph 3
• Directive 95/46 -A01P1 : paragraph 25
• Directive 95/46 -A02 : paragraph 4
• Directive 95/46 -A02LA : paragraph 24
• Directive 95/46 -A02LD : paragraph 24
• Directive 95/46 -A05 : paragraphs 5, 25
• Directive 95/46 -A07 : paragraph 6
• Directive 95/46 -A07LF : paragraphs 1, 22, 23, 25 - 28, 34
• Directive 95/46 -A08P2LE : paragraphs 7, 29
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -275/06 -N53 : paragraph 29
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -275/06 -N54 : paragraph 26
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -275/06 -N55 : paragraph 26
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -92/09 -N86 : paragraph 30
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -468/10 -N40 : paragraph 31
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -468/10 -N44 : paragraph 32
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -473/12 -N39 : paragraph 30
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -212/13 -N28 : paragraph 30
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -582/14 -N62 : paragraph 31
• Court of Justice - Opinion C -13/16 : paragraphs 26, 29, 33

Operative part

• Interprets : Directive 95/46 -A07LF

Opinion

• Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU (2007), Article 7 : points 3, 67
  
• Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU (2007), Article 8 : points 4, 67
  
• TFEU, Article 16 -P1 : point 5
  
• Directive 95/46 : points 32, 33, 37, 38, 42, 45
  
• Directive 95/46 -A02 : point 6
  
• Directive 95/46 -A05 : point 7
  
• Directive 95/46 -A06P1 : point 8
  
• Directive 95/46 -A06P1LC : point 73
  
• Directive 95/46 -A07 : points 16, 39, 40, 48, 52, 55, 58, 64, 72
  
• Directive 95/46 -A07LA : point 56
  
• Directive 95/46 -A07LB : point 56
  
• Directive 95/46 -A07LC : points 41, 54, 56, 57
  
• Directive 95/46 -A07LD : point 56
  
• Directive 95/46 -A07LE : points 41, 54, 56, 57
  
• Directive 95/46 -A07LF : points 2, 29, 30, 34 - 36, 41, 43, 49 - 51, 53, 54, 56, 57, 59, 60, 62, 63, 66, 68, 76, 79, 80, 86, 90, 100
  
• Directive 95/46 -A08 : point 10
  
• Directive 95/46 -A08P2LE : points 11, 80
  
• Directive 95/46 -A08P5 : point 12
  
• Directive 95/46 -A08P7 : points 13, 88
  
• Directive 95/46 -A09 : point 9
  
• Directive 95/46 -A10 : point 66
  
• Directive 95/46 -A11 : point 66
  
• Directive 95/46 -A12 : point 66
  
• Directive 95/46 -A14 : point 14
  
• Directive 95/46 -A17 : point 66
  
• Directive 95/46 -A29 : point 64
  
• Directive 95/46 -C28 : point 73
  
• Regulation 46/95 -A07 : point 58
  
• Directive 2000/31 : point 46
  
• Directive 2001/29 : point 46
  
• Directive 2002/58 : point 45
  
• Directive 2004/48 : point 46
  
• Regulation 79/2016 -A06P1 : point 58
  
• Regulation 679/2016 : point 15
  
• Commission - COM Document (Draft Legislation) - 51990PC0314(01) : point 66
  
• Commission - COM Document (Draft Legislation) - 51992PC0422 : point 66
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -369/98 -N38 : point 90
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -465/00 -N100 : points 41, 73
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -465/00 -N101 : points 41, 73
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -465/00 -N99 : points 41, 73
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -275/06 -N54 : point 45
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -275/06 -N55 : point 45
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -275/06 -N57 : point 46
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -275/06 -N65 : point 46
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -275/06 -N68 : point 97
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -275/06 -N70 : point 46
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -524/06 -N67 : point 90
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -92/09 -N77 : point 65
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -92/09 -N86 : point 70
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -468/10 -N25 : point 38
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -468/10 -N38 : points 60, 67
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -468/10 -N40 : point 67
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -468/10 -N44 : point 69
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -468/10 -N47 : point 68
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -468/10 -N52 : point 41
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -131/12 : point 94
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -131/12 -N66 : point 38
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -131/12 -N74 : point 67
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -293/12 : point 94
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -212/13 : point 93
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -212/13 -N28 : point 70
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -212/13 -N64 : point 65
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -362/14 : point 94
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -582/14 -N62 : point 68
  
• Court of Justice - Order C -508/16 : point 93
  

Dates

Date of the lodging of the application initiating proceedings

• 08/01/2016

Date of the Opinion

• 26/01/2017

Date of the hearing

Information not available

Date of delivery

04/05/2017

References

Publication in the Official Journal

Judgment: OJ C 213 from 03.07.2017, p.11

Application: OJ C 111 from 29.03.2016, p.10

Name of the parties

Rīgas satiksme

Notes on Academic Writings

1. Dimitrova, Diana: Rigas satiksme: The Scope and Limits of Data Protection U, European Data Protection Law Review 2017 Vol. 3 p. 418 - 422 402 - 405 (EN)
2. Gazin, Fabienne: Protection des données personnelles, Europe 2017 Juillet Comm. nº 251 p.21 (FR)
3. Rostama, Guilda ; Malaty, Elsa: Les limites de l'intérêt légitime pour fonder une demande de communication de données, Dalloz IP / IT 2017 nº 10 p.552-555 (FR)
4. Soós, Andrea Klára: Az irányelv 7. cikkének f) pontját úgy kell-e értelmezni, hogy az kötelezővé teszi, hogy a személyes adatokat közöljék valamely harmadik féllel annak érdekében, hogy e fél polgári bíróság előtt az adatvédelemmel érintett személy által okozott kár megtérítése iránti keresetet indíthasson?, Infokommunikáció és jog 2017 nº 68 p.46-49 (HU)

Procedural Analysis Information

Source of the question referred for a preliminary ruling

Augstākā tiesa - Latvia

Subject-matter

• Approximation of laws
  
• Data protection
  

Provisions of national law referred to

Fizisko personu datu aizsārdzības likums, 2., 6., 7., 8., 10.panti Latvijas Republikas Satversme, 96.pants Iedzīvotāju reģistra likums, 2.pants

Provisions of international law referred to

Convention européenne de sauvegarde des Droits de l'Homme et des Libertés fondamentales (04/11/1950), article 8

Procedure and result

• Reference for a preliminary ruling
  

Formation of the Court

deuxième chambre (Cour)

Judge-Rapporteur

Rosas

Advocate General

Bobek

Language(s) of the Case

• Latvian
  

Language(s) of the Opinion

• English