Reports of Cases

published in the electronic Reports of Cases (Court Reports - general)

Subject-matter

Information not available

Systematic classification scheme

Citations of case-law or legislation

References in grounds of judgment

• Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU (2007), Article 10 : paragraph 27
• Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU (2007), Article 10 -P1 : paragraphs 1, 34, 46, 49, 51, 63, 75
• TFEU - Protocol No 3 -A23 : paragraphs 26 - 28
• TFEU, Article 17 : paragraph 74
• TFEU, Article 267 : paragraph 28
• Directive 95/46 -A01 : paragraph 4
• Directive 95/46 -A01P1 : paragraph 35
• Directive 95/46 -A02 : paragraph 5
• Directive 95/46 -A02LC : paragraphs 1, 20, 24, 27, 52, 54, 55, 57, 58, 62
• Directive 95/46 -A02LD : paragraphs 1, 21, 24, 27, 63, 65, 67, 68, 75
• Directive 95/46 -A03 : paragraphs 1, 6, 27
• Directive 95/46 -A03P1 : paragraphs 20, 36, 53, 54
• Directive 95/46 -A03P2 : paragraphs 34, 37, 51
• Directive 95/46 -A03P2T1 : paragraphs 19, 24, 34, 38, 39, 51
• Directive 95/46 -A03P2T2 : paragraphs 19, 24, 34, 40, 42, 43, 49, 51
• Directive 95/46 -A29 : paragraph 21
• Directive 95/46 -C10 : paragraphs 3, 35
• Directive 95/46 -C12 : paragraph 3
• Directive 95/46 -C15 : paragraphs 3, 53, 57
• Directive 95/46 -C26 : paragraphs 3, 24
• Directive 95/46 -C27 : paragraphs 3, 24, 53, 57
• Court of Justice - Rules of Procedure (2012) -A83 : paragraphs 25, 26, 28
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -101/01 -N43 : paragraph 38
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -101/01 -N44 : paragraph 38
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -101/01 -N47 : paragraph 42
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -284/06 -N44 : paragraph 28
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -73/07 -N41 : paragraph 38
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -73/07 -N44 : paragraph 42
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -73/07 -N46 : paragraph 37
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -131/12 : paragraph 21
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -131/12 -N66 : paragraph 35
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -212/13 -N29 : paragraph 37
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -212/13 -N30 : paragraph 40
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -212/13 -N31 : paragraphs 41, 42
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -212/13 -N33 : paragraphs 41, 42
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -73/16 -N36 : paragraph 38
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -73/16 -N37 : paragraph 38
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -73/16 -N38 : paragraph 37
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -74/16 -N24 : paragraph 31
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -74/16 -N25 : paragraph 31
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -210/16 -N26 : paragraph 35
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -210/16 -N28 : paragraph 66
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -210/16 -N29 : paragraph 65
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -210/16 -N38 : paragraph 69
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -414/16 -N58 : paragraph 74
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -426/16 -N44 : paragraph 47
• Court of Justice - Opinion C -25/17 : paragraphs 25, 26, 28, 29, 44

Operative part

• Interprets : Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU (2007), Article 10 -P1
• Interprets : Directive 95/46 -A02LC
• Interprets : Directive 95/46 -A02LD
• Interprets : Directive 95/46 -A03P2
• Interprets : Directive 95/46 -A03P2T1
• Interprets : Directive 95/46 -A03P2T2

Opinion

• Treaty of Amsterdam 1997 - Final Act, Declaration No 11 : point 34
  
• Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU (2007), Article 7 : point 44
  
• Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU (2007), Article 8 : point 44
  
• Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU (2007), Article 10 -P1 : points 45, 48, 50, 51
  
• Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU (2007), Article 52 -P3 : point 45
  
• TFEU, Article 17 : points 28, 32
  
• Directive 95/46 -A02 : point 4
  
• Directive 95/46 -A02LC : points 19, 21, 53, 55, 59, 74
  
• Directive 95/46 -A02LD : points 20, 21, 60, 63, 64, 69, 73, 74
  
• Directive 95/46 -A03 : point 5
  
• Directive 95/46 -A03P1 : points 53, 56, 59, 74
  
• Directive 95/46 -A03P2 : point 18
  
• Directive 95/46 -A03P2T1 : points 18, 21, 27 - 29, 31, 34, 35, 38
  
• Directive 95/46 -A03P2T2 : points 21, 27, 36, 37, 39, 42, 50 - 52, 74
  
• Directive 95/46 -A03P3T2 : point 19
  
• Directive 95/46 -A08P1 : points 6, 40
  
• Directive 95/46 -A08P2LD : point 34
  
• Directive 95/46 -C12 : points 2, 18, 39, 40
  
• Directive 95/46 -C18 : point 18
  
• Directive 95/46 -C26 : point 21
  
• Directive 95/46 -C27 : points 3, 21, 55
  
• Regulation 679/2016 -A02P1 : point 55
  
• Regulation 679/2016 -A02P2 : point 28
  
• Regulation 679/2016 -A02P2LA : point 28
  
• Regulation 679/2016 -A04P6 : point 55
  
• Regulation 679/2016 -A09P2LD : point 34
  
• Regulation 679/2016 -A91 : point 34
  
• Regulation 679/2016 -A99 : point 18
  
• Regulation 679/2016 -C165 : point 34
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -52/76 : point 26
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -52/76 -N10 : point 26
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -52/76 -N12 : point 26
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -52/76 -N14 : point 26
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -52/76 -N16 : point 26
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -52/76 -N19 : point 26
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -52/76 -N22 : point 26
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -83/91 : points 24, 25
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -83/91 -N26 : point 25
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -83/91 -N33 : point 26
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -266/96 -N27 : point 26
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -465/00 : point 18
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -465/00 -N43 : points 29, 56
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -465/00 -N68 : point 44
  
