Decision of the Curia of Hungary in civil case no. Gfv.VII.30.572/2018

Пълен текст 2019 01 pk unios vonatkozasu hatarozat hu - 2,09M PDF документ, отваря се в нов прозорец
Заглавие на прессъобщението/резюмето Summary of the decision of the Curia of Hungary in civil case no. Gfv.VII.30.572/2018
Номер на прессъобщението/резюмето -
Пълен текст на прессъобщението 2019 01 pk unios vonatkozasu hatarozat osszefoglalo en - 37,89K нов прозорец
Номер ECLI -
Номер ELI -
Оригинален език на акта hongrois
Дата на документа 29/01/2019
Юрисдикция автор Kúria (HU)
Област
  • Основни права
Област EUROVOC
  • международно частно право
  • преюдициално производство
  • компетенции на съда
Разпоредба на националното право -
Посочена разпоредба на правото на Съюза

https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/fr/TXT/?uri=CELEX:61993CJ0312

https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/fr/TXT/?uri=CELEX:62014CJ0169

https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/fr/TXT/?uri=CELEX:12012PTXT12012P/TXT

https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/fr/TXT/?uri=CELEX:62013CJ0464

https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/fr/TXT/?uri=CELEX:62010CJ0069

https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/fr/TXT/?uri=CELEX:61981CJ0283

https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/fr/TXT/?uri=CELEX:12012MTXT12012M/TXT
Разпоредба на международното право -
Описание

The Curia was of the opinion that the former Code of Civil Procedure’s rules excluding the possibility of requesting the judicial review of the impugned court ruling had not rendered the exercise of the defendants’ rights originating from Community law impossible or excessively difficult, hence, their right to effective judicial protection and to an effective remedy had not been violated. According to the Curia, part of the European Union provisions relevant to the proceedings and referred to in the defendants’ petition for judicial review has already been interpreted by the European Court of Justice, while the correct application of another part of such provisions – in light of the foregoing – was so obvious as to leave no scope for any reasonable doubt. Thus, the Curia was not under the obligation to make a reference for a preliminary ruling.