Decision of the Curia of Hungary in civil case no. Pfv.V.21.663/2017
| Úplné znění |
2018 10 bk unios vonatkozasu hatarozat hu
- 57,34K
(nová karta)
|
|---|---|
| Název tiskové zprávy / shrnutí | Summary of the decision of the Curia of Hungary in civil case no. Pfv.V.21.663/2017 |
| Číslo tiskové zprávy / shrnutí | - |
| Úplné znění tiskové zprávy |
2018 10 bk unios vonatkozasu hatarozat osszefoglalo en
- 33,28K
(nová karta)
|
| Číslo ECLI | - |
| Číslo ELI | - |
| Původní jazyk rozhodnutí | hongrois |
| Datum dokumentu | 06.02.2019 |
| Soud původu | Kúria (HU) |
| Oblast |
|
| Oblast EUROVOC |
|
| Citovaná ustanovení vnitrostátního práva | - |
| Citovaná ustanovení unijního práva | |
| Citovaná ustanovení mezinárodního práva | - |
| Popis |
The legal provision according to which the default interest rate applicable to the service provider has to be equal to the default interest rate applicable to the consumer and a market environment in which other service providers have not applied more favourable general contract terms either, do not mean that the defendant has not gained such unilateral and unjustified advantage which has been detrimental to the other contracting party. The Curia was of the opinion that the fact that the default interest rates were identical in respect of both parties did not counterbalance – with regard to the different conditions and impacts of their interest payment obligation – the disadvantage suffered by the consumer. Hence, the defendant was unable to rebut the presumption of the invalidity of the impugned general contract term. |
