Decision of the Curia of Hungary in civil case no. Gfv.VII.30.572/2018

Visas tekstas	2019 01 pk unios vonatkozasu hatarozat hu - 2,09M (PDF dokumentas, atidaromas naujoje naršyklės kortelėje)
Pranešimo spaudai, santraukos pavadinimas	Summary of the decision of the Curia of Hungary in civil case no. Gfv.VII.30.572/2018
Pranešimo spaudai, santraukos numeris	-
Visas pranešimo spaudai tekstas	2019 01 pk unios vonatkozasu hatarozat osszefoglalo en - 37,89K (nauja naršyklės kortelė)
ECLI numeris	-
ELI numeris	-
Sprendimo originalo kalba	hongrois
Dokumento data	2019-01-29
Teismas autorius	Kúria (HU)
Sritis	Pagrindinės teisės<br />
EUROVOC sritis	tarptautinė privatinė teisė prejudicinio sprendimo priėmimo procedūra teismų kompetencija
Nacionalinės teisės nuostata	-
Cituojama Sąjungos teisės nuostata	https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/fr/TXT/?uri=CELEX:61993CJ0312 https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/fr/TXT/?uri=CELEX:62014CJ0169 https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/fr/TXT/?uri=CELEX:12012PTXT12012P/TXT https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/fr/TXT/?uri=CELEX:62013CJ0464 https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/fr/TXT/?uri=CELEX:62010CJ0069 https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/fr/TXT/?uri=CELEX:61981CJ0283 https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/fr/TXT/?uri=CELEX:12012MTXT12012M/TXT
Tarptautinės teisės nuostata	-
Aprašymas	The Curia was of the opinion that the former Code of Civil Procedure’s rules excluding the possibility of requesting the judicial review of the impugned court ruling had not rendered the exercise of the defendants’ rights originating from Community law impossible or excessively difficult, hence, their right to effective judicial protection and to an effective remedy had not been violated. According to the Curia, part of the European Union provisions relevant to the proceedings and referred to in the defendants’ petition for judicial review has already been interpreted by the European Court of Justice, while the correct application of another part of such provisions – in light of the foregoing – was so obvious as to leave no scope for any reasonable doubt. Thus, the Curia was not under the obligation to make a reference for a preliminary ruling.