Decision of the Curia of Hungary in civil case no. Pfv.V.21.663/2017
| Texto íntegro |
2018 10 bk unios vonatkozasu hatarozat hu
- 57,34K
(nueva pestaña)
|
|---|---|
| Título del comunicado de prensa / resumen | Summary of the decision of the Curia of Hungary in civil case no. Pfv.V.21.663/2017 |
| Número del comunicado de prensa / resumen | - |
| Texto íntegro del comunicado de prensa |
2018 10 bk unios vonatkozasu hatarozat osszefoglalo en
- 33,28K
(nueva pestaña)
|
| Número ECLI | - |
| Número ELI | - |
| Lengua original de la resolución | hongrois |
| Fecha del documento | 06/02/2019 |
| Tribunal autor | Kúria (HU) |
| Materia |
|
| Materia EUROVOC |
|
| Disposición de Derecho nacional | - |
| Disposición del Derecho de la Unión citada | |
| Disposición de Derecho internacional | - |
| Descripción |
The legal provision according to which the default interest rate applicable to the service provider has to be equal to the default interest rate applicable to the consumer and a market environment in which other service providers have not applied more favourable general contract terms either, do not mean that the defendant has not gained such unilateral and unjustified advantage which has been detrimental to the other contracting party. The Curia was of the opinion that the fact that the default interest rates were identical in respect of both parties did not counterbalance – with regard to the different conditions and impacts of their interest payment obligation – the disadvantage suffered by the consumer. Hence, the defendant was unable to rebut the presumption of the invalidity of the impugned general contract term. |
