Decision of the Curia of Hungary in civil case no. Gfv.VII.30.572/2018

Texto íntegro 2019 01 pk unios vonatkozasu hatarozat hu - 2,09M (documento en PDF, abre una nueva pestaña
Título del comunicado de prensa / resumen Summary of the decision of the Curia of Hungary in civil case no. Gfv.VII.30.572/2018
Número del comunicado de prensa / resumen -
Texto íntegro del comunicado de prensa 2019 01 pk unios vonatkozasu hatarozat osszefoglalo en - 37,89K (nueva pestaña)
Número ECLI -
Número ELI -
Lengua original de la resolución hongrois
Fecha del documento 29/01/2019
Tribunal autor Kúria (HU)
Materia
  • Derechos fundamentales
Materia EUROVOC
  • Derecho internacional privado
  • procedimiento prejudicial
  • competencia jurisdiccional
Disposición de Derecho nacional -
Disposición del Derecho de la Unión citada

https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/fr/TXT/?uri=CELEX:61993CJ0312

https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/fr/TXT/?uri=CELEX:62014CJ0169

https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/fr/TXT/?uri=CELEX:12012PTXT12012P/TXT

https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/fr/TXT/?uri=CELEX:62013CJ0464

https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/fr/TXT/?uri=CELEX:62010CJ0069

https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/fr/TXT/?uri=CELEX:61981CJ0283

https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/fr/TXT/?uri=CELEX:12012MTXT12012M/TXT
Disposición de Derecho internacional -
Descripción

The Curia was of the opinion that the former Code of Civil Procedure’s rules excluding the possibility of requesting the judicial review of the impugned court ruling had not rendered the exercise of the defendants’ rights originating from Community law impossible or excessively difficult, hence, their right to effective judicial protection and to an effective remedy had not been violated. According to the Curia, part of the European Union provisions relevant to the proceedings and referred to in the defendants’ petition for judicial review has already been interpreted by the European Court of Justice, while the correct application of another part of such provisions – in light of the foregoing – was so obvious as to leave no scope for any reasonable doubt. Thus, the Curia was not under the obligation to make a reference for a preliminary ruling.