Decision of the Curia of Hungary in civil case no. Pfv.V.21.663/2017
| Integrale tekst |
2018 10 bk unios vonatkozasu hatarozat hu
- 57,34K
(nieuw tabblad)
|
|---|---|
| Titel van het perscommuniqué / de samenvatting | Summary of the decision of the Curia of Hungary in civil case no. Pfv.V.21.663/2017 |
| Nummer van het perscommuniqué / de samenvatting | - |
| Integrale tekst van het perscommuniqué |
2018 10 bk unios vonatkozasu hatarozat osszefoglalo en
- 33,28K
(nieuw tabblad)
|
| ECLI-nummer | - |
| ELI-nummer | - |
| Oorspronkelijke taal van de beslissing | hongrois |
| Datum van het document | 06/02/2019 |
| Rechterlijke instantie die de auteur is | Kúria (HU) |
| Materie |
|
| Materie volgens Eurovoc |
|
| Bepaling van nationaal recht | - |
| Aangehaalde bepaling van Unierecht | |
| Bepaling van internationaal recht | - |
| Beschrijving |
The legal provision according to which the default interest rate applicable to the service provider has to be equal to the default interest rate applicable to the consumer and a market environment in which other service providers have not applied more favourable general contract terms either, do not mean that the defendant has not gained such unilateral and unjustified advantage which has been detrimental to the other contracting party. The Curia was of the opinion that the fact that the default interest rates were identical in respect of both parties did not counterbalance – with regard to the different conditions and impacts of their interest payment obligation – the disadvantage suffered by the consumer. Hence, the defendant was unable to rebut the presumption of the invalidity of the impugned general contract term. |
