Decision of the Curia of Hungary in civil case no. Pfv.V.21.663/2017
| Terviktekst |
2018 10 bk unios vonatkozasu hatarozat hu
- 57,34K
(uus vahekaart)
|
|---|---|
| Pressiteate / kokkuvõtte pealkiri | Summary of the decision of the Curia of Hungary in civil case no. Pfv.V.21.663/2017 |
| Pressiteate / kokkuvõtte number | - |
| Pressiteate terviktekst |
2018 10 bk unios vonatkozasu hatarozat osszefoglalo en
- 33,28K
(uus vahekaart)
|
| ECLI number | - |
| ELI number | - |
| Lahendi algkeel | hongrois |
| Dokumendi kuupäev | 06/02/2019 |
| Lahendi teinud kohus | Kúria (HU) |
| Valdkond |
|
| EUROVOCi valdkond |
|
| Riigisisese õiguse säte | - |
| Viidatud liidu õiguse säte | |
| Rahvusvahelise õiguse säte | - |
| Kirjeldus |
The legal provision according to which the default interest rate applicable to the service provider has to be equal to the default interest rate applicable to the consumer and a market environment in which other service providers have not applied more favourable general contract terms either, do not mean that the defendant has not gained such unilateral and unjustified advantage which has been detrimental to the other contracting party. The Curia was of the opinion that the fact that the default interest rates were identical in respect of both parties did not counterbalance – with regard to the different conditions and impacts of their interest payment obligation – the disadvantage suffered by the consumer. Hence, the defendant was unable to rebut the presumption of the invalidity of the impugned general contract term. |