• Court of Justice - Opinion C -101/01 : point 42
  
• Court of Justice - Opinion C -101/01 -N36 : point 31
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -101/01 : points 18, 31, 32
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -101/01 -N42 : point 31
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -101/01 -N43 : point 30
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -101/01 -N44 : point 30
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -101/01 -N45 : point 31
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -101/01 -N46 : point 39
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -101/01 -N47 : point 39
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -467/04 -N44 : point 26
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -73/07 -N43 : point 39
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -73/07 -N44 : point 39
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -73/07 -N46 : point 29
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -73/07 -N53 : point 44
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -396/09 -N23 : point 26
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -131/12 : point 20
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -131/12 -N34 : point 63
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -131/12 -N38 : point 61
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -131/12 -N66 : points 29, 43
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -212/13 -N27 : point 29
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -212/13 -N28 : point 29
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -212/13 -N29 : point 44
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -212/13 -N31 : points 37, 39
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -212/13 -N33 : points 37, 39
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -362/14 -N92 : point 29
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -157/15 : point 34
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -188/15 : point 34
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -398/15 -N37 : points 29, 43
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -398/15 -N39 : point 44
  
• Court of Justice - Opinion C -210/16 -N44 : point 63
  
• Court of Justice - Opinion C -210/16 -N46 : point 69
  
• Court of Justice - Opinion C -210/16 -N62 : point 71
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -74/16 -N43 : point 34
  

Dates

Date of the lodging of the application initiating proceedings

• 19/01/2017

Date of the Opinion

• 01/02/2018

Date of the hearing

Information not available

Date of delivery

10/07/2018

References

Publication in the Official Journal

Judgment: OJ C 319 from 10.09.2018, p.7

Application: OJ C 86 from 20.03.2017, p.19

Name of the parties

Jehovan todistajat

Notes on Academic Writings

1. Ernst, Stefan: Zur Erhebung personenbezogener Daten in Papierform („Jehovan todistajat“), Entscheidungen zum Wirtschaftsrecht 2018 p.493-494 (DE)
2. Skubic, Zoran: Oznanjevanje vere od vrat do vrat je lahko nezakonita obdelava osebnih podatkov, Pravna praksa 2018 nº 39-40 p.36-37 (SL)
3. Petri, Thomas: Datenschutzrecht: Schutz der natürlichen Personen bei Verarbeitung personenbezogener Daten im Rahmen der Verkündigungstätigkeit der Zeugen Jehovas - EuGH (Große Kammer), Urteil vom 10.7.2018 - C-25/17 (Jehovan todistajat / Datenschutzkommission) - Anmerkung von Professor Dr. Thomas Petri, Europäische Zeitschrift für Wirtschaftsrecht 2018 p.897-903 (DE)
4. Simon, Denys: La collecte et le traitement de données personnelles par les Témoins de Jehovah dans le cadre des activités de prédication porte à porte sont soumis à la directive relative à la protection des données personnelles., Europe 2018 Octobre Comm. nº 10 p.15-16 (FR)
5. Gellert, Raphaël: Door-to-Door Preaching by Jehovah's Witnesses Community Falls under Data Protection Law, European Data Protection Law Review 2018 Vol. 4 p.391-395 (EN)
6. Perray, Romain ; Uzan-Naulin, Julie: Même Jéhovah est soumis au RGPD !, Dalloz IP / IT 2018 nº 12 p.698-701 (FR)
7. Thüsing, Gregor ; Rombey, Sebastian: Dateigebundene Verarbeitung und Datenverantwortung, Neue Zeitschrift für Arbeitsrecht 2019 p.6-11 (DE)
8. D’Ath, Florence ; De Smedt, Stéphanie: Arrêt « Jehovan todistajat » : témoins de Jéhovah et application de la législation sur la protection des données à caractère personnel, Journal de droit européen 2019, nº 256, p. 67-69 (FR)

Procedural Analysis Information

Source of the question referred for a preliminary ruling

Korkein hallinto-oikeus - Finland

Subject-matter

• Data protection
  
• Approximation of laws
  

Provisions of national law referred to

Information not available

Provisions of international law referred to

Information not available

Procedure and result

• Reference for a preliminary ruling
  

Formation of the Court

grande chambre (Cour)

Judge-Rapporteur

von Danwitz

Advocate General

Mengozzi

Language(s) of the Case

• Finnish
  

Language(s) of the Opinion

• French