Decision of the Curia of Hungary in civil case no. Gfv.VII.30.572/2018

Test sħiħ 2019 01 pk unios vonatkozasu hatarozat hu - 2.09M (dokument PDF, jiftaħ f’tab ġdida
Titolu tal-istqarrija għall-istampa / sunt Summary of the decision of the Curia of Hungary in civil case no. Gfv.VII.30.572/2018
Numru tal-istqarrija għall-istampa / sunt -
Test sħiħ tal-istqarrija għall-istampa 2019 01 pk unios vonatkozasu hatarozat osszefoglalo en - 37.89K (tab ġdida)
Numru ECLI -
Numru ELI -
Lingwa oriġinali tad-deċiżjoni hongrois
Data tad-dokument 29/01/2019
Qorti li hija l-awtur Kúria (HU)
Suġġett
  • Drittijiet fundamentali<br />
Suġġett EUROVOC
  • dritt privat internazzjonali
  • proċedura għal deċiżjoni preliminari
  • ġuriżdizzjoni
Dispożizzjoni tad-dritt nazzjonali -
Dispożizzjoni tad-dritt tal-Unjoni ċċitata

https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/fr/TXT/?uri=CELEX:61993CJ0312

https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/fr/TXT/?uri=CELEX:62014CJ0169

https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/fr/TXT/?uri=CELEX:12012PTXT12012P/TXT

https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/fr/TXT/?uri=CELEX:62013CJ0464

https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/fr/TXT/?uri=CELEX:62010CJ0069

https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/fr/TXT/?uri=CELEX:61981CJ0283

https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/fr/TXT/?uri=CELEX:12012MTXT12012M/TXT
Dispożizzjoni tad-dritt internazzjonali -
Deskrizzjoni

The Curia was of the opinion that the former Code of Civil Procedure’s rules excluding the possibility of requesting the judicial review of the impugned court ruling had not rendered the exercise of the defendants’ rights originating from Community law impossible or excessively difficult, hence, their right to effective judicial protection and to an effective remedy had not been violated. According to the Curia, part of the European Union provisions relevant to the proceedings and referred to in the defendants’ petition for judicial review has already been interpreted by the European Court of Justice, while the correct application of another part of such provisions – in light of the foregoing – was so obvious as to leave no scope for any reasonable doubt. Thus, the Curia was not under the obligation to make a reference for a preliminary ruling.