Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 19 May 2022
HEITEC AG v HEITECH Promotion GmbH and RW
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesgerichtshof
Reference for a preliminary ruling – Trade marks – Directive 2008/95/EC – Article 9 – Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 – Articles 54, 110 and 111 – Limitation in consequence of acquiescence – Concept of ‘acquiescence’ – Interruption of the period of limitation in consequence of acquiescence – Sending of a warning letter – Date of interruption of the period of limitation in the event of a court action being initiated – Effects of limitation – Application for damages, the provision of information and destruction of goods
Case C-466/20
Reports of Cases
not yet published (Court Reports - general)
Links to the texts
|
Curia |
EUR-Lex |
Link |
Opinion
ECLI:EU:C:2022:25 |
|
|
|
Judgment
ECLI:EU:C:2022:400 |
|
|
|