GIURISDIZIONE CIVILE - STRANIERO (GIURISDIZIONE SULLO) - IN GENERE Società con sede in uno Stato dell’Unione europea - Controversie sulla validità delle decisioni degli organi sociali - Art. 24, comma 1, n. 2, del Regolamento UE n. 1215 del 2012 - Ambito di applicazione - Fattispecie.
| Integrale tekst |
sez. u ordinanza n. 5682 del 2020
- 426,11K
(pdf-document, wordt in een nieuw tabblad geopend)
|
|---|---|
| Titel van het perscommuniqué / de samenvatting | - |
| Nummer van het perscommuniqué / de samenvatting | - |
| Integrale tekst van het perscommuniqué |
rgue 1 civile sez. un. ordinanza 5682 2020 en
- 23,78K
(pdf-document, wordt in een nieuw tabblad geopend)
|
| ECLI-nummer | - |
| ELI-nummer | - |
| Oorspronkelijke taal van de beslissing | italien |
| Datum van het document | 26/10/2020 |
| Rechterlijke instantie die de auteur is | Corte suprema di cassazione (IT) |
| Materie |
|
| Materie volgens Eurovoc |
|
| Bepaling van nationaal recht | - |
| Aangehaalde bepaling van Unierecht | - |
| Bepaling van internationaal recht | - |
| Beschrijving |
United Civil Chambers, ruling [ordinanza] of 2 Mar. 2020 No 5682 Article 24(1)(2) of Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012 assigns to the courts of the Member State in which a company has its seat the jurisdiction over the matters concerning the validity of the decisions of its organs. Hence, it concerns exclusively proceedings challenging the validity of those decisions in the light of the applicable company law, or of the Company’s Statutes on the functioning of its organs. (The Supreme Court of Cassation, in application of this principle, excluded the applicability of this provision to an action for a declaration of nullity of the minutes of the company’s general meetings stating a sham increase in the company’s capital through a contribution of immovable property). |
