Decision of the Curia of Hungary in civil case no. Pfv.V.21.663/2017
| Full text |
2018 10 bk unios vonatkozasu hatarozat hu
- 57.34K
(new tab)
|
|---|---|
| Title of press release/summary | Summary of the decision of the Curia of Hungary in civil case no. Pfv.V.21.663/2017 |
| Press release No/summary | - |
| Full text of press release |
2018 10 bk unios vonatkozasu hatarozat osszefoglalo en
- 33.28K
(new tab)
|
| ECLI Number | - |
| ELI Number | - |
| Original language of the decision | hongrois |
| Date of the document | 06/02/2019 |
| Originating court | Kúria (HU) |
| Subject matter |
|
| EUROVOC topic |
|
| Provision of national law | - |
| Provision of EU law cited | |
| Provision of international law | - |
| Description |
The legal provision according to which the default interest rate applicable to the service provider has to be equal to the default interest rate applicable to the consumer and a market environment in which other service providers have not applied more favourable general contract terms either, do not mean that the defendant has not gained such unilateral and unjustified advantage which has been detrimental to the other contracting party. The Curia was of the opinion that the fact that the default interest rates were identical in respect of both parties did not counterbalance – with regard to the different conditions and impacts of their interest payment obligation – the disadvantage suffered by the consumer. Hence, the defendant was unable to rebut the presumption of the invalidity of the impugned general contract term. |
